ripvanwinkle
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 9, 2011 22:36:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,448
|
Post by ripvanwinkle on Oct 4, 2023 21:21:08 GMT -5
What changed to allow him to do this?
|
|
|
Post by minnesotapaintlady on Oct 4, 2023 21:32:32 GMT -5
Nothing changed. The forgiveness was for people that would have already qualified under other programs like PSLF program and for those in IDR that had met their 20 years of payments.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,056
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Oct 4, 2023 21:35:00 GMT -5
Now rip is concerned about the constitution. He didn’t seem worried when Trump was shitting all over it when he wanted to fund his wall despite congress not allocating any funds
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,508
|
Post by Tiny on Oct 4, 2023 22:25:24 GMT -5
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,508
|
Post by Tiny on Oct 4, 2023 22:28:30 GMT -5
Perhaps what changed was Biden's ability to work within the system and remove some of the road blocks to getting debt relief to people who really need it? Kind of the way trump put a bunch of road blocks into place to keep that debt in place; Even if the debt was due to fraud. Even if the borrowers had faithfully followed rules that would have granted them loan forgiveness but who were denied forgiveness due to errors in the system. www.nytimes.com/2021/03/19/business/student-loan-forgiveness-betsy-devos.html
|
|
ripvanwinkle
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jan 9, 2011 22:36:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,448
|
Post by ripvanwinkle on Oct 4, 2023 22:44:48 GMT -5
Now rip is concerned about the constitution. He didn’t seem worried when Trump was shitting all over it when he wanted to fund his wall despite congress not allocating any funds That's different. That was more of a national security issue.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Oct 5, 2023 0:48:37 GMT -5
Now rip is concerned about the constitution. He didn’t seem worried when Trump was shitting all over it when he wanted to fund his wall despite congress not allocating any funds That's different. That was more of a national security issue. And that 4% of the border that he added a wall to doesn't have seemed to make much difference, has it? Still most of the southern border has no physical manmade barrier on it.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,362
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Oct 5, 2023 0:51:10 GMT -5
That's evil. She never struck me as a good person or even a fair one. Those predatory schools/loan programs do not deserve free money.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 8,056
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Oct 5, 2023 6:00:48 GMT -5
Now rip is concerned about the constitution. He didn’t seem worried when Trump was shitting all over it when he wanted to fund his wall despite congress not allocating any funds That's different. That was more of a national security issue. Doesn’t matter. If Congress didn’t appropriate the money, he cannot spend it. It is what the constitution says. It is why a shutdown is an issue. If we have no budget and we are attacked, the president ask the defense department to spend money to get more weapons? Even if it a national security issue. But since you are “comfortably uninformed” I shouldn’t expect you to understand. But Trump shot all over the constitution, most notably by trying to overturn the constitution, and you don’t care. And he continues to tell you how he will ignore it if te-elected, and you will still vote for him. So excuse me if I do not take your concerns about whether Biden can do this with a grain of s as lt
|
|
tbop77
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 8:24:37 GMT -5
Posts: 2,698
|
Post by tbop77 on Oct 5, 2023 6:48:11 GMT -5
What changed to allow him to do this? Nothing has changed. President Biden is working to help the American people while Trump and the conservative party are busy providing a shit show.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Oct 5, 2023 16:33:20 GMT -5
the student loan debt bubble is the next one to pop, unless it gets fixed.
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,819
|
Post by happyhoix on Oct 5, 2023 19:15:04 GMT -5
Now rip is concerned about the constitution. He didn’t seem worried when Trump was shitting all over it when he wanted to fund his wall despite congress not allocating any funds That's different. That was more of a national security issue. So was giving all the wealthy people and large corporations a big tax break the moment he became president a good idea? In case you think that big tax break was important to rev up the economy, imagine how hot the economy will get if all the people struggling to pay off student loan debt now have the budge to buy a house or new car?
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,893
|
Post by thyme4change on Oct 5, 2023 19:45:44 GMT -5
The bubble of student loans is going to be different from previous bubbles. The dot-com bust every Tom, Dick and Harry was out there buying any stock that sounded internetty. The companies had no fundamentals, and no profit. When the market crashed a bunch of average Joes were holding useless stock and lost money - some of it real. When the housing crisis happened many average homeowners got screwed because they paid the elevated prices. Also, every Tom, Dick and Harry were out there declaring themselves real estate investors and buying houses. When the bubble popped, people lost any down payments or money to do upgrades. A bunch of flippers and landlords went under. Regular people lost real money.
