Hûbba! Hubba! Hillary 2 Hawt 4 Hasidic Handbill!

[Mkitty is pro kitty]

... Here's the Huffington Headline:

"Hillary Clinton Removed From Situation Room Photo By Der Tzitung, Hasidic Newspaper (PHOTOS)"

A Brooklyn-based Hasidic newspaper removed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and another woman from the now-iconic photo of the Obama national security team watching the raid that killed Osama bin Laden from the White House Situation Room.

The original photo, taken as the raid was occurring, famously shows Clinton in the center of the room, with her hand over her mouth. But the newspaper Der Tzitung, described by the Jewish Week as "ultra-Orthodox," has a policy of never printing photos of women in its pages because it thinks they could be sexually suggestive. Thus, Clinton and counterterrorism director Audrey Tomason, who was seen standing at the back of the room, were removed from the picture.

The blogger Failed Messiah was the first to notice the Photoshopping.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/09/hillary-clinton-der-tzitung-removed-situation-room_n_859254.html?icid=main|netscape|dl2|sec1_lnk3|212615

Huffington Post has the pictures separate, but here they are together:



So guys, did that "suggestive" picture of Hillary turn you on?

[ugonow]

I am still pondering the name of the newspaper. There should be a good Hillary joke in it somewhere.....

[Deleted]

"Hillary Clinton Removed From Situation Room Photo By Der Tzitung, Hasidic Newspaper (PHOTOS)"
But the newspaper Der Tzitung, described by the Jewish Week as "ultra-Orthodox," has a policy of never printing photos of women in its pages because it thinks they could be sexually suggestive

To me that's just shocking. I've always thought that a picture of Hillary Clinton in motel rooms would cut down sex in them by 90% (assuming of course that 10% of the people that go there to have sex are blind).

[cme1201]

May 9, 2011 11:41:23 GMT -5 @oldtex said:

"Hillary Clinton Removed From Situation Room Photo By Der Tzitung, Hasidic Newspaper (PHOTOS)"
But the newspaper Der Tzitung, described by the Jewish Week as "ultra-Orthodox," has a policy of never printing photos of women in its pages because it thinks they could be sexually suggestive

To me that's just shocking. I've always thought that a picture of Hillary Clinton in motel rooms would cut down sex in them by 90% (assuming of course that 10% of the people that go there to have sex are blind).

How do you explain Bill?

[ed1066]

They removed another woman from the background, too. Why does the left hate Jews so much? In Muslim theocracies, they cut the noses, clitorises and ears off of their women, but someone wants to post this story like it's shocking...?

[Opti]

Its just sad that the ultra Orthodox jews seem to have more in common with extreme Muslims than not. Both believe men are raving barely in control sexual beasts so women should rarely be seen etc. so these men can attend to their duties.

[Mkitty is pro kitty]

I've always thought that a picture of Hillary Clinton in motel rooms would cut down sex in them by 90%

Hotels having Hillary hung-up hampers having hanky-panky, home-runs, humping, etc.

Why does the left hate Jews so much?

Ho-hum, heavy handed, ham-fisted, hate-filled harangue.

but someone wants to post this story like it's shocking...?

Ha, ha! Humor hovers high over hysterical & hypercritical hack's head.

Both believe men are raving barely in control sexual beasts so women should rarely be seen etc.

Also, husband's "have & hold" hampered from having her own hanky-panky or even having herself heeded.

[ed1066]

May 9, 2011 13:06:55 GMT -5 Mkitty is pro kitty said:

I've always thought that a picture of Hillary Clinton in motel rooms would cut down sex in them by 90%

Hotels having Hillary hung-up hampers having hanky-panky, home-runs, humping, etc.



Ho-hum, heavy handed, ham-fisted, hate-filled harangue.



Ha, ha! Humor hovers high over hysterical & hypercritical hack's head.

Both believe men are raving barely in control sexual beasts so women should rarely be seen etc.

Also, husband's "have & hold" hampered from having her own hanky-panky or even having herself heeded.

Trolling with the dictionary...how sad

[❤ mollymouser ❤]

If practicing their faith means not publishing newspaper photographs containing women, who am I to criticize, complain, or mock? Their faith. Their newspaper. Their decision.

[cme1201]

May 9, 2011 14:02:10 GMT -5 ❤ mollymouser ❤ said:

If practicing their faith means not publishing newspaper photographs containing women, who am I to criticize, complain, or mock? Their faith. Their newspaper. Their decision.

Enligntened.

