|
Post by magichat on May 12, 2011 13:31:51 GMT -5
Did you even read #41 Dez?
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 13:34:27 GMT -5
Clinton can get a blow job in the Oval Office while ON DUTY and that is OK I guess. I really don't know what her point is. snerds , the politically correct word for the event/happening for most civilized folk is not the BG, but "head " seems to be better received in polite society. Just a thought. we are discussing POTUS after all, a little simpkle decorum in my estimation, not really out of line. IMHO>
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 13:50:44 GMT -5
I don't know what you are talking about. And, i guess i really don't' care either way. It just was a politically correct, suggestion of a more genteel way of describing the event That YOU posted , which many feel is a vulgar description of the act and the one I suggested that might be substituted in it's place. Posted in a way as a tongue in cheek, joshing, humorous little inter play here but realizing those adjectives and phrases , "tongue in cheek ", "joshing", "humorous ", seem to be foreign words to you so I guess you will stay with your original, {sigh} "Clinton can get a blow job in the Oval Office while ON DUTY and that is OK I guess. " mmm, yep think the genteel discription is a better one , but then again, what do I know.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 13:55:18 GMT -5
I don't know what you are talking about. And, i guess i really don't' care either way. It just was a politically correct, suggestion of a more genteel way of describing the event That YOU posted , which many feel is a vulgar description of the act and the one I suggested that might be substituted in it's place. Posted in a way as a tongue in cheek, joshing, humorous little inter play here but realizing those adjectives and phrases , "tongue in cheek ", "joshing", "humorous ", seem to be foreign words to you so I guess you will stay with your original, {sigh} "Clinton can get a blow job in the Oval Office while ON DUTY and that is OK I guess. " mmm, yep think the genteel discription is a better one , but then again, what do I know. "Head" as you put it Dezilooooo is almost as vulgar as Blow Job, if you are looking for the correct "PC" term to describe the act I would suggest Fellatio as that is the appropriate term.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 12, 2011 14:00:53 GMT -5
1. There's no viable third party, or third party candidate. If one emerged, I would consider it as an option- and I'm not inherently opposed to third parties. Right now, I'm content to, with the help of God and the TEA Party, herd cats in the GOP.
2. I don't expect the Democrats to like Newt. So, I'm really not going to get into a back and forth about the ideas with Democrats. I've made up my mind on the issues, this is about selecting a candidate.
3. I am a little surprised at how mean spirited and judgmental the democrats are about Newt's personal life. It's an issue for me, too. I think he made a mistake- several. Who hasn't? However, I trust he has turned himself around, and while he may have personal failings, I don't think equivocating on policy and principles of governance will be one of them.
4. Of the GOP candidates now-- and mind you with the exception of Trump, I'd take ANY of them right now over Obama-- I am confident that Newt is the only candidate ready to govern. He will hit the ground running, there won't be a month of "adjustment" and turnover, he doesn't have to flesh out his ideas, or draft proposals-- he's already done that and he's ready to go.
5. Should another candidate prove ready, I'm still open minded.
|
|
|
Post by magichat on May 12, 2011 14:10:27 GMT -5
It's pretty early for a 3rd party to have a candidate. They don't have the money for an extended campaign and typically do not have a need for a primary election. I wouldn't expect an announcment until after November.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 14:16:59 GMT -5
It just was a politically correct, suggestion of a more genteel way of describing the event That YOU posted , which many feel is a vulgar description of the act and the one I suggested that might be substituted in it's place. Posted in a way as a tongue in cheek, joshing, humorous little inter play here but realizing those adjectives and phrases , "tongue in cheek ", "joshing", "humorous ", seem to be foreign words to you so I guess you will stay with your original, {sigh} "Clinton can get a blow job in the Oval Office while ON DUTY and that is OK I guess. " mmm, yep think the genteel discription is a better one , but then again, what do I know. "Head" as you put it Dezilooooo is almost as vulgar as Blow Job, if you are looking for the correct "PC" term to describe the act I would suggest Fellatio as that is the appropriate term. Possible but then to many folks seem to have to scramble for dictionarys or mutter to friends along the lines of "mmmm I heard that word before but it really escapes me , know what it refers to Darlin, " , where as the word I suggested seems to get a immediate, "Oh right old boy, got that one , righto " or something along those lines. IMHO of course.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 14:20:33 GMT -5
