cranberry49
Familiar Member
'Sometimes the simple things are the prettiest'
Joined: Jul 15, 2011 21:09:58 GMT -5
Posts: 734
|
Post by cranberry49 on Feb 7, 2012 10:21:56 GMT -5
I don't think you would actually decrease obesity. You would increase it. More starch, less fruit and vegetables, at least in urban areas. Maybe it would work in wealthier suburban areas with better stores. The probable result in the city would be fewer sales at farmer's markets, more in small bodegas with limited produce. White rice, potatoes, white bread, plantains, corn and other starches are fattening, cheap and easy. I understand what you're saying here, tt. However, there are other options. Brown rice, whole wheat bread, etc. This is how I eat myself. As far as the beans go, they are complex carbohydrates and very healthy. Even if all they ate were the things you listed above, it would still be healthier and a lot more nutritious than eating only junk food. Especially sweets, which have almost no nutrition what-so-ever...
|
|
formerroomate99
Junior Associate
Joined: Sept 12, 2011 13:33:12 GMT -5
Posts: 7,381
|
Post by formerroomate99 on Feb 7, 2012 10:26:10 GMT -5
You know, when we're talking about forcing Catholic hospitals to do elective abortions and Catholic adoption agencies to adopt out to gay couples, most of the left leaning folks on this board say "You take the King's shilling, you do the king's bidding", but when we talk about having any kind of restrictions on what folks buying food on the government's dime, the same people say the government shouldn't restrict what these folks buy with the government's money. Curious isn't it?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 10:32:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2012 10:28:24 GMT -5
I was watching the Sunday morning political talk shows and I really liked how one of the Democrats rationalized it. To summary he said that as long as the Church as acting like a church they can follow their beliefs without anyone batting an eye, but as soon as the Church wants to operate as a business in the business world they have to follow the rules of all other businesses.
|
|
cranberry49
Familiar Member
'Sometimes the simple things are the prettiest'
Joined: Jul 15, 2011 21:09:58 GMT -5
Posts: 734
|
Post by cranberry49 on Feb 7, 2012 10:30:09 GMT -5
I use to have a neighbor on FS (I know this because I took her grocery shopping several times) she had two young children. I felt so sorry for those kids. All they ate was junk. No lie. I mean literally nothing but junk. Her groceries consisted of potato chips, soda, pizza, ice cream, cookies, etc. I don't ever remember her buying any vegetables or meat that she had to cook herself. She is not the only one out there that does this either. And yes, she was obese and lazy. I watched her literally make her 4 year old son change her babies diaper! Those kids will grow up with all kinds of health problems, not to mention a shortened life span. They have to be literally starving for vitamins and minerals that there diets are sorely missing. This is where my heart goes out to. The children. The poor most definitely do need help. But, they need to wise up and make better choices for their kids sakes.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Feb 7, 2012 10:40:51 GMT -5
We just did a dinner at the Lodge last Saturday. We cooked for 180 and fed 150+- a handful. Cost of all ingredients was a little under $500. Cost per plate worked out to around $2.77 (prepped) and $3.34 per plate (served) for a meatloaf dinner with cheesy potatoes, broccoli and dinner roll. Deserts were all donated at no cost to us so I didn't include them. Eating a decent meal doesn't have to be expensive. You get that there were some economies of scale involved, right? You could not cook that same meal for 4 for $2.77 per person. I sure could. We bought 5 lb packages of ground chuck off the same shelf we usually do, not a 50 lb bucket. Everything we bought, we also purchase to use at home....just a lot more of it. Immaterial, considering a heart attack in a bag meal at your local fast food joint will cost about the same and cuts into your $4.50/day just like my dinner would. So, meatloaf that requires a little work or greasy bag of crap that requires none. It's a pretty easy choice for me to make. I'd also imagine my dinner would hold you over a lot longer than $3.00 in fast food would.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on Feb 7, 2012 10:43:56 GMT -5
We just did a dinner at the Lodge last Saturday. We cooked for 180 and fed 150+- a handful. Cost of all ingredients was a little under $500. Cost per plate worked out to around $2.77 (prepped) and $3.34 per plate (served) for a meatloaf dinner with cheesy potatoes, broccoli and dinner roll. Deserts were all donated at no cost to us so I didn't include them. Eating a decent meal doesn't have to be expensive. You get that there were some economies of scale involved, right? You could not cook that same meal for 4 for $2.77 per person. And food stamp benefits are only about $4.50 per person per day. So spending close to $3 for dinner really cuts in to your breakfast and lunch options. I cook for a family of 5 nightly for less than 10 per night, or roughly $2 per person with fresh veggis and dessert.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 10:32:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2012 10:44:25 GMT -5
You know, when we're talking about forcing Catholic hospitals to do elective abortions and Catholic adoption agencies to adopt out to gay couples, most of the left leaning folks on this board say "You take the King's shilling, you do the king's bidding", but when we talk about having any kind of restrictions on what folks buying food on the government's dime, the same people say the government shouldn't restrict what these folks buy with the government's money. Curious isn't it? There was a great Daily Show story on drug testing welfare recipients and how that program saved Florida negative $200,000. Realistically, I think that is how this would go. It is a nice idea to keep people from eating junk, but I don't think there is a cost effective way to do it - so this would be a high cost, low benefit way to erode our libertarian values. The math just doesn't work for me.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Feb 7, 2012 10:47:25 GMT -5
Anybody remember that bill to cut down on corporate welfare? Oh right, when millionaires get more millions they don't need, somehow that's acceptable. You apparently read a different thread than I did. Most people are in favor of removing corporate subsidies.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on Feb 7, 2012 10:53:20 GMT -5
Since the inception of the WIC program in 1974 the infrastructure has been there the onus is on the retailer to sell the appropriate Items as classified by the Federal Government, it would not take a lot of money or man power on the Federal side to institute a change such as this.
