Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 21, 2021 7:54:21 GMT -5
Isn't this like the equivalent of choosing abortion as a method of birth control? Very ironic if you consider where most Covidiots stand on that issue! According to my pharmacist husband, monoclonal antibody treatment has a much higher adverse reaction rate than the vaccine. With the vaccine you feel like shit a few days. The you can have a severe allergic reaction to the antibody treatment including anaphylaxis That is a good thing to know. Surprised that hasn't been communicated to the public.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 21, 2021 7:59:47 GMT -5
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 21, 2021 8:10:13 GMT -5
|
|
Lizard Queen
Senior Associate
103/2024
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 22:19:13 GMT -5
Posts: 14,659
|
Post by Lizard Queen on Sept 21, 2021 8:26:00 GMT -5
Unmasked, unvaxed, un-alive.
|
|
jerseygirl
Junior Associate
Joined: May 13, 2018 7:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 5,388
|
Post by jerseygirl on Sept 21, 2021 8:51:33 GMT -5
So sad so stupid
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,036
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Sept 21, 2021 9:00:08 GMT -5
Isn't this like the equivalent of choosing abortion as a method of birth control? Very ironic if you consider where most Covidiots stand on that issue! According to my pharmacist husband, monoclonal antibody treatment has a much higher adverse reaction rate than the vaccine. With the vaccine you feel like shit a few days. The you can have a severe allergic reaction to the antibody treatment including anaphylaxis Not only that, it must be given in a certain time frame, and before you are sick enough to be hospitalized. It is about 70% effective at preventing hospitalizations, and the antibodies disappear in a few months, which leaves you vulnerable to reinfection. Given antibodies may also depress your bodies immune response, so you may actually not have the immunity you would have had, leaving you more susceptible to infection. All of which leads to the conclusion that vaccination is still a better choice. Not only that, but these treatments are under an EUA, so they are no less "experimental" than the vaccine is. So, if the concern about the vaccine is long term effects, how are these treatments any different?
|
|
Knee Deep in Water Chloe
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 21:04:44 GMT -5
Posts: 14,324
Mini-Profile Name Color: 1980e6
|
Post by Knee Deep in Water Chloe on Sept 21, 2021 9:02:22 GMT -5
It's wayyyyyy past time for folks to sue Fox News for all of the misinformation they give out. Seems to me that people dying due to bad information should hold up in court. Class action lawsuit! The problem is they have been sued. The defense attorney literally used the argument that Fox News is entertainment only and no one in their right mind would believe anything--Tucker specifically--from them.
link to NPR article
|
|
Knee Deep in Water Chloe
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 21:04:44 GMT -5
Posts: 14,324
Mini-Profile Name Color: 1980e6
|
Post by Knee Deep in Water Chloe on Sept 21, 2021 9:08:47 GMT -5
Personal anecdote: There's a woman I've worked with/been friends with for a decade who is the same age as I am. She and her husband--the husband especially--were taking the Christian evangelical anti-vaccination stance. The husband died last week of COVID. Their children are 9 and 13. I'm pretty pissed off at him.
|
|
Lizard Queen
Senior Associate
103/2024
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 22:19:13 GMT -5
Posts: 14,659
|
Post by Lizard Queen on Sept 21, 2021 9:21:33 GMT -5
The problem is they have been sued. The defense attorney literally used the argument that Fox News is entertainment only and no one in their right mind would believe anything--Tucker specifically--from them.
link to NPR article Let the preponderance of evidence show that people are listening to them as if they are news.
|
|
Lizard Queen
Senior Associate
103/2024
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 22:19:13 GMT -5
Posts: 14,659
|
Post by Lizard Queen on Sept 21, 2021 10:47:42 GMT -5
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 21, 2021 13:59:21 GMT -5
|
|
jerseygirl
Junior Associate
Joined: May 13, 2018 7:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 5,388
|
Post by jerseygirl on Sept 21, 2021 15:35:06 GMT -5
Those stupid inconsiderate selfish anti axxers protesting delayed a critical patient to get help They should be arrested
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 23, 2021 8:59:14 GMT -5
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 23, 2021 12:00:00 GMT -5
www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/sri-lankan-shaman-dies-of-covid-after-touting-cure/ar-AAOKvPZ?ocid=msedgntpA Sri Lankan shaman who touted a potion which he said would protect people against Covid-19 has died with the disease, his family says. Eliyantha White treated sports stars and top politicians with the potion, which he said came to him in a dream. The 48-year-old fell ill with the virus earlier this month and was taken to hospital where his condition worsened. His potion was publicly endorsed by Sri Lanka's former health minister, Pavithra Wanniarachchi, who subsequently spent two weeks in intensive care with Covid.
|
|
nidena
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 28, 2010 20:32:26 GMT -5
Posts: 3,648
|
Post by nidena on Sept 23, 2021 12:17:26 GMT -5
I wonder how many of these folks had life insurance...
