billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 38,175
|
Post by billisonboard on Jul 21, 2018 20:13:35 GMT -5
when you side against reasonable people, you should be aware of how that appears. Reasonable?? Yeah, you know, people like me.
|
|
tallguy
Senior Associate
Joined: Apr 2, 2011 19:21:59 GMT -5
Posts: 14,512
|
Post by tallguy on Jul 21, 2018 23:41:59 GMT -5
Current U.S. population is around 326 million, but the point is still accurate. What's more illustrative is this: The groups that are over-represented in Trump counties are older, whiter, less-educated, and less-wealthy. Do you have any data to back up this claim? Always. It was in the link. Click on it and read for yourself.
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jul 22, 2018 9:05:53 GMT -5
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,351
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 22, 2018 17:29:59 GMT -5
i read the "two perspectives". i have both of them. unless they are saying the current POtuS is a good president. i took it as a conditional statement.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jul 22, 2018 19:41:09 GMT -5
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,351
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 23, 2018 0:32:43 GMT -5
it was kind of a boring read, but i read it. all 450 pages. it makes Trey Gowdy (and everyone that follows him around like a herd of sheep) look like imbiciles.
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,459
Member is Online
|
Post by happyhoix on Jul 23, 2018 6:54:09 GMT -5
it was kind of a boring read, but i read it. all 450 pages. it makes Trey Gowdy (and everyone that follows him around like a herd of sheep) look like imbiciles.
Well, I guess if someone took the time to write out 450 pages of anything, that must make it legitimate, huh?
I think that's one of the core principles of propaganda. Flood your opponents with so many words they either start to believe the B.S. or choke on it.
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jul 23, 2018 10:11:58 GMT -5
everyone that follows him around like a herd of sheep) look like imbiciles.
The difference between the sides in this political arena are??
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,182
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Jul 23, 2018 11:10:05 GMT -5
There are more than two sides in the political arena, however, many of Trump followers have shown they care more about power than the country and more about preserving their illusions than being Christian. MO.
|
|
Rukh O'Rorke
Senior Associate
Joined: Jul 4, 2016 13:31:15 GMT -5
Posts: 10,265
|
Post by Rukh O'Rorke on Jul 23, 2018 11:13:28 GMT -5
it was kind of a boring read, but i read it. all 450 pages. it makes Trey Gowdy (and everyone that follows him around like a herd of sheep) look like imbiciles.
You are a spartan to be sure! Thanks for reading it through and providing us with your review.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,351
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 23, 2018 11:15:16 GMT -5
everyone that follows him around like a herd of sheep) look like imbeciles.
The difference between the sides in this political arena are??
clearly. for example, i never for an instant thought that Carter Page was surveyeled (sic) without cause. i don't recall ANYONE on the right vocally agreeing with that position. on the contrary, there has been a parade of imbeciles screaming just the opposite for the better part of a year, at least.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jul 24, 2018 9:18:09 GMT -5
So, they swore under oath that Carter Page was an agent of a hostile foreign government, and they presented what they knew to be a counterfeit intelligence document prepared by foreign agents at the behest of the Hillary Clinton campaign with campaign funds illegally laundered through the Parkins Coie Law firm. They did NOT directly state that it was "Candidate #2" but instead concocted a deliberately vague statement which was just enough to CYA "a person opposed to Candidate #1".
Look, let's cut the shit here: they're caught. Virg has said before that there's no hard evidence, and I have always insisted that we can use our intelligence and commonsense guided by experience and infer what happened. But now we're at the end.
Hillary and her campaign practically wrote the 'dossier' and used Fusion GPS / Christopher Steele who in turn used Russian agent's rumour mill to create a counterfeit intelligence document.
Democratic party apparatchiks then slipped it into our intelligence and law enforcement agencies as if it was some "discovery" which landed in their lap. It's important to remember that the first response was to deny having anything to do with it. Only when it was no longer deniable was the term opposition research used. So in effect "oppo research" is the cover story.
But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute.
