pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 16, 2021 13:48:35 GMT -5
You act like the medical community are idiots. You think those studies aren’t investigating this? Studies like this take time. In the meantime, people are getting sick and dying. And we have an excellent intervention to prevent that, today. You deal with the problem at hand, and change when new information becomes available. If it turns out your suspicions about prior infection is wrong, we will have more people die. The way out is vaccination, pure and simple. It will end this faster and save more lives. But the party of life does not care about that. They would rather own the libs and rail against the elites For the last time, and I know it is hard for you to get it, I believe in vacinations. Period. Now I wonder just how you spend so many hours here when you claim to be fighting the good fight in the medical field. Must be skimming the web while at work instead of paying attention to your profession. I am starting to wonder who you really are. I am currently eating lunch. Am I allowed to do what I want at lunch, or can I relax? I also will check in when I get a few moments, like when a patient does not show up despite being confirmed. But, how I spend my time is no matter to you. I am what I claim to be. If you are going to call me a liar, screw you
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 16, 2021 13:52:53 GMT -5
You act like the medical community are idiots. You think those studies aren’t investigating this? Studies like this take time. In the meantime, people are getting sick and dying. And we have an excellent intervention to prevent that, today. You deal with the problem at hand, and change when new information becomes available. If it turns out your suspicions about prior infection is wrong, we will have more people die. The way out is vaccination, pure and simple. It will end this faster and save more lives. But the party of life does not care about that. They would rather own the libs and rail against the elites For the last time, and I know it is hard for you to get it, I believe in vacinations. Period. Now I wonder just how you spend so many hours here when you claim to be fighting the good fight in the medical field. Must be skimming the web while at work instead of paying attention to your profession. I am starting to wonder who you really are. You believe in vaccination. Wonderful. Welcome to the 19th century. The problem is that your side is spreading disinformation and being obstinate when it comes to stopping the spread of the virus. I really do not care about your belief. If people who are refusing vaccination and ignoring mitigation methods would change their behavior, lives would be saved. Instead we continue to have over 1k deaths a day
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 16, 2021 16:17:37 GMT -5
You act like the medical community are idiots. You think those studies aren’t investigating this? Studies like this take time. In the meantime, people are getting sick and dying. And we have an excellent intervention to prevent that, today. You deal with the problem at hand, and change when new information becomes available. If it turns out your suspicions about prior infection is wrong, we will have more people die. The way out is vaccination, pure and simple. It will end this faster and save more lives. But the party of life does not care about that. They would rather own the libs and rail against the elites For the last time, and I know it is hard for you to get it, I believe in vacinations. Period. Now I wonder just how you spend so many hours here when you claim to be fighting the good fight in the medical field. Must be skimming the web while at work instead of paying attention to your profession. I am starting to wonder who you really are. VB- a few things:
I would call your attention to the word THEY above. I have noted recently your propensity to take stuff personally. I think you are making a mistake there. liberals like me are EXTREMELY frustrated. when I use the term THEY, I mean the anti-vaxxer, anti-mask community. there are plenty of leftists out there in that community. I don't think you are a leftist, but you seem to be getting very defensive when pmd levels a claim against THEM.
second, you SHOULD doubt who people really are on this board. I doubt who you are. I doubt who everyone is, here. no offense, but we are anonymous posters on a backwater board. you could be the King of Siam, or some dirty hobo. how would I know? I don't. so I take your posts at face value, and comment on them or ignore them. I think most people here do the same.
finally, I believe pmd is who he says he is. knowing people in the medical profession, they generally work long shifts and then get long breaks. I notice that pmd does not post every day, but even if he did, a 20 hour shift would allow for that. not that I really care. the information he brings to the discussion is generally spot on, in cases where I have researched it.
"doubting who you are" is ad hominem. it is irrelevant to the topic. if you have specific claims to make against him, you should do so, rather that insinuating that he is not the medical professional he claims to be.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 16, 2021 16:24:03 GMT -5
My favorite chart is Figure 18 where you can literally see covid sweep across the nation. Couldn't figure out how to post it here.
thank you! the link is awesome. yeah, excess mortality is the way to do this. because not every hospital will CORRECTLY diagnose the cause of death. when that is done, we will surpass 1M.
remember a year and a half ago, when OldCoyote called me to task for claiming that the death toll could be as high as 1M? he basically laughed me out of the room.
