Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,891 
|
Post by Tennesseer on Apr 21, 2013 20:30:36 GMT -5
I don't think the 9/11 attacks were Clinton's fault... but I also don't think they were Bush's fault. We can discuss that in another thread if you like. This is just a new usage of the term "let in here" to me. It would be interesting to see it applied to undocumented workers, but that to is an issue for another thread. In my experience, I have always thought that I let people into my home when I opened my door to them, not when I added their name to the mortgage. But you know a lot more about real estate than me, so maybe without any sort of permanent legal status, my houseguests were never really here?  I used the term quite deliberately. There's an enormous problem when a person here legally exits the country for six months to attend a radical mosque in Russia, the FBI interviews him and finds no issues. There's HUGE problem when Russia (or some "mystery country") warns us directly you've got a terrorist living there, we interview the guy, find nothing wrong, and less than a year before he murders 4 and mames hundreds in the name of Islam, we make the a citizen. It doesn't get any more "letting them in" than that. This is a massive- and frighteningly willful- intelligence failure by an administration that STILL won't admit we have a problem with radical islamic extremism. Russia asked the U.S./FBI in 2011 to interview the guy. They did. There were no findings. The guy didn't leave for Russia until 2012. Russia, the country of which he was still a citizen. I doubt this guy is the only legal resident who has ever gone back to the home country for an extended visit. Many do. If Russia was so interested in this guy (in 2011)while he lived in the U.S., why wasn't Russia watching him when he returned there in 2012? |
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Apr 22, 2013 8:44:29 GMT -5
I used the term quite deliberately. There's an enormous problem when a person here legally exits the country for six months to attend a radical mosque in Russia, the FBI interviews him and finds no issues. There's HUGE problem when Russia (or some "mystery country") warns us directly you've got a terrorist living there, we interview the guy, find nothing wrong, and less than a year before he murders 4 and mames hundreds in the name of Islam, we make the a citizen. It doesn't get any more "letting them in" than that. This is a massive- and frighteningly willful- intelligence failure by an administration that STILL won't admit we have a problem with radical islamic extremism. Russia asked the U.S./FBI in 2011 to interview the guy. They did. There were no findings. The guy didn't leave for Russia until 2012. Russia, the country of which he was still a citizen. I doubt this guy is the only legal resident who has ever gone back to the home country for an extended visit. Many do. If Russia was so interested in this guy (in 2011)while he lived in the U.S., why wasn't Russia watching him when he returned there in 2012? Right. No findings. Which turns out to have been complete horseshit because we have an administration that is not merely overly politically correct, but is overly politically correct precisely because they are sympathetic to radical islam- having the far-left worldview that they wouldn't hate us so much if we didn't back Israel, and we didn't oppress them. As I stated: frighteningly willful. |
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Apr 22, 2013 9:00:46 GMT -5
Well the investigation should just stop. After all, our resident "expert" states Obama did it, so that should be good enough for everyone because you shouldn't doubt him ever.
<snicker>
|
|
