b2r
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:35:25 GMT -5
Posts: 7,257
|
Post by b2r on Jul 29, 2014 15:11:18 GMT -5
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 29, 2014 15:39:46 GMT -5
if Sessions is serious about his stance, he should double the personnel of INS, thus enabling them to investigate BUSINESSES that hire "illegals".
he is not serious. he is grandstanding.
|
|
chiver78
Administrator
Current Events Admin
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:04:45 GMT -5
Posts: 39,746
|
Post by chiver78 on Jul 29, 2014 15:44:28 GMT -5
Yes, you can be rid of them. No school, no medical care except to stabilize, no social services of any kind. Drop an anchor baby here? It can stay and be adopted or it can return along with its mom back to own country. At 18, if no criminal record and self supporting, it can return. ALONE. it? seriously? and another thing - I hate that term, anchor baby. almost as much as the C word.
|
|
chiver78
Administrator
Current Events Admin
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:04:45 GMT -5
Posts: 39,746
|
Post by chiver78 on Jul 29, 2014 15:46:29 GMT -5
At this point, the baby could be unborn...so, according the the pro-abortionists, yes, an it. Plus, it is easier to type than he/she this thread will NOT be hijacked into an abortion thread. I will remove posts on that topic as it does not apply here. -chiver mod
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 29, 2014 15:48:55 GMT -5
boom! out go the lights!!!!
|
|
jkapp
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 12:05:08 GMT -5
Posts: 5,416
|
Post by jkapp on Jul 29, 2014 16:20:08 GMT -5
At this point, the baby could be unborn...so, according the the pro-abortionists, yes, an it. Plus, it is easier to type than he/she this thread will NOT be hijacked into an abortion thread. I will remove posts on that topic as it does not apply here. -chiver mod Take a pill, Robocop!
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 28, 2024 22:42:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2014 18:48:56 GMT -5
It- you know- less than human. AKA 'the enemy'. No. "It" as in "I am not gong to confine the infant or child to either boy or girl status because I am referring the the infants or children singly AND collectively, but don't see the need to type an essay on the description of the persons that I am referring to"
|
|
Sum Dum Gai
Senior Associate
Joined: Aug 15, 2011 15:39:24 GMT -5
Posts: 19,892
|
Post by Sum Dum Gai on Jul 29, 2014 20:10:13 GMT -5
Time for the Arizona solution. You want to enroll a kid in school, "show us your papers". You want a job, "show us your papers". You walk into any city or state building for any reason, "show us your papers". You interact with law enforcement in any way, even just reporting a crime, "show us your papers". You walk into a clinic, hospital, or dentist, "show us your papers".
In the mean time we increase the manpower of the federal agency that investigates businesses that hire illegals, and we make the minimum fine if a business is caught hiring an illegal $10k for the first offense. A second offense will result in a $100k fine and loss of business license for a month. Third offense is a $1M fine, and you lose your business license in that state permanently. If you run a meat packing plant and can't find Americans who will do the job, you can raise your wages until you can, go out of business, or let the state put you out of business.
Enough with the bullshit. Time to get serious about this and put an end to it.
|
|
chiver78
Administrator
Current Events Admin
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:04:45 GMT -5
Posts: 39,746
|
Post by chiver78 on Jul 29, 2014 20:17:11 GMT -5
I'm with you 100% until you say "even just reporting a crime".....undocumented illegal women would then become very vulnerable to being exploited for sex, victimized for rapes. I'm absolutely of the opinion that if you didn't come here legally, then GTFO and get in line. but I'm not okay with that piece of your proposal. yes, they may have come here illegally, but that doesn't mean it's okay to leave them afraid to report a rape for fear of deportation.
still haven't read the original article, btw. will get to it eventually.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 28, 2024 22:42:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2014 20:46:10 GMT -5
Time for the Arizona solution. You want to enroll a kid in school, "show us your papers". You want a job, "show us your papers". You walk into any city or state building for any reason, "show us your papers". You interact with law enforcement in any way, even just reporting a crime, "show us your papers". You walk into a clinic, hospital, or dentist, "show us your papers". In the mean time we increase the manpower of the federal agency that investigates businesses that hire illegals, and we make the minimum fine if a business is caught hiring an illegal $10k for the first offense. A second offense will result in a $100k fine and loss of business license for a month. Third offense is a $1M fine, and you lose your business license in that state permanently. If you run a meat packing plant and can't find Americans who will do the job, you can raise your wages until you can, go out of business, or let the state put you out of business. Enough with the bullshit. Time to get serious about this and put an end to it. I can get on board with all of that EXCEPT "reporting a crime". What if an illegal DOESN'T report the criminal... and then the criminal doesn't get caught BECAUSE of that... and then that criminal goes on to commit another crime... but this time it's against a citizen?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 28, 2024 22:42:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2014 20:46:42 GMT -5
I'm with you 100% until you say "even just reporting a crime".....undocumented illegal women would then become very vulnerable to being exploited for sex, victimized for rapes. I'm absolutely of the opinion that if you didn't come here legally, then GTFO and get in line. but I'm not okay with that piece of your proposal. yes, they may have come here illegally, but that doesn't mean it's okay to leave them afraid to report a rape for fear of deportation. still haven't read the original article, btw. will get to it eventually. And that's good reasoning too.