I am NOT laughing now. I am crying. but I was right. and he was dead wrong.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 16, 2021 16:29:14 GMT -5
www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/?fbclid=IwAR2uBN4t68ssk2c9o7bwC5lcPwXn7zy39HVGBS4kBCa_0Qv0S4ebeOo-4vwThis mornings totals 51,290,000 confirmed cases 823,000 deaths. Numbers, rounded downward. With that many confirmed cases in the country, I have to wonder when our government will start talking about the actual herd immunity there is in the country.I would "guess" half of the people who have had the virus have also now had the vaccination for a rough estimate on my part. Why will our government not do any analysis of these potential 25,00,000 citzens who are unvaccinated but survived the virus? Do unvaccinated people who have had the virus also transmit the delta virus at the same rate as vaccinated people do. We now know people who are double vaxxed and even have the booster can spread the virus, and I am assuming they are spreading the deadly delta virus since that is the primary one in the country, at least for another week or so. Instead of attacking the unvaccinated publicy, let the government do some analysis of all the groups. If 25,000,000 or more citizens are naturally immunized add them to the vaccinated number if they do not present a potential issue. when 85-95% of us have either been infected or vaccinated. right now, that number is quite a bit below that. so, if we get about half the unvaccinated population vaccinated, "the government" can talk about that.
the odds of that are zero, btw. so, we will have to wait for the virus to infect the unvaccinated, with all of the attendant loss that one can anticipate from that, first.
|
|
mollyc
Familiar Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 2:12:25 GMT -5
Posts: 927
|
Post by mollyc on Dec 16, 2021 16:44:27 GMT -5
Wrong yet again. Herd immunity is when viruses cannot be propagated in any significant fashion due to there being to few susceptible individuals being present. Do you see any signs of that happening? Hospitalizations and deaths continue to increase. That is not herd immunity. It will eventually happen. It will happen more quickly and at a lower cost in deaths and illness of people get vaccinated. If they do not, we will see over another 100k deaths. And you still want to give the unvaccinated a break? All the resources devoted to caring for the unnecessary victims(at this point) of the pandemic takes away from everyone else. In addition, we are spending a ridiculous amount of money caring for them. Money that should not need to be spent. So no, it is not time to give the unvaccinated a break. When deaths from Covid approach that of the flu(about 50k), then we can talk about herd immunity Again, you simply ignore the intent of my posts. I wonder why the government does not do any surveying of the people who have had covid. What does their bloodwork actually tell them? This is not a conspiracy theory here. It seems strange the government does not follow up on this issue. Who knows? Maybe the previously sick covid survivor's blood has some answers for us. Any particular government doesn't have to do such a survey. Various public health depts and research hospitals world wide have been collecting and reporting on all kinds of info re the vaccinated and non-vaccinated and have given public access to many reports. The issue if you look for this data is they may not have asked the exact question you want answered. I know because I was looking for similar answers last night for my sister. I'm not going to try to link anything with my phone. Going on my memory (which won't be exact), one U.S. study of 9000+ individuals who had severe covid found that less then 1% of them had severe covid again. Of that less then 1%, 6 people died. It doesn't say anything about how many of the original group were reinfected because that wasn't what that particular report was studying. Their data may have had more info but I didn't have time to look. And you can't say no one has studied the blood of infected people since one treatment tried was blood transfusions from infected people. Lunch is over so I have to go
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 16, 2021 17:31:04 GMT -5
Again, you simply ignore the intent of my posts. I wonder why the government does not do any surveying of the people who have had covid. What does their bloodwork actually tell them? This is not a conspiracy theory here. It seems strange the government does not follow up on this issue. Who knows? Maybe the previously sick covid survivor's blood has some answers for us. Any particular government doesn't have to do such a survey. Various public health depts and research hospitals world wide have been collecting and reporting on all kinds of info re the vaccinated and non-vaccinated and have given public access to many reports. The issue if you look for this data is they may not have asked the exact question you want answered. I know because I was looking for similar answers last night for my sister. I'm not going to try to link anything with my phone. Going on my memory (which won't be exact), one U.S. study of 9000+ individuals who had severe covid found that less then 1% of them had severe covid again. Of that less then 1%, 6 people died. It doesn't say anything about how many of the original group were reinfected because that wasn't what that particular report was studying. Their data may have had more info but I didn't have time to look. And you can't say no one has studied the blood of infected people since one treatment tried was blood transfusions from infected people. Lunch is over so I have to go Another study showed that infection followed by vaccination lead to better antibody levels and protection than infection alone. If we want to get through this, having people better protected is the goal
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 16, 2021 17:34:45 GMT -5
www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/?fbclid=IwAR2uBN4t68ssk2c9o7bwC5lcPwXn7zy39HVGBS4kBCa_0Qv0S4ebeOo-4vwThis mornings totals 51,290,000 confirmed cases 823,000 deaths. Numbers, rounded downward. With that many confirmed cases in the country, I have to wonder when our government will start talking about the actual herd immunity there is in the country.I would "guess" half of the people who have had the virus have also now had the vaccination for a rough estimate on my part. Why will our government not do any analysis of these potential 25,00,000 citzens who are unvaccinated but survived the virus? Do unvaccinated people who have had the virus also transmit the delta virus at the same rate as vaccinated people do. We now know people who are double vaxxed and even have the booster can spread the virus, and I am assuming they are spreading the deadly delta virus since that is the primary one in the country, at least for another week or so. Instead of attacking the unvaccinated publicy, let the government do some analysis of all the groups. If 25,000,000 or more citizens are naturally immunized add them to the vaccinated number if they do not present a potential issue. when 85-95% of us have either been infected or vaccinated. right now, that number is quite a bit below that. so, if we get about half the unvaccinated population vaccinated, "the government" can talk about that.
