Let's show them booXXX

[tloonya]

www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/celebrity/2015-screen-actors-guild-awards-red-carpet/ss-AA8zYAU

Just saw this link on msn by accident and wondering...
When women wearing these dresses that showing 50% of boobs - what ta heck?
I love Jennifer Aniston but common, she is not a spring chicken anymore.
She does look awesome and all but is it really so necessary to have boobs out so far away?
I did like JLo in her overly open dress - but it was kind of done already. She shocked and wow factor is used up now.
Why to bring all that again and again? If you look so good classy and covered?
I am far from prudent but something striked me like whew.
Am I getting old?

[NancysSummerSip]

Yes, you are getting old.

And boobage has been displayed forever. I think the problem with their coverage is the exposure (if you will pardon the expression) by the media.

Years ago, plenty of celebrities, bombshells and Hollywood broads showed and strutted their top-shelf stuff. But there was no Internet and 24/7 media to (un)cover it all. So people didn't get tired of it, and didn't always remember from one magazine cover story to the next just how much Jane Russell, Sophia Loren, Elizabeth Taylor and other "A"-list and lesser starlets had out on the table.

FWIW, I prefer the less-is-more look, personally. Then again, some of these women pay a lot of money for those mammaries. So if you've got an investment, I guess the thing to do is flaunt it.

[tloonya]

Jan 26, 2015 13:52:35 GMT -5 NancysSummerSip said:

Yes, you are getting old.

And boobage has been displayed forever. I think the problem with their coverage is the exposure (if you will pardon the expression) by the media.

Years ago, plenty of celebrities, bombshells and Hollywood broads showed and strutted their top-shelf stuff. But there was no Internet and 24/7 media to (un)cover it all. So people didn't get tired of it, and didn't always remember from one magazine cover story to the next just how much Jane Russell, Sophia Loren, Elizabeth Taylor and other "A"-list and lesser starlets had out on the table.

FWIW, I prefer the less-is-more look, personally. Then again, some of these women pay a lot of money for those mammaries. So if you've got an investment, I guess the thing to do is flaunt it.

I've looked again and think I didn't like it because it was kind of...flat.

[NancysSummerSip]

Jan 26, 2015 13:57:52 GMT -5 tloonya said:

Jan 26, 2015 13:52:35 GMT -5 NancysSummerSip said:

Yes, you are getting old.

And boobage has been displayed forever. I think the problem with their coverage is the exposure (if you will pardon the expression) by the media.

Years ago, plenty of celebrities, bombshells and Hollywood broads showed and strutted their top-shelf stuff. But there was no Internet and 24/7 media to (un)cover it all. So people didn't get tired of it, and didn't always remember from one magazine cover story to the next just how much Jane Russell, Sophia Loren, Elizabeth Taylor and other "A"-list and lesser starlets had out on the table.

FWIW, I prefer the less-is-more look, personally. Then again, some of these women pay a lot of money for those mammaries. So if you've got an investment, I guess the thing to do is flaunt it.

I've looked again and think I didn't like it because it was kind of...flat.

In Aniston's case, they appear kind of small and flat, at least in that outfit. Not the most flattering look for her. She's in her forties, and her body rocks overall, for any age. Oh, well. She can blame her stylist.

[Tennesseer]

Mae West, 1933. The nickname for the life vest under your airplane seat is named after her.

[tloonya]

Jan 26, 2015 14:01:19 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

Mae West, 1933. The nickname for the life vest under your airplane seat is named after her.

That I can look at all day...

[ArchietheDragon]

well they are called the sag awards.