Fake Definition of "Santorum" Promoted by Leftie

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Title changed to be absolutely accurate

As it turns out, if you have Googled the definition of "Santorum" and come up with the disgusting results (If you DO actually search it on Google, you will come up with sexually explicit words AND images) you should know that that definition was fabricated by a respondant to leftist cyber bully Dan Savage who has been promoting the fake dictionary-like definition of "Santorum" and has been bullying and publishing these and other attacks on Senator Rick Santorum since at least 2003.

Tell a friend. And let them know that the real frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter resulting from anal sex is a man named DAN SAVAGE:

kelly.halldorson.com/blog/?p=3293

Dan Savage, co-founder of the IT GETS BETTER PROJECT. A wonderful idea. An idea that when I heard about…I choked up. It’s just that beautiful, positive and uplifting of a project. What it is, is grown (gay/lesbian) bully victims sharing stories of things getting better of time healing. Sharing stories. Inspiring compassion. Imparting the wisdom of impermanence. The beauty of impermanence, something we all often forget…life ebbs and flows. It’s not always bad. You won’t always be bullied. There is no forever (at least on earth). Life goes on beyond high school or middle school. Things do get better.

The problem?

Dan Savage is responsible for the near-decade long cyber bully attack on Rick Santorum.

That’s right.

Dan Savage is the owner and creator of SpreadingSantorum.com and as recently as 2009 Savage not only laughs about it but calls members of the religious right “psycho-murderer-bigot-assholes” along with a slew of other huge distortions…apparently his justification for why people like Santorum deserve their name to be permanently linked (for the world) to fecal matter, lube and anal sex.

Think about that for a minute.

This man’s LAST name is now (to the entire internet/world) defined as a frothy mixture of fecal matter and lube.

Maybe you don’t like Rick Santorum. Maybe you don’t like his politics (I certainly don’t). Maybe you don’t agree with him personally (again, I don’t). Maybe you even agree with Savage…Maybe you think of Santorum (and others like him) a psycho-murderer-bigot-asshole. Maybe you think he deserves this? Or maybe you just think it’s all kind of funny.

Just another example of left wingers talking love, and tolerance, but being filled with vicsious hatred for those they disagree with:

Bullying is bad. Well, not all bullying is bad. Um…some people deserve it. And if you were bullied as a gay kid…it does get better…you can grow up and be the bully yourself!! Just hang in there and you can launch decade long attacks on men and their families. You can advocate “outing” a person’s sexual orientation if you don’t agree with them. You can attack Christian teens by coining a term like “saddlebacking” as ”the phenomenon of Christian teens engaging in unprotected anal sex in order to preserve their virginities” inspired by Rick Warren’s involvement as pastor at the Saddleback Church. You can express your digust for “licking vagina” and celebrate the gay community as being a “guy’s paradise” because you can “have sex all the time but don’t have to deal with women” while simultaneously claiming to support women.

…and sadly there are SO many more examples… so much more…

It’s just hate. Sad. Sad. Hate.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

The left is never going to survive the free exchange of information. No wonder they want to shut down the internet...

[pepper112765]

Dan Savage has an advice column entitled Savage Love in the Washington City Paper. There are some twisted individuals that seek his advice... and is also a reminder to myself that there are indeed some sick, sick, people in this world that are in need of therapy, meds and Jesus.

[ugonow]

Is he Michael's brother?

[billisonboard]

"Here, read this and tell me what kind of sick individual would post something like this for people to read."

[pepper112765]

Like it or not Dan Savage represents the LGBT community and it is a large one. And that community suffers all sorts or harassment, particularly as children, who had no one to confide in, before coming out as adults. Some may consider him sick and twisted, however, by reading his advice columns, which I do for amusement if for nothing else, as the Washington City Paper is free, those that write his column are a bit above and beyond and reflects a segment of American society. I will not comment on Dan Savage as a person, I don't know him, his story or journey, nor have I walked in his shoes, so I am not judging him.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

I know plenty of lesbians and gays and none of them are anything like this guy. In fact, all the lesbians I know-- like 8 of them- 4 couples-- are quite conservative / libertarian in their views including that they OPPOSE gay adoption, AND gay marriage. The gay men I know- 4, are split about even conservative / liberal.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

I will judge Dan Savage. He is scum. He owes Senator Santorum an apology. I'm not holding my breath.

I don't know why we have so little stomach for holding people accountable for their actions. What he did is indefensible, and he's not getting a pass from me because of any "good" he might have done, unless or until he admits his attacks on Senator Santorum are wrong, and he apologizes.

[stats45]

Dan Savage is an odd guy. On one hand, he does seem to have some interest in letting gay kids know that life gets better for them. On the other hand, his worldview is overwhelming saturated with promiscuous and frivolous sexuality that can be very dangerous for young people both physically and emotionally.