(I am playing Devils Advocate)
|
|
formerroomate99
Junior Associate
Joined: Sept 12, 2011 13:33:12 GMT -5
Posts: 7,381
|
Post by formerroomate99 on Feb 7, 2012 11:01:25 GMT -5
You know, when we're talking about forcing Catholic hospitals to do elective abortions and Catholic adoption agencies to adopt out to gay couples, most of the left leaning folks on this board say "You take the King's shilling, you do the king's bidding", but when we talk about having any kind of restrictions on what folks buying food on the government's dime, the same people say the government shouldn't restrict what these folks buy with the government's money. Curious isn't it? There was a great Daily Show story on drug testing welfare recipients and how that program saved Florida negative $200,000. Realistically, I think that is how this would go. It is a nice idea to keep people from eating junk, but I don't think there is a cost effective way to do it - so this would be a high cost, low benefit way to erode our libertarian values. The math just doesn't work for me. Again, it is the retailers who are paying for this, not government. Do you think that magic fairy dust is the reason people on food stamps can't use them to buy cigarettes or diapers? The cash registers are already programmed to weed out the eligible and not eligible stuff. All it would take is a minor change in the code to get this done. This type of thing won't cost the government much of anything and will be a pretty cheap adjustment for the vast majority of retailers.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 10:32:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2012 11:14:46 GMT -5
Big retailers perhaps - someone should ask Loony what this would cost her to implement.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,794
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Feb 7, 2012 11:15:25 GMT -5
Since the inception of the WIC program in 1974 the infrastructure has been there the onus is on the retailer to sell the appropriate Items as classified by the Federal Government, it would not take a lot of money or man power on the Federal side to institute a change such as this. (I am playing Devils Advocate) WIC and foodstamps are different programs. With WIC you can only get what's on the list and with foodstamps I believe you are limited to buying food, i.e. no TP. The latter is an easy exception to code because it doesn't fall into a food category. I do think it will cost the retailers more to administer and provide very little useful benefit. I think pasta and white rice is probably a larger problem than cookies but given the junk food grocery shopper example above my guess is she would just buy more pizza, sugary cereal, etc. instead of promoting health in any way. JMO.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Feb 7, 2012 11:16:56 GMT -5
Since the inception of the WIC program in 1974 the infrastructure has been there the onus is on the retailer to sell the appropriate Items as classified by the Federal Government, it would not take a lot of money or man power on the Federal side to institute a change such as this. (I am playing Devils Advocate) As am I. I never support more government control, but I also don't support long term reliance on government. We have let government intrude further and further into our every day lives all in the name of protecting us from ourselves. We've called for increased control and regulation of our lives because we're apparently too stupid to make our own choices (all of us except food stamp recipients apparently). We voted these idiots in, so the government we get is the government we deserve. A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on Feb 7, 2012 11:34:32 GMT -5
Since the inception of the WIC program in 1974 the infrastructure has been there the onus is on the retailer to sell the appropriate Items as classified by the Federal Government, it would not take a lot of money or man power on the Federal side to institute a change such as this. (I am playing Devils Advocate) WIC and foodstamps are different programs. With WIC you can only get what's on the list and with foodstamps I believe you are limited to buying food, i.e. no TP. The latter is an easy exception to code because it doesn't fall into a food category. I do think it will cost the retailers more to administer and provide very little useful benefit. I think pasta and white rice is probably a larger problem than cookies but given the junk food grocery shopper example above my guess is she would just buy more pizza, sugary cereal, etc. instead of promoting health in any way. JMO. Correct 2 different programs that would be able to use the same infrastructure for limiting purchases. Code that states Bread = food, Soda = not food, meat = food, prepared dish = not food, milk = food, hi-c = not food, juice = food, juice flavored ice pops = not food. Both run along the same guiding factor, the only thing that will affect the retailer is the first 6 months of having to restock the products that are ruled not allowed by the program.
