Radicals blahblahblah.....

[Deleted]

Gotta love this hopey changey stuff..

Patriotism a red, white, and blue wrecking ball???
Paul Ryan's budget is a threat to radicals, that is for sure..

[Deleted]

A successful parochial country? Can't progress because of the constitution and founding fathers???

[Deleted]

SO-- do they want to blow up Israel, too??

[Deleted]

Egypt helping Gaza-- why?? HUH??? Peace, love, dove??

[deziloooooo]

Sorry, don't do windows or flicks...

[Deleted]

Godless buses??? Atheists sue for not allowing Godless bus ads?? HUH??
www.theblaze.com/stories/atheists-sue-after-public-buses-reject-godless-ads/
An atheist group in Arkansas has sued the local transit authority after the group’s ads were prohibited from going on local buses.

The United Coalition of Reason claims its free speech rights were violated when the Central Arkansas Transit Authority (CATA) and its advertising agent, On the Move Advertising, decided not to run the group’s “Godless” bus ads. But while the group says they are being targeted, CATA claims that’s not true and says the group is simply trying to pull a publicity stunt.

That ads themselves are not shocking as far as atheist statements go. They show a bright blue sky with a simple question and answer:



The ads were supposed to launch the Central Arkansas Coalition of Reason, a collection of about 10 area atheist and agnostic groups.

“In the brief, UnitedCoR alleges that CATA and On the Move violated UnitedCoR’s free speech rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” the group explains on its website. “UnitedCoR asserts that the First Amendment prohibits CATA, as a governmental entity, from using its disfavor of the nontheistic message of UnitedCoR’s ads as a reason for refusing to run them on its buses.”

But CATA claims the rejection has nothing to do with the merits of the group’s message, and that the fault for the rejection lies with the group.

The sticking point for the ads is that CATA is requesting, as part of ad negotiations, that the group pay more than $30,000 in insurance because of the likelihood that the ads, and buses, will be vandalized. The coalition rejects that notion and has refused to pay the fee.

[Deleted]

Banning the Bible? HUH??? Isn't that kind of closeminded?

www.theblaze.com/stories/radical-pakistani-clerics-call-bible-blasphemous-may-seek-to-have-it-banned/

Anti-Christian sentiment continues to grow in Pakistan, as a group of radical Islamic clerics is asking the nation’s Supreme Court to declare certain portions and passages of the Bible “blasphemous.” Why, you ask? Because these leaders view some biblical characters as “flawed.” If the court doesn’t comply, the clerics plan to petition to have the Bible formally banned in Pakistan. CNS News has more:

Citing Florida pastor Terry Jones’ Qur’an-burning act, the leader of the initiative, Abdul Rauf Farooqi, said the campaigners would like to pay back such “blasphemers” by doing the same to the Bible, but would not follow in their footsteps.
Instead, he and the other clerics in the campaign want Pakistan’s top court to rule that certain passages in the Bible are blasphemous, since they undermine prophets’ sanctity by portraying them as flawed or immoral.
Farooqi, who is leader of the Islamist organization JUI-S (Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Sami-ul-Haq group), said the “insertions” in the Bible were offensive to Muslims, who hold all prophets in high esteem.
Among the biblical figures viewed by Muslims as Islamic prophets are some whom the Bible clearly describes as behaving immorally, such as David, who coveted a man’s wife and so sent him to face certain death on the battle frontlines; and Solomon, who later in life sought out pagan women and their gods.
If the Supreme Court complies, there may be some major problems in store for the nation’s Christian minority. Even the Bible’s assertion that Jesus Christ is God would potentially be considered blasphemous and, thus, punishable. If an individual violates blasphemy laws in Pakistan, he or she may be put to death or face life behind bars.

[Deleted]

This is cute. Think they dislike Sarah?

[Deleted]

Think Progress trying to deny this was said.. OOPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[jarhead1976]

Krickitt , I just can not believe these things. You must have spent millions producing these videos. k sista

[Deleted]

LOL, Jar, and back atcha!! All of this is out there, new ones every day-- for those that care to look..

[Deleted]

From the mouth of babes.. as usual..
GO, USA!!!!
Fight back!!

[dancinmama]

Jun 2, 2011 16:52:02 GMT -5 @krickitt said:

From the mouth of babes.. as usual..
GO, USA!!!!
Fight back!!

This must be getting around. DS just showed it to me this morning. It kind of reminded me of something he would have said as a kid. ;D

[Deleted]

We gotta fight for the baby kids that can't fight for themselves!! Riding a bike is a big step towards independence!!!!!

