Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 6, 2019 15:01:39 GMT -5
I think Trump is going to win and I'm a democrat.
All 3 front runners are to damn old! Give it up already, yet some young fresh blood come in.....someone that can relate more to the voters.
Warren is about as likeable as Clinton was! Bernie is a wacko! Biden is a perv!
If Trump is re-elected, it won't be because he "won" per se but more because the democrats lost to themselves! I don't think Trump won 2016, per se....it was more that Hillary lost. She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump. And I'm a staunch conservative! I think had the democrats put anyone else up in 2016 they probably would have won. I am in one of those swing states that was called very late in the game. Trump only won by 44,292 votes.. I honestly wish there were more parties than just two.
|
|
dezii
Distinguished Associate
Joined: May 18, 2017 14:26:36 GMT -5
Posts: 20,671
|
Post by dezii on Nov 6, 2019 15:04:02 GMT -5
I think Trump is going to win and I'm a democrat.
All 3 front runners are to damn old! Give it up already, yet some young fresh blood come in.....someone that can relate more to the voters.
Warren is about as likeable as Clinton was! Bernie is a wacko! Biden is a perv!
If Trump is re-elected, it won't be because he "won" per se but more because the democrats lost to themselves! " Biden is a perv!"
Because he hugged some females when out there..? Sheesh...don't believe your going to find any Mother Teresa types out there or son of the savior either....Just Saying. A recent poll shows both sides, a year from the election, both sides really ramped up about the 2020 election...Almost all claiming going to vote.. {hopefully the Dems and especially minorities and youth..do turn out in record #'s...I believe Dems have to get together to register as many none registered voters as possible..} However, Poll indicates like u ...many feel the Donald will win...I agree, believe he can just because and have absolutly no clue why he would and definitely , unless is a card carrying National socialist or similar type..why any one in their right mind...even if a bit mixed up..would vote for him..not at all. ================================ www.yahoo.com/news/poll-majority-expects-trump-win-100719696.html
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,177
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 6, 2019 15:07:49 GMT -5
... I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. There are. And yes, as long as people say they won't vote for their candidates because they have no chance of winning they will have no chance of winning. When a majority or plurality votes for them, they will win.
|
|
dezii
Distinguished Associate
Joined: May 18, 2017 14:26:36 GMT -5
Posts: 20,671
|
Post by dezii on Nov 6, 2019 15:08:32 GMT -5
I think Trump is going to win and I'm a democrat.
All 3 front runners are to damn old! Give it up already, yet some young fresh blood come in.....someone that can relate more to the voters.
Warren is about as likeable as Clinton was! Bernie is a wacko! Biden is a perv!
If Trump is re-elected, it won't be because he "won" per se but more because the democrats lost to themselves! I don't think Trump won 2016, per se....it was more that Hillary lost. She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump. And I'm a staunch conservative! I think had the democrats put anyone else up in 2016 they probably would have won. I am in one of those swing states that was called very late in the game. Trump only won by 44,292 votes.. I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. "I honestly wish there were more parties than just two." Like Israel..? ------------------------------------- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Israel
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 6, 2019 15:29:29 GMT -5
... I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. There are. And yes, as long as people say they won't vote for their candidates because they have no chance of winning they will have no chance of winning. When a majority or plurality votes for them, they will win. I know there are more than two. I guess I meant more than two that actually have a chance of winning. But you are right, that is the exact attitude that causes us to be stuck with just two.
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Nov 6, 2019 15:31:03 GMT -5
I think Trump is going to win and I'm a democrat.
All 3 front runners are to damn old! Give it up already, yet some young fresh blood come in.....someone that can relate more to the voters.
Warren is about as likeable as Clinton was! Bernie is a wacko! Biden is a perv!
If Trump is re-elected, it won't be because he "won" per se but more because the democrats lost to themselves! I don't think Trump won 2016, per se....it was more that Hillary lost. She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump. And I'm a staunch conservative! I think had the democrats put anyone else up in 2016 they probably would have won. I am in one of those swing states that was called very late in the game. Trump only won by 44,292 votes.. I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. Nearly THREE MILLION more voters chose her. She lost in the EC, not in the voting booth.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,374
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
Member is Online
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 6, 2019 15:38:04 GMT -5
I don't think Trump won 2016, per se....it was more that Hillary lost. She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump. And I'm a staunch conservative! I think had the democrats put anyone else up in 2016 they probably would have won. I am in one of those swing states that was called very late in the game. Trump only won by 44,292 votes.. I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. Nearly THREE MILLION more voters chose her. She lost in the EC, not in the voting booth. not to pile on here, but this is pretty much exactly what the NATIONAL polling predicted, although the REGIONAL polls were off.
