Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on Feb 13, 2022 10:10:07 GMT -5
Posters may find trouble finding this news right now because Durham did not publicly release this info to the national media. It is part of his Friday request to the Court and was buried in his request to the Court. Details involve not naming names other than person #1 And tech company #1 but it involves illegally tapping into then candidate Trump's servers of the campaign and continued on into the Computer servers in the White House as he was President. Dismiss this if you want, but it bleeds into the DOJ who was made aware of the situation and did not investigate into the spying on a sitting President. www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-campaign-paid-infiltrate-trump-tower-white-house-servers
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,055
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Feb 13, 2022 11:13:37 GMT -5
Nothing to say about trumps treatment of confidential documents, his removing confidential documents to mar-a-lago, ripping up documents despite the law against that, and the missing phone logs o January 6. Let’s talk about that. Once that is dealt with and trump is in jail, then we can worry about Clinton.
I am far more worried about the actions of a president and someone who is still trying to overthrow a legitimate election than I am of the prior acts of a has been
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,475
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Feb 13, 2022 11:14:59 GMT -5
Posters may find trouble finding this news right now because Durham did not publicly release this info to the national media. It is part of his Friday request to the Court and was buried in his request to the Court. Details involve not naming names other than person #1 And tech company #1 but it involves illegally tapping into then candidate Trump's servers of the campaign and continued on into the Computer servers in the White House as he was President. Dismiss this if you want, but it bleeds into the DOJ who was made aware of the situation and did not investigate into the spying on a sitting President. www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-campaign-paid-infiltrate-trump-tower-white-house-serversInteresting extension of what is actually indicated in the link. Didn't see anything about illegal activity other than lying about who was paying for the work. Not clear on tech side of the DNS lookups but seems like "spying" is a strong term for collecting that data. From the link: Durham wrote, adding that the "lookups were far from rare in the United States."But thanks for keeping us updated on the Durham investigation.
|
|
Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on Feb 13, 2022 11:22:09 GMT -5
Nothing to say about trumps treatment of confidential documents, his removing confidential documents to mar-a-lago, ripping up documents despite the law against that, and the missing phone logs o January 6. Let’s talk about that. Once that is dealt with and trump is in jail, then we can worry about Clinton. I am far more worried about the actions of a president and someone who is still trying to overthrow a legitimate election than I am of the prior acts of a has been So you have no problem with a coup attempt by the democrats started by Hillary, and then carried on by the DOJ for not looking into the servers when they were notified of Russian collusion by the company that illegally controlled the Presidential servers? And remember, there was nothing on the servers involving Trump and the White House. Illegal spying by anyone should be prosecuted regardless of who is saved by the investigation, in this case trump. Hillary and her campaign hired the group. The DNC was then brought in on it. Secret Service and FBI were then drawn into it, and failed to report anything about it. Even after they knew it was not true.
|
|
Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on Feb 13, 2022 11:30:30 GMT -5
Posters may find trouble finding this news right now because Durham did not publicly release this info to the national media. It is part of his Friday request to the Court and was buried in his request to the Court. Details involve not naming names other than person #1 And tech company #1 but it involves illegally tapping into then candidate Trump's servers of the campaign and continued on into the Computer servers in the White House as he was President. Dismiss this if you want, but it bleeds into the DOJ who was made aware of the situation and did not investigate into the spying on a sitting President. www.foxnews.com/politics/clinton-campaign-paid-infiltrate-trump-tower-white-house-serversInteresting extension of what is actually indicated in the link. Didn't see anything about illegal activity other than lying about who was paying for the work. Not clear on tech side of the DNS lookups but seems like "spying" is a strong term for collecting that data. From the link: Durham wrote, adding that the "lookups were far from rare in the United States."But thanks for keeping us updated on the Durham investigation. Glad you read the article. Durham's filing states that in July 2016, the tech executive worked with Sussmann, a U.S. investigative firm retained by Law Firm 1 on behalf of the Clinton campaign, numerous cyber researchers and employees at multiple internet companies to "assemble the purported data and white papers." "In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data," the filing states. "Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract." "Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish 'an inference' and 'narrative' tying then-candidate Trump to Russia," Durham states. "In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain 'VIPs,' referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign."
|
|
Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on Feb 13, 2022 11:31:51 GMT -5
And here is where it gets a little serious.