Posted by Mkitty says "you're fired!" on Today at 11:09am
... Here's the Huffington Headline:

"Hillary Clinton Removed From Situation Room Photo By Der Tzitung, Hasidic Newspaper (PHOTOS)"

A Brooklyn-based Hasidic newspaper removed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and another woman from the now-iconic photo of the Obama national security team watching the raid that killed Osama bin Laden from the White House Situation Room.

The original photo, taken as the raid was occurring, famously shows Clinton in the center of the room, with her hand over her mouth. But the newspaper Der Tzitung, described by the Jewish Week as "ultra-Orthodox," has a policy of never printing photos of women in its pages because it thinks they could be sexually suggestive. Thus, Clinton and counterterrorism director Audrey Tomason, who was seen standing at the back of the room, were removed from the picture.

The blogger Failed Messiah was the first to notice the Photoshopping.

www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/09.....html?icid=main|netscape|dl2|sec1_lnk3|212615

Huffington Post has the pictures separate, but here they are together:[\quote]

Huffington, not so enlightened.

[ed1066]

News sources always manipulate photos. Only lobotomized liberals believe this is what Barack Obama actually looks like:

[Deleted]

www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/hillary-clinton-audrey-tomason-go-missing-in-situation-room-photo-in-der-tzitung-newspaper/2011/05/09/AFfJbVYG_blog.h

Update: Full statement by Der Tzitung.

The White House released a picture showing the President following “live” the events in the apprehension of Osama Bin Laden, last week Sunday. Also present in the Situation Room were various high-ranking government and military officials. Our photo editor realized the significance of this historic moment, and published the picture, but in his haste he did not read the "fine print" that accompanied the picture, forbidding any changes. We should not have published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and apologies to the White House and to the State Department.

The allegations that religious Jews denigrate women or do not respect women in public office, is a malicious slander and libel. The current Secretary of State, the Honorable Hillary R. Clinton, was a Senator representing New York State with great distinction 8 years. She won overwhelming majorities in the Orthodox Jewish communities in her initial campaign in '00, and when she was re-elected in '06, because the religious community appreciated her unique capabilities and compassion to all communities. The Jewish religion does not allow for discrimination based on gender, race, etc.

We respect all government officials. We even have special prayers for the welfare of our Government and the government leaders, and there is no mention of gender in such prayers.

All Government employees are sworn into office, promising adherence to the Constitution, and our Constitution attests to our greatness as a nation that is a light beacon to the entire world. The First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion. (See below.) That has precedence even to our cherished freedom of the press! In accord with our religious beliefs, we do not publish photos of women, which in no way relegates them to a lower status. Publishing a newspaper is a big responsibility, and our policies are guided by a Rabbinical Board. Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging to women, which is certainly never our intention. We apologize if this was seen as offensive.

We are proud Americans of the Jewish faith, and there is no conflict in that, and we will with the help of the Almighty continue as law-abiding citizens, in this great country of our's, until the ultimate redemption.tml


**** How about leaving the Jews alone??***

[burnsattornincan]

ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzz..... zzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZ..... zzzzZZZZZZZ.... zzzzzzZZZZZZZZzzzzz...... ZZZZZZZZZzzzzz..... zzzzzZZZZZZZ.... ZZZZZZZZZzzzzz..... zzzzZZZZZZZ.... zzzzZZZZZZZzzzzz..... zzzzzzZZZZZ... zzzzZZZzzzz... zzzzzZZZ...... zzzZZZZ... ZZzzzz......

[Deleted]

WAKE UP, BURNS!!!!!! You are sleeping on the keyboard!!!!!!
;D

[burnsattornincan]

ZZZZZZZzzzz... zzzzZZZZz..... zzzzZZZ... zzzzZZ.... zzzZZ... zzZ... zz.... Oh, sorry Ms. krickitt. Did I miss something interesting?

[moon/Laura]

burns.. i am tired of you insulting people with your ZZZs. i have told you before, that if you have nothing to offer beyond that, don't bother posting.

[formerexpat]

So guys, did that "suggestive" picture of Hillary turn you on?

No - her mouth was covered.

Of course, an uncovered Hillary mouth didn't turn Bill on, so I'm not sure that I would be either.

[burnsattornincan]

burns.. i am tired of you insulting people with your ZZZs.

Maybe it should be the other way around. If people can't post something of interest to me then they shouldn't bother posting. At all.

[Mkitty is pro kitty]

Trolling with the dictionary...how sad

Hardly, hater.

News sources always manipulate photos.

But the newspaper Der Tzitung, described by the Jewish Week as "ultra-Orthodox," has a policy of never printing photos of women in its pages because it thinks they could be sexually suggestive.

So guys, did that "suggestive" picture of Hillary turn you on?

Have a handle on Hillary & Hasidic habit? Hell-no!