"Head" as you put it Dezilooooo is almost as vulgar as Blow Job, if you are looking for the correct "PC" term to describe the act I would suggest Fellatio as that is the appropriate term. Possible but then to many folks seem to have to scramble for dictionarys or mutter to friends along the lines of "mmmm I heard that word before but it really escapes me , know what it refers to Darlin, " , where as the word I suggested seems to get a immediate, "Oh right old boy, got that one , righto " or something along those lines. IMHO of course. No you suggested that it be changed because it was in your view vulgar. Whether your word or the term used by Snerdly is used they both bring instant recognition to the act. Both could be considered vulgar so if you want to slap Someone on the wrist be willing to take the slap yourself
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 14:20:43 GMT -5
1. There's no viable third party, or third party candidate. If one emerged, I would consider it as an option- and I'm not inherently opposed to third parties. Right now, I'm content to, with the help of God and the TEA Party, herd cats in the GOP. 2. I don't expect the Democrats to like Newt. So, I'm really not going to get into a back and forth about the ideas with Democrats. I've made up my mind on the issues, this is about selecting a candidate. 3. I am a little surprised at how mean spirited and judgmental the democrats are about Newt's personal life. It's an issue for me, too. I think he made a mistake- several. Who hasn't? However, I trust he has turned himself around, and while he may have personal failings, I don't think equivocating on policy and principles of governance will be one of them. 4. Of the GOP candidates now-- and mind you with the exception of Trump, I'd take ANY of them right now over Obama-- I am confident that Newt is the only candidate ready to govern. He will hit the ground running, there won't be a month of "adjustment" and turnover, he doesn't have to flesh out his ideas, or draft proposals-- he's already done that and he's ready to go. 5. Should another candidate prove ready, I'm still open minded. Not to get into it with Newts, I too have made up my mind but then your feeling of "I am a little surprised at how mean spirited and judgmental the democrats are about Newt's personal life. It's an issue for me, too. I think he made a mistake- several. Who hasn't? However, I trust he has turned himself around, and while he may have personal failings, I don't think equivocating on policy and principles of governance will be one of them. applies to the former POTUS Bill Clinton too, in fact during his time and office as well as his time out of it?
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 14:32:27 GMT -5
Possible but then to many folks seem to have to scramble for dictionarys or mutter to friends along the lines of "mmmm I heard that word before but it really escapes me , know what it refers to Darlin, " , where as the word I suggested seems to get a immediate, "Oh right old boy, got that one , righto " or something along those lines. IMHO of course. No you suggested that it be changed because it was in your view vulgar. Whether your word or the term used by Snerdly is used they both bring instant recognition to the act. Both could be considered vulgar so if you want to slap Someone on the wrist be willing to take the slap yourself I wasn't slapping any wrists, just making a simple suggestion. Actually I do not consider the two words as equally vulger in the eyes of readers. In fact, I would suggest, on a busy Saturday night at a populer watering hole some where, say a bit after 9 PM, when enough but not to much liquid refreshments had been consumed, that a poll of which word was less vulger and more acceptable to be used in polite company was put forth, "Head " would win out handidly. Enough so, that I would put up say a 10 spot as a bet. {Hey it isn't the end of the world or that important a event, just a idea of how "Blow Jobs " fit into our national conciousness, acceptability of usage in polite company, thus no more then a ten spot} Where are those polls for important concensus polling when we need them, oh mooooonnnn..
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 14:35:19 GMT -5
I have a feeling that in "polite" company, that neither of the terms come up, because in polite society bedroom acts are kept in the bedroom.
now depending on the age of those you are having as "polite" company, what ever term is used will be based off the age of those talking.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on May 12, 2011 14:50:05 GMT -5
Just a thought.we are discussing POTUS after all, a little simpkle decorum in my estimation, not really out of line. IMHO> Hold up a second......There's an actual decorum to follow when talking about presidential oval office oral escapades??
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 14:52:10 GMT -5
Just a thought.we are discussing POTUS after all, a little simpkle decorum in my estimation, not really out of line. IMHO> Hold up a second......There's an actual decorum to follow when talking about presidential oval office oral escapades?? Touche..it was somethin wasn't it.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on May 12, 2011 15:04:52 GMT -5
"Head" as you put it Dezilooooo is almost as vulgar as Blow Job, if you are looking for the correct "PC" term to describe the act I would suggest Fellatio as that is the appropriate term. So now we're pissing and moaning over the political correctness of something that somebody might find offensive. Good lord. Fellatio, BJ, blow job, honkin' bobo....Who cares?!?!?!? Move on! Sorry CME...not "picking" on anybody...just used your post to respond.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 15:08:47 GMT -5
I understand, just thought it was funny that Dezi had an issue with Blow Job but not head ass both refer to the same act, and both are vulgar terms to different people.