If they don't, it's truly salt on the wound for their families.
|
|
azucena
Junior Associate
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 13:23:14 GMT -5
Posts: 5,939
|
Post by azucena on Sept 23, 2021 13:17:26 GMT -5
Only half of American adults have life insurance. Only 30M have sufficient coverage.
During the initial pandemic stage, we saw sales tick up 5-10% and then they quickly went back to normal. If that didn't get people to buy it, nothing will.
|
|
nidena
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 28, 2010 20:32:26 GMT -5
Posts: 3,648
|
Post by nidena on Sept 23, 2021 13:31:05 GMT -5
I imagine many people just don't see the point. They feel they have better things to do with that money each month. If they're like me, I can understand that: Nobody is depending upon my income. I think many who are low-income/poverty don't realize there are options for them that don't cost anything.
|
|
seriousthistime
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 20:27:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,168
|
Post by seriousthistime on Sept 23, 2021 14:08:30 GMT -5
Personal anecdote: There's a woman I've worked with/been friends with for a decade who is the same age as I am. She and her husband--the husband especially--were taking the Christian evangelical anti-vaccination stance. The husband died last week of COVID. Their children are 9 and 13. I'm pretty pissed off at him. And elsewhere in this thread or another one similar to it, we were discussing the costs to society associated with treating COVID cases (i.e., who pays for hospitalizations , increased insurance rates, hospital write-offs for patients who can't pay, etc.). This was one we forgot to mention, the cost of Social Security survivor benefits to the family.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 23, 2021 15:08:32 GMT -5
|
|
NomoreDramaQ1015
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:26:32 GMT -5
Posts: 48,359
|
Post by NomoreDramaQ1015 on Sept 23, 2021 15:20:37 GMT -5
I don't get being a parent and not getting vaccinated. The risk of leaving my children motherless and my husband a widow to me are far less tolerable than any possible "side effect" a vaccine may have later down the road. Whatever side effect may be I'll at least have lived to see my children grow to adulthood. Catching COVID may not provide me with that opportunity so why risk it? Just because the neighbor told you his son who heard it from who heard it from his aunt heard it from her grandmother who heard it from Tucker Carlson called COVID "just a bad cold" doesn't mean YOU are going to get that lucky. There is far far more data on the safety and efficacy of mRNA and mRNA vaccines than we know about COVID-19. Let alone COVID-19 long term effects which will likely take decades to figure out as people age. I honestly do not understand how some people risk assess. It's also getting a little freaky to watch how fast karma is acting in real time anymore. I mean it was going to catch up with a lot of these people eventually but oof.
|
|
MJ2.0
Senior Associate
Joined: Jul 24, 2014 10:27:09 GMT -5
Posts: 11,090
|
Post by MJ2.0 on Sept 23, 2021 15:41:49 GMT -5
I imagine many people just don't see the point. They feel they have better things to do with that money each month. If they're like me, I can understand that: Nobody is depending upon my income. I think many who are low-income/poverty don't realize there are options for them that don't cost anything. It’s not just about you getting sick, it’s also about spreading it to others with a weaker immune system.
|
|
andi9899
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 6, 2011 10:22:29 GMT -5
Posts: 31,563
Member is Online
|
Post by andi9899 on Sept 23, 2021 15:56:55 GMT -5
I imagine many people just don't see the point. They feel they have better things to do with that money each month. If they're like me, I can understand that: Nobody is depending upon my income. I think many who are low-income/poverty don't realize there are options for them that don't cost anything. It’s not just about you getting sick, it’s also about spreading it to others with a weaker immune system. She was referring to purchasing life insurance.
