djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 17:04:30 GMT -5
there is a separate thread on this, started by kd.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 17:09:42 GMT -5
PS- i am not angry, if anyone is wondering. i have considered that objection before. i just don't buy it. I'm not angry either, and I do really respect and admire your expertise in your posts. I don't know much about ex-patting. Are you saying you think someone could expat to a decent country for $500? That wouldn't even buy a one way ticket. Aren't you paying a pretty decent amount of money to relocate to your new country? I can't remember if you decided, I know Malta, Costa Rica, and a few others have been mentioned over time. And I know there was mention of citizenship costing hundreds of thousands of dollars for some of those places. I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc. to your first paragraph: sure it would. i just bought a one way ticket to Europe for $380. to your second paragraph: not necessarily. i mean you CAN, if you want. if i were just to RENT where i am going, i could do that for (not kidding you here) $200/month. so, yeah, i could not do that indefinitely. i would have to find a job, etc. but you don't need to be a member of the NYSE to move the hell out of this place. to paragraph three: of course. you have to REALLY want to go. i mean, it has to mean WAY more to you than any other consideration. or you won't go. i get that. but again, 40 million people living here were not born here. they moved here despite all of the things you mentioned, in many cases with little more the shirts on their backs. so, yeah. it can be done. for next to nothing.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 17:11:06 GMT -5
Headline in today’s Seattle Times: Washington voter turnout lags behind pace of last midterm Just a big WTF on that one.😢 that has been the case in several states.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 17:19:31 GMT -5
What do you do for a living, Hurley? Canada might need your particular skill. We have jobs, jobs, jobs...and nobody to fill them. I'm an Sr. Analyst for the California High Speed Rail Project. While I work remotely, I am not sure if the project would let me work from outside of the country, not on a long term basis anyway. My parent company is in Canada, but unfortunately, their contract expired this year, and I will have to switch companies to stay on the project. But I have worked for them for 15 years, and I am leaving on great terms, so they are always an option in the future. a very dear friend of mine who can telecommute asked his boss if he would entertain moving to another country and working remotely. his boss said "technically it is against company policy, but if you can manage it, and keep it quiet, go ahead". so, that is what he is going to do. Barra de Navidad, MX, if you are wondering. lovely place. i am going to visit him for two weeks in Feb.
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Nov 7, 2022 17:24:58 GMT -5
Headline in today’s Seattle Times: Washington voter turnout lags behind pace of last midterm Just a big WTF on that one.😢 that has been the case in several states. If folks don’t want to bother, especially the Roevember crowd touted by my Uber liberal friend, then we get what we deserve. But as tall guy previously said: we can fall back on our white privilege and wealth, and our location way up here in Seattle. But…. I just can’t wrap my head around what looks like a weak effort to maintain demo power. WTF is wrong with these people.🧟
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 17:37:43 GMT -5
that has been the case in several states. If folks don’t want to bother, especially the Roevember crowd touted by my Uber liberal friend, then we get what we deserve. But as tall guy previously said: we can fall back on our white privilege and wealth, and our location way up here in Seattle. But…. I just can’t wrap my head around what looks like a weak effort to maintain demo power. WTF is wrong with these people.🧟 i was just thinking to myself, in addition to the election crisis that is unfolding, why the hell have Democrats not been mentioning the RECORD JOBS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH the last two years? jesus.
|
|
tbop77
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 8:24:37 GMT -5
Posts: 2,510
|
Post by tbop77 on Nov 7, 2022 18:27:00 GMT -5
In a new video ad the Florida Republican’s wife, Casey, shared on Friday, the narrator tells us that on day eight, “God looked down on His planned paradise and said, ‘I need a protector.’ So God made a fighter.” That fighter is DeSantis, the governor who will serve the people, and “save their jobs, their livelihoods, their liberty, their happiness.” www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ron-desantis-new-ad-is-ridiculous-and-dangerous/ar-AA13PKzE?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=720cca30562243fcba9a96d95084fed7I hope it is true and the MAGA crowd hates him. Very dangerous man. I hope Trump vilifies him in the primary if they both run.
|
|
hurley1980
Well-Known Member
I am all that is wrong with the world....don't get too close, I'm contagious.