If someone is going to try and be PC-lite, and attempt to correct someone I think they should use the proper term.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 15:21:46 GMT -5
I understand, just thought it was funny that Dezi had an issue with Blow Job but not head ass both refer to the same act, and both are vulgar terms to different people. If someone is going to try and be PC-lite, and attempt to correct someone I think they should use the proper term. Lordy so many with a stick some where, so little humor around today, I guess the election is coming up faster then I thought. Relax all you people, take a breath, a walk around the block , possible a {what has been discussed in jest above} might get more to have a smile on their faces if lucky enough to have a willing and enthusiastic partner available for such fun and games.{Don't forget, its polite to give too and not just be a receiver}
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 12, 2011 15:42:59 GMT -5
"Head" as you put it Dezilooooo is almost as vulgar as Blow Job, if you are looking for the correct "PC" term to describe the act I would suggest Fellatio as that is the appropriate term. So now we're pissing and moaning over the political correctness of something that somebody might find offensive. Good lord. Fellatio, BJ, blow job, honkin' bobo....Who cares?!?!?!? Move on! Sorry CME...not "picking" on anybody...just used your post to respond. Can we just call it a "Lewinsky" now?
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 12, 2011 15:45:52 GMT -5
1. There's no viable third party, or third party candidate. If one emerged, I would consider it as an option- and I'm not inherently opposed to third parties. Right now, I'm content to, with the help of God and the TEA Party, herd cats in the GOP. 2. I don't expect the Democrats to like Newt. So, I'm really not going to get into a back and forth about the ideas with Democrats. I've made up my mind on the issues, this is about selecting a candidate. 3. I am a little surprised at how mean spirited and judgmental the democrats are about Newt's personal life. It's an issue for me, too. I think he made a mistake- several. Who hasn't? However, I trust he has turned himself around, and while he may have personal failings, I don't think equivocating on policy and principles of governance will be one of them. 4. Of the GOP candidates now-- and mind you with the exception of Trump, I'd take ANY of them right now over Obama-- I am confident that Newt is the only candidate ready to govern. He will hit the ground running, there won't be a month of "adjustment" and turnover, he doesn't have to flesh out his ideas, or draft proposals-- he's already done that and he's ready to go. 5. Should another candidate prove ready, I'm still open minded. Not to get into it with Newts, I too have made up my mind but then your feeling of "I am a little surprised at how mean spirited and judgmental the democrats are about Newt's personal life. It's an issue for me, too. I think he made a mistake- several. Who hasn't? However, I trust he has turned himself around, and while he may have personal failings, I don't think equivocating on policy and principles of governance will be one of them. applies to the former POTUS Bill Clinton too, in fact during his time and office as well as his time out of it? President Clinton lied to a Grand Jury. That was the issue. He was impeached by the House, and the Senate had a duty to remove him from office. Instead, they invented a phony option that is not Constitutionally available to them and "Censured" him. This is in fact something that provided clarity when it comes to Newt- you've got a leader that did his job when the boys in the Senate would not, and the President was committing a felony.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 12, 2011 15:50:06 GMT -5
I suppose one down side of Newt's nomination will be that we have to re-live the impeachment of Bill Clinton-- though I'd think the Clintons and a number of mainstream Democrats would see it as in their interests if we didn't. For review... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 15:59:17 GMT -5
Not to get into it with Newts, I too have made up my mind but then your feeling of "I am a little surprised at how mean spirited and judgmental the democrats are about Newt's personal life. It's an issue for me, too. I think he made a mistake- several. Who hasn't? However, I trust he has turned himself around, and while he may have personal failings, I don't think equivocating on policy and principles of governance will be one of them. applies to the former POTUS Bill Clinton too, in fact during his time and office as well as his time out of it? President Clinton lied to a Grand Jury. That was the issue. He was impeached by the House, and the Senate had a duty to remove him from office. Instead, they invented a phony option that is not Constitutionally available to them and "Censured" him. This is in fact something that provided clarity when it comes to Newt- you've got a leader that did his job when the boys in the Senate would not, and the President was committing a felony. Did not lie, he had a honest difference of opinion with those who were triaing him , did he have sexual relations with Monica, in his mind, he felt "no"...and since they didn't convict him, I guess they agreed. Cost a lot of $ too, I bet you were up set with that verdict too .