GO, USA!!!!
;D

[Deleted]

5/20/11 Palestinians praise Osama-- Imam of Imams.. Osama brought America to her knees?? Land of prostitution and heresy? Huh?

[Deleted]

www.theblaze.com/stories/iranian-woman-calls-for-slut-women-to-be-stoned-on-the-pages-of-calif-paper/

US
IRANIAN WOMAN CALLS FOR ‘SLUT WOMEN’ TO BE STONED…ON THE PAGES OF CALIF. PAPER
Posted on June 2, 2011 at 9:32pm

Infidelity seems rampant in our culture and during these times. Just recently, Arnold Schwarzenegger is alleged to have had a love child with his housekeeper. So what’s the solution to this problem? Shamci Rafani of Visalia, CA has a proposal: stone the “sluts” responsible.

In a letter to the editor that appeared in yesterday’s Visalia Times-Delta, Rafani — herself the victim of infidelity — angrily calls for the death of woman who knowingly engage in an affair. And she didn’t hold back:

But the woman who had been aware of her wrongdoing, and yet had done it without any shame or fear, must be punished severely.
Yes, in many countries, the public will stone that woman to death.
Believe me, that might be the right answer to the behavior of these kind of loose women, who want to blame it all on men.
My main question is, how many more families have to be destroyed?
[...]
These women not only must not be awarded, but they must pay for destroying the happiness and the future of their victims, especially this woman who lived with the family and had become a member of that family.
These slut women do not know how to say no. To my judgment, these women who freely sleep with married men must be severely punished and put to death.
If the lawmakers do something about it, you will find less stories like Arnold’s.
Those are some strong words. And the absurdity of them raises more then a few questions. The man one: Is this a joke? Gawker went digging and found that, no, it’s not a joke. Rafani is a real woman, and bringing adultress women to justice has become her life goal:

The Visalia Times-Delta didn’t respond to our inquiry. By phone, Shamci Rafani assured us that she is a real person, a 77-year-old immigrant from Iran. She says her husband left her thirty years ago for another woman, and since then she has been dedicated herself to speaking out against “sluts” in letters to the editor and a self-published book.
I guess there‘s nothing like a woman’s scorn. And I guess adulterers in the U.S. should be glad that capital punishment — unlike in Iran and other countries in the Mideast– is reserved for the killers and traitors.

[Deleted]

Huh?? We need to be more like Lybia? Something about Libya, Africa, black people is the USA??

[Deleted]

www.foxnews.com/us/2011/06/02/prayer-prohibited-at-graduation-ceremony/?test=latestnews
Religion
Federal Judge Prohibits Prayer at Texas Graduation Ceremony
By Todd Starnes
Published June 02, 2011
| FoxNews.com

A federal judge has ordered a Texas school district to prohibit public prayer at a high school graduation ceremony.
Chief U.S. District Judge Fred Biery’s order against the Medina Valley Independent School District also forbids students from using specific religious words including “prayer” and “amen.”
The ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed by Christa and Danny Schultz. Their son is among those scheduled to participate in Saturday’s graduation ceremony. The judge declared that the Schultz family and their son would “suffer irreparable harm” if anyone prayed at the ceremony.
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said the school district is in the process of appealing the ruling, and his office has agreed to file a brief in their support.
“Part of this goes to the very heart of the unraveling of moral values in this country,” Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott told Fox News Radio, saying the judge wanted to turn school administrators into “speech police.”

“I’ve never seen such a restriction on speech issued by a court or the government,” Abbott told Fox News Radio. “It seems like a trampling of the First Amendment rather than protecting the First Amendment.”
Judge Biery’s ruling banned students and other speakers from using religious language in their speeches. Among the banned words or phrases are: “join in prayer,” “bow their heads,” “amen,” and “prayer.”
He also ordered the school district to remove the terms “invocation” and “benediction” from the graduation program.
“These terms shall be replaced with ‘opening remarks’ and ‘closing remarks,'” the judge’s order stated. His ruling also prohibits anyone from saying, “in we pray.”
Should a student violate the order, school district officials could find themselves in legal trouble. Judge Biery ordered that his ruling be “enforced by incarceration or other sanctions for contempt of Court if not obeyed by District official (sic) and their agents.”
The Texas attorney general called the ruling unconstitutional and a blatant attack from those who do not believe in God -- “attempts by atheists and agnostics to use courts to eliminate from the public landscape any and all references to God whatsoever.”
“This is the challenge we are dealing with here,” he said. “(It’s) an ongoing attempt to purge God from the public setting while at the same time demanding from the courts an increased yielding to all things atheist and agnostic.”
MORE...