henryclay
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 5, 2011 19:03:37 GMT -5
Posts: 3,685
|
Post by henryclay on Jun 6, 2011 2:15:40 GMT -5
It's about an hour with some hair-raising interview points made about the power plays involved. It will probably get pulled off the net, too. But if it is, then Corsi's book, " Where's The Birth Certificate?" will still be available. It's the best seller that Esquire and one of our friends here tried to tell everybody had been pulled by the publisher a while back, , , remember? You remember, don't you Lakota? The video can be watched and downloaded (why wait for the elitest's re-writing of this part of our history), here: J B Williams has this to say as a prelude. It has some names included that may strike you as odd, given their espoused "deep concern" for the future of the nation.: WHICH GOP CANDIDATES REALLY CARE ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION?
By J.B. Williams May 27, 2011 NewsWithViews.com
What issue takes precedence over a known fraud in the White House and all of the kingmakers who made it possible? If Article II of the U.S. Constitution means nothing to a GOP candidate at this late date, after the issuance of two forged Obama documents, what else in the Constitution do they care about?
And if a GOP candidate is not willing to take on the most important question of the era, who is the fraud in the White House, how did he get there and how do we make sure that this can never happen again, why would there be a second question for that candidate?
For over two years now, a mountain of evidence has been collected and released on the Internet proving numerous ways that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” eligible for the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.
Every member of congress knows it and so does every member of the U.S. Supreme Court. But nobody, not even the newly elected Tea Party candidates of 2010 have raised a finger to do anything about it. The precedent stands, anyone from anywhere, loyal to foreign entities can be President of the United States now, without even having to provide the basic background information that is required every day in low level jobs across the country and around the globe.
Obama could never pass a standard FBI background check or high level security clearance. Yet, if this issue in not addressed, the precedence has been established. Anyone, loyal to any foreign entity, can be president and nobody can even question that individual.
If GOP candidates are not willing to take on this most vital issue to the future of freedom, liberty, decency, transparency and constitutional self-governance, what else should voters count on those candidates to do on behalf of the people?
Which of the potential 2012 GOP candidates cares about Article II?
Herman Cain – NO Newt Gingrich – NO Ron Paul – NO Tim Pawlenty – NO Mitt Romney – NO Rick Santorum – NO Michele Bachmann – NO John Bolton – NO Lindsey Graham – NO Sarah Palin – NO Jeb Bush – NO Chris Christie – NO Jim DeMint – NO Bob McDonald – NO
How many of these people even know the true definition of natural born citizen? If they don’t know it, how much do they really care about the Constitution?
• natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. • As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. • The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; • in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. Should anyone who does not know this basic information be trusted to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States? Should people who do not care about Article II of the Constitution be trusted to care about any other part of the Constitution?
If the Tea Party accomplished nothing else, it did accomplish putting the U.S. Constitution back on the table for debate. By the 2010 election cycle, even Nancy Pelosi was mumbling Tea Party talking points as she tried to stop the Republican tsunami that stripped her of her gavel.
But talking about the Constitution and actually acting to uphold and defend the Constitution are two very different things. If the people elected in 2010 and 2012 won’t ACT to protect the Constitution, all of the flowery rhetoric about the Constitution is meaningless. And if they won’t uphold Article II, which parts of the Constitution should we expect them to uphold?
Obama and his media minions told the world that he released his birth certificate back in 2009. That was proven to be an outright lie when he released another birth certificate, different from the first, in May of 2011, under increasing public pressure from business mogul Donald Trump.
Like everyone else above a 3rd grade education with an interest in truth, Trump has figured out that the second White House birth certificate is also a forgery. Surely the GOP candidates are smart enough to figure this out too, and if they aren’t, are they smart enough to be president of the United States at a time when we really need a real president?
Each American must find their own path here, choose what is most important to them and make their decisions on that basis.
As for me, the U.S. Constitution really does come first, and if a candidate is not willing to uphold Article II, then I do not believe they will be willing to uphold any other part of those principles and values.
In the 2012 GOP primaries, I have only one question for each candidate…
Dear candidate - What do YOU intend to do about the fraud in the White House and the utter intentional destruction of the U.S. Constitution, our economic systems and our way of life under their criminally evil assault on all things American?
If you don’t answer that question correctly, I have no second question for you! I stand for the Constitution, including Article II. If you don't, I'm not interested...
Until we have a candidate who cares about Article II, we DO NOT have a candidate who cares about the constitution! That’s simply unacceptable!