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 16:02:53 GMT -5
So now we're pissing and moaning over the political correctness of something that somebody might find offensive. Good lord. Fellatio, BJ, blow job, honkin' bobo....Who cares?!?!?!? Move on! Sorry CME...not "picking" on anybody...just used your post to respond. Can we just call it a "Lewinsky" now? now that I do like, very good. ;D
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 16:10:12 GMT -5
President Clinton lied to a Grand Jury. That was the issue. He was impeached by the House, and the Senate had a duty to remove him from office. Instead, they invented a phony option that is not Constitutionally available to them and "Censured" him. This is in fact something that provided clarity when it comes to Newt- you've got a leader that did his job when the boys in the Senate would not, and the President was committing a felony. Did not lie, he had a honest difference of opinion with those who were trying him , did he have sexual relations with Monica, in his mind, he felt "no"...and since they didn't convict him, I guess they agreed. Cost a lot of $ too, I bet you were up set with that virdict too . On January 26, President Clinton, standing with his wife, spoke at a White House press conference, and issued a forceful denial, which contained what would later become one of the best-known sound bites of his presidency:[20] Now, I have to go back to work on my State of the Union speech. And I worked on it until pretty late last night. But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. Thank you Clinton admitted in taped grand jury testimony on August 17, 1998, that he had had an "improper physical relationship" with Lewinsky. That evening he gave a nationally televised statement admitting his relationship with Lewinsky which was "not appropriate".[23] Lewinsky received transactional immunity in exchange for grand jury testimony concerning her relationship with Clinton. She also turned over a semen-stained blue dress (which Linda Tripp had encouraged her to save without dry cleaning) to the Starr investigators, thereby providing a smoking gun based on DNA evidence that could prove the relationship despite Clinton's official denials.[22] He lied, he got caught, he admitted it, he was not held accountible for it. Unless you believe that his semen just happend to jump on the blue dress.
|
|
|
Post by Mkitty is pro kitty on May 12, 2011 16:37:50 GMT -5
In regards to my question, I guess we may never know.
Wow, I didn't know he was running for President for a third time. Note how Conservatives will whine and cry about Bush, but won't hesitate to bring up Clinton. (*pssst* he was President before Bush)
Don't Pat your self on the back too much, Mrs. Self Declared Victory and Deflection. You know the whole Clinton thing has nothing to do with Gingrich, but you, et al. will pontificate on that for about a whole page, won't you?
Sure, if your calendar says something around 1996. Hey, maybe you can blow the dust off your Tickle-Me-Elmo doll to get some laughs from that old joke.
|
|
vonnie6200
Senior Member
Adopt a Shelter Pet
Joined: Jan 8, 2011 14:07:17 GMT -5
Posts: 2,199
|
Post by vonnie6200 on May 12, 2011 16:45:08 GMT -5
Quote: Can we just call it a "Lewinsky" now? Sure, if your calendar says something around 1996. Hey, maybe you can blow the dust off your Tickle-Me-Elmo doll to get some laughs from that old joke. ?
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 16:46:55 GMT -5
However his character, lack of possible. This quote from deziloo is even more curious. So Gingrich has lack of "character" but Clinton doesn't? And, we shouldn't question Clinton or any other dem's character because questioning someone's character is wrong unless they do it? If you want to say, it doesn't matter, then fine. But, you can't have it both ways. Well, maybe you can....if you are smoking a cigar. Mr. Snerdly...excuse me but: " This quote from deziloo is even more curious. So Gingrich has lack of "character" but Clinton doesn't? And, we shouldn't question Clinton or any other dem's character because questioning someone's character is wrong unless they do it?" Those are not my words , think you have the wrong party here. Do I get a apology or is that not given here?
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 16:50:06 GMT -5
Oh, OK. I said he wasn't my choice and i even made jokes about him. But, i love how you gossiping hens know everyone's business and what they should or shouldn't do. I am sure you have plenty of advice for everyone. -------------------------------------------------------- Snerds old man, this gossiping hen has some serious questions as to why he would even put his name up for nomination , even though he has felt the job , POTUS, was one he could do well for three decades. However his character, lack of possible. Having affairs as he was leading the opposition to impeach Bill Clinton over sexual misconduct, how much did that cost the tax payers. Stating that his first wife was to young and not pretty enough to be a POTUS first lady. Did discuss a divorce , sent wire , while wife #2 or 3 , forgot now, was in hospital being treated for ovarian cancer. Did notify one of the ex's by phone call to her while she was at a gathering celebrating her mothers 84th birthday. I bet that set off a great celebration. Then his affair wit his current one who was a aid of his, and then there was the great decision to shut down the government. And the right were not to happy with Pelosi. So yeah this gossiping hen isn't that impressed with the former congressman, but don't worry, he wouldn't get my vote anyway. I will be open to listen to pubs, possible support , but as of now, staying with the POTUS, until some one demonstrable better comes along and so far, in my book , it's just been yadda, yadda, with some amusement seeing some all up and excited with a four month in office congressman from Florida, thinking he , in such a short time , is the anointed one or others such , who gave fire eating speech some where,{ Same folk seem to be saying ooh,ooh, he's the one , he's the one} very impressed they seem to be. news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/11/video-gingrich-announces-presidential-run-despite-marriage-issues/Your post message #43 .