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on Jul 29, 2014 21:06:55 GMT -5
boom! out go the lights!!!! That's Boom Boom!
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on Jul 29, 2014 21:09:25 GMT -5
I'm with you 100% until you say "even just reporting a crime".....undocumented illegal women would then become very vulnerable to being exploited for sex, victimized for rapes. I'm absolutely of the opinion that if you didn't come here legally, then GTFO and get in line. but I'm not okay with that piece of your proposal. yes, they may have come here illegally, but that doesn't mean it's okay to leave them afraid to report a rape for fear of deportation. still haven't read the original article, btw. will get to it eventually. Right on WTF? Someone calls in a home invasion, a rape, a robbery, whatever- and you want the police to interrogate the victim first?
|
|
Malarky
Junior Associate
Truth and snark are equal opportunity here.
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 21:00:51 GMT -5
Posts: 5,313
|
Post by Malarky on Jul 29, 2014 21:20:20 GMT -5
I'm with you 100% until you say "even just reporting a crime".....undocumented illegal women would then become very vulnerable to being exploited for sex, victimized for rapes. I'm absolutely of the opinion that if you didn't come here legally, then GTFO and get in line. but I'm not okay with that piece of your proposal. yes, they may have come here illegally, but that doesn't mean it's okay to leave them afraid to report a rape for fear of deportation. still haven't read the original article, btw. will get to it eventually. Right on WTF? Someone calls in a home invasion, a rape, a robbery, whatever- and you want the police to interrogate the victim first? I won't speak for Chiver, but we live in an area where there is a large illegal population and some of those women have been the object of horrific abuse and have been fearful of reporting it. I don't want illegal immigrants here and I resent like hell that my tax dollars are spent to support them, but at the same time, I don't think they should be subjected to abuse on the way out the door.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 29, 2014 21:55:18 GMT -5
Right on WTF? Someone calls in a home invasion, a rape, a robbery, whatever- and you want the police to interrogate the victim first? I won't speak for Chiver, but we live in an area where there is a large illegal population and some of those women have been the object of horrific abuse and have been fearful of reporting it. I don't want illegal immigrants here and I resent like hell that my tax dollars are spent to support them, but at the same time, I don't think they should be subjected to abuse on the way out the door. how do your tax dollars support them?
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 29, 2014 21:56:55 GMT -5
Time for the Arizona solution. You want to enroll a kid in school, "show us your papers". You want a job, "show us your papers". You walk into any city or state building for any reason, "show us your papers". You interact with law enforcement in any way, even just reporting a crime, "show us your papers". You walk into a clinic, hospital, or dentist, "show us your papers". In the mean time we increase the manpower of the federal agency that investigates businesses that hire illegals, and we make the minimum fine if a business is caught hiring an illegal $10k for the first offense. A second offense will result in a $100k fine and loss of business license for a month. Third offense is a $1M fine, and you lose your business license in that state permanently. If you run a meat packing plant and can't find Americans who will do the job, you can raise your wages until you can, go out of business, or let the state put you out of business. Enough with the bullshit. Time to get serious about this and put an end to it. shawn- if i say "this will never happen", do i need to say why, or do you KNOW why?
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on Jul 29, 2014 22:00:52 GMT -5
Cheap labor- the dumb republicans are fighting the smart ones- and being misdirected to attacking the democrats. Just my take
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on Jul 29, 2014 22:05:39 GMT -5
Yep- wasn't for those illegal assholes I would have a bigger house and be able to pay my bills- wouldn't be so angry either
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 29, 2014 22:07:22 GMT -5
Cheap labor- the dumb republicans are fighting the smart ones- and being misdirected to attacking the democrats. Just my take bingo. the real power has no interest in solving this problem whatsoever. this is just like universal background checks. 80% of the public wants them. they won't happen? why? because the 20% is way more powerful than the 80%, that is why. the 20% pulls the strings, and congress dances. this issue, federal spending, defense spending, health and welfare- ALL of these things go the way the 20% wants. it is ONLY when the 20% just happen to agree with the 80% that we get apparently "popular" approval. our presidents suck. our congress sucks even worse. but none of that sucks worse than the sickening corruption.