Durham also writes that during Sussmann's trial, the government will establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to "(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)."
SPECIAL COUNSEL JOHN DURHAM ‘STILL IN ACTION,’ GARLAND SAYS
Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP."
"Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states.
The filing also reveals that Sussmann provided "an updated set of allegations" including the Russian bank data, and additional allegations relating to Trump "to a second agency of the U.S. government" in 2017.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,475
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Feb 13, 2022 11:32:07 GMT -5
Nothing to say about trumps treatment of confidential documents, his removing confidential documents to mar-a-lago, ripping up documents despite the law against that, and the missing phone logs o January 6. Let’s talk about that. Once that is dealt with and trump is in jail, then we can worry about Clinton. I am far more worried about the actions of a president and someone who is still trying to overthrow a legitimate election than I am of the prior acts of a has been So you have no problem with a coup attempt by the democrats started by Hillary, and then carried on by the DOJ for not looking into the servers when they were notified of Russian collusion by the company that illegally controlled the Presidential servers? And remember, there was nothing on the servers involving Trump and the White House. Illegal spying by anyone should be prosecuted regardless of who is saved by the investigation, in this case trump. Hillary and her campaign hired the group. The DNC was then brought in on it. Secret Service and FBI were then drawn into it, and failed to report anything about it. Even after they knew it was not true. Fuck, first the "cult". Now a "coup". wow
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Feb 13, 2022 11:32:37 GMT -5
When Hillary orders the crowds to attack Trump at Mar-a-lago get back to us.
|
|
Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on Feb 13, 2022 11:33:38 GMT -5
When you are in the backdoor of Presidential servers gathering information you are on thin ice. Try doing that to a sitting democrat President.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,475
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Feb 13, 2022 11:34:28 GMT -5
Interesting extension of what is actually indicated in the link. Didn't see anything about illegal activity other than lying about who was paying for the work. Not clear on tech side of the DNS lookups but seems like "spying" is a strong term for collecting that data. From the link: Durham wrote, adding that the "lookups were far from rare in the United States."But thanks for keeping us updated on the Durham investigation. Glad you read the article. Durham's filing states that in July 2016, the tech executive worked with Sussmann, a U.S. investigative firm retained by Law Firm 1 on behalf of the Clinton campaign, numerous cyber researchers and employees at multiple internet companies to "assemble the purported data and white papers." "In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data," the filing states. "Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract." "Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish 'an inference' and 'narrative' tying then-candidate Trump to Russia," Durham states. "In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain 'VIPs,' referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign." And here is where it gets a little serious. Durham also writes that during Sussmann's trial, the government will establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to "(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)." SPECIAL COUNSEL JOHN DURHAM ‘STILL IN ACTION,’ GARLAND SAYS Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP." "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states. The filing also reveals that Sussmann provided "an updated set of allegations" including the Russian bank data, and additional allegations relating to Trump "to a second agency of the U.S. government" in 2017. Yes, that is what the linked article said.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Feb 13, 2022 11:39:08 GMT -5
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,055
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Feb 13, 2022 11:39:21 GMT -5