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 6, 2019 16:11:05 GMT -5
I don't think Trump won 2016, per se....it was more that Hillary lost. She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump. And I'm a staunch conservative! I think had the democrats put anyone else up in 2016 they probably would have won. I am in one of those swing states that was called very late in the game. Trump only won by 44,292 votes.. I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. Nearly THREE MILLION more voters chose her. She lost in the EC, not in the voting booth. The EC is all that matters. She picked up the very liberal states and lost most others. That gives her the popular vote and not the EC. And she lost my state by a whopping 44k votes. I'm saying if she wasn't such a polarizing bitch, she probably would have won.
|
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Nov 6, 2019 16:47:19 GMT -5
Nearly THREE MILLION more voters chose her. She lost in the EC, not in the voting booth. The EC is all that matters. She picked up the very liberal states and lost most others. That gives her the popular vote and not the EC. And she lost my state by a whopping 44k votes. I'm saying if she wasn't such a polarizing bitch, she probably would have won. So, you voted for the ultra-polarizing bastard instead. Lol!
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Nov 6, 2019 16:56:09 GMT -5
The EC is all that matters. She picked up the very liberal states and lost most others. That gives her the popular vote and not the EC. And she lost my state by a whopping 44k votes. I'm saying if she wasn't such a polarizing bitch, she probably would have won. So, you voted for the ultra-polarizing bastard instead. Lol! The serial sex assaulter who’d “date” his own daughter.... Hypocritemuch?
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Nov 6, 2019 22:08:30 GMT -5
“Polarizing Bitch”. Gee, nice person. Hope nobody thinks that about you.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,374
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
Member is Online
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 6, 2019 22:14:30 GMT -5
The EC is all that matters. She picked up the very liberal states and lost most others. That gives her the popular vote and not the EC. And she lost my state by a whopping 44k votes. I'm saying if she wasn't such a polarizing bitch, she probably would have won. So, you voted for the ultra-polarizing bastard instead. Lol! curiously, men rarely get called things like "polarizing bastard".
#feminism
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Nov 6, 2019 22:28:44 GMT -5
“Polarizing Bitch”. Gee, nice person. Hope nobody thinks that about you.
|
|
sesfw
Junior Associate
Today is the first day of the rest of my life
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 15:45:17 GMT -5
Posts: 6,268
|
Post by sesfw on Nov 6, 2019 23:10:09 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.
I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama .........
I remember the campaign of 2008, and the fact that Hillary dropped out so quickly and easily. I'm 99% sure the Obama group promised the 2016 nomination to her if she would let Obama have the 2008 ticket.
Trump winning the next election depends on who the Dems have on their ticket.
|
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Nov 6, 2019 23:22:07 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... I remember the campaign of 2008, and the fact that Hillary dropped out so quickly and easily. I'm 99% sure the Obama group promised the 2016 nomination to her if she would let Obama have the 2008 ticket. Trump winning the next election depends on who the Dems have on their ticket. I guess you don't remember Trump dropping out even more quickly and easily in 2000.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,374
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
Member is Online
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2019 0:28:19 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... there was nothing wrong with Obama's appointees. they sailed right through confirmation.
Trump's were quite controversial.
are you an evangelical?
