moon/Laura
Administrator
Forum Owner
Joined: Dec 17, 2010 15:05:36 GMT -5
Posts: 10,052
Mini-Profile Text Color: f8fb10
|
Post by moon/Laura on May 11, 2011 13:14:37 GMT -5
go ahead and report me doesn't change the facts you so want to ignore. how about the FACT that calling someone retarded is a personal attack shelby, which is against the CoC??
|
|
shelby
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 21:29:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,368
|
Post by shelby on May 11, 2011 13:15:32 GMT -5
Yes dezi so true...I don't like the koch brothers and what they do so I am not surprised. I am surprised so many are fine with this and the board who accepted it. Where does it end? What are the people who support this thinking?
|
|
shelby
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 21:29:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,368
|
Post by shelby on May 11, 2011 13:16:27 GMT -5
I know moon it was wrong I do regret it.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 11, 2011 13:16:36 GMT -5
Also worth noting he wants to make welfare recipients pay for their own drug tests
Which will be repaid when they have a positive result, the cost of a simple urine test is 25-35 dollars. That's not really unfair.
I have provided Federal Guidelines as to drug testing you have provided only hat air and speculation.
The facts are the facts, mine are printed in black and white and backs up my claims you say alot yet prove nothing.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 11, 2011 13:18:43 GMT -5
I know moon it was wrong I do regret it. Then why not remove it and we move on..S happens, but it is easy to clean up, bit messy, but still, a little water, soap, holding ones nose, viola, all gone.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 11, 2011 13:19:46 GMT -5
I'd rather it stay, it's easier to ignore the juvenile comments and poster when you can see what they really think.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 11, 2011 13:28:53 GMT -5
I'd rather it stay, it's easier to ignore the juvenile comments and poster when you can see what they really think. ok, but as I said, mistakes happen, S too, and to clean up the mistakes , if admitted, this was, and definitly the S, that has to go, health reasons if no other, to clean it up, way to go in my book.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 11, 2011 13:36:10 GMT -5
I'd rather it stay, it's easier to ignore the juvenile comments and poster when you can see what they really think. ok, but as I said, mistakes happen, S too, and to clean up the mistakes , if admitted, this was, and definitly the S, that has to go, health reasons if no other, to clean it up, way to go in my book. A mistake happens once and you learn from it if it is done more than once, it is not a mistake.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 11, 2011 13:46:26 GMT -5
ok, but as I said, mistakes happen, S too, and to clean up the mistakes , if admitted, this was, and definitly the S, that has to go, health reasons if no other, to clean it up, way to go in my book. A mistake happens once and you learn from it if it is done more than once, it is not a mistake.
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on May 11, 2011 13:49:08 GMT -5
Also worth noting he wants to make welfare recipients pay for their own drug tests Which will be repaid when they have a positive result, the cost of a simple urine test is 25-35 dollars. That's not really unfair. I have provided Federal Guidelines as to drug testing you have provided only hat air and speculation. The facts are the facts, mine are printed in black and white and backs up my claims you say alot yet prove nothing. You can argue all the facts you want- I have the law and precedent on my side. Scotus: 489 U.S. 656 The last case in Florida cost them a 150K verdict and the policy was declared unconstitutional- in 2004. Nothing has changed but the governor. He's an obvious fraud and cares nothing about the law. Are you that naive to think this about saving money? Since when has drug testing ever saved money? This is about 100K employees that would have the state random test them in clinics like his. Drug testing is a waste of money and an insult to employees.
|
|
shelby
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 21:29:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,368
|
Post by shelby on May 11, 2011 13:50:36 GMT -5
I will admit I have a hot temper and can be quite crass at times. I will take a few minutes before I post anything from now or I fully expect to be banned.