Nothing to say about trumps treatment of confidential documents, his removing confidential documents to mar-a-lago, ripping up documents despite the law against that, and the missing phone logs o January 6. Let’s talk about that. Once that is dealt with and trump is in jail, then we can worry about Clinton. I am far more worried about the actions of a president and someone who is still trying to overthrow a legitimate election than I am of the prior acts of a has been So you have no problem with a coup attempt by the democrats started by Hillary, and then carried on by the DOJ for not looking into the servers when they were notified of Russian collusion by the company that illegally controlled the Presidential servers? And remember, there was nothing on the servers involving Trump and the White House. Illegal spying by anyone should be prosecuted regardless of who is saved by the investigation, in this case trump. Hillary and her campaign hired the group. The DNC was then brought in on it. Secret Service and FBI were then drawn into it, and failed to report anything about it. Even after they knew it was not true. I have the same degree of problems with this as republicans have about trumps actions. When they are serious about dealing with trump and is lawlessness, get back to me. I think all lawlessness should be investigated and dealt with. However, I find the actions of a sitting president to be far mor dangerous than a private citizens actions. I am also far mor worried about a party that believes that January 6 was legitimate political discourse. ETA: what do you think we should do about trump and the riot/insurrection of January 6. For someone who posts many opinions you are quite mum about that. Denounce that, Trump, the servile republicans and the party and you may get some respect
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,818
|
Post by happyhoix on Feb 13, 2022 13:57:34 GMT -5
And here is where it gets a little serious. Durham also writes that during Sussmann's trial, the government will establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to "(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)." SPECIAL COUNSEL JOHN DURHAM ‘STILL IN ACTION,’ GARLAND SAYS Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP." "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states. The filing also reveals that Sussmann provided "an updated set of allegations" including the Russian bank data, and additional allegations relating to Trump "to a second agency of the U.S. government" in 2017. So a tech executive with a company that worked with dedicated servers for the government left himself a trap door where he could sneak some peeks at Trumps emails? Sounds serious. No wonder the DOJ is concerned. Where is the proof Hillary or Obama or Pelosi or the DNC had their fingers in this pie? I thought Trump said Durham would discover all the illegal things the evil Dems did in Russiagate? Seems like a lot of taxpayer dough to take in this one little fish. The DOJ investigation dug up much more important shit about Trump and his Russian ties.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,475
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Feb 13, 2022 15:18:10 GMT -5
And here is where it gets a little serious. Durham also writes that during Sussmann's trial, the government will establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic pertaining to "(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)." SPECIAL COUNSEL JOHN DURHAM ‘STILL IN ACTION,’ GARLAND SAYS Durham states that the internet company that Tech Executive-1 worked for "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers" for the Executive Office of the President as "part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP." "Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump," Durham states. The filing also reveals that Sussmann provided "an updated set of allegations" including the Russian bank data, and additional allegations relating to Trump "to a second agency of the U.S. government" in 2017. So a tech executive with a company that worked with dedicated servers for the government left himself a trap door where he could sneak some peeks at Trumps emails? Sounds serious. No wonder the DOJ is concerned. Where is the proof Hillary or Obama or Pelosi or the DNC had their fingers in this pie? I thought Trump said Durham would discover all the illegal things the evil Dems did in Russiagate? Seems like a lot of taxpayer dough to take in this one little fish. The DOJ investigation dug up much more important shit about Trump and his Russian ties. Where is there any suggestion that he had access to emails? I read the whole thing is about connecting electronic addresses showing who was talking to who, not what they were discussing.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Feb 13, 2022 17:41:34 GMT -5
vb seems to hang onto every consonant, vowel and punctuation mark of the Fox report on Special Counsel John Durham's findings.
Maybe the J6 Select Committee should hire John Durham as their Special Counsel and have him investigate all those who have refused to testify under oath in front of the J6SC. What are they hiding?