The student loan crisis is a little different because individuals aren’t out there buying up student loans and telling everyone how easy it is to make money doing so. The loans that will get forgiven were probably paid already, with some interest. So even the companies who hold them are really only losing paper money. And the average Joe is only benefiting from any erasure. There is only 130 billion in private loans - while a lot of money - not the kind that sinks the US economy. The big money (1.5 trillion I think) is held by the government, so would that amount just disappear? Would it create a bigger deficit?
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Oct 5, 2023 20:29:18 GMT -5
The bubble of student loans is going to be different from previous bubbles. The dot-com bust every Tom, Dick and Harry was out there buying any stock that sounded internetty. The companies had no fundamentals, and no profit. When the market crashed a bunch of average Joes were holding useless stock and lost money - some of it real. When the housing crisis happened many average homeowners got screwed because they paid the elevated prices. Also, every Tom, Dick and Harry were out there declaring themselves real estate investors and buying houses. When the bubble popped, people lost any down payments or money to do upgrades. A bunch of flippers and landlords went under. Regular people lost real money. The student loan crisis is a little different because individuals aren’t out there buying up student loans and telling everyone how easy it is to make money doing so. The loans that will get forgiven were probably paid already, with some interest. So even the companies who hold them are really only losing paper money. And the average Joe is only benefiting from any erasure. There is only 130 billion in private loans - while a lot of money - not the kind that sinks the US economy. The big money (1.5 trillion I think) is held by the government, so would that amount just disappear? Would it create a bigger deficit? the federal government BACKED about 28% of student loans as of 12/31/22. my student loan was with a private lender, but had federal BACKING. the total burden that is NOT backed by US Government is about $1T.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Oct 5, 2023 20:31:33 GMT -5
i could go on a long winded tirade about student debt, it's general unfairness, and it's long term cost to the US economy, but why bother? it is really too subtle an analysis to survive "why should we give away money to Humanities Majors?". i get sick of defending against narrow attacks like that.
not that you would do that, thyme. you're one of the good ones. very thoughtful reply, as usual.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,893
|
Post by thyme4change on Oct 6, 2023 10:58:13 GMT -5
The bubble of student loans is going to be different from previous bubbles. The dot-com bust every Tom, Dick and Harry was out there buying any stock that sounded internetty. The companies had no fundamentals, and no profit. When the market crashed a bunch of average Joes were holding useless stock and lost money - some of it real. When the housing crisis happened many average homeowners got screwed because they paid the elevated prices. Also, every Tom, Dick and Harry were out there declaring themselves real estate investors and buying houses. When the bubble popped, people lost any down payments or money to do upgrades. A bunch of flippers and landlords went under. Regular people lost real money. The student loan crisis is a little different because individuals aren’t out there buying up student loans and telling everyone how easy it is to make money doing so. The loans that will get forgiven were probably paid already, with some interest. So even the companies who hold them are really only losing paper money. And the average Joe is only benefiting from any erasure. There is only 130 billion in private loans - while a lot of money - not the kind that sinks the US economy. The big money (1.5 trillion I think) is held by the government, so would that amount just disappear? Would it create a bigger deficit? the federal government BACKED about 28% of student loans as of 12/31/22. my student loan was with a private lender, but had federal BACKING. the total burden that is NOT backed by US Government is about $1T. You and I have conflicting information, although mine is definitely Google based. I did check several reputable links. That said - I guess we need more information. We have all heard the stories that people have paid 2x the amount of their original loans, but still owe more than they started with. Is that the debt that will be bounced? Of the loans that are eligible for forgiveness how much is backed and/or owned by the government? Even if it costs a trillion real dollars, add it to the debt! If the Rs can give rich people a trillion dollars, the Ds can give a trillion to the poor people. The real question is what percentage of the regular population is held in student loans? The total amount of wealth is 150T, and I don’t think the whole trillion in student loans is sold in traunches like mortgages were. I just don’t think a student loan bubble pop will sink the value of the average person.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Oct 6, 2023 13:27:15 GMT -5
interesting. that is definitely in conflict.
i think it makes more SENSE if you are right. i mean, if Biden was demanding that COMPANIES unwind those loans, the courts would be packed with companies suing the government.
i am more inclined to take your word for it.
|
|
teen persuasion
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,207
|
Post by teen persuasion on Oct 6, 2023 14:11:23 GMT -5
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Oct 6, 2023 14:39:22 GMT -5
not exactly. it is the private/public funds question that we were debating.
|
|