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on May 11, 2011 13:52:53 GMT -5
Sounds to me like he violated his oath of office- as if it mattered to him in the first place.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 11, 2011 14:04:23 GMT -5
Also worth noting he wants to make welfare recipients pay for their own drug tests Which will be repaid when they have a positive result, the cost of a simple urine test is 25-35 dollars. That's not really unfair. I have provided Federal Guidelines as to drug testing you have provided only hat air and speculation. The facts are the facts, mine are printed in black and white and backs up my claims you say alot yet prove nothing. You can argue all the facts you want- I have the law and precedent on my side. Scotus: 489 U.S. 656 The last case in Florida cost them a 150K verdict and the policy was declared unconstitutional- in 2004. Nothing has changed but the governor. He's an obvious fraud and cares nothing about the law. Are you that naive to think this about saving money? Since when has drug testing ever saved money? This is about 100K employees that would have the state random test them in clinics like his. Drug testing is a waste of money and an insult to employees. Sure, like his. It is an insult to people who pay the state taxes so that state workers are not held to the same standard as private emplyed citizens.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 11, 2011 14:05:45 GMT -5
Drug testing is a waste of money
I agree that Drug testing is a waste of money. Though I doubt anyone who doesn't do drugs sees it as an insult.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 11, 2011 14:13:27 GMT -5
Also worth noting he wants to make welfare recipients pay for their own drug tests Which will be repaid when they have a positive result, the cost of a simple urine test is 25-35 dollars. That's not really unfair. I have provided Federal Guidelines as to drug testing you have provided only hat air and speculation. The facts are the facts, mine are printed in black and white and backs up my claims you say alot yet prove nothing. You can argue all the facts you want- I have the law and precedent on my side. Scotus: 489 U.S. 656 The last case in Florida cost them a 150K verdict and the policy was declared unconstitutional- in 2004. Nothing has changed but the governor. He's an obvious fraud and cares nothing about the law. Are you that naive to think this about saving money? Since when has drug testing ever saved money? This is about 100K employees that would have the state random test them in clinics like his. Drug testing is a waste of money and an insult to employees. How so ? To many people use em, besides being illegal, the fact is, if one is tested positive, knowing that part of the job offer is the fact that one is going to have to P in a cup and have the urine tested and still gets caught, they are users , thus a potential employee problem, and better to not hire then have to go through all the malarkey after wards that takes time , $, and potential losses for employer in poorly done work, even being libel for damages caused by drug addiction leading to negligence they the employer is libel for. I see nothing wrong with drug testing and the only ones who raise the objection I believe might be ones who have a problem in this way, thus the objection. IMHO.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 11, 2011 14:14:09 GMT -5
I know, right! I LOVE Florida!! It gets better every day!!! The more liberals whine, the more I know we are doing things right. Don't like it? Move to California.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 11, 2011 14:17:35 GMT -5
Drug testing is a waste of money I agree that Drug testing is a waste of money. Though I doubt anyone who doesn't do drugs sees it as an insult. Of course it's an insult. This is just a variation on the old, "Well, if you've got nothing to hide" argument against refusing a search or invoking one's Fifth Amendment rights. But then, a government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take everything you have-- including your freedom.
|
|
shelby
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 21:29:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,368
|
Post by shelby on May 11, 2011 14:20:57 GMT -5
I don't have a problem with drug testing I have a problem with a politician passing something that he personally stands to gain from. If in fact he does profit from such clinics. Every employer has the right to test for drugs my employer doesn't and we are a health and wellnes company I guess they see no need. have there been drug related incidences lately or just greed I think is what should be asked.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on May 11, 2011 14:21:14 GMT -5
I know, right! I LOVE Florida!! It gets better every day!!! The more liberals whine, the more I know we are doing things right. Don't like it? Move to California. Again , a blast from the past, "love it or leave it", so original, love the history lesson though, but really, so un original.
|
|
cme1201
Junior Associate
Tennis Elbow, Jock Itch, and Athletes Foot, every man has a sports life!
Joined: Apr 6, 2011 13:55:07 GMT -5
Posts: 5,503
|
Post by cme1201 on May 11, 2011 14:24:43 GMT -5
I don't have a problem with drug testing I have a problem with a politician passing something that he personally stands to gain from. If in fact he does profit from such clinics. Every employer has the right to test for drugs my employer doesn't and we are a health and wellnes company I guess they see no need. have there been drug related incidences lately or just greed I think is what should be asked. We pre-test, we have a 1 month test and randoms occasionally. Lots of problems can come from a construction worker high on the job.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 11, 2011 14:40:12 GMT -5
I don't have a problem with drug testing I have a problem with a politician passing something that he personally stands to gain from. If in fact he does profit from such clinics. Every employer has the right to test for drugs my employer doesn't and we are a health and wellnes company I guess they see no need. have there been drug related incidences lately or just greed I think is what should be asked. They don't have a "right" to drug test. They "may" drug test if enough qualified candidates permit it. Otherwise, we could simply choose to work for another employer. I think it's quite the insult that many times before you're even made an offer, step one is to take a pee while someone else watches, or stands close by. More people have to have respect for themselves, and know what THEIR rights are. Government, quite literally, has NO RIGHT to drug test. It amounts to a search, and without a warrant issued by a judge presented with probable cause-- there's no ability (in the real world, it's different- government routinely violates the law, and our civil rights) legally for the government to do this. Of course, the government doesn't have a legal right to transfer earnings from those who have earned it to those that haven't. So, once we went down this road, we pretty well sealed our fate.
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on May 11, 2011 15:02:26 GMT -5
Unfortunately, the 4th amendment doesn't apply to private corporations, so they are free to degrade you at will. Statistics do show they are pretty much a waste of time- and considering the sheer number of state employees, it would be a giant waste of time and money. Question is how much are the damages going to be as soon as he is sued by the first fired employee?