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,459
Member is Online
|
Post by happyhoix on Jul 24, 2018 14:09:55 GMT -5
<p>So, if I steal a bunch of money and hide it under my bed, and my worst enemy slips a note to the cops telling them that I have stolen money under my bed, and the cops find the money and arrest my ass, my legal defense can be that the cops can't use the information they got from my worst enemy, because he was my enemy - even if the information he told them was 100% correct? </p><p><br></p><p>Unless the cops just happen to trip over the money under my bed, it's not fair for them to arrest me for it? </p><p><br></p><p>Interesting legal theory. </p><p><br></p><p>I think probably it's wrong. At least that's what my intelligence and common sense tell me. </p><p><br></p><p><br></p>
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,729
|
Post by thyme4change on Jul 24, 2018 21:55:48 GMT -5
But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute. Many people dispute that. Including multiple judges that reviewed all the documentation.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,351
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 24, 2018 22:35:23 GMT -5
But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute. Many people dispute that. Including multiple judges that reviewed all the documentation. yeah. it is one thing to make this claim in the absence of such a review. it is just a flat out lie to make this claim WITH such a review. and yes, i do know Dan pretty well. he does my gardening, and i play music with him. he is definitely not a spy. but he is in amazing shape for a man his age.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,182
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Jul 24, 2018 23:56:29 GMT -5
So, they swore under oath that Carter Page was an agent of a hostile foreign government, and they presented what they knew to be a counterfeit intelligence document prepared by foreign agents at the behest of the Hillary Clinton campaign with campaign funds illegally laundered through the Parkins Coie Law firm. They did NOT directly state that it was "Candidate #2" but instead concocted a deliberately vague statement which was just enough to CYA "a person opposed to Candidate #1". Look, let's cut the shit here: they're caught. Virg has said before that there's no hard evidence, and I have always insisted that we can use our intelligence and commonsense guided by experience and infer what happened. But now we're at the end. Hillary and her campaign practically wrote the 'dossier' and used Fusion GPS / Christopher Steele who in turn used Russian agent's rumour mill to create a counterfeit intelligence document.Democratic party apparatchiks then slipped it into our intelligence and law enforcement agencies as if it was some "discovery" which landed in their lap. It's important to remember that the first response was to deny having anything to do with it. Only when it was no longer deniable was the term opposition research used. So in effect "oppo research" is the cover story. But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute. Yeah, let's cut the shit here as you say.
You are still telling lies as is Trump and his enablers. The dossier was written and bought by a Republican before Hillary's campaign purchased it. If you had common sense on this, it would be obvious she is not going to write a dossier and then buy it later after a GOP Trump competitor bought it prior. That's bat shit crazy. And in addition, if she and her campaign wrote it, why the heck buy it at all? That kind of silliness and subterfuge is for conservative and Trumpkin minds. Not policy wonks.
So if you are going to link the dossier to Hillary's campaign, could you at least you something reasonable and not something a crazy paranoid would say? Thanks in advance!
Here's my Carter Page theory - he's guilty. Here's my Trump theory - he's guilty and a Putin puppet.
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 21,459
Member is Online
|
Post by happyhoix on Jul 25, 2018 7:01:55 GMT -5
But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute. Many people dispute that. Including multiple judges that reviewed all the documentation. Many people including Senate intelligence committee Chairman Burr - who is GOP.
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/burr-breaks-with-nunes-sound-reasons-for-judges-to-approve-fisa-warrant/ar-AAAmIJQ
Of course, all the judges that reviewed the FISCA applications for Page were GOP - so of course, the far right is now trying to say all those judges were part of the Deep State/Black Hat massive effort to Fuck Trump Over - because if you aren't with us, you're an enemy, even if you're a dyed in the wool republican.
