|
|
Post by ed1066 on Mar 21, 2011 22:42:37 GMT -5
Democrat Ed Markey says Obama is in Libya for oil. Liberals love the "war for oil" line. It's nice to see it coming home to roost... www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/03/21/dem_congressman_were_in_libya_because_of_oil.html"Well, we're in Libya because of oil. And I think both Japan and the nuclear technology and Libya and this dependence that we have upon imported oil have both once again highlighted the need for the United States to have a renewable energy agenda going forward," Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) said on MSNBC. |
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Mar 21, 2011 23:29:50 GMT -5
In related news, liberals now LOVE wars for oil!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mkitty is pro kitty on Mar 22, 2011 0:45:51 GMT -5
Really? Wouldn't there be better places? www.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_ep00_im0_mbbl_m.htm(number is thousands of barrels) Libya 3,401 3,811 1,293 1,101 697 2,060 (July 2010-Dec. 2010 by month) We'd be better off invading Canada or Mexico. Or how about: Netherlands 6,555 4,185 1,364 3,308 1,703 2,207 And we made Qaddafi and the rebels do all those things, right? In related news, mkitty borrows ed's very broad paintbrush and gets the house repainted in four strokes. Thanks! |
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Mar 22, 2011 1:46:30 GMT -5
Well if we do get rid of Gaddafi and the Libyan's want to give us some tankers full of oil at at a great price as a thank you, that would be neat , but except for that, haven't a clue as to how we get to be in there for 'the Oil ".  |
|