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 17:35:06 GMT -5
Posts: 1,943
|
Post by hurley1980 on Nov 7, 2022 18:35:42 GMT -5
The ads this midterm are more outrageous than I have ever seen. America First Legal (Stephen Miller) has been airing ads in California saying that Biden is racist against Asians. With nothing to back it up except a bunch of quotes from Fox, et al. I really hope the Asian community knows who is behind these ads (the very people who said Covid was made in a lab in China)!
|
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Nov 7, 2022 18:43:05 GMT -5
I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc.
Not necessarily. Canada won't take retired people, unless they're insanely wealthy and can start a company which will hire Canadians. Think about it.....retired people are old. Most countries with single payer healthcare don't want them. They will cost them a lot of money. It you're going to cost more than you will pay in, in taxes.....forget it. www.visasavenue.com/canada-immigration/canada-immigration-eligibility-criteria/To apply the Canadian permanent residency, you need to meet the below Canada PR eligibility criteria or do well based on the key selection factors for Canada PR. Age- You must be 18 years or above to apply Canada PR. As an applicant, you get maximum points for age factor, when you are in age group 18-35. Although, you can still apply PR up to the age of 45 years.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 18:55:47 GMT -5
The ads this midterm are more outrageous than I have ever seen. America First Legal (Stephen Miller) has been airing ads in California saying that Biden is racist against Asians. With nothing to back it up except a bunch of quotes from Fox, et al. I really hope the Asian community knows who is behind these ads (the very people who said Covid was made in a lab in China)! this is like the pot calling the kettle light grey. Miller is as racist as they come.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,483
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 7, 2022 19:09:25 GMT -5
I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc.
Not necessarily. Canada won't take retired people, unless they're insanely wealthy and can start a company which will hire Canadians. Think about it.....retired people are old. Most countries with single payer healthcare don't want them. They will cost them a lot of money. It you're going to cost more than you will pay in, in taxes.....forget it. www.visasavenue.com/canada-immigration/canada-immigration-eligibility-criteria/To apply the Canadian permanent residency, you need to meet the below Canada PR eligibility criteria or do well based on the key selection factors for Canada PR. Age- You must be 18 years or above to apply Canada PR. As an applicant, you get maximum points for age factor, when you are in age group 18-35. Although, you can still apply PR up to the age of 45 years. Thus a Catch 22. hurley1980 's point, as I read it, is that it easier for retired people to uproot their lives and relocate. It is also potentially more challenging to find a place which will accept them unless they have very solid financial resources.
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Nov 7, 2022 19:26:40 GMT -5
If folks don’t want to bother, especially the Roevember crowd touted by my Uber liberal friend, then we get what we deserve. But as tall guy previously said: we can fall back on our white privilege and wealth, and our location way up here in Seattle. But…. I just can’t wrap my head around what looks like a weak effort to maintain demo power. WTF is wrong with these people.🧟 i was just thinking to myself, in addition to the election crisis that is unfolding, why the hell have Democrats not been mentioning the RECORD JOBS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH the last two years? jesus. Because they are lame. I keep waiting for our Senator to pop an ad calling BS on the series of lies the Repo-con Smiley is telling about her. And don’t put the gloves ON. This should be bare knuckle.
|
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Nov 7, 2022 19:41:30 GMT -5
I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc.
Not necessarily. Canada won't take retired people, unless they're insanely wealthy and can start a company which will hire Canadians. Think about it.....retired people are old. Most countries with single payer healthcare don't want them. They will cost them a lot of money. It you're going to cost more than you will pay in, in taxes.....forget it. www.visasavenue.com/canada-immigration/canada-immigration-eligibility-criteria/To apply the Canadian permanent residency, you need to meet the below Canada PR eligibility criteria or do well based on the key selection factors for Canada PR. Age- You must be 18 years or above to apply Canada PR. As an applicant, you get maximum points for age factor, when you are in age group 18-35. Although, you can still apply PR up to the age of 45 years. Thus a Catch 22. hurley1980 's point, as I read it, is that it easier for retired people to uproot their lives and relocate. It is also potentially more challenging to find a place which will accept them unless they have very solid financial resources. Exactly! Older/retired people will be needing hip replacements, knee replacements, cataract surgery, stents, pacemakers, etc. Meanwhile, they won't be working and paying income taxes. So, while it's easier for them to move, which countries will take them? It's a Catch 22, indeed.
|
|
hurley1980
Well-Known Member
I am all that is wrong with the world....don't get too close, I'm contagious.