the odds of that are zero, btw. so, we will have to wait for the virus to infect the unvaccinated, with all of the attendant loss that one can anticipate from that, first.
Based on our previous experiences with coronaviruses, herd immunity, is unlikely. We get reinfected with coronaviruses all the time. But those other viruses cause the common cold. What needs to happen is that people have enough immunity or the virus mutates that infection does not lead to death or hospitalization. The reality of that is that everyone needs to be infected or vaccinated. I think achieving herd immunity as we were hoping was likely a pipe dream given our current understanding of this virus.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,894
|
Post by Tennesseer on Dec 17, 2021 11:33:42 GMT -5
www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/?fbclid=IwAR2uBN4t68ssk2c9o7bwC5lcPwXn7zy39HVGBS4kBCa_0Qv0S4ebeOo-4vwThis mornings totals 51,290,000 confirmed cases 823,000 deaths. Numbers, rounded downward. With that many confirmed cases in the country, I have to wonder when our government will start talking about the actual herd immunity there is in the country. I would "guess" half of the people who have had the virus have also now had the vaccination for a rough estimate on my part. Why will our government not do any analysis of these potential 25,00,000 citzens who are unvaccinated but survived the virus? Do unvaccinated people who have had the virus also transmit the delta virus at the same rate as vaccinated people do. We now know people who are double vaxxed and even have the booster can spread the virus, and I am assuming they are spreading the deadly delta virus since that is the primary one in the country, at least for another week or so. Instead of attacking the unvaccinated publicy, let the government do some analysis of all the groups. If 25,000,000 or more citizens are naturally immunized add them to the vaccinated number if they do not present a potential issue. The Trump administration made 'deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes,' report findsA new report from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform — the main investigative body of the House of Representatives — found that the Trump administration undermined the country's COVID-19 pandemic response for political The report, first written about by CNN and conducted under the auspices of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, includes numerous findings that have already been released this year. But the report also includes new evidence of what the committee called "deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes." According to the report, the Trump administration also weakened COVID-19 testing guidelines set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) while blocking media briefings by the public health agency. After a February 25, 2020 briefing in which then-CDC National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Dr. Nancy Messonnier warned about the dangers of the virus, former President Donald Trump was angered and blocked the health agency's requests to conduct public briefings for three months. "That is the feeling that we had, many of us had," said Dr. Anne Schuchat, a CDC official, when asked by the committee about whether she and others at the agency felt "muzzled" by the administration. Dr. Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under Trump, wrote in an email released by the committee that she would be skipping a meeting that included many proponents of a "herd immunity" response to the pandemic. "I can't be part of this with these people who believe in herd immunity," Birx wrote in an August 2020 email to Marc Short, then the chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence. "They are a fringe group without grounding in epidemics, public health or on the ground common sense experience." The report also found that Trump administration officials "neglected the pandemic response to focus on the 2020 presidential election and promote the Big Lie that the election results were fraudulent." "The narrow focus on campaigning 'took people's time away from and distracted them away from the pandemic,'" read the committee's summary of Birx's remarks. The Trump administration made 'deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes,' report finds
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 17, 2021 13:11:34 GMT -5
when 85-95% of us have either been infected or vaccinated. right now, that number is quite a bit below that. so, if we get about half the unvaccinated population vaccinated, "the government" can talk about that.
the odds of that are zero, btw. so, we will have to wait for the virus to infect the unvaccinated, with all of the attendant loss that one can anticipate from that, first.