There are some gay people who hold strong grudges against religious people because of how they were treated, especially when they were younger. It is unfair that many gay people had to/have to deal with those things, but it shouldn't permit you to turn around and act inappropriately to an entire group of people (religious persons, conservatives) to settle old scores.

[Deleted]

We have some clean candidates out there. All the opposition can do is make stuff up and start smear campaigns. When I see garbage I know all it means is that this is a decent candidate that can't be attacked any other way-- just like Lak trying to make Bachmann look like a psycho. I say when this stuff happens it means I should take a closer look at the candidate. Seriously-- is that all they've got?? LOL!! Keep up the trash, liberals. Wheelchair Granny is the best, though..

[Deleted]

It's illegal for adults to get in to sexual issues with kids.. not sure why gays are exempt from that. Some gays get away with crap aimed at kids that would get a straight person arrested. And I am not anti-gay, just pointing out the discrepancies.. Think Kevin Jennings advising a young gay teen in his job as school counselor about his sexual relationship with an older man. No, he did not report it. He should have been prosecuted, but he just apologized when he got exposed and went on to be Obama's safe school czar.. yeah.. different set of rules for gays, I guess..

[Tennesseer]

May 21, 2011 11:01:43 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

I know plenty of lesbians and gays and none of them are anything like this guy. In fact, all the lesbians I know-- like 8 of them- 4 couples-- are quite conservative / libertarian in their views including that they OPPOSE gay adoption, AND gay marriage. The gay men I know- 4, are split about even conservative / liberal.

So to sum it up (I guess), Paul's four Lesbian couples and two gay men couples don't want to get married. (They probably live in Florida or Illinois where gay marriage is not allowed (though civil unions become legal in Illinois effective June 1.)) Therefore 75% of all gay couples don't want to get married?

Not all gay couples want to get married-just like not all heterosexual couples want to get married though most would get married at some point in time if allowed or desired.

Marriage Rates Among Young Adults Ages 25-34, 1965-2010 (Percent) (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census and American Community Survey.):

[hello fromWarsaw]

No one's heard of these horrible attacks on the angelic Santorum off the internet. Another put up outrage job by the RW. There is no left wing in any number like the huge misled RW. In any other modern country Democrats would be center right.

[hello fromWarsaw]

In 2003 sex-advice columnist Dan Savage was seeking to mock Santorum for his homophobic statements, such as remarks he made in an interview that year to the effect that legalization of gay sex could lead to recognition of “man on child” and “man on dog” relationships. Savage held a competition asking his readers to come up with a new definition for “Santorum,” and the winning entry referred to a by-product of anal intercourse. Now a Google search for “Santorum” will frequently turn up that meaning of the word.

Roll Call consulted technology experts, who said there was little Santorum could do to prevent Web searches from finding sites with that definition. The politician himself “sounded slightly defeated” when asked about his “Google problem” recently, the publication reported. “It’s one guy,” Santorum told Roll Call. “You know who it is. The Internet allows for this type of vulgarity to circulate. It’s unfortunate that we have someone who obviously has some issues. But he has an opportunity to speak.”

Santorum added, however, that the phenomenon is an indication of “incivility” in politics. “You want to talk about incivility,” he said. “I don’t know of anybody on the left who came to my defense for the incivility with respect to those things.”

In response to Santorum’s statements, Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund spokesman Dennis Dison told Roll Call, “I think that civility in politics is a fantastic goal. ... Speaking from the LGBT community, we wish he would practice it.”

Santorum SHOULD consider the insulting hateful bigotry of what HE says.

I believe everything the misled say. NOT!

[Deleted]

Welcome back, War. Glad to see you. Nice posts, BTW.... not that I agree with anything you say..
;D

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

I apologize for getting off topic. This thread isn't about gay marriage. It's not about Rick Santorum's views at all. It's about the cyber-bully, Dan Savage, and his deliberate posting of the fake "dictionary-like" definition of "Santorum" as the "frothy mixture of lube and feces resulting from anal sex" posted on the internet.

My opinion, now that Dan Savage has been exposed as the cyber bully behind the attacks on Rick Santorum, is that Dan Savage owes Rick Santorum, and by extension his supporters, and Americans in general an apology. I understand there will be differences of opinion on this, and it wouldn't be the first time people on the left defended the indefensible. There have been similar attacks on Sarah Palin, her Down's Syndrome newborn baby, Trig; and her daughter, Bristol; Rush Limbaugh, Allen West, and others have also been victims of fringe left vitriol. I am hopeful that those liberals and leftists here are more reasonable-- and that they would agree with me that Dan Savage should apologize for his actions-- not merely for the insult, but also for the terrible example he is setting as the founder of "It Gets Better" which is supposed to support members of the LGBT community from similar vicious attacks. So, let's find out. Let me know if you agree with me, or if you are a defender of Dan Savage's actions?