© 2011 JB Williams - All Rights Reserved
It's on the internet here: www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams149.htm
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 6, 2011 2:17:48 GMT -5
OMG, let's get WorldNutDaily on the case! J.B. Williams is right up there with Perez Hilton. In fact they even look alike.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,476
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Jun 6, 2011 8:45:06 GMT -5
No matter how much you frame it as just being true to the original intent of the men who wrote the Constitution in the 18th Century, I think that a person running for President of the United States in the 21st Century would lose a lot more than they would gain by announcing that "Mothers Don't Matter". Doesn't seem like a winning slogan to me. IM(not so)HO of course.
|
|
henryclay
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 5, 2011 19:03:37 GMT -5
Posts: 3,685
|
Post by henryclay on Jun 6, 2011 10:12:43 GMT -5
A report on CNN about the Corsi book has its readers up in arms and accusing CNN of perpetuating the story by even reporting on it. Back in the headlines is a CNN report crediting Jerome Corsi's best seller book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?, , , , " with pushing the issue over Obama's qualifications under the Constitution's [to be] president.
CNN readers were outraged that the story even was reported.
"Will the silliness never stop?" wrote one, called "Ferret out the B.S.," "Not (sic) matter what twist someone (sic) puts on the issue, the guy's legit."
"Sad pathetic people. Just mad that the guy in the WHITE House ain't WHITE," accused "Tam."
The CNN report, by associate producer Gabriella Schwarz, explained how the arguments reached the headlines "earlier this year, as billionaire businessman and real estate mogul Donald Trump repeatedly discussed the issue while considering a run for the White House."
CNN noted Obama later released "the long-form version of his birth certificate that shows he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961."
The release came just as Corsi's book was highlighted by the online Drudge Report and reached No. 1 at Amazon.com.
But CNN lamented, "despite the president's actions, 17 percent of Americans think the president was definitely or probably not born in the U.S."
Another reader reminded people that the book had been pulled by the publisher and 200,000 copies shredded. ( It might make a couple of posters here downright ecstatic, knowing their knee slapper lies about the book are still alive. , , , , Antat right, Lakota?) Sounds like maybe the writer plagiarized some comments from members here. www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=305673
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Jun 6, 2011 10:35:28 GMT -5
I'm still confused about the "long form". Obama and his liberal supporters said there was no such thing as a "long form" birth certificate in the state of Hawaii, and that what he released to the media early on was the absolute only document in existence to prove his birth. This was widely reported in the lame stream media. Then suddenly a year or more later, there IS a long form from Hawaii? Has anyone else born in Hawaii received a "long form" birth certificate?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 11:35:52 GMT -5
Obama is a phony. He was created by the powers that be. They thought no one would notice.
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 6, 2011 11:57:45 GMT -5
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 6, 2011 12:33:02 GMT -5
I'm still confused about the "long form". Obama and his liberal supporters said there was no such thing as a "long form" birth certificate in the state of Hawaii, and that what he released to the media early on was the absolute only document in existence to prove his birth. This was widely reported in the lame stream media. Then suddenly a year or more later, there IS a long form from Hawaii? Has anyone else born in Hawaii received a "long form" birth certificate? So you are a birther?
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Jun 6, 2011 12:40:51 GMT -5
Personally, I want nothing to do with anybody's cajones.
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 6, 2011 12:57:32 GMT -5
I'm still confused about the "long form". Obama and his liberal supporters said there was no such thing as a "long form" birth certificate in the state of Hawaii, and that what he released to the media early on was the absolute only document in existence to prove his birth. This was widely reported in the lame stream media. Then suddenly a year or more later, there IS a long form from Hawaii? Has anyone else born in Hawaii received a "long form" birth certificate? So you are a birther? So you are a denier?? This lefty trick of calling someone a lame name and thinking that ends the discussion is getting a little overused and limp. Anything to avoid the painful truth.
|
|
SweetVirginia
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 17:56:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,360
|
Post by SweetVirginia on Jun 6, 2011 13:02:30 GMT -5
So you are a denier?? This lefty trick of calling someone a lame name and thinking that ends the discussion is getting a little overused and limp. Anything to avoid the painful truth. First of all marsha, my comment was not to you, it was to eddie, so if you dont like it, butt out. Second, I never said it "ended the discussion" That is just you thinking you know what everyone is thinking when in reality you do not know squat. Third, the "painful truth" as you call it is only your own delusional truth.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 13:23:21 GMT -5
Sweet, it would serve you well to admit from time to time, as you do to me, that there is something really wrong here. Not to challenge you or get your back up... never.. but you will say it to me, so say it to others. We all need to unite, or we are sunk. JMO. The way people present things does not change the fact that there is something really wrong here... right?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 13:25:34 GMT -5
Marsha, by the way.. ah, never mind, sweet, but you should take another look at her, instead of just judging her. She thinks like me, and you think like me.
