pappyjohn99
Familiar Member
The driveway needs a little work.
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 1:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 928
|
Post by pappyjohn99 on Jan 1, 2011 17:06:51 GMT -5
I do not believe that # 87 disproves # 75. As I stated, I believe it will ultimatly become an issue for SCOTUS.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,445 
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 1, 2011 17:27:04 GMT -5
Believe what you want. A judge voided a part of a law that Congressman Ryan reported could only be accepted or rejected in its whole.
|
|
pappyjohn99
Familiar Member
The driveway needs a little work.
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 1:01:13 GMT -5
Posts: 928
|
Post by pappyjohn99 on Jan 1, 2011 17:53:36 GMT -5
Okay......But you are familiar with the concept of appeals?
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,445
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 1, 2011 18:01:58 GMT -5
Yes. Also competence. Have to question the competence of a judge who only voids part of a law if legally it is either all or nothing. Did he get any of it right?
|
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jan 1, 2011 19:08:36 GMT -5
Seriously, I think Paul Ryan is a very scary dude. He is power hungry, and I worry about him gaining enough power to carry out some of his agenda. His agenda will NOT be good for the poor and Middle Class. A very scary dude...
The Bush looting of the Treasury should not be replenished on the backs of the poor and Middle Class.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex2 on Jan 1, 2011 19:32:43 GMT -5
The GOP has also proposed a new rule requiring that each piece of new legislation include a statement justifying the legislation’s constitutionality.
Sounds great to me All Americans should be overjoyed about this.Sane leadership for the Country at last.
thumbs_up
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,445
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 1, 2011 19:37:28 GMT -5
The GOP has also proposed a new rule requiring that each piece of new legislation include a statement justifying the legislation’s constitutionality. Sounds great to me All Americans should be overjoyed about this.Sane leadership for the Country at last. thumbs_up Should be good for at least one/two more staffers for each Senator and Representative. |
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Jan 1, 2011 19:42:22 GMT -5
legislation the legislation’s constitutionality." ==================================== Little confused here...realize so many of the congressionals are lawyers..but I though all legislationn was supposed to be constitutionally correct..I am sure they, Congress has a legal department to help with the wording and issues that might arise....and legislation once passed..then if some have a problem with it , I guess they could bring suit..final judge on that is the courts, so what is so earth shaking about this added what ever you want to call it??  |
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,445
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 1, 2011 19:46:28 GMT -5
dezi, They are going to have to add verbage to "prove" the law is constitutional is all. The games that we play.  |
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Jan 1, 2011 19:55:09 GMT -5
Which means ALL the legislatures, Senators, House Members are going to add to their staffs..and that would mean high priced staff, attorneys who are versed in the Constitution, knowlegable types , or do you think theyll just have a new department that after a bill is written will have to be vented or..any way, I bet this cost $.. I say in a year , oh how about , with all the potential bills, $25 mill?? This being proposd by the Tea Party??
|
|