Based on our previous experiences with coronaviruses, herd immunity, is unlikely. We get reinfected with coronaviruses all the time. But those other viruses cause the common cold. What needs to happen is that people have enough immunity or the virus mutates that infection does not lead to death or hospitalization. The reality of that is that everyone needs to be infected or vaccinated. I think achieving herd immunity as we were hoping was likely a pipe dream given our current understanding of this virus. hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 17, 2021 13:13:41 GMT -5
www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/?fbclid=IwAR2uBN4t68ssk2c9o7bwC5lcPwXn7zy39HVGBS4kBCa_0Qv0S4ebeOo-4vwThis mornings totals 51,290,000 confirmed cases 823,000 deaths. Numbers, rounded downward. With that many confirmed cases in the country, I have to wonder when our government will start talking about the actual herd immunity there is in the country. I would "guess" half of the people who have had the virus have also now had the vaccination for a rough estimate on my part. Why will our government not do any analysis of these potential 25,00,000 citzens who are unvaccinated but survived the virus? Do unvaccinated people who have had the virus also transmit the delta virus at the same rate as vaccinated people do. We now know people who are double vaxxed and even have the booster can spread the virus, and I am assuming they are spreading the deadly delta virus since that is the primary one in the country, at least for another week or so. Instead of attacking the unvaccinated publicy, let the government do some analysis of all the groups. If 25,000,000 or more citizens are naturally immunized add them to the vaccinated number if they do not present a potential issue. The Trump administration made 'deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes,' report findsA new report from the House Committee on Oversight and Reform — the main investigative body of the House of Representatives — found that the Trump administration undermined the country's COVID-19 pandemic response for political The report, first written about by CNN and conducted under the auspices of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, includes numerous findings that have already been released this year. But the report also includes new evidence of what the committee called "deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes." According to the report, the Trump administration also weakened COVID-19 testing guidelines set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) while blocking media briefings by the public health agency. After a February 25, 2020 briefing in which then-CDC National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Dr. Nancy Messonnier warned about the dangers of the virus, former President Donald Trump was angered and blocked the health agency's requests to conduct public briefings for three months. "That is the feeling that we had, many of us had," said Dr. Anne Schuchat, a CDC official, when asked by the committee about whether she and others at the agency felt "muzzled" by the administration. Dr. Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under Trump, wrote in an email released by the committee that she would be skipping a meeting that included many proponents of a "herd immunity" response to the pandemic. "I can't be part of this with these people who believe in herd immunity," Birx wrote in an August 2020 email to Marc Short, then the chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence. "They are a fringe group without grounding in epidemics, public health or on the ground common sense experience." The report also found that Trump administration officials "neglected the pandemic response to focus on the 2020 presidential election and promote the Big Lie that the election results were fraudulent." "The narrow focus on campaigning 'took people's time away from and distracted them away from the pandemic,'" read the committee's summary of Birx's remarks. The Trump administration made 'deliberate efforts to undermine the nation's coronavirus response for political purposes,' report findsof course. can anyone doubt this?
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 17, 2021 13:20:08 GMT -5
Based on our previous experiences with coronaviruses, herd immunity, is unlikely. We get reinfected with coronaviruses all the time. But those other viruses cause the common cold. What needs to happen is that people have enough immunity or the virus mutates that infection does not lead to death or hospitalization. The reality of that is that everyone needs to be infected or vaccinated. I think achieving herd immunity as we were hoping was likely a pipe dream given our current understanding of this virus. hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,508
|
Post by Tiny on Dec 17, 2021 13:26:50 GMT -5
Based on our previous experiences with coronaviruses, herd immunity, is unlikely. We get reinfected with coronaviruses all the time. But those other viruses cause the common cold. What needs to happen is that people have enough immunity or the virus mutates that infection does not lead to death or hospitalization. The reality of that is that everyone needs to be infected or vaccinated. I think achieving herd immunity as we were hoping was likely a pipe dream given our current understanding of this virus. hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
Does that mean: once all the Covid19 susceptible old people die off we will have mutated out of the problem?
|
|
haapai
Junior Associate
Character
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 20:40:06 GMT -5
Posts: 6,009
|
Post by haapai on Dec 17, 2021 13:29:34 GMT -5
hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does I call this the "happy cowpox" theory. It's terribly attractive until you remember that Omicron has an awful lot of mutations on it, so while getting infected with it may give you a whole lot of immunity to Omicron and it's successors in the same lineage, it seems unlikely that getting infected with Omicron will give you immunity to Delta or any of the other variants in circulation now.