I'd say the Deep Hole/Black heart conspiracy people were starting to sound paranoid and frantic, but they've been that way for a long while now. Slipping into overdrive, I guess.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,351
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 25, 2018 10:44:13 GMT -5
So, they swore under oath that Carter Page was an agent of a hostile foreign government, and they presented what they knew to be a counterfeit intelligence document prepared by foreign agents at the behest of the Hillary Clinton campaign with campaign funds illegally laundered through the Parkins Coie Law firm. They did NOT directly state that it was "Candidate #2" but instead concocted a deliberately vague statement which was just enough to CYA "a person opposed to Candidate #1". Look, let's cut the shit here: they're caught. Virg has said before that there's no hard evidence, and I have always insisted that we can use our intelligence and commonsense guided by experience and infer what happened. But now we're at the end. Hillary and her campaign practically wrote the 'dossier' and used Fusion GPS / Christopher Steele who in turn used Russian agent's rumour mill to create a counterfeit intelligence document.Democratic party apparatchiks then slipped it into our intelligence and law enforcement agencies as if it was some "discovery" which landed in their lap. It's important to remember that the first response was to deny having anything to do with it. Only when it was no longer deniable was the term opposition research used. So in effect "oppo research" is the cover story. But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute. Yeah, let's cut the shit here as you say.
You are still telling lies as is Trump and his enablers. The dossier was written and bought by a Republican before Hillary's campaign purchased it. If you had common sense on this, it would be obvious she is not going to write a dossier and then buy it later after a GOP Trump competitor bought it prior. That's bat shit crazy. And in addition, if she and her campaign wrote it, why the heck buy it at all? That kind of silliness and subterfuge is for conservative and Trumpkin minds. Not policy wonks.
So if you are going to link the dossier to Hillary's campaign, could you at least you something reasonable and not something a crazy paranoid would say? Thanks in advance!
Here's my Carter Page theory - he's guilty. Here's my Trump theory - he's guilty and a Putin puppet.
it might also be a good time to mention that the dossier, thusfar, is rock solid. as to your conclusions, if the jury were the public they would already be guilty. we will see if the courts can find them legally guilty by an evidencial standard, and then we will have to decide what we do with at least one of those defendants.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jul 26, 2018 15:42:38 GMT -5
Let's remember where we started: Trump was "crazy" for stating that Obama had "tapped my wires". The apoplectic response of the left was not on the substance of whether or not Obama was spying on his campaign, his transition, and his early Presidency, but rather semantics over "wire tapping". Then there was the denial of any FISA warrant. Then there were the denials of whether the Clinton dossier- a counterfeit intelligence document smuggled into our intelligence and law enforcement community by Democratic Party apparatchiks using their positions to help Hillary Clinton and attack, even frame Donald Trump, was used to obtain the FISA warrant- that turned into a denial that it was the "primary" or "only means" of obtaining the warrant-- in other words, would a FISA warrant have issued without it? Now we know it wouldn't have. We know that ONLY verified information can be presented as evidence to the FISA court- so we have a problem. We have lots of problems.
No one here will address a single item- because you can't. Because you're either too ignorant to discuss any of this, or you know these people are fucked and you don't want to admit that I have been right all along:
let's talk about the facts as we know them.
German bank records prove the funding chain from the DNC and Hillary campaign through Perkins-Coie and managing partner Marc Elias to Fusion GPS and on to Chris Steele. And the Russians. And there were reporters on the payroll too.
So we have collaboration between the very top of the Democrats and Russians via a complex hidden funding scheme.
We know that the Michael Isikoff story on Yahoo News which was used as partial justification for the warrants was leaked to Isikoff by Chris Steele directly.
We know Steele hated Trump and made it his mission to ensure he wasn't elected.
We know that Strzok and Page spoke of an insurance policy in case Trump was elected, and they spoke of it in Andrew McCabe's office.
We know that the dossier and Yahoo News story plus a letter from Harry Reid that originated from the dossier were the basis of all the FISA warrant applications.
We know the FBI paid Steele directly also, in addition to what he got from Fusion.
We know the dossier was unverified, not obtained through U.S. intelligence activities, and paid for by the DNC and Hillary campaign. And that neither fact was disclosed to the Court. And that neither fact was disclosed to Trump as a candidate, as President-elect, or as President.