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 17:35:06 GMT -5
Posts: 1,943
|
Post by hurley1980 on Nov 7, 2022 19:50:06 GMT -5
I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc.
Not necessarily. Canada won't take retired people, unless they're insanely wealthy and can start a company which will hire Canadians. Think about it.....retired people are old. Most countries with single payer healthcare don't want them. They will cost them a lot of money. It you're going to cost more than you will pay in, in taxes.....forget it. www.visasavenue.com/canada-immigration/canada-immigration-eligibility-criteria/To apply the Canadian permanent residency, you need to meet the below Canada PR eligibility criteria or do well based on the key selection factors for Canada PR. Age- You must be 18 years or above to apply Canada PR. As an applicant, you get maximum points for age factor, when you are in age group 18-35. Although, you can still apply PR up to the age of 45 years. This actually doesn't seem as difficult as I had expected. I'm sure I could find employment, but I am 43 in May, so I had to decide soon if this is really what I want. I have never lived anywhere but the west coast. I would need to move my 77 year old mother with me, as I am her care taker. And I would have to sell my house. For those reasons alone, djAdvocate is correct that I used them as excuses because I can. I would absolutely love Canada, this I know! And I prefer colder weather (I hate Sacramento summers), so I would be fine with that as well. I do worry about the HCOL in the areas that I would be looking for employment. But at the end of the day, if the US falls, and I need to get out, Canada has always been one of the best and easiest choices for me. I will actually be on a cruise to Vancouver and Victoria next spring. It will be my first time to the country. I am VERY excited!
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,721
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Nov 7, 2022 20:01:44 GMT -5
In a new video ad the Florida Republican’s wife, Casey, shared on Friday, the narrator tells us that on day eight, “God looked down on His planned paradise and said, ‘I need a protector.’ So God made a fighter.” That fighter is DeSantis, the governor who will serve the people, and “save their jobs, their livelihoods, their liberty, their happiness.” www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ron-desantis-new-ad-is-ridiculous-and-dangerous/ar-AA13PKzE?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=720cca30562243fcba9a96d95084fed7I hope it is true and the MAGA crowd hates him. Very dangerous man. I hope Trump vilifies him in the primary if they both run. God needs a protector? Blasphemy seems to be in this GOP's wheelhouse. Sad. Scary. Apparently works for those who didn't really read the Bible.
|
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Nov 7, 2022 20:02:46 GMT -5
I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc.
Not necessarily. Canada won't take retired people, unless they're insanely wealthy and can start a company which will hire Canadians. Think about it.....retired people are old. Most countries with single payer healthcare don't want them. They will cost them a lot of money. It you're going to cost more than you will pay in, in taxes.....forget it. www.visasavenue.com/canada-immigration/canada-immigration-eligibility-criteria/To apply the Canadian permanent residency, you need to meet the below Canada PR eligibility criteria or do well based on the key selection factors for Canada PR. Age- You must be 18 years or above to apply Canada PR. As an applicant, you get maximum points for age factor, when you are in age group 18-35. Although, you can still apply PR up to the age of 45 years. This actually doesn't seem as difficult as I had expected. I'm sure I could find employment, but I am 43 in May, so I had to decide soon if this is really what I want. I have never lived anywhere but the west coast. I would need to move my 77 year old mother with me, as I am her care taker. And I would have to sell my house. For those reasons alone, djAdvocate is correct that I used them as excuses because I can. I would absolutely love Canada, this I know! And I prefer colder weather (I hate Sacramento summers), so I would be fine with that as well. I do worry about the HCOL in the areas that I would be looking for employment. But at the end of the day, if the US falls, and I need to get out, Canada has always been one of the best and easiest choices for me. I will actually be on a cruise to Vancouver and Victoria next spring. It will be my first time to the country. I am VERY excited! You would have to be 100% financially responsible for your 77 year old mother. All that aside, you would LOVE Canada! It's been deemed the best place in the world to live, more than once. Politically, it's waaay to the left of your democrats.
|
|
NastyWoman
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 20:50:37 GMT -5
Posts: 14,379
|
Post by NastyWoman on Nov 7, 2022 20:03:23 GMT -5
I know it is possible, its just not a top priority....yet. I have to see how things go, and then I'd have to do a lot of planning. I do think it is easier for retired people to move to another country, than younger people, that have families to take care of, careers to think about, etc.