[Deleted]

Weird he has been after Santorum for so long. Is he some kind of stalker, or what?

[billisonboard]

May 21, 2011 13:42:41 GMT -5 hello fromWarsaw said:

... Savage held a competition asking his readers to come up with a new definition for “Santorum,” and the winning entry ...

Is it a FACT that the person who submitted the winning entry was a "Left Winger"?

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 21, 2011 14:39:49 GMT -5 @krickitt said:

Weird he has been after Santorum for so long. Is he some kind of stalker, or what?

He's obviously a mentally disturbed person along the lines of a Jarrod Loughner who should be closely watched.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 21, 2011 14:42:35 GMT -5 billisonboard said:

May 21, 2011 13:42:41 GMT -5 hello fromWarsaw said:

... Savage held a competition asking his readers to come up with a new definition for “Santorum,” and the winning entry ...

Is it a FACT that the person who submitted the winning entry was a "Left Winger"?

Who else? So, is that a YES, you agree with me that Dan Savage should apologize for his actions?

[billisonboard]

May 21, 2011 14:46:45 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

May 21, 2011 14:42:35 GMT -5 billisonboard said:

Is it a FACT that the person who submitted the winning entry was a "Left Winger"?

Who else? ...

Of course.

[billisonboard]

btw, on the issue of an apology, I put no importance on apologies offered under public pressure. If the guy feels truly sorry, he will apologize. If he doesn't feel sorry, he won't. "Should" or "shouldn't" doesn't factor into it IM(not so)HO. Is what he did the behavior of a jerk, again IM(not so)HO, yeah.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 21, 2011 15:02:21 GMT -5 billisonboard said:

btw, on the issue of an apology, I put no importance on apologies offered under public pressure. If the guy feels truly sorry, he will apologize. If he doesn't feel sorry, he won't. "Should" or "shouldn't" doesn't factor into it IM(not so)HO. Is what he did the behavior of a jerk, again IM(not so)HO, yeah.

Fair enough.

Hey- anyone remember when Trent Lott had to go on apolopalooza all over the country apologizing for saying something nice to Strom Thurmond on the occasion of his birthday?

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

May 21, 2011 14:56:15 GMT -5 billisonboard said:

May 21, 2011 14:46:45 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Who else? ...

Of course.

I modified the OP. Cut me some slack!

[pepper112765]

May 21, 2011 11:04:08 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

I will judge Dan Savage. He is scum. He owes Senator Santorum an apology. I'm not holding my breath.

I don't know why we have so little stomach for holding people accountable for their actions. What he did is indefensible, and he's not getting a pass from me because of any "good" he might have done, unless or until he admits his attacks on Senator Santorum are wrong, and he apologizes.

If that's the case, then there should be apologizing all the way around for a lot of politicians. From what I understand, the definition was the result of a contest of sorts. However, the definition is legally protected opinion based on one of Savage's readers that "won" the contest. As I have said plenty before, people are free to say what they want and in this case Santorum, but he had to deal with the fallout of his speech. He wasn't threatened with violence, he wasn't physically attacked. In this case, the definition of his name is the result of him expressing his opinion about gays in the public arena, to which he has ample access because he is a public official. It may not sit well with a lot of people and I understand that. On the other hand, you can not stifle the right of people to express opinion, even Santorum. So, in essence, the pendulum swings both ways.

[billisonboard]

May 21, 2011 15:17:11 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

...

Hey- anyone remember when Trent Lott had to go on apolopalooza all over the country apologizing for saying something nice to Strom Thurmond on the occasion of his birthday?

You mean when Senator Lott chose to apologize?

[ed1066]

Ugh. Dan Savage is so disgusting...what a perv...

[lakhota]

Are you talking abour Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum...?

[Mkitty is pro kitty]

All of pbp's self declared statements that are full of hot air is proof enough for me.

The left is never going to survive the free exchange of information.

unsubstantiated blather =/= information

that they OPPOSE gay adoption, AND gay marriage.

I'll believe it when the come on and say so themselves. Do you think you're clever by pulling the old "I know a ..." routine. Well, my sister's husband's barber's uncle's golf buddy said so.

Dan Savage owes Rick Santorum, and by extension his supporters, and Americans in general an apology. I understand there will be differences of opinion on this, and it wouldn't be the first time people on the left defended the indefensible. There have been similar attacks on Sarah Palin, ...

Gee, for a group of people who tout themselves as rugged invidualists, Conservatives sure are a bunch of hypocritical (you know, 'cause Conservatives never do such a thing ), cross-bearing crybabies. Do yourself a favor palmbeach : get the sand out of your panties and dry up.

[lakhota]

Did Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum really take a dead baby home to his children?