|
|
cranberry49
Familiar Member
'Sometimes the simple things are the prettiest'
Joined: Jul 15, 2011 21:09:58 GMT -5
Posts: 734
|
Post by cranberry49 on Feb 7, 2012 12:07:09 GMT -5
I use to have a neighbor on FS (I know this because I took her grocery shopping several times) she had two young children. I felt so sorry for those kids. All they ate was junk. No lie. I mean literally nothing but junk. Her groceries consisted of potato chips, soda, pizza, ice cream, cookies, etc. I don't ever remember her buying any vegetables or meat that she had to cook herself. She is not the only one out there that does this either. And yes, she was obese and lazy. I watched her literally make her 4 year old son change her babies diaper! Those kids will grow up with all kinds of health problems, not to mention a shortened life span. They have to be literally starving for vitamins and minerals that there diets are sorely missing. This is where my heart goes out to. The children. The poor most definitely do need help. But, they need to wise up and make better choices for their kids sakes. Hasn't a junk food diet been linked to deviant social behavior? I have no idea, lone. But if so, then this woman is a perfect example!
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,794
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Feb 7, 2012 12:21:34 GMT -5
WIC and foodstamps are different programs. With WIC you can only get what's on the list and with foodstamps I believe you are limited to buying food, i.e. no TP. The latter is an easy exception to code because it doesn't fall into a food category. I do think it will cost the retailers more to administer and provide very little useful benefit. I think pasta and white rice is probably a larger problem than cookies but given the junk food grocery shopper example above my guess is she would just buy more pizza, sugary cereal, etc. instead of promoting health in any way. JMO. Correct 2 different programs that would be able to use the same infrastructure for limiting purchases. Code that states Bread = food, Soda = not food, meat = food, prepared dish = not food, milk = food, hi-c = not food, juice = food, juice flavored ice pops = not food. Both run along the same guiding factor, the only thing that will affect the retailer is the first 6 months of having to restock the products that are ruled not allowed by the program. Its not the same infrastructure at all though. WIC I believe is only certain listed items, not categories so it is totally different in implementation. Not sure if every retailer is required to deal with WIC but the only one I notice that actively flags items is an ethnic leaning grocery store. Based on what I see on the shelves it is this juice is WIC approved(those not so flagged I believe are not), this bag of frozen veggies is WIC approved, etc. I think you have to purchase what's on the list which is totally different than foodstamps which just excludes categories like non-grocery, cigarettes, and alcohol. I have noticed in general where I see WIC approved tags is that the prices are higher than average.
|
|
zibazinski
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Posts: 47,869
|
Post by zibazinski on Feb 7, 2012 12:27:06 GMT -5
Those people on food stamps are getting their kids fed breakfast and lunch btw.
|
|
cranberry49
Familiar Member
'Sometimes the simple things are the prettiest'
Joined: Jul 15, 2011 21:09:58 GMT -5
Posts: 734
|
Post by cranberry49 on Feb 7, 2012 12:29:01 GMT -5
As CME stated above, all the managers would have to do is redifine the code in the cash registers to recognize the item as food approved for FS purchase or not. The same way toilet paper, alcohol, washing powders, all non-food items are already done. Use to be that food stamp items had to be seperated from the other items. Not so anymore. It is all done with a bar code and is all dependant on what the manager puts into the cash register.
|
|
cranberry49
Familiar Member
'Sometimes the simple things are the prettiest'
Joined: Jul 15, 2011 21:09:58 GMT -5
Posts: 734
|
Post by cranberry49 on Feb 7, 2012 12:30:33 GMT -5
WIC is actually harder to do. I use to work at a grocery store and I know this first hand. You have to manually check the items to make sure it is wic approved, then write in the price after it is rung up.
|
|
Phoenix84
Senior Associate
Joined: Feb 17, 2011 21:42:35 GMT -5
Posts: 10,056
|
Post by Phoenix84 on Feb 7, 2012 13:03:08 GMT -5
"Critics say the government shouldn't be telling people what to eat."
