Why Obama Really Voted For Infanticide

[Mkitty is pro kitty]

Democrats are baby killers......Boy that felt good!

F-E-T-U-S. That didn't feel good because Republicans, etc. haven't learned. And it's the Republicans who don't care for the babies after they're born. For a recent example, look at Joplin; I'm sure there are babies there, but Republicans want to hold up funding. Think of the children, Mr. Cantor! ... anyways, get your empty rhetoric straight.

maybe Obama can produce a document refuting that he did in fact support institutional infanticide. Waiting...waiting...waiting...

And where's your document that you don't support institutional infanticide. I'd also like to see your document refuting the love of kicking puppies and kittens. And until I see both of those, I'll just assume you love infanticide and kicking puppies and kittens. For shame, ed, for shame! Waiting...waiting...waiting...waiting...

Must be a slow news day if people are dragging up this old crap. My favorite is when they dredged up that affair that he supposedly had with a woman in a hotel room years ago. A sex tape didn't surface, and someone was offering a reward for any housekeeping staff having any pertinent information. You know, because people that are offered money for a "he said she said" sort of story that happened before Obama was President (i.e. he wasn't famous yet) are so reliable.

[ed1066]

So when it's 22 weeks and 6 days old it's a "fetus", then the next day it's a baby? WTF???

[billisonboard]

Jun 6, 2011 9:33:18 GMT -5 @ed1066 said:

So when it's 22 weeks and 6 days old it's a "fetus", then the next day it's a baby? WTF???

I agree with you on this one ed, though we go different directions from that agreement. Choice is choice, or it isn't.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Jun 5, 2011 23:21:59 GMT -5 billisonboard said:

August 22, 2008 7:30 A.M.
Why Obama Really Voted For Infanticide

The article was published well prior to the 2008 presidential election and it didn't stop him from being elected President of the United States of America then. While it might be fun for some to bash him again with it on this board in June of 2011, it won't be the thing that stops him from being re-elected in 2012.

Nothing will be "the thing" that defeats him in 2012; it will be a preponderance of the evidence against him- of which this is a part.

Now that people's lives SUCK thanks to his failed policies, people are paying attention.

We really haven't experienced nationally a return to the Carter era until now. We have been basking in the glow of the Reagan Recovery for almost 25 years and until recently, we weren't fool enough to return to the failed policies that had almost permanently discredited the Democratic Party.

For this brief reminder, I say, "Thank you! President Obama!" We won't forget again.

[billisonboard]

Jun 6, 2011 9:46:44 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

... We have been basking in the glow of the Reagan Recovery for almost 25 years ...

The "Reagan Recovery" was done on credit. The situation we face today is a direct result of "Mourning(sic) in America".

[marshabar1]

The shocking extremism of that position — giving infanticide the nod over compassion and life — is profoundly embarrassing to him now.

So he has lied about what he did.

He has offered various conflicting explanations, ranging from the assertion that

he didn’t oppose the anti-infanticide legislation (he did),

to the assertion that he opposed it because it didn’t contain a superfluous clause reaffirming abortion rights (it did),

to the assertion that it was unnecessary because Illinois law already protected the children of botched abortions (it didn’t — and even if it arguably did, why oppose a clarification?).


What Obama hasn’t offered, however, is the rationalization he vigorously posited during the 2002 Illinois senate debate.

When it got down to brass tacks, Barack Obama argued that protecting abortion doctors from legal liability was more important than protecting living infants from death.




He also argued for protecting the mother from revisiting her decision, making her responsible for not just a clinical abortion but for actually deciding that the living, breathing baby she had born was to be left alone to die.

It's a picture of evil in case anybody missed it. This is what evil looks like.

[Deleted]

Killing a potential person in the womb is bad enough, but putting a living child in a closet to die is without a doubt-- MURDER.

As I already said, based on OBAMA'S own words from HIS quote in this thread-- God FORBID there should be a second opinion brought in to determine the viability of a born alive abortion. The abortionist and the NOT mother already made the decision to kill, so that squirming infant could not be a BABY, could it?? Best to just let the abortionist sign off on the viability of said child, right, since he already killed it... so he thought... yeah, leave the decision to him..

[Deleted]

Why the left thinks this will all not be re-visited in this time when people have SEEN Obama's lies since he took office is beyond me. Get ready, left. A second look at Obama is coming, this time with his failed presidency as proof.

[jkapp]

Jun 5, 2011 23:32:07 GMT -5 @lakhota said:

Even though I'm not an Obama fan, a thread like this sickens me. This is even more vile than the birther nonsense.

Funny considering the amount of shit you post about the GOP that is exactly like this...

Oh well...hypocrisy has no political preferences