We all need to get on the same page.
|
|
henryclay
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 5, 2011 19:03:37 GMT -5
Posts: 3,685
|
Post by henryclay on Jun 6, 2011 13:48:42 GMT -5
Note to self: "Ask if anyone has watched the video." Has anyone watched trhe video?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 13:51:18 GMT -5
I watched 1/3, Henry, then was stirred to send you a PM. Did you get it?
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 6, 2011 13:53:15 GMT -5
Nice thing about a message board is you put it out there, it's out there. Inviting comment from any who care to comment. I think the term birther is thrown around because there is no argument against the fact that Obama's paper(s) are fishy.
His name is fishy.
His social security number is fishy.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 13:53:48 GMT -5
Even his fish are fishy.
|
|
txbo
Familiar Member
Joined: Apr 1, 2011 4:07:47 GMT -5
Posts: 547
|
Post by txbo on Jun 6, 2011 13:55:17 GMT -5
LMAO, all the usual suspects. At first, I thought it was something the democrats put out in order to keep the birthers going. It’s certainly something I would write it is more against the far right than the liberals and its disguised as a birther issue. The more the birthers carryon the more the 2% of independents that win or lose an election get disgusted with the tactics
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 6, 2011 14:12:18 GMT -5
LMAO, all the usual suspects. At first, I thought it was something the democrats put out in order to keep the birthers going. It’s certainly something I would write it is more against the far right than the liberals and its disguised as a birther issue. The more the [img src=" i143.photobucket.com/albums/r146/12_8/sm/1Via/viannen_fireworks.gif"] [/img] birthers carryon the more the 2% of independents that win or lose an election get disgusted with the tactics[/quote][/b][/size] Fishy.
Oh gosh! Who is the shadow man sharing the president's Minnesota social security number? The one who shows up as a relative of Michelle Obama??
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 14:23:38 GMT -5
The whole thing about the suspended law licenses, too. Michelle was NOT suspended by the BAR, but by a disciplinary group in the law branch. ALL of this is out there, but no one cares.. LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
txbo
Familiar Member
Joined: Apr 1, 2011 4:07:47 GMT -5
Posts: 547
|
Post by txbo on Jun 6, 2011 14:29:33 GMT -5
I had the same SS number using two different names for many years. I used an alias for many years. During a background investigation the FBI informed me that they could not find any type of record for a certain time frame. I had filled out the paperwork giving them my alias, but they never looked.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 14:37:23 GMT -5
I've had 4 different names, and the same SS. I was even nailed once by SS for working under one after a divorce gave me a name change to another. This isn't rocket science.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 14:38:29 GMT -5
The whole thing about the suspended law licenses, too. Michelle was NOT suspended by the BAR, but by a disciplinary group in the law branch. ALL of this is out there, but no one cares.. LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Some people care. Luckily that group of people is slowly growing smaller and smaller.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 14:42:19 GMT -5
Lucky that the group that cares that Mrs. Obama did NOT voluntarily give up her license is getting smaller??
Think again.
|
|
txbo
Familiar Member
Joined: Apr 1, 2011 4:07:47 GMT -5
Posts: 547
|
Post by txbo on Jun 6, 2011 14:48:07 GMT -5
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,476
Member is Online
|
Post by billisonboard on Jun 6, 2011 14:52:50 GMT -5
It's a conspiracy. Snopes is in on it also.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 14:56:03 GMT -5
Snopes, my butt. Michelle's license was suspended to avoid further consequences. Wanna play? If I am wrong, I will eat my keyboard, how about that?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 15:00:35 GMT -5
|
|
txbo
Familiar Member
Joined: Apr 1, 2011 4:07:47 GMT -5
Posts: 547
|
Post by txbo on Jun 6, 2011 15:01:35 GMT -5
Start eating or proof it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 1, 2024 17:23:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2011 15:07:33 GMT -5
Do you have anything to say about my link, or should I post more?
|
|