Why DNC Abandoned Middle Class In Favor Of Rich

[lakhota]

Why the Democratic Party Has Abandoned the Middle Class in Favor of the Rich

If politicians care almost exclusively about the concerns of the rich, it makes sense that over the past decades they've enacted policies that have ended up benefiting the rich.

The following article first appeared in Mother Jones.

In 2008, a liberal Democrat was elected president. Landslide votes gave Democrats huge congressional majorities. Eight years of war and scandal and George W. Bush had stigmatized the Republican Party almost beyond redemption. A global financial crisis had discredited the disciples of free-market fundamentalism, and Americans were ready for serious change.

Or so it seemed. But two years later, Wall Street is back to earning record profits, and conservatives are triumphant. To understand why this happened, it's not enough to examine polls and tea parties and the makeup of Barack Obama's economic team. You have to understand how we fell so short, and what we rightfully should have expected from Obama's election. And you have to understand two crucial things about American politics.

The first is this: Income inequality has grown dramatically since the mid-'70s—far more in the US than in most advanced countries—and the gap is only partly related to college grads outperforming high-school grads. Rather, the bulk of our growing inequality has been a product of skyrocketing incomes among the richest 1 percent and—even more dramatically—among the top 0.1 percent. It has, in other words, been CEOs and Wall Street traders at the very tippy-top who are hoovering up vast sums of money from everyone, even those who by ordinary standards are pretty well off.

Second, American politicians don't care much about voters with moderate incomes. Princeton political scientist Larry Bartels studied the voting behavior of US senators in the early '90s and discovered that they respond far more to the desires of high-income groups than to anyone else. By itself, that's not a surprise. He also found that Republicans don't respond at all to the desires of voters with modest incomes. Maybe that's not a surprise, either. But this should be: Bartels found that Democratic senators don't respond to the desires of these voters, either. At all.

More: www.alternet.org/rights/151108/why_the_democratic_party_has_abandoned_the_middle_class_in_favor_of_the_rich/?page=entire

[vonnie6200]

Oh no - you are going to give Warsaw a coronary with this!

[lakhota]

May 28, 2011 18:50:19 GMT -5 vonnie6200 said:

Oh no - you are going to give Warsaw a coronary with this!

So, you read the entire article in only 3 minutes. I'm impressed...

[lakhota]

May 28, 2011 19:22:44 GMT -5 @toughtimes said:

The DNC courts the rich for the same reason Willie Sutton robbed banks:" Because that is where the money is." America is becoming a kleptocracy with scarce differentiation between the platforms of the crooks, albeit one party is more insulting when they steal the teeth out of your head.

Amen! At least Republicans don't bother to hide it.

[rovo]

Why should the DNC respond to those on the lower rungs of the ladder? These people will vote for the Dems regardless of who the candidate is. They have to go after the middle class and up if there is to be any expectation of winning.

[marshabar1]

Reading this all over the place. Blogs are calling mainstream liberal news sources fake liberals. The Democratic Party is sloughing off constituencies right and left.

[lakhota]

May 28, 2011 19:59:47 GMT -5 @toughtimes said:

I tend to lump the "middle class" in with the poor because it is evident to me that it is slowly being strangled.

Amen!