When you hand over providing for your basic needs to the government, you should expect instrusion into your life. He who has the gold makes the rules. If you don't like it, get off food stamps.
|
|
pepper112765
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 9, 2011 15:55:30 GMT -5
Posts: 1,812
|
Post by pepper112765 on Feb 7, 2012 13:08:17 GMT -5
But I don't understand why it would cost any more. The grocery stores know what can be purchased with food stamps and what can't. They are already doing it. You beat me to it, girl! ;D I don't think that the recipients will be raising that much hell if they are precluded from buying prepackaged snacks...it is not as if they are precluded from buying sugar, etc., to make cookies and cakes. The manufacturers will be making the most noice. People tend to adapt pretty easily to which they have no control over.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 10:32:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2012 13:18:46 GMT -5
Every able bodied person of relatively sound mind receiving food stamps should have to do something in return, even if that means sweeping the streets a few hours a day, then I wouldn’t care if they bought smokes and booze with them.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,445
|
Post by thyme4change on Feb 7, 2012 13:22:44 GMT -5
I'm not sure how denying cookies makes produce more or less available. I'm not seeing the connection at all.
|
|
pepper112765
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 9, 2011 15:55:30 GMT -5
Posts: 1,812
|
Post by pepper112765 on Feb 7, 2012 13:28:02 GMT -5
Every able bodied person of relatively sound mind receiving food stamps should have to do something in return, even if that means sweeping the streets a few hours a day, then I wouldn’t care if they bought smokes and booze with them. That is based on the assumption that all those receiving food stamps do not work. A lot do work. They don't make enough after paying for housing and utilities to buy food.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 39,794
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Feb 7, 2012 13:33:48 GMT -5
As CME stated above, all the managers would have to do is redifine the code in the cash registers to recognize the item as food approved for FS purchase or not. The same way toilet paper, alcohol, washing powders, all non-food items are already done. Use to be that food stamp items had to be seperated from the other items. Not so anymore. It is all done with a bar code and is all dependant on what the manager puts into the cash register. My guess is taxable, non-taxable, and currently what is food stamp OK is by category not individual items/bar codes. Perhaps given how often price changes percolate through the system it wouldn't be that big of a deal for the larger chains. My guess is the manager doesn't do the price changes in bigger grocery chain stores, but they are downloaded to all stores at a regular time. Since its Florida I'm sure the law will pass. I wonder if they will drop all baking mixes as well. Flour, sugar, baking soda, baking powder, salt, vanilla, butter or butter substitute do cost money and the start up costs for baking would be over $10 easy. That doesn't even count the cost of pans and spices that aren't cinnamon. Maybe I should move to Florida if the law passes and start a black market in baked goods.
|
|
pepper112765
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 9, 2011 15:55:30 GMT -5
Posts: 1,812
|
Post by pepper112765 on Feb 7, 2012 13:36:31 GMT -5
I'm not sure how denying cookies makes produce more or less available. I'm not seeing the connection at all. The connection is that in most urban neighborhoods they have corner stores, bodegas, what have you, that do not sell fresh produce or even have a large selection of items from which to choose, but do sell pre-packaged meals-- Oodles of Noodles, Top Ramen, etc., and the prices are higher for things like bread and milk. Decent grocery stores are not within walking distance or even a moderate bus ride with no transfers. The District of Columbia (where I work) is a prime example. There are really not a lot of grocery retailers in the poorer sections of the city -- north and east of the Anacostia River. Walmart is trying to get a store in each quadrant...And say what you want about Walmart, at least those residents will have more selections to choose from.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Feb 7, 2012 13:54:28 GMT -5
Maybe I should move to Florida if the law passes and start a black market in baked goods. No need for black market baked goods. This bill wouldn't make them illegal.
|
|
zibazinski
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Posts: 47,869
|
Post by zibazinski on Feb 7, 2012 13:54:39 GMT -5
And just why is it that no grocery chain will go into bad neighborhoods? Maybe because of the crime?
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Feb 7, 2012 13:59:48 GMT -5
I'm not sure how denying cookies makes produce more or less available. I'm not seeing the connection at all. ..... and the prices are higher for things like bread and milk. Aren't the prices higher for nearly everything in urban centers?
|
|
Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on Feb 7, 2012 14:03:31 GMT -5
Everyone doesn't ring up purchases with a modern register. If someone buys food at a farmer's market set up for a few weeks at a Botanical Garden during the Fall Harvest or if a farmer sells produce out the back of his truck a lot of that recordkeeping goes by the board. Yes and no. In order to use food stamps at a farmer's market, they need to have a fancy pants EBT machine. (Also popular with the debit card carrying masses) But no UPC codes to scan, so in that sense, you are right. Farmer's markets might be set up to accept wic vouchers, (and I believe they have to be pre-approved for this) but unless they have filled out the application(s) for being a foodstamp vendor in advance, they will not be allowed to get reimbursed for any foodstamp redemptions.
|
|