Not necessarily. Canada won't take retired people, unless they're insanely wealthy and can start a company which will hire Canadians. Think about it.....retired people are old. Most countries with single payer healthcare don't want them. They will cost them a lot of money. It you're going to cost more than you will pay in, in taxes.....forget it. www.visasavenue.com/canada-immigration/canada-immigration-eligibility-criteria/To apply the Canadian permanent residency, you need to meet the below Canada PR eligibility criteria or do well based on the key selection factors for Canada PR. Age- You must be 18 years or above to apply Canada PR. As an applicant, you get maximum points for age factor, when you are in age group 18-35. Although, you can still apply PR up to the age of 45 years. Thus a Catch 22. hurley1980 's point, as I read it, is that it easier for retired people to uproot their lives and relocate. It is also potentially more challenging to find a place which will accept them unless they have very solid financial resources. Or if they are lucky and are a passport holder to one of the Schengen countries.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 63,514
|
Post by Tennesseer on Nov 7, 2022 20:09:44 GMT -5
Republicans sue to disqualify thousands of mail ballots in swing statesThe lawsuits coincide with a systemic effort by GOP leaders to persuade voters to cast ballots in person, not absentee Republican officials and candidates in at least three battleground states are pushing to disqualify thousands of mail ballots after urging their own supporters to vote on Election Day, in what critics are calling a concerted attempt at partisan voter suppression. In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court has agreed with the Republican National Committee that election officials should not count ballots on which the voter neglected to put a date on the outer envelope — even in cases when the ballots arrive before Election Day. Thousands of ballots have been set aside as a result, enough to swing a close race. In Michigan, Kristina Karamo, the Republican nominee for secretary of state, sued the top election official in Detroit last month, seeking to toss absentee ballots not cast in person with an ID, even though that runs contrary to state requirements. When asked in a recent court hearing, Karamo’s lawyer declined to say why the suit targets Detroit, a heavily Democratic, majority-Black city, and not the entire state. And in Wisconsin, Republicans won a court ruling that will prevent some mail ballots from being counted when the required witness address is not complete. Over the past two years, Republicans have waged a sustained campaign against alleged voter fraud. Experts say the litigation — which could significantly affect Tuesday’s vote — represents a parallel strategy of suing to disqualify mail ballots based on technicalities. While the rejections may have some basis in state law, experts say they appear to go against a principle, enshrined in federal law, of not disenfranchising voters for minor errors. Rest of article here: Republicans sue to disqualify thousands of mail ballots in swing states
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,483
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 7, 2022 20:57:22 GMT -5
If folks don’t want to bother, especially the Roevember crowd touted by my Uber liberal friend, then we get what we deserve. But as tall guy previously said: we can fall back on our white privilege and wealth, and our location way up here in Seattle. But…. I just can’t wrap my head around what looks like a weak effort to maintain demo power. WTF is wrong with these people.🧟 i was just thinking to myself, in addition to the election crisis that is unfolding, why the hell have Democrats not been mentioning the RECORD JOBS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH the last two years? jesus. Perhaps because good/great general economic numbers don't necessarily play well to families struggling with personal economic numbers.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 7, 2022 21:24:14 GMT -5
i was just thinking to myself, in addition to the election crisis that is unfolding, why the hell have Democrats not been mentioning the RECORD JOBS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH the last two years? jesus. Perhaps because good/great general economic numbers don't necessarily play well to families struggling with personal economic numbers. forgive me for saying so, but the national numbers are the national numbers. NOT telling people the FACTS just plays into the narrative of the GOP that everything is horrible. it isn't. parts of the economy are doing very well. employment is a shining star of the Biden administration. to not weaponize that as defense against the crap that is being spewed is, as don put it, stupid lame. MO
|
|
chiver78
Administrator
Current Events Admin
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:04:45 GMT -5
Posts: 38,565
|
Post by chiver78 on Nov 7, 2022 21:36:35 GMT -5