We know the warrants also named George Papadopoulos and the Trump Campaign in addition to Carter Page. We know that when Trump said that Obama was surveilling him at Trump Tower and the media laughed, that he was being surveilled.
We know that Rice and Power unmasked over a hundred people recorded in the surveillance.
We know that Lisa Page texted to Peter Strzok that "POTUS wants to know everything we're doing."
We know Obama knew all about Russian meddling, Trump had no idea, and Team Obama did nothing to stop it or tell anyone.
We know Comey pre-exonerated Hillary and granted immunity to five senior advisers and two IT staff who wiped her server.
We know Obama wrote to Hillary on her private server using an alias even though he claimed not to know about it.
We know the DNC via Bob Creamer staged every act of violence at Trump rallies.
We know the DNC rigged and stole the primary for Hillary.
We know there was a shredding party at State one weekend.
We know Comey leaked his classified notes to the New York Times.
We know that Comey did not tell Trump the truth about the dossier.
We know that the warrants were renewed multiple times without any updated information (i.e. surveillance yielded nothing).
We know McCabe leaked and lied about it and that he was compromised by the large donation from Hillary bagman Terry McAuliffe to his wife's Democratic Virginia Senate campaign.
We know that Carter Page is not a spy as he was never charged and the surveillance ended.
We know Lynch and Bill Clinton met inappropriately in Phoenix two days before Comey exonerated Hillary. We know Lynch was lying when she said she did not know what Comey was going to say before he said it.
We know Lynch personally issued an extraordinary visa waiver to Putin Stoogette Natalia Veselnitskaya after she was denied a visa in Moscow so she could get in to attend the staged meeting at Trump Tower with the President's son and son-in-law. And that shortly thereafter she was a front-row guest at a Congressional hearing, sitting next to Obama's Ambassador to Russia.
We know piles of cash flowed to the Clintons after the sale of Uranium One. We know Bob Mueller had uncovered massive Russian corruption with regard to U. S. uranium BEFORE the sale, that Eric Holder knew about it and signed off anyway, and that the Maryland prosecutor who sat on the charges until the sale was complete was Rod Rosenstein.
We know that George Papadopoulos was baited and hooked by Alexander Downer, and invited to London to allow Downer to get him drunk and report it to the FBI, which is why Papadopoulos was named in the warrants, and that Downer had just overseen the Australian $11M donation to the Clinton Foundation.
We know Paul Manafort's crimes date from 2006 and have zero to do with Russian collaboration OR Trump.
We know Flynn did not lie as there is no one who says he did. He pleaded guilty because the legal fight had bankrupted him. They still haven't sentenced him.
We know Peter Strzok was personal friends with Judge Rudy Contreras, a FISA judge and the one who accepted the Flynn plea before he was recused without explanation. We know Lisa Page planned a fake dinner party so Peter and Rudy could talk without arousing suspicion.
We know Brennan and Clapper were part and parcel of the whole thing. Clapper's starting to blame Obama now.
Let me know which Republicans might be hit. I know of none and the 400 pages of FISA documents don't provide any new names.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jul 26, 2018 15:44:30 GMT -5
Yeah, let's cut the shit here as you say.
You are still telling lies as is Trump and his enablers. The dossier was written and bought by a Republican before Hillary's campaign purchased it. If you had common sense on this, it would be obvious she is not going to write a dossier and then buy it later after a GOP Trump competitor bought it prior. That's bat shit crazy. And in addition, if she and her campaign wrote it, why the heck buy it at all? That kind of silliness and subterfuge is for conservative and Trumpkin minds. Not policy wonks.
So if you are going to link the dossier to Hillary's campaign, could you at least you something reasonable and not something a crazy paranoid would say? Thanks in advance!
Here's my Carter Page theory - he's guilty. Here's my Trump theory - he's guilty and a Putin puppet.
it might also be a good time to mention that the dossier, thusfar, is rock solid. as to your conclusions, if the jury were the public they would already be guilty. we will see if the courts can find them legally guilty by an evidencial standard, and then we will have to decide what we do with at least one of those defendants.