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Nov 7, 2019 0:30:07 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... I remember the campaign of 2008, and the fact that Hillary dropped out so quickly and easily. I'm 99% sure the Obama group promised the 2016 nomination to her if she would let Obama have the 2008 ticket. Trump winning the next election depends on who the Dems have on their ticket. Hope you are happy with an unqualified rapist on the bench
|
|
dezii
Distinguished Associate
Joined: May 18, 2017 14:26:36 GMT -5
Posts: 20,671
|
Post by dezii on Nov 7, 2019 5:13:07 GMT -5
I don't think Trump won 2016, per se....it was more that Hillary lost. She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump. And I'm a staunch conservative! I think had the democrats put anyone else up in 2016 they probably would have won. I am in one of those swing states that was called very late in the game. Trump only won by 44,292 votes.. I honestly wish there were more parties than just two. Nearly THREE MILLION more voters chose her. She lost in the EC, not in the voting booth. "She was extremely polarizing "
Seriously....how so? I guess I missed that...I know the arguments put forth, Bengasi..White Water...Suicide of a aid to Bill...her staying with Bill because of the Monica thing...her wardrobe. Pantsuits...her voice...Server problem..{not quite sure what a server is or the problems nationally of one} E mails missing..{figure a person in her position would have many, many e mails... Guess none of those topics ever bothered me...especially since millions were spent investigating questionable ones...white water, the suicide, e mails , server and what ever.. I am sure if I looked deeply into her actions over the years I am sure there were some things I disagreed with but I wasn't looking for a life time partner...or a saint. Just interested in a intelligent, {she is}..experienced in how our government runs..{definitely as a two term Senator , and supposedly a respected one, even from those across the aisle as it was reported she was, articulate {she is} plus seemed to be a good mother, did a good job as first Lady for eight years...with all that, it was easy for me to vote for her and support her candency.. After the Soap Opera of the past three years, I know she would have been a better choice to be POTUS then the one we have now, with out going over his obvious screw ups...
|
|
dezii
Distinguished Associate
Joined: May 18, 2017 14:26:36 GMT -5
Posts: 20,671
|
Post by dezii on Nov 7, 2019 5:15:20 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... I remember the campaign of 2008, and the fact that Hillary dropped out so quickly and easily. I'm 99% sure the Obama group promised the 2016 nomination to her if she would let Obama have the 2008 ticket. Trump winning the next election depends on who the Dems have on their ticket. Hope you are happy with an unqualified rapist on the bench ...regarding the rape..a 13 year old plus a ex wife...
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 7, 2019 8:59:13 GMT -5
The EC is all that matters. She picked up the very liberal states and lost most others. That gives her the popular vote and not the EC. And she lost my state by a whopping 44k votes. I'm saying if she wasn't such a polarizing bitch, she probably would have won. So, you voted for the ultra-polarizing bastard instead. Lol! I said earlier in this thread that I do not vote for personality. I voted against Hillary's politics. Lots of people also voted against Trump because they did not like him as a person. But I still say if the dems put up almost anyone over Hillary, they would have taken 2016. Of course, that is just my opinion and since I wanted to make sure we didn't get more liberal judges, I'm thrilled that Hillary was the nominee that election.
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 7, 2019 9:01:05 GMT -5
“Polarizing Bitch”. Gee, nice person. Hope nobody thinks that about you. that's the great thing...I actually don't care if anyone thinks that about me! I'm sure lots of people think I'm a polarizing bitch. My career doesn't depend on not alienating half the country so it's all good.
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 7, 2019 9:02:33 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... I remember the campaign of 2008, and the fact that Hillary dropped out so quickly and easily. I'm 99% sure the Obama group promised the 2016 nomination to her if she would let Obama have the 2008 ticket. Trump winning the next election depends on who the Dems have on their ticket. Hope you are happy with an unqualified rapist on the bench Interesting. I don't recall Kavanaugh being found guilty of rape. Does that mean Clinton was also a rapist? He WAS accused. Or do you only consider Republicans guilty of every accusation/ I prefer the old "innocent until proven guilty" regardless of the party.
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 7, 2019 9:04:45 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... there was nothing wrong with Obama's appointees. they sailed right through confirmation.
Trump's were quite controversial.
are you an evangelical?
Because the left will fight anything Trump does. There was zero wrong with Kavanaugh, other than the fact that he is not liberal. As soon as he was confirmed, the cries of "no more abortions" started, even on this board. The fight to keep him off the bench had zero to do with an unconfirmed rape accusation and all to do about politics.