We need John Durham to maybe cross all the 'T's and dot the 'I's so we can convict traitor Donald Trump and all his insurrectionists.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Feb 13, 2022 19:05:40 GMT -5
Nothing to say about trumps treatment of confidential documents, his removing confidential documents to mar-a-lago, ripping up documents despite the law against that, and the missing phone logs o January 6. Let’s talk about that. Once that is dealt with and trump is in jail, then we can worry about Clinton. I am far more worried about the actions of a president and someone who is still trying to overthrow a legitimate election than I am of the prior acts of a has been So you have no problem with a coup attempt by the democrats started by Hillary, and then carried on by the DOJ for not looking into the servers when they were notified of Russian collusion by the company that illegally controlled the Presidential servers? And remember, there was nothing on the servers involving Trump and the White House. Illegal spying by anyone should be prosecuted regardless of who is saved by the investigation, in this case trump. Hillary and her campaign hired the group. The DNC was then brought in on it. Secret Service and FBI were then drawn into it, and failed to report anything about it. Even after they knew it was not true. Have you already forgotten that Trump's data analytics team did spy on individuals and literally called them at home to figure out how to influence them? What about the same team actively influencing black voters in Milwaukee and other places to suppress the vote? If you are unaware of this, and missed my numerous posts on Cambridge Analytica, I know nothing done prior to this including Hillary Rodham Clinton's and Obama's campaigns are even close to the malfeasance of what Trump's campaign did. And I hope going forward, nothing ever is that awful ever again in American politics.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,055
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Feb 13, 2022 19:14:39 GMT -5
It’s rich for republicans to care about this and to continue to defend trump and his behavior. Denounce trump and then we can take you seriously.
I am also amused at how blocking traffic is now ok. Seems like only yesterday they were passing bills allowing motorists to run people who were blocking traffic down. How is it possible to twist yourself in so many directions without breaking something?
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,818
|
Post by happyhoix on Feb 13, 2022 19:36:26 GMT -5
It’s rich for republicans to care about this and to continue to defend trump and his behavior. Denounce trump and then we can take you seriously. I am also amused at how blocking traffic is now ok. Seems like only yesterday they were passing bills allowing motorists to run people who were blocking traffic down. How is it possible to twist yourself in so many directions without breaking something? Well, they also wanted to frog March people to the street for sending non classified messages on private servers yet ignore the fact that Trump carted off fifteen boxes of documents (some classified) and parked them for a year in the garden shed or under the pool table or wherever else he stashed shit in maralago. Or how the GOP lost their minds when Obama golfed sometimes until Trump golfed four times more that he did, plus way overcharged the SS for golf cart rentals, or how the GOP was completely against the BLM mobs causing property damage until the MAGA heads vandalized the Capital, and then it’s just free speech. Hypocrites, all the MAGA heads and their leaders are hypocrites.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Feb 13, 2022 20:21:41 GMT -5
Sounds like a political witch hunt requested by former President Trump. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham#CareerOn November 1, 2017, he was nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as U.S. Attorney for Connecticut.[15] On February 16, 2018, his nomination was confirmed by voice vote of the Senate. He was sworn in on February 22, 2018.[12] Barr secretly appointed Durham Special Counsel on October 19, 2020.[16] Durham resigned as U.S. Attorney effective February 28, 2021.[6] He was one of 56 remaining Trump-appointed U.S. Attorneys President Biden asked to resign in February 2021.[17] He remains Special Counsel as of September 2021.[17]www.bing.com/search?q=Special+Counsel+John+Durham+&form=ANNTH1&refig=b7e43f713f5245de970408260923d8ca2020: The Times reported in February 2020 that Durham was examining whether intelligence community officials, and specifically Brennan, had concealed or manipulated evidence of Russian interference to achieve a desired result. 2020: Barr secretly appointed Durham Special Counsel on October 19, 2020. 2020: In December 2020, Barr revealed to Congress that he had secretly appointed Durham special counsel on October 19. 2021: On September 16, 2021, Durham indicted Michael Sussmann, a partner for the law firm Perkins Coie, alleging he falsely told FBI general counsel James Baker during a September 2016 meeting that he was not representing a client for their discussion.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Feb 13, 2022 20:22:33 GMT -5
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Feb 14, 2022 1:54:18 GMT -5
the only coup attempt i have seen is the one initiated by Trump. it is still underway by undermining the vote in as many Republican controlled swing states as possible.