Incorrect. Both of you. The dossier wasn't crafted until AFTER Republicans severed ties with Fusion GPS and the Democrats began working with Christopher Steele to create it. Literally nothing in the dossier has been verified. Not. One. Item.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jul 26, 2018 15:53:51 GMT -5
|
|
ken a.k.a OMK
Senior Associate
They killed Kenny, the bastards.
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 14:39:20 GMT -5
Posts: 14,219
Location: Maryland
|
Post by ken a.k.a OMK on Jul 26, 2018 15:59:35 GMT -5
I didn't need to read any further then that. You get away with insulting us as a group but we can't tell you ......oh wait this will pass muster, people who feel that way and have to insult people are ignorant.
|
|
weltschmerz
Community Leader
Joined: Jul 25, 2011 13:37:39 GMT -5
Posts: 38,962
|
Post by weltschmerz on Jul 26, 2018 19:09:20 GMT -5
I didn't need to read any further then that. You get away with insulting us as a group but we can't tell you ......oh wait this will pass muster, people who feel that way and have to insult people are ignorant. Neither did I.
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jul 26, 2018 21:14:42 GMT -5
So, they swore under oath that Carter Page was an agent of a hostile foreign government, and they presented what they knew to be a counterfeit intelligence document prepared by foreign agents at the behest of the Hillary Clinton campaign with campaign funds illegally laundered through the Parkins Coie Law firm. They did NOT directly state that it was "Candidate #2" but instead concocted a deliberately vague statement which was just enough to CYA "a person opposed to Candidate #1". Look, let's cut the shit here: they're caught. Virg has said before that there's no hard evidence, and I have always insisted that we can use our intelligence and commonsense guided by experience and infer what happened. But now we're at the end. Hillary and her campaign practically wrote the 'dossier' and used Fusion GPS / Christopher Steele who in turn used Russian agent's rumour mill to create a counterfeit intelligence document.Democratic party apparatchiks then slipped it into our intelligence and law enforcement agencies as if it was some "discovery" which landed in their lap. It's important to remember that the first response was to deny having anything to do with it. Only when it was no longer deniable was the term opposition research used. So in effect "oppo research" is the cover story. But the biggest piece of evidence we have that this whole thing has been a fraud, is the fact that Carter page has been questioned for a total of 10 hours, turned up nothing and he's still roaming free. Why? Because we all know Dan well that no one believes he was a spy, and here's my Carter Page theory: he was in on the scam. But either way- they lied to that FISA court. Period. No longer in dispute. Yeah, let's cut the shit here as you say.
You are still telling lies as is Trump and his enablers. The dossier was written and bought by a Republican before Hillary's campaign purchased it. If you had common sense on this, it would be obvious she is not going to write a dossier and then buy it later after a GOP Trump competitor bought it prior. That's bat shit crazy. And in addition, if she and her campaign wrote it, why the heck buy it at all? That kind of silliness and subterfuge is for conservative and Trumpkin minds. Not policy wonks.
So if you are going to link the dossier to Hillary's campaign, could you at least you something reasonable and not something a crazy paranoid would say? Thanks in advance!
Here's my Carter Page theory - he's guilty. Here's my Trump theory - he's guilty and a Putin puppet.
bought by a Republican Yes, one that was trying anything and everything to keep Trump out, He hated Trump.
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jul 26, 2018 21:22:32 GMT -5
I didn't need to read any further then that. You get away with insulting us as a group but we can't tell you ......oh wait this will pass muster, people who feel that way and have to insult people are ignorant. From Paul long list,, What items are not true?
|
|
ken a.k.a OMK
Senior Associate
They killed Kenny, the bastards.