I'm an Sr. Analyst for the California High Speed Rail Project. While I work remotely, I am not sure if the project would let me work from outside of the country, not on a long term basis anyway. My parent company is in Canada, but unfortunately, their contract expired this year, and I will have to switch companies to stay on the project. But I have worked for them for 15 years, and I am leaving on great terms, so they are always an option in the future. a very dear friend of mine who can telecommute asked his boss if he would entertain moving to another country and working remotely. his boss said "technically it is against company policy, but if you can manage it, and keep it quiet, go ahead". so, that is what he is going to do. Barra de Navidad, MX, if you are wondering. lovely place. i am going to visit him for two weeks in Feb. this is pretty much where Im' at right now. my boss is 100% WFH and he lives a few states away from me. our office is in the city, and I asked him in 2020 whether I needed to be close to the office or not, and he said in no uncertain terms, I don't GAF where you sit" and so I moved back to the beach.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,483
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 7, 2022 23:10:48 GMT -5
Perhaps because good/great general economic numbers don't necessarily play well to families struggling with personal economic numbers. forgive me for saying so, but the national numbers are the national numbers. NOT telling people the FACTS just plays into the narrative of the GOP that everything is horrible. it isn't. parts of the economy are doing very well. employment is a shining star of the Biden administration. to not weaponize that as defense against the crap that is being spewed is, as don put it, stupid lame. MO FACT based arguments aren't exactly the hottest commodity these days.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 8, 2022 0:33:09 GMT -5
word
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,412
|
Post by thyme4change on Nov 8, 2022 10:14:06 GMT -5
Welp - today is the day. We are going out to dinner with my husband’s cousins tonight. She is from Trumplandia so we are going to avoid the topic. I suspect we will come home after and stare at the TV with disdain and disbelief until midnight or so.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,141
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Nov 8, 2022 10:15:28 GMT -5
this will, at BEST, be interesting.
|
|
busymom
Distinguished Associate
Why is the rum always gone? Oh...that's why.
Joined: Dec 25, 2010 21:09:36 GMT -5
Posts: 28,398
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"https://cdn.nickpic.host/images/IPauJ5.jpg","color":""}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 0D317F
Mini-Profile Text Color: 0D317F
|
Post by busymom on Nov 8, 2022 10:53:26 GMT -5
Republicans sue to disqualify thousands of mail ballots in swing statesThe lawsuits coincide with a systemic effort by GOP leaders to persuade voters to cast ballots in person, not absentee Republican officials and candidates in at least three battleground states are pushing to disqualify thousands of mail ballots after urging their own supporters to vote on Election Day, in what critics are calling a concerted attempt at partisan voter suppression. In Pennsylvania, the state Supreme Court has agreed with the Republican National Committee that election officials should not count ballots on which the voter neglected to put a date on the outer envelope — even in cases when the ballots arrive before Election Day. Thousands of ballots have been set aside as a result, enough to swing a close race. In Michigan, Kristina Karamo, the Republican nominee for secretary of state, sued the top election official in Detroit last month, seeking to toss absentee ballots not cast in person with an ID, even though that runs contrary to state requirements. When asked in a recent court hearing, Karamo’s lawyer declined to say why the suit targets Detroit, a heavily Democratic, majority-Black city, and not the entire state. And in Wisconsin, Republicans won a court ruling that will prevent some mail ballots from being counted when the required witness address is not complete. Over the past two years, Republicans have waged a sustained campaign against alleged voter fraud. Experts say the litigation — which could significantly affect Tuesday’s vote — represents a parallel strategy of suing to disqualify mail ballots based on technicalities. While the rejections may have some basis in state law, experts say they appear to go against a principle, enshrined in federal law, of not disenfranchising voters for minor errors. Rest of article here: Republicans sue to disqualify thousands of mail ballots in swing states It would be total KARMA if it was the GOP voters who weren't filling out their ballots & envelopes properly. Trump LOVES the uneducated, after all.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,721
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Nov 8, 2022 19:26:33 GMT -5