I think that it is more rational to hope that it scares folks into getting their shots.
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,508
|
Post by Tiny on Dec 17, 2021 13:31:05 GMT -5
hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does Isn't that one of the most likely reasons the "Spanish Flu" pandemic ended - the virus changed and was less severe and it just kind of faded out because deaths from it dropped dramatically? I'm pretty sure that pandemic didn't end because of "herd immunity"
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 17, 2021 14:28:32 GMT -5
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does I call this the "happy cowpox" theory. It's terribly attractive until you remember that Omicron has an awful lot of mutations on it, so while getting infected with it may give you a whole lot of immunity to Omicron and it's successors in the same lineage, it seems unlikely that getting infected with Omicron will give you immunity to Delta or any of the other variants in circulation now.
I think that it is more rational to hope that it scares folks into getting their shots.
Not entirely true
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 17, 2021 14:30:59 GMT -5
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does Isn't that one of the most likely reasons the "Spanish Flu" pandemic ended - the virus changed and was less severe and it just kind of faded out because deaths from it dropped dramatically? I'm pretty sure that pandemic didn't end because of "herd immunity" Part of the reason. Eventually, viruses become less of a problem due to our immune system, their predilection to mutations, and our response to them. All pandemics eventually end, otherwise we would not be here as a society
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,894
|
Post by Tennesseer on Dec 18, 2021 18:35:27 GMT -5
Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly tests positive for coronavirus after Senate hearingKelly sat beside senior executives from competing airlines and a top labor leader, none of whom wore masks. Southwest Airlines chief executive Gary Kelly tested positive for the coronavirus, the company announced Friday, two days after he testified at a Senate hearing in Washington. Kelly sat beside senior executives from competing airlines and a top labor leader, none of whom wore masks while facing questions from members of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Southwest said Kelly, who was vaccinated and had received a booster, tested negative multiple times before the hearing, but tested positive after getting home. He has mild symptoms and “each day he is moving closer to a full recovery,” the airline said, adding that he is “following all notification procedures.” During the hearing, Kelly was pressed on when he believed masks would no longer be required on planes. He and other executives spoke of the high frequency and effectiveness of filtration systems commonly used on planes. “I think the case is very strong that masks don’t add much, if anything, in the air cabin environment. It’s very safe, very high quality, compared to any other indoor setting,” Kelly said. Complete article here: Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly tests positive for coronavirus after Senate hearing
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 19, 2021 4:19:28 GMT -5
hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does indeed. and the fact that it is 3x as communicable means that it will help us reach herd immunity that much faster in unvaccinated places like North Dakota, thus reducing the chances of future infection and mutation.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 19, 2021 4:27:15 GMT -5
Nature does interesting and surprising things. Some data suggest omicron causes less severe disease. Would actually be a positive outcome if it does Isn't that one of the most likely reasons the "Spanish Flu" pandemic ended - the virus changed and was less severe and it just kind of faded out because deaths from it dropped dramatically? I'm pretty sure that pandemic didn't end because of "herd immunity" i studied the Spanish Flu for a couple of weeks early last year. it seemed to me to be quite similar to what was happening and that turned out to be quite true.
the best article i found was THIS ONE: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291398/
i highly recommend reading that. it is only about 10 pages, but it discusses the lineage between the Spanish Flu and later H1N1 viruses. to be brief, the Spanish Flu never stopped. we reached herd immunity, then we developed a vaccine, and then it mutated into different forms, and it is STILL OUT THERE. CV19 will do the same thing. it will mutate into a different form (unlikely more virulent, but certainly possible), it will branch off, and it will be covered by a vaccine.
if you find anything i just said WRONG, please let me know. i am no expert. i just read a lot about stuff like this that interests me.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 19, 2021 4:29:49 GMT -5
hadn't considered that we might MUTATE out of this problem. interesting.
