Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Nov 7, 2023 13:00:00 GMT -5
This should be an intersting case. The pro-gun side states guns don't kill people. people kill people, especially mentally ill people. So are domestic abusers with a violence restraining order mentally ill? Supreme Court reviews federal ban on guns for domestic abusers
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear arguments over a 30-year-old federal ban on firearms for people under domestic violence restraining orders. The case, U.S. v. Rahimi, is a blockbuster test of a widely popular gun safety regulation and the Second Amendment at a time when firearms are a leading factor in intimate partner violence nationwide. An estimated 12 million American adults are victims of domestic abuse every year; on average, 70 die every month from being shot by an intimate partner, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A woman is five times more likely to die from a domestic abuse situation if a gun is involved, according to the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. The justices are taking up the issue one year after a landmark decision made it more difficult for governments to restrict individual gun rights. The high court's ruling said only laws "consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation" can be allowed. "This is an opportunity for the justices to clarify the test, particularly as it applies to domestic abusers, and to a whole host of incredibly effective gun violence prevention laws," said Kelly Roskam, director of law and policy at the Center for Gun Violence Solutions. The 1994 federal statute at the center of the case requires thousands of domestic violence restraining orders issued each year by federal and state judges to be reported to the national background check system. In turn, they serve as a basis to deny a firearm sale. More than 77,000 attempted firearm purchases by alleged domestic abusers have been blocked since 1998, according to the FBI. Rest of article here: Supreme Court reviews federal ban on guns for domestic abusers
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,893
|
Post by thyme4change on Nov 7, 2023 15:20:18 GMT -5
This one could be ugly
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,917
|
Post by Tennesseer on Nov 7, 2023 22:19:44 GMT -5
Hopefully SCOTUS does rule keeping the law in place. US Supreme Court leans toward allowing domestic-violence gun curbsWASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared inclined to uphold the legality of a federal law that makes it a crime for people under domestic violence restraining orders to have guns in the latest major case to test the willingness of its conservative majority to further expand gun rights. The justices heard arguments in an appeal by President Joe Biden's administration of a lower court's ruling striking down the law - intended to protect victims of domestic abuse - as a violation of the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right to "keep and bear arms." The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the measure failed a stringent test set by the Supreme Court in a 2022 ruling that required gun laws to be "consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation" in order to survive a Second Amendment challenge. Rest of article here: US Supreme Court leans toward allowing domestic-violence gun curbs
|
|