Lot's of problems can come from drunk/high people on or off the job- Does drug testing prevent that? Probably not. Will it stop a bad accident? Probably not. Is it worth the invasion of privacy? Probably not.
|
|
shelby
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 21:29:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,368
|
Post by shelby on May 11, 2011 15:09:23 GMT -5
Yes employers do have a right it is employment at will if you don't like it work some where else. I don't like the fact they are trying to test govermnet workers I am torn on this. I think there are certain jobs it is a good thing like school bus drivers or anyone who has the safety of others in their hands. But the intentions of some and govermnet intrusions are big factors here.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on May 11, 2011 15:30:35 GMT -5
I see nothing wrong with drug testing and the only ones who raise the objection I believe might be ones who have a problem in this way, thus the objection. IMHO. What do you mean the police can't have a camera linked to your house...what do you have to hide? Makes me cringe whenever I hear the "nothing to hide" excuse. Don't go down that slippery slope..... So, I'll say that I don't do drugs (you'll just have to take my word for it) and I don't support random, unwarranted testing either private or public. In most cases, there is no need. I do support testing when there is a need such as a new hire or working in a position where "your" drug abuse could kill other innocent people. We do random tests on drivers, a mandatory pre-hire test and a mandatory test after a workplace accident...no other time. In 10 years and many accidents, we have caught just one person after an accident with a forklift. I still can't honestly can't say it's a total waste of money because the fear of being caught and losing your job most likely cuts down abuse by some that might otherwise use.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 11, 2011 15:37:30 GMT -5
Unfortunately, the 4th amendment doesn't apply to private corporations, so they are free to degrade you at will. Statistics do show they are pretty much a waste of time- and considering the sheer number of state employees, it would be a giant waste of time and money. Question is how much are the damages going to be as soon as he is sued by the first fired employee? Lot's of problems can come from drunk/high people on or off the job- Does drug testing prevent that? Probably not. Will it stop a bad accident? Probably not. Is it worth the invasion of privacy? Probably not. No, they're only as free as we permit them to be. If EVERY applicant simply said, "NO!" then things would change. But people with a job mentality seem to have a subservient attitude. Employers can only do what the market permits them to do. Drug users have ways around this anyway. I think it's about control. I'm a cynic when it comes to both big business AND big government. I think the market needs to speak loudly with one voice that we just aren't going to roll over and be treated like livestock.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 11, 2011 15:44:00 GMT -5
I would be fine with government regulation that severely punishes people who cause accidents as a DIRECT RESULT of their drug use as shown by their obvious, demonstrable impairment.
I'm just not for searches based upon suspicion of every single person.
In fact, if I were to let government step in-- and I don't think it should, btw, in spite of how distasteful I think drug testing is-- but if I were to permit government to step in, I'd step in on behalf of workers and say companies may NOT drug test.
Still, I think companies should be permitted to do what the market allows.
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on May 11, 2011 17:25:47 GMT -5
A lot of companies are doing it because solely because their insurance carriers have bought into it. There is another ball of wax there with liability. Back to FL- what good is randomly testing state employees? Is there some drug abuse crisis I am unaware of that requires spending the money to test them even if they could find a way around the law? Cost benefit please: Cost-FL taxpayers, Benefit- Rick Scott's companies- Oh I see how that works. "One of the more popular services at Solantic, the urgent care chain co-founded by Florida Gov. Rick Scott, is drug testing, according to Solantic CEO Karen Bowling. Given Solantic's role in that marketplace, critics are again asking whether Scott's policy initiatives - this time, requiring drug testing of state employees and welfare recipients - are designed to benefit Scott's bottom line. The Palm Beach Post reported in an exclusive story two weeks ago that while Scott divested his interest in Solantic in January, the controlling shares went to a trust in his wife's name." www.palmbeachpost.com/money/gov-rick-scotts-drug-testing-policy-stirs-suspicion-1350922.html
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on May 11, 2011 18:22:34 GMT -5
I know Florida Republicans have a history of manipulating elections, but it sounds like things are getting much worse.
It appears Tea Party crackpots like Scott, West and Koch have totally hijacked the state.
I sure wouldn't want to live there...
|
|
Value Buy
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 17:57:07 GMT -5
Posts: 18,680
Today's Mood: Getting better by the day!
Location: In the middle of enjoying retirement!
Favorite Drink: Zombie Dust from Three Floyd's brewery
Mini-Profile Name Color: e61975
Mini-Profile Text Color: 196ce6
|
Post by Value Buy on May 11, 2011 21:02:28 GMT -5
I know Florida Republicans have a history of manipulating elections, but it sounds like things are getting much worse. It appears Tea Party crackpots like Scott, West and Koch have totally hijacked the state. I sure wouldn't want to live there... Well, we also know Cook County Illinois Democrats steal elections and have even stolen Presidential elections, ala Kennedy in 1960. Do you want to live there?
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on May 11, 2011 21:29:50 GMT -5
I know Florida Republicans have a history of manipulating elections, but it sounds like things are getting much worse. It appears Tea Party crackpots like Scott, West and Koch have totally hijacked the state. I sure wouldn't want to live there... Trust me when I tell you we don't want you voting here, so carry on.
|
|