Rukh O'Rorke
Senior Associate
Joined: Jul 4, 2016 13:31:15 GMT -5
Posts: 10,311 
|
Post by Rukh O'Rorke on Jul 15, 2018 1:30:13 GMT -5
The election proved no such thing.
|
|
ken a.k.a OMK
Senior Associate
They killed Kenny, the bastards.
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 14:39:20 GMT -5
Posts: 14,271 
Location: Maryland
|
Post by ken a.k.a OMK on Jul 15, 2018 10:11:49 GMT -5
What did the election prove? Oh that she was the peoples choice. Look at the mess you wound up with. The swamp is worst then ever. We are losing our world allies. Congress is non-functional.
|
|
ednkris
Well-Known Member
Joined: Feb 7, 2016 9:11:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,176
|
Post by ednkris on Jul 15, 2018 10:24:11 GMT -5
What did the election prove? Oh that she was the peoples choice. Look at the mess you wound up with. The swamp is worst then ever. We are losing our world allies. Congress is non-functional. Peoples choco thank god for the electoral college. Swamp no the swamp is actually getting cleaned. You mean we are the world's money bitch and that is finally stopping. Congress is actually working better not just ass kissing each other like the previous administrations |
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Jul 15, 2018 13:18:09 GMT -5
I have told since day one,, I didn't vote for Trump,,, I voted against Hillary,,,
You are clearly a Trump supporter and voted for him. Say what you will. |
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Jul 15, 2018 13:41:34 GMT -5
What did the election prove? Oh that she was the peoples choice. Look at the mess you wound up with. The swamp is worst then ever. We are losing our world allies. Congress is non-functional. Now the ignorant and bloated pus-bag is saying that the European Union is America's foe. Good thing he still has a good buddy in Putin and Kim Jong Un. |
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Jul 15, 2018 13:46:35 GMT -5
|
|
ken a.k.a OMK
Senior Associate
They killed Kenny, the bastards.
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 14:39:20 GMT -5
Posts: 14,271
Location: Maryland
|
Post by ken a.k.a OMK on Jul 15, 2018 14:55:16 GMT -5
America's foe is Trump.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 15, 2018 15:42:00 GMT -5
I thought I replied but lost it, newbie here...Hatian, you last post proves my point your willing to condemn Trump for divorce cheating, saying inappropriate things all before he was president, but this strozk. Will be honest when he says things negative against the person he is investigating there is supposed to be neutrality here. FWIW I thought the Clinton Lewinsky affair was nobody's business either. The fact he lied was the issue for me. i think Hatian is just pointing out the hypocrisy of those that are criticizing Strzok for it, but voting for and continuing to supportTrump. none of us voted for Strzok. PS- as far as i am concerned, cheating is between the cheater and his spouse. it has no business in the public eye, and should not be a mark against any sitting official. in other parts of the world our weirdly puritanical view of public officials is mocked. and yes, this is me saying that we look silly and strange to others in this respect. PS- welcome to the board.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,288
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Jul 15, 2018 15:45:37 GMT -5
I am curious why you think its important Donald is rich and at least some of the women were willing to cheat with him? Isn't that how it generally works, willing cheaters cheat with other willing cheaters?
People defend and ignore Trump infidelities. I don't understand why if they are doing that, they won't do it for Strzok. Some great hypocrites were among the questioners. One guy with a pro-life stand has had multiple affairs and has had both his wife and another woman have an abortion. There is no value in playing black pot versus black kettle, or even supporter of black kettle, but not you black pot. It makes one look exceedingly stupid.
ARE You saying I am, or I have EVER defended Trumps screwing around with other women. I personally don't remember or know what you feel about Trump's screwing around. But you are OK with him being President. I do not get why you would invoke Trump or a similar rich guy is discussing Strzok. It implies to me you are OK with rich guys doing so but not Strzok. |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 15, 2018 15:45:41 GMT -5
What did the election prove? Oh that she was the peoples choice. Look at the mess you wound up with. The swamp is worst then ever. We are losing our world allies. Congress is non-functional. Peoples choco thank god for the electoral college. Swamp no the swamp is actually getting cleaned. You mean we are the world's money bitch and that is finally stopping. Congress is actually working better not just ass kissing each other like the previous administrations this might be an interesting moment to reflect on the presidents we got when the EC overruled the popular vote: 1824: John Quincy Adams.
