hoops902
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 13:21:29 GMT -5
Posts: 11,978
|
Post by hoops902 on Jul 13, 2012 16:41:23 GMT -5
But he couldn't even be sure it was his dog. Sounds like he put the cart before the horse. He was sure enough that the woman said she was going to take the dog home, say her good-byes, then give him the dog back.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,409
|
Post by thyme4change on Jul 13, 2012 16:51:59 GMT -5
She knows that dog was his at one time. I don't think anyone is disputing that.
|
|
zibazinski
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Posts: 47,866
|
Post by zibazinski on Jul 13, 2012 19:27:54 GMT -5
That's what HE says. What does SHE say she said? I can call a dog any name I want and if I do it in the right voice, it'll come. I did that with one of our dogs after my dad claimed the dog knew its own name. It knows the tone of voice not it's name.
|
|
hoops902
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 13:21:29 GMT -5
Posts: 11,978
|
Post by hoops902 on Jul 13, 2012 22:41:01 GMT -5
That's what HE says. What does SHE say she said? I can call a dog any name I want and if I do it in the right voice, it'll come. I did that with one of our dogs after my dad claimed the dog knew its own name. It knows the tone of voice not it's name. She acknowledged that the dog was the one which he owned. You're the only person who's disputing whether the dog in question used to belong to this guy.
|
|
zibazinski
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Posts: 47,866
|
Post by zibazinski on Jul 14, 2012 6:44:18 GMT -5
I'll bet she won't now. What she told him and what she will say in court are going to be totally different.
|
|
zibazinski
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Posts: 47,866
|
Post by zibazinski on Jul 14, 2012 6:49:13 GMT -5
Well, it looks like she made some key mistakes and this may come back to haunt her. I still don't see how he can actually prove its HIS dog but since he got a ruling, that may help. Sad all around. But both of them can get another frickin' dog, they're all over the place. He's a douchecanoe and she may be as well.
|
|
hoops902
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 13:21:29 GMT -5
Posts: 11,978
|
Post by hoops902 on Jul 14, 2012 9:41:07 GMT -5
:He's a douchecanoe :
Clearly if you lose something, someone else takes it home, you find out and want your property back you're a douchecanoe.
:Well, it looks like she made some key mistakes and this may come back to haunt her.:
The primary one being thinking that if you find someone else's property you can just take it home and keep it. Proving the dog is hers is easy, provide the papers showing the adoption or purchase of the animal. Problem solved.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,715
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Jul 14, 2012 10:07:47 GMT -5
She knows that dog was his at one time. I don't think anyone is disputing that. Except Zib. I guess she doesn't want to acknowledge he had papers, and pics as proof and that's why the ruling went his way. I just find it odd that a twenty year old college student has the money to hire a lawyer let alone a specialist in that area of law. Is it possible she comes from a well-off home and is used to getting her way? While I can see it would be easier to remember spending 5 months looking for your dog versus some attempts to find the owner I think the fact she got the lawyer she did and avoided court points to her saying she did the right thing back then but not actually have done the right thing. If there is a douche canoe in this story, I would vote it is her.
|
|
zibazinski
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Posts: 47,866
|
Post by zibazinski on Jul 14, 2012 12:29:05 GMT -5
Could be.
|
|