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 16:54:00 GMT -5
-------------------------------------------------------- Snerds old man, this gossiping hen has some serious questions as to why he would even put his name up for nomination , even though he has felt the job , POTUS, was one he could do well for three decades. However his character, lack of possible. Having affairs as he was leading the opposition to impeach Bill Clinton over sexual misconduct, how much did that cost the tax payers. Stating that his first wife was to young and not pretty enough to be a POTUS first lady. Did discuss a divorce , sent wire , while wife #2 or 3 , forgot now, was in hospital being treated for ovarian cancer. Did notify one of the ex's by phone call to her while she was at a gathering celebrating her mothers 84th birthday. I bet that set off a great celebration. Then his affair wit his current one who was a aid of his, and then there was the great decision to shut down the government. And the right were not to happy with Pelosi. So yeah this gossiping hen isn't that impressed with the former congressman, but don't worry, he wouldn't get my vote anyway. I will be open to listen to pubs, possible support , but as of now, staying with the POTUS, until some one demonstrable better comes along and so far, in my book , it's just been yadda, yadda, with some amusement seeing some all up and excited with a four month in office congressman from Florida, thinking he , in such a short time , is the anointed one or others such , who gave fire eating speech some where,{ Same folk seem to be saying ooh,ooh, he's the one , he's the one} very impressed they seem to be. news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/11/video-gingrich-announces-presidential-run-despite-marriage-issues/Your post message #43 . Yes it is and I had gone back and re read all my posts to make sure what I was clainimg was correct, was sweating it a bit, I do post a lot and now as I re read your post of my post, #43, I see nothing similer to what you put up as my post.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 16:59:39 GMT -5
Snerdly is replying to your message 1st line second sentence:
His character, lack of possible.
"This quote from deziloo is even more curious. So Gingrich has lack of "character" but Clinton doesn't? And, we shouldn't question Clinton or any other dem's character because questioning someone's character is wrong unless they do it?"
The quote he is referring to is your assertion that he has a lack of character for committing marital indiscretions yet white washing Clinton's marital indiscretions.
now the question begs, why am I trying to spell it out for you.
or are you trying to say that you did not type the line: However his character, lack of possible.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 12, 2011 17:15:59 GMT -5
Snerdly is replying to your message 1st line second sentence: His character, lack of possible. "This quote from deziloo is even more curious. So Gingrich has lack of "character" but Clinton doesn't? And, we shouldn't question Clinton or any other dem's character because questioning someone's character is wrong unless they do it?" The quote he is referring to is your assertion that he has a lack of character for committing marital indiscretions yet white washing Clinton's marital indiscretions. now the question begs, why am I trying to spell it out for you. or are you trying to say that you did not type the line: However his character, lack of possible. You posted that I said: "This quote from deziloo is even more curious. So Gingrich has lack of "character" but Clinton doesn't? And, we shouldn't question Clinton or any other dem's character because questioning someone's character is wrong unless they do it? If you want to say, it doesn't matter, then fine. But, you can't have it both ways. Well, maybe you can....if you are smoking a cigar. I posted: " His character, lack of possible." and then went on to list in my mind his actions with his different wives...as indications in my mind, his lack of charecter. Now you or snerds want to discuss in you eyes a disagreement of why I feel he, newt, has no charecter, thats fine but that is not what you are doing. You are saying I posted a whole paragraph of yadda, which I did not...just the one sentence and then subsequesnt reasons for my feelings expressed in that one sentence. You don't add words that I did not say to a post and then say the poster said this..yadda, yadda.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 12, 2011 17:26:19 GMT -5
However his character, lack of possible. This quote from deziloo is even more curious. So Gingrich has lack of "character" but Clinton doesn't? And, we shouldn't question Clinton or any other dem's character because questioning someone's character is wrong unless they do it? If you want to say, it doesn't matter, then fine. But, you can't have it both ways. Well, maybe you can....if you are smoking a cigar. I will try this one more time. You said: However his character, lack of possible Snerdly said: This quote from dezi (referring to the above statement you made) is even more curious. Then goes on to speak of Gingrich haveing a Lack of charater and infering that you do not see a lack of character in Clinton but, you see it in Newt. Is that clear? I don't believeI can break it down any clearer.
|
|