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 7, 2019 9:07:16 GMT -5
So, you voted for the ultra-polarizing bastard instead. Lol! The serial sex assaulter who’d “date” his own daughter.... Hypocritemuch? What I find hypocritical is that all of you that are part of the Pantsuit Nation can't take a step back and see how Hillary treated the women that accused her husband. How can you be a champion of woman and accept her behavior? Accept her standing behind a man accused of rape? Because you all tell me over and over and over, women don't lie. If he was accused, he is a guilty and she stayed with him. How in the world does that fit with the #metoo movement? You seriously crack me up!
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,388
|
Post by Tennesseer on Nov 7, 2019 9:27:44 GMT -5
The serial sex assaulter who’d “date” his own daughter.... Hypocritemuch? What I find hypocritical is that all of you that are part of the Pantsuit Nation can't take a step back and see how Hillary treated the women that accused her husband. How can you be a champion of woman and accept her behavior? Accept her standing behind a man accused of rape? Because you all tell me over and over and over, women don't lie. If he was accused, he is a guilty and she stayed with him. How in the world does that fit with the #metoo movement? You seriously crack me up! If trump is the Republican candidate in 2020, how can you vote for a man who treats women like he has and does? You know his character.
|
|
ednkris
Well-Known Member
Joined: Feb 7, 2016 9:11:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,176
|
Post by ednkris on Nov 7, 2019 9:27:55 GMT -5
She was extremely polarizing and I know a lot of people that voted against her and not for Trump.I'm one of these voters. I could not in good conscience allow Hillary to get near the Supreme Court. Especially when I think of 2 possible nominees ................. hubby Bill, and/or Obama ......... I remember the campaign of 2008, and the fact that Hillary dropped out so quickly and easily. I'm 99% sure the Obama group promised the 2016 nomination to her if she would let Obama have the 2008 ticket. Trump winning the next election depends on who the Dems have on their ticket. Hope you are happy with an unqualified rapist on the bench A very qualified, accused for rape by a liar on the bench yes why yes very happyt
|
|
ednkris
Well-Known Member
Joined: Feb 7, 2016 9:11:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,176
|
Post by ednkris on Nov 7, 2019 9:34:16 GMT -5
Hope you are happy with an unqualified rapist on the bench ...regarding the rape..a 13 year old plus a ex wife... you mean accused, not charged, not found guilty. Please do every american a favor and stay off a jury duty you just don't get how it works
|
|
ednkris
Well-Known Member
Joined: Feb 7, 2016 9:11:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,176
|
Post by ednkris on Nov 7, 2019 9:39:37 GMT -5
So, you voted for the ultra-polarizing bastard instead. Lol! I said earlier in this thread that I do not vote for personality. I voted against Hillary's politics. Lots of people also voted against Trump because they did not like him as a person. But I still say if the dems put up almost anyone over Hillary, they would have taken 2016. Of course, that is just my opinion and since I wanted to make sure we didn't get more liberal judges, I'm thrilled that Hillary was the nominee that election. That is a mouthful right there...how true. Just getting the "right" judges in is worth voting for Trump. At least this way if another liberal nut job get in or worse a nightmare like Hillary actually wins the country can take solace that we have some chance of keeping the country somewhat normal.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,177
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 7, 2019 9:45:25 GMT -5
... That is a mouthful right there... ... we have some chance of keeping the country somewhat normal. Speaking of a mouthful.
|
|
Miss Tequila
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 10:13:45 GMT -5
Posts: 20,602
|
Post by Miss Tequila on Nov 7, 2019 9:50:20 GMT -5
What I find hypocritical is that all of you that are part of the Pantsuit Nation can't take a step back and see how Hillary treated the women that accused her husband. How can you be a champion of woman and accept her behavior? Accept her standing behind a man accused of rape? Because you all tell me over and over and over, women don't lie. If he was accused, he is a guilty and she stayed with him. How in the world does that fit with the #metoo movement? You seriously crack me up! If trump is the Republican candidate in 2020, how can you vote for a man who treats women like he has and does? You know his character. I actually don't "know" anything. I know accusations. He is a cheating asshole, yes. So was Bill Clinton but people overlooked that. He has been accused of rape. So was Bill Clinton, but people overlooked that. What I know is that if it is between Trump and a progressive agenda, Trump will be getting my vote. I do not personally like the man but me liking a person does not mean I do not think he is the lesser of two evils. I am also not a feminist. I am curious how a feminist could vote for Bill or Hillary. But no feminists have been willing to answer that question.
|
|