**** How about leaving the Jews alone??***

Have they halos & harps?

Huffington, not so enlightened.

Here's a helpful hint:

[glow=red,1,200]HH.....HH[/glow]
[glow=orange,1,200]HH.....HH[/glow]
[glow=yellow,1,200]HHHHHHH[/glow]
[glow=green,1,200]HHHHHHH[/glow]
[glow=blue,1,200]HH.....HH[/glow]
[glow=purple,1,200]HH.....HH[/glow]

[ed1066]

Lame!

[moon/Laura]

May 9, 2011 21:30:50 GMT -5 burnsattornincan said:

burns.. i am tired of you insulting people with your ZZZs.

Maybe it should be the other way around. If people can't post something of interest to me then they shouldn't bother posting. At all.

last i checked, it wasn't about YOU. this board does not exist to make mr. bully burns happy. if you think it's boring, close out the thread and move on without comment. next time, i'm just going to shut you out of this place and you won't be getting back in.

[Value Buy]

If the thread topic is boring, or the comments are boring, why not point it out?
Moonbeam, Getting too many pm's from the far left, these days?
Worry about the complainers that privately complain, not the ones who are public about their complaints.
Myself, I do try to just keep walking, you know, like the policeman say, "nothing to see here, keep moving". But you know what they say about car crashes.....everyone has to stop and gape.

Oh Oh. Probably should have pm'd Moonbeam

[moon/Laura]

because if we were going to just 'point it out', VB, i'd be on every thread ON this board saying so.. hell, i wouldn't even have the board at all!.. might not for much longer as is because the trolls who never have anything nice to say ruin the place..

it is not for me, or you, or anyone else to say "your topic is boring" .. just move on if you have nothing nice to say.

[mmhmm]

Sorry, but I really have to chuckle at all this. If you don't like the way this board is run, there's an absolutely fool-proof way of avoiding all the angst. Proboards are FREE! Start your own. Shibby did. I have noticed Shibby's board is no longer available, but yours might do quite well. Who knows? At least, you'd have a board where all the rules were to your liking. Makes a lot more sense than posting here and griping.

[Deleted]

To me that's just shocking. I've always thought that a picture of Hillary Clinton in motel rooms would cut down sex in them by 90% (assuming of course that 10% of the people that go there to have sex are blind).

How do you explain Bill?

cme1201 to be honest I CAN'T explain Bill. Sure I can see why he would cheat but then I take a look at WHO he cheated with & I'm just at a loss for words. The only thing that I can come up with is that he's just very very vain & won't wear glasses where others can see him (& he could see them).

[mmhmm]

I've got to give the Hasidic newspaper credit for having the decency to apologize for altering the photograph. Seems it may have been done by someone who had no intent to cause problems but was simply trying to follow the directives of his employer and stumbled in the process. Better, I'd think, not to have published the picture at all. I'm sure whoever made the decision regrets it now.

[cme1201]

May 10, 2011 8:36:14 GMT -5 @oldtex said:

To me that's just shocking. I've always thought that a picture of Hillary Clinton in motel rooms would cut down sex in them by 90% (assuming of course that 10% of the people that go there to have sex are blind).

How do you explain Bill?

cme1201 to be honest I CAN'T explain Bill. Sure I can see why he would cheat but then I take a look at WHO he cheated with & I'm just at a loss for words. The only thing that I can come up with is that he's just very very vain & won't wear glasses where others can see him (& he could see them).

I guess that Love is blind, even when it's love for a few hours or a night only.

[burnsattornincan]

Sorry, but I really have to chuckle at all this. If you don't like the way this board is run, there's an absolutely fool-proof way of avoiding all the angst. Proboards are FREE! Start your own. Shibby did.

Oh for cripes sake. Why all the fuss about a few zzzzzzz's? This place is getting so edgy. I think people have a right to know when their stuff is crap and interests no one. I would surely like to know if my stuff is crap but it seems more often than not it is exactly what people want to hear. By the way, shibby can shove it. I'm not interested in posting on some other board and when I'm done here I'll be retiring. /Dalton

[moon/Laura]

the thing you are overlooking burns, is that "crap" is subjective! what you find boring, others don't, and vice versa. therefore, it serves NO purpose to come on someone's thread and put in a bunch of zzzzs. it's rude and unneccesary..

[Mkitty is pro kitty]

Oh for cripes sake. Why all the fuss about a few zzzzzzz's?

Histrionic and hypocritical.

I think people have a right to know when their stuff is crap and interests no one.

Who hired him as herald here?

but it seems more often than not it is exactly what people want to hear.

A heaping helping of haughtiness and hype.