|
|
nidena
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 28, 2010 20:32:26 GMT -5
Posts: 3,648
|
Post by nidena on Sept 23, 2021 16:09:39 GMT -5
I imagine many people just don't see the point. They feel they have better things to do with that money each month. If they're like me, I can understand that: Nobody is depending upon my income. I think many who are low-income/poverty don't realize there are options for them that don't cost anything. It’s not just about you getting sick, it’s also about spreading it to others with a weaker immune system. How do you jump to your statement from what I said? I was talking about the actual monetary COST of life insurance.
|
|
MJ2.0
Senior Associate
Joined: Jul 24, 2014 10:27:09 GMT -5
Posts: 11,090
|
Post by MJ2.0 on Sept 23, 2021 16:23:50 GMT -5
Ah okay, my bad. Should have read more. 😳
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,787
|
Post by happyhoix on Sept 23, 2021 16:25:24 GMT -5
According to my pharmacist husband, monoclonal antibody treatment has a much higher adverse reaction rate than the vaccine. With the vaccine you feel like shit a few days. The you can have a severe allergic reaction to the antibody treatment including anaphylaxis Not only that, it must be given in a certain time frame, and before you are sick enough to be hospitalized. It is about 70% effective at preventing hospitalizations, and the antibodies disappear in a few months, which leaves you vulnerable to reinfection. Given antibodies may also depress your bodies immune response, so you may actually not have the immunity you would have had, leaving you more susceptible to infection. All of which leads to the conclusion that vaccination is still a better choice. Not only that, but these treatments are under an EUA, so they are no less "experimental" than the vaccine is. So, if the concern about the vaccine is long term effects, how are these treatments any different? The antibodies come from someone else who had the disease and recovered, right? So you run the risk of getting other people’s various blood borne diseases along with the antibodies? And the anti vac vets prefer that to just getting a vaccine? Or do they have a way of replicating the antibodies in a nice sterile lab, rather in someone’s body?
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,036
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Sept 23, 2021 17:32:00 GMT -5
Not only that, it must be given in a certain time frame, and before you are sick enough to be hospitalized. It is about 70% effective at preventing hospitalizations, and the antibodies disappear in a few months, which leaves you vulnerable to reinfection. Given antibodies may also depress your bodies immune response, so you may actually not have the immunity you would have had, leaving you more susceptible to infection. All of which leads to the conclusion that vaccination is still a better choice. Not only that, but these treatments are under an EUA, so they are no less "experimental" than the vaccine is. So, if the concern about the vaccine is long term effects, how are these treatments any different? The antibodies come from someone else who had the disease and recovered, right? So you run the risk of getting other people’s various blood borne diseases along with the antibodies? And the anti vac vets prefer that to just getting a vaccine? Or do they have a way of replicating the antibodies in a nice sterile lab, rather in someone’s body? They are lab made. The drug is a unique antibody against one site. That is what makes them so powerful, you know how they work, and you can pick the most powerful antibody. What you are describing is convalescent serum, which has not been effective in clinical trials. One of the original monoclonal antibody is no longer used, because the mutations have made it ineffective. The idiocy about accepting these and not the vaccines is the following: Vaccines are based on centuries old technology Monoclonal antibodies are much newer technology Both were released under an EUA Both have been studied for a short period of time We do not know the long term effects of these any better than we know the long term effects of the vaccines The vaccines are more effective at preventing disease And, the vaccines have been given to hundreds of millions of people eith only side effects, while these have been given to far fewer people
|
|
Lizard Queen
Senior Associate
103/2024
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 22:19:13 GMT -5
Posts: 14,659
|
Post by Lizard Queen on Sept 23, 2021 17:33:27 GMT -5
I'm not really into pointing out a bunch of random people getting covid because of their stupid choices, but the loud-mouths and these, I will:
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,350
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Sept 23, 2021 17:48:32 GMT -5
Idiots. I guess some people aren't paying attention that Delta is worse and the average age of people dying from Covid is dropping.
|
|
nidena
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 28, 2010 20:32:26 GMT -5
Posts: 3,648
|
Post by nidena on Sept 23, 2021 19:55:31 GMT -5
I wonder what this chart will look like in a couple years, once 2020 and beyond are added.
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,787
|
Post by happyhoix on Sept 23, 2021 20:36:04 GMT -5
I wonder what this chart will look like in a couple years, once 2020 and beyond are added. I’m not sure, but I do know the population of Alabama, for the first time in their history, had more deaths than births last year. Since the majority of Alabamaians are GOPers, that’s not great for the Grand Old Party.
|
|