1876: Rutherford B. Hayes.
1888: Benjamin Harrison.
2000: George W. Bush.
2016: Donald Trump. here is a quick quiz question for you: which of those presidents fall in the top half of presidential historians rankings? the time for doubting the wisdom of the general public in these matters is officially over.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 15, 2018 15:47:25 GMT -5
I am curious why you think its important Donald is rich and at least some of the women were willing to cheat with him? Isn't that how it generally works, willing cheaters cheat with other willing cheaters?
People defend and ignore Trump infidelities. I don't understand why if they are doing that, they won't do it for Strzok. Some great hypocrites were among the questioners. One guy with a pro-life stand has had multiple affairs and has had both his wife and another woman have an abortion. There is no value in playing black pot versus black kettle, or even supporter of black kettle, but not you black pot. It makes one look exceedingly stupid.
ARE You saying I am, or I have EVER defended Trumps screwing around with other women. are you saying that any of us have defended Strzok for doing so? |
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,288
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
|
Post by Opti on Jul 15, 2018 15:49:28 GMT -5
Library computer acting up. AS, if you didn't mention anything about rich guys cheating, it wouldn't bring up wondering why you even said it. Strzok's cheating is totally unimportant when evaluating whether he acted with bias or not. Texting with bias is not proof. Texting not liking Trump is not automatically pro-Hillary, pro Jill Stein or anyone else.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 15, 2018 15:53:47 GMT -5
Library computer acting up. AS, if you didn't mention anything about rich guys cheating, it wouldn't bring up wondering why you even said it. Strzok's cheating is totally unimportant when evaluating whether he acted with bias or not. Texting with bias is not proof. Texting not liking Trump is not automatically pro-Hillary, pro Jill Stein or anyone else. there is no evidence that he texted with bias. as has been pointed out for MONTHS, Strzok also excoriated Sanders, Clinton, Biden and a host of other "non-Republicans". if anything, Strzok seems biased against shill, sellouts, populists, and opportunists- WHICH IS ALL TO HIS CREDIT. the only POSITIVE thing he had to say seemed to be about Kasich, who he called "ok"- hardly a ringing endorsement. in short, he seems like a really jaded, cynical bastard who PRIVATELY tells people about it. i can't really hold it against him, since i do it, too- as does almost everyone here.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,780
|
Post by Tennesseer on Jul 15, 2018 16:01:38 GMT -5
What did the election prove? Oh that she was the peoples choice. Look at the mess you wound up with. The swamp is worst then ever. We are losing our world allies. Congress is non-functional. Peoples choco thank god for the electoral college. Swamp no the swamp is actually getting cleaned. You mean we are the world's money bitch and that is finally stopping. Congress is actually working better not just ass kissing each other like the previous administrations The swamp is getting cleaned-trump's chosen officials are saying 'What the fuck-I'm out of here this guy is nuts" or they're getting canned. Just a bit more cleaning of the swamp is required. Booting the trumps out of Washington is a good start. |
|
ednkris
Well-Known Member
Joined: Feb 7, 2016 9:11:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,176
|
Post by ednkris on Jul 15, 2018 16:54:23 GMT -5
Peoples choco thank god for the electoral college. Swamp no the swamp is actually getting cleaned. You mean we are the world's money bitch and that is finally stopping. Congress is actually working better not just ass kissing each other like the previous administrations this might be an interesting moment to reflect on the presidents we got when the EC overruled the popular vote: 1824: John Quincy Adams.
1876: Rutherford B. Hayes.
1888: Benjamin Harrison.
2000: George W. Bush.
2016: Donald Trump. here is a quick quiz question for you: which of those presidents fall in the top half of presidential historians rankings? the time for doubting the wisdom of the general public in these matters is officially over.
So your saying it's OK that only a few states gets to decide the election |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 15, 2018 17:04:38 GMT -5
this might be an interesting moment to reflect on the presidents we got when the EC overruled the popular vote: 1824: John Quincy Adams.
1876: Rutherford B. Hayes.
1888: Benjamin Harrison.
2000: George W. Bush.
2016: Donald Trump. here is a quick quiz question for you: which of those presidents fall in the top half of presidential historians rankings? the time for doubting the wisdom of the general public in these matters is officially over.
So your saying it's OK that only a few states gets to decide the election nope. i am saying that NO states should get to decide the presidential election. so, your (sic) saying that a voter in Wyoming should have 4x the say of me in presidential elections?