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 14:39:20 GMT -5
Posts: 14,219
Location: Maryland
|
Post by ken a.k.a OMK on Jul 26, 2018 21:35:35 GMT -5
I didn't need to read any further then that. You get away with insulting us as a group but we can't tell you ......oh wait this will pass muster, people who feel that way and have to insult people are ignorant. From Paul long list,, What items are not true? Can you read? I said I wasn't going to read any further then him insulting people here.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,182
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Jul 26, 2018 21:51:14 GMT -5
Yeah, let's cut the shit here as you say.
You are still telling lies as is Trump and his enablers. The dossier was written and bought by a Republican before Hillary's campaign purchased it. If you had common sense on this, it would be obvious she is not going to write a dossier and then buy it later after a GOP Trump competitor bought it prior. That's bat shit crazy. And in addition, if she and her campaign wrote it, why the heck buy it at all? That kind of silliness and subterfuge is for conservative and Trumpkin minds. Not policy wonks.
So if you are going to link the dossier to Hillary's campaign, could you at least you something reasonable and not something a crazy paranoid would say? Thanks in advance!
Here's my Carter Page theory - he's guilty. Here's my Trump theory - he's guilty and a Putin puppet.
bought by a Republican Yes, one that was trying anything and everything to keep Trump out, He hated Trump. Not everyone is Trump, did he hate him or was it just about the Republican nomination? I think its the latter.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,182
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Jul 26, 2018 22:02:50 GMT -5
it might also be a good time to mention that the dossier, thusfar, is rock solid. as to your conclusions, if the jury were the public they would already be guilty. we will see if the courts can find them legally guilty by an evidencial standard, and then we will have to decide what we do with at least one of those defendants.
Incorrect. Both of you. The dossier wasn't crafted until AFTER Republicans severed ties with Fusion GPS and the Democrats began working with Christopher Steele to create it. Literally nothing in the dossier has been verified. Not. One. Item. I'm sorry Paul, you are totally and provably incorrect. By many news sources. The dossier existed before Hillary's campaign purchased it. It may not have had various hands in it, i.e I'm not positive when Fusion came in versus when Steele started on his part, but reality remains. The Dossier in its early form was purchased by a Republican before being worked on more and later sold to Hillary's campaign.
You haven't read the full existing dossier and neither have I. Therefore, You. Can't. Legitimately. Make. That. Claim. Versteht? People more knowledgeable on this than both of us, said some claims of the dossier have been verified, so that's reality as well.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,182
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Jul 26, 2018 22:13:34 GMT -5
I didn't need to read any further then that. You get away with insulting us as a group but we can't tell you ......oh wait this will pass muster, people who feel that way and have to insult people are ignorant. From Paul long list,, What items are not true? Lots, but I no longer care to play the game shit masquerading as truth.
But here's one that caught my eye for you- We know Obama wrote to Hillary on her private server using an alias even though he claimed not to know about it.
First off, anyone who writes "We know" in many sentences, generally does not know. Its a tell, just like a woman saying "I'm a Good Christian woman" as she precedes to do something assholish. You can pretty much guarantee she is not good nor really Christian, but she likes to pretend she's both.
But I digressed. Here's reality. You don't write to anyone on a private server or a public server. You email them. And just because you have an email address it doesn't mean you necessarily know where it is. Now I don't know how his alias was set up, so I can't speak to that, but it is another level of indirection.
If you mail Paul at paul@rwserver.gov.org can you tell me automatically if its public or private? And even if you email someone at a well known domain whether the whitehouse or gmail, how do you even know it isn't automatically forwarded elsewhere? (You don't. Mail forwarding, spoofing and domains are a significant subject area, most regular folk know little about it.) So I judge that assertion a lie, or mostly a lie.
|
|
tallguy
Senior Associate
Joined: Apr 2, 2011 19:21:59 GMT -5
Posts: 14,512
|
Post by tallguy on Jul 26, 2018 23:57:27 GMT -5
From a 1943 United States Office of Strategic Services report, A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler: His Life and Legend, was this:
Who else does this sound like, absent the ability to concentrate on one enemy at a time? And why would anyone here want Trump's acolytes spreading those lies all over this board?
|
|