Perhaps because good/great general economic numbers don't necessarily play well to families struggling with personal economic numbers. forgive me for saying so, but the national numbers are the national numbers. NOT telling people the FACTS just plays into the narrative of the GOP that everything is horrible. it isn't. parts of the economy are doing very well. employment is a shining star of the Biden administration. to not weaponize that as defense against the crap that is being spewed is, as don put it, stupid lame. MO I agree. I think the fact that they ignore economy questions hurt, because Republicans just lie and say they will fix it. Really what the GOP generally does is reward the big donors, make lots of empty promises, and then pretend trickle down economics is working if anything at all seems to improve for most of the citizens. In reality, we all know how the story goes - the GOP will vote to make things worse for middle and lower economic class America at which time Dems will be voted in yet again to fix the problems. We need to educate voters how things work IMO. It won't work with all of them because they go on feels and their gut which apparently is pretty off. The Dems should have touted how well we were doing versus the rest of the world. They should have advertised how Trump prevented the economy from addressing inflation correctly by not allowing the Fed to raise rates while he was still Prez. I would have ha d a different message as the old how do you feel about now is a loser question. We globally are recovering from a pandemic. It sucks. It will get better no matter who is elected. Only the willfully blind fail to realize that
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,483
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 8, 2022 19:30:46 GMT -5
forgive me for saying so, but the national numbers are the national numbers. NOT telling people the FACTS just plays into the narrative of the GOP that everything is horrible. it isn't. parts of the economy are doing very well. employment is a shining star of the Biden administration. to not weaponize that as defense against the crap that is being spewed is, as don put it, stupid lame. MO I agree. I think the fact that they ignore economy questions hurt, because Republicans just lie and say they will fix it. Really what the GOP generally does is reward the big donors, make lots of empty promises, and then pretend trickle down economics is working if anything at all seems to improve for most of the citizens. In reality, we all know how the story goes - the GOP will vote to make things worse for middle and lower economic class America at which time Dems will be voted in yet again to fix the problems. We need to educate voters how things work IMO. It won't work with all of them because they go on feels and their gut which apparently is pretty off. The Dems should have touted how well we were doing versus the rest of the world. They should have advertised how Trump prevented the economy from addressing inflation correctly by not allowing the Fed to raise rates while he was still Prez. I would have ha d a different message as the old how do you feel about now is a loser question. We globally are recovering from a pandemic. It sucks. It will get better no matter who is elected. Only the willfully blind fail to realize that The President does not control the Fed.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,721
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Nov 8, 2022 19:40:22 GMT -5
I agree. I think the fact that they ignore economy questions hurt, because Republicans just lie and say they will fix it. Really what the GOP generally does is reward the big donors, make lots of empty promises, and then pretend trickle down economics is working if anything at all seems to improve for most of the citizens. In reality, we all know how the story goes - the GOP will vote to make things worse for middle and lower economic class America at which time Dems will be voted in yet again to fix the problems. We need to educate voters how things work IMO. It won't work with all of them because they go on feels and their gut which apparently is pretty off. The Dems should have touted how well we were doing versus the rest of the world. They should have advertised how Trump prevented the economy from addressing inflation correctly by not allowing the Fed to raise rates while he was still Prez. I would have ha d a different message as the old how do you feel about now is a loser question. We globally are recovering from a pandemic. It sucks. It will get better no matter who is elected. Only the willfully blind fail to realize that The President does not control the Fed. That does not mean that he did not threaten them. He does not control voting in Georgia. Did not stop him from threatening GOPers who did not want to toss the election to him. This is Trump. Threats are his business strategy. Getting even with you for not following his will is sport to him. Not everyone is able to deal with that kind of pressure from a crazy screaming rich white man.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,483
|
Post by billisonboard on Nov 9, 2022 9:15:52 GMT -5
Inside Joe Biden’s cautiously optimistic election night But on several fronts, Biden advisers said they viewed the initial results as early-stage vindication that their multi-faceted messaging approach – one that had drawn criticism for not focusing more on the economy – may have landed more fulsomely than predicted. Found this interesting
|
|