THAT is what we ALL should be worried about.
not this.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Feb 14, 2022 11:23:13 GMT -5
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Feb 14, 2022 11:55:29 GMT -5
I hope they allow these men to sue. I do not find Jordan's denials plausible. He will have some interesting career ramifications should these cases go to trial.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Feb 14, 2022 11:59:08 GMT -5
I hope they allow these men to sue. I do not find Jordan's denials plausible. He will have some interesting career ramifications should these cases go to trial. Jordan is deny, deny, deny whether it's the sexual abuse at OSU or that Trump lost the election and the J6 insurrectionists were violent.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Feb 14, 2022 11:59:37 GMT -5
Sounds like a political witch hunt requested by former President Trump. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Durham#CareerOn November 1, 2017, he was nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as U.S. Attorney for Connecticut.[15] On February 16, 2018, his nomination was confirmed by voice vote of the Senate. He was sworn in on February 22, 2018.[12]
Barr secretly appointed Durham Special Counsel on October 19, 2020.[16] Durham resigned as U.S. Attorney effective February 28, 2021.[6] He was one of 56 remaining Trump-appointed U.S. Attorneys President Biden asked to resign in February 2021.[17] He remains Special Counsel as of September 2021.[17]www.bing.com/search?q=Special+Counsel+John+Durham+&form=ANNTH1&refig=b7e43f713f5245de970408260923d8ca2020: The Times reported in February 2020 that Durham was examining whether intelligence community officials, and specifically Brennan, had concealed or manipulated evidence of Russian interference to achieve a desired result. 2020: Barr secretly appointed Durham Special Counsel on October 19, 2020. 2020: In December 2020, Barr revealed to Congress that he had secretly appointed Durham special counsel on October 19. 2021: On September 16, 2021, Durham indicted Michael Sussmann, a partner for the law firm Perkins Coie, alleging he falsely told FBI general counsel James Baker during a September 2016 meeting that he was not representing a client for their discussion.I'm going to do a SCP, and point out this was done secretly, less than a month before the 2020 election and roughly three months before President Trump's term ended.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Feb 14, 2022 12:01:23 GMT -5
I hope they allow these men to sue. I do not find Jordan's denials plausible. He will have some interesting career ramifications should these cases go to trial. Jordan is deny, deny, deny whether it's the sexual abuse at OSU or that Trump lost the election and the J6 insurrectionists were violent. I wonder how denials taste when served in court?
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Feb 14, 2022 16:51:15 GMT -5
sounds incredibly fishy to me.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Feb 14, 2022 17:06:12 GMT -5
“ We’ve never seen anything like this in history,” Jordan added. “So President Trump’s statement yesterday, I think is right on target. This is truly unprecedented, truly something that has never happened in the history of our great country.” this is absolute bullshit, btw. even IF the allegations were true, it is NOTHING compared to the FISA spying that has taken place on ordinary citizens since FISA was first created. it is NOTHING compared to CO-INTEL-PRO, and any of a dozen OTHER similar programs in the last half century. it is NOTHING compared to what the NSA is doing to everyone in the US every hour of every day in the US: www.eff.org/nsa-spyingeither Jordan is WOEFULLY ignorant on this subject, he is a fucking liar, or both. but i won't ask for the death penalty for how stupid he is. just for him to STFU.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Feb 14, 2022 17:07:43 GMT -5
got a new nickname for him, based on everything i have read about him:
Bullshit Durham
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Feb 14, 2022 17:30:30 GMT -5
this link is super tenuous. this is how the Trump campaign tends to do things.
for example, he claimed that the "Clinton Campaign" started the birther thing. that is false. the Clinton Campaign didn't exist when that came out. FORMER MEMBERS of the Clinton Campaign, WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE did that.
i would bet $100 that the same lie is being trotted out here. in other words, even based on Trumps statements, there is NOTHING that ties Clinton to the spying (EVEN IF IT WERE TRUE).
so, we have questionable spying and questionable connections to the spying, but Trump treats it as if it is a capital offense against Clinton herself.
this is complete rubbish.
|
|