Does that mean: once all the Covid19 susceptible old people die off we will have mutated out of the problem? by "we" i meant the virus. that it might mutate into something more resembling your standard annual influenza.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 19, 2021 9:49:25 GMT -5
Does that mean: once all the Covid19 susceptible old people die off we will have mutated out of the problem? by "we" i meant the virus. that it might mutate into something more resembling your standard annual influenza. The end game is that it mutates into something more like the other human coronaviruses. Omicron appears to have picked up some genetic material from one of them. We can help this process along by vaccination. It puts selection pressure on the virus. I hope the initial impression that omicron is less severe. Lots to learn before that is confirmed however
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,351
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Dec 19, 2021 22:23:08 GMT -5
Isn't that one of the most likely reasons the "Spanish Flu" pandemic ended - the virus changed and was less severe and it just kind of faded out because deaths from it dropped dramatically? I'm pretty sure that pandemic didn't end because of "herd immunity" i studied the Spanish Flu for a couple of weeks early last year. it seemed to me to be quite similar to what was happening and that turned out to be quite true.
the best article i found was THIS ONE: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3291398/
i highly recommend reading that. it is only about 10 pages, but it discusses the lineage between the Spanish Flu and later H1N1 viruses. to be brief, the Spanish Flu never stopped. we reached herd immunity, then we developed a vaccine, and then it mutated into different forms, and it is STILL OUT THERE. CV19 will do the same thing. it will mutate into a different form (unlikely more virulent, but certainly possible), it will branch off, and it will be covered by a vaccine.
if you find anything i just said WRONG, please let me know. i am no expert. i just read a lot about stuff like this that interests me.
Interesting. Makes more sense than it just disappearing in two to three years.
|
|
seriousthistime
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 20:27:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,176
|
Post by seriousthistime on Dec 19, 2021 23:20:32 GMT -5
Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly tests positive for coronavirus after Senate hearingKelly sat beside senior executives from competing airlines and a top labor leader, none of whom wore masks. Southwest Airlines chief executive Gary Kelly tested positive for the coronavirus, the company announced Friday, two days after he testified at a Senate hearing in Washington. “I think the case is very strong that masks don’t add much, if anything, in the air cabin environment. It’s very safe, very high quality, compared to any other indoor setting,” Kelly said. Complete article here: Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly tests positive for coronavirus after Senate hearing It took me a long time from the early COVID days to feel okay (not comfortable, but okay) getting on a plane. And I double-mask in the airports and on the plane. Considering that most of my flights since COVID have been cross country, that's not an insignificant amount of a day to be double-masked. If it gets to a point where the COVID numbers have not dropped significantly but the mask mandate for planes and airports ends, it will be some time before I get on another plane, and even then I will likely mask up. Thinking back to the pre-2020 days when I and everyone else would get on a plane without even for a split second considering a mask, there were generally people sitting around me that were coughing, sneezing, blowing their noses, etc. I can't tell you how often I would come down with a nasty cold within 2 days of a flight, especially when heading out on vacation.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Dec 29, 2021 15:54:37 GMT -5
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,040
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 29, 2021 15:59:43 GMT -5
It's no worse than the flu It is killing only old people My risk of dying is low, why do I need a vaccination, wear a mask, stay home, etc We will kill the economy if we shut down It is my right to do what I want, consequences be damned. Did I miss any of the reasons for why so many people do not care? Add another 100-200K deaths next year. anyone who guessed 1.25 million dead wins the gold star. I never thought we would do this poorly.
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Dec 29, 2021 16:54:00 GMT -5
It's no worse than the flu It is killing only old people My risk of dying is low, why do I need a vaccination, wear a mask, stay home, etc We will kill the economy if we shut down It is my right to do what I want, consequences be damned. Did I miss any of the reasons for why so many people do not care? Add another 100-200K deaths next year. anyone who guessed 1.25 million dead wins the gold star. I never thought we would do this poorly. I have heard “It’s a poison”. “Why trust an untested vaccine when I can rely on my own immune system”.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jan 2, 2022 23:02:39 GMT -5
if everyone could rely on their immune system NOBODY would die from disease. ever.
|
|
Spellbound454
Senior Member
"In the end, we remember not the words of our enemies but the silence of our friends"
Joined: Sept 9, 2011 17:28:42 GMT -5
Posts: 4,107
|
Post by Spellbound454 on Jan 3, 2022 5:43:30 GMT -5
Can hardly call it untested, hundreds of millions of doses have been given.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,710
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jan 3, 2022 13:30:01 GMT -5
Can hardly call it untested, hundreds of millions of doses have been given. this has to do with confidence in science.
the bleach injection community prefers brands they know. like Chlorox.**
(** even though name brand bleaches are nearly 2x as expensive as their chemically equal generic counterparts)
|
|