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,369
|
Post by billisonboard on Jul 15, 2018 17:59:40 GMT -5
... The swamp is worst then ever. ... ... the swamp is actually getting cleaned. ... There are plenty of people who are ending their employment by the Federal Government. If those people were dedicated public servants working for the good of our nation, we are the worse for losing them. If they were smug bureaucrats pushing their personal agenda down the throats everyday Americans, we are better off without them. |
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Jul 15, 2018 18:02:22 GMT -5
Only if you can vote for him, defend him, and then find fault with those that did the same thing as long as they are Demos. I have told since day one,, I didn't vote for Trump,,, I voted against Hillary,,, I said that even before the election. I thought She was going to win, poll after poll said she was going to win, I can not tell you how happy I was when She lost!
She was the worse possible candidate that could have run,, as the election proved she was worse than Trump!
How did the election prove that? She got more votes than the douchecanoe named Trump. |
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jul 15, 2018 19:55:25 GMT -5
I have told since day one,, I didn't vote for Trump,,, I voted against Hillary,,, I said that even before the election. I thought She was going to win, poll after poll said she was going to win, I can not tell you how happy I was when She lost!
She was the worse possible candidate that could have run,, as the election proved she was worse than Trump!
How did the election prove that? She got more votes than the douchecanoe named Trump. Not the one's that counted! |
|
countrygirl2
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 7, 2016 15:45:05 GMT -5
Posts: 17,623
|
Post by countrygirl2 on Jul 16, 2018 7:56:14 GMT -5
Yeah and we are suffering for it. People knew who would be the best and our institution kept her from being in.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 16, 2018 10:35:25 GMT -5
How did the election prove that? She got more votes than the douchecanoe named Trump. Not the one's that counted! every vote counts. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 10, 2024 1:34:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2018 11:07:55 GMT -5
This is my first time posting..although I have been Reading for the last couple of months. I am amazed at the level of hypocrisy of liberals and democrats supporters on this board. So yes I am a conservative. There is always a plausible explanation for anything that supports the lefts agenda but Trump oh no can't go there he is already guilty. Truly amazing. BTW I am a white middle age avg income male...I know I'm the bad guy. With all the text evidence against Stock how can anyone defend him in thinking he would be neutral in an investigation. He deseven everything they threw at him the democrats should be ashamed how their representitives were defending him The democrats should be ashamed? The DEMOCRATS? Lol! The Republicans should be ashamed for voting in this ill-mannered, ignorant boor of a con man named Trump. Versus the fluff pansy Justin.  Trumps here to stay, Tariffs anyone  |
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 10, 2024 1:34:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2018 11:10:24 GMT -5
Not the one's that counted! every vote counts. In a democracy. |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 16, 2018 11:13:16 GMT -5
or a democratic republic, such as ours. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 10, 2024 1:34:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2018 11:46:52 GMT -5
or a democratic republic, such as ours. You will need to google how a US presidential election works in our republic. Both candidates were playing by the same rules. They apply to you also. |
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Jul 16, 2018 12:26:43 GMT -5
That's a bit of a low rent insult.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,700
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 16, 2018 14:51:46 GMT -5
or a democratic republic, such as ours. You will need to google how a US presidential election works in our republic. Both candidates were playing by the same rules. They apply to you also. one candidate may eventually be impeached for failing to play by the rules. so, frankly, this response is utter bullshit. no offense.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,841
|
Post by thyme4change on Jul 16, 2018 18:51:18 GMT -5
Not the one's that counted! every vote counts. I wish. |
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jul 16, 2018 22:52:34 GMT -5
Woooo Hooooo Trump is Making America Great Again!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 10, 2024 1:34:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2018 11:31:16 GMT -5
You will need to google how a US presidential election works in our republic. Both candidates were playing by the same rules. They apply to you also. one candidate may eventually be impeached for failing to play by the rules. so, frankly, this response is utter bullshit. no offense.
Democrats have been waiting for years, for the Bill Clinton payback on impeaching. Not going to happen without hard evidence, media innuendo doesn't count as hard evidence. Your answer should play well for the usual audience. No offense taken. You do realize that Russia has been attempting to interfere with elections in all Western democracies don't you ? To create division and weakness ? Hardly earth shaking information. I take the time to view both sides of an issue. |
|