|
|
EVT1
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 30, 2010 16:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 8,596
|
Post by EVT1 on Jul 29, 2014 22:13:05 GMT -5
Cheap labor- the dumb republicans are fighting the smart ones- and being misdirected to attacking the democrats. Just my take bingo. the real power has no interest in solving this problem whatsoever. this is just like universal background checks. 80% of the public wants them. they won't happen? why? because the 20% is way more powerful than the 80%, that is why. the 20% pulls the strings, and congress dances. this issue, federal spending, defense spending, health and welfare- ALL of these things go the way the 20% wants. it is ONLY when the 20% just happen to agree with the 80% that we get apparently "popular" approval. our presidents suck. our congress sucks even worse. but none of that sucks worse than the sickening corruption. Spot on- I give it an 80% chance your steak was butchered and prepared by an illegal-and in fact the only reason there isn't a shortage.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 29, 2014 22:21:05 GMT -5
bingo. the real power has no interest in solving this problem whatsoever. this is just like universal background checks. 80% of the public wants them. they won't happen? why? because the 20% is way more powerful than the 80%, that is why. the 20% pulls the strings, and congress dances. this issue, federal spending, defense spending, health and welfare- ALL of these things go the way the 20% wants. it is ONLY when the 20% just happen to agree with the 80% that we get apparently "popular" approval. our presidents suck. our congress sucks even worse. but none of that sucks worse than the sickening corruption. Spot on- I give it an 80% chance your steak was butchered and prepared by an illegal-and in fact the only reason there isn't a shortage. and there are labor laws to prevent all of that. they are just not enforced. why? corruption. the 20%. the answer is always the same. follow the money. just like Deep Throat said.
|
|
Malarky
Junior Associate
Truth and snark are equal opportunity here.
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 21:00:51 GMT -5
Posts: 5,313
|
Post by Malarky on Jul 29, 2014 22:31:19 GMT -5
how do your tax dollars support them?In my public schools where we pay for extra classes for kids who don't speak English, because their parents came here illegally. And can't be bothered to try to assimilate, even if it would be good for their kids. When my kid who has drug allergies is exposed to documented cases of diseases to which she should enjoy herd immunity, yet she doesn't. There are documented outbreaks of measles, mumps and outbreaks of tuberculosis. When my kid breaks a bone and knows it's broken and yet begs me not to take him to the ER because "It's Friday night and I don't want to wait for an X-ray"...behind all the illegals who know they can't be turned away. When my kid gets "free lunch" and I'm like WTF? I didn't ask for this, nor did we need it and I'm told "Don't worry, be happy, the taxpayers will cover it." It was to garner more services for the school/poor/illegals. Am I the only one who said " I am the taxpayer."
|
|
Malarky
Junior Associate
Truth and snark are equal opportunity here.
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 21:00:51 GMT -5
Posts: 5,313
|
Post by Malarky on Jul 29, 2014 22:35:52 GMT -5
Yep- wasn't for those illegal assholes I would have a bigger house and be able to pay my bills- wouldn't be so angry either
Illegal aliens have nothing to do with whether I have a bigger house or am able to pay my bills. That's all on me. I'm angry because they broke the rules to get here and I'm expected to pay for that? No thanks.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 30, 2014 0:15:28 GMT -5
how do your tax dollars support them?In my public schools where we pay for extra classes for kids who don't speak English, because their parents came here illegally. And can't be bothered to try to assimilate, even if it would be good for their kids. When my kid who has drug allergies is exposed to documented cases of diseases to which she should enjoy herd immunity, yet she doesn't. There are documented outbreaks of measles, mumps and outbreaks of tuberculosis. When my kid breaks a bone and knows it's broken and yet begs me not to take him to the ER because "It's Friday night and I don't want to wait for an X-ray"...behind all the illegals who know they can't be turned away. When my kid gets "free lunch" and I'm like WTF? I didn't ask for this, nor did we need it and I'm told "Don't worry, be happy, the taxpayers will cover it." It was to garner more services for the school/poor/illegals. Am I the only one who said " I am the taxpayer."
you're aware, of course, that most of them are taxpayers too, right?
|
|
truthbound
Familiar Member
Joined: Mar 1, 2014 6:01:51 GMT -5
Posts: 814
|
Post by truthbound on Jul 30, 2014 4:49:12 GMT -5
Hey-if Obama is going to be impeached, he might as well go out with a BANG! Obama is not going to be impeached. And he is mulling nothing.
|
|
chiver78
Administrator
Current Events Admin
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:04:45 GMT -5
Posts: 39,746
|
Post by chiver78 on Jul 30, 2014 8:15:22 GMT -5
Right on WTF? Someone calls in a home invasion, a rape, a robbery, whatever- and you want the police to interrogate the victim first? I won't speak for Chiver, but we live in an area where there is a large illegal population and some of those women have been the object of horrific abuse and have been fearful of reporting it. I don't want illegal immigrants here and I resent like hell that my tax dollars are spent to support them, but at the same time, I don't think they should be subjected to abuse on the way out the door. nah, I'd totally put my name on this comment too. you're good.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,919
|
Post by Tennesseer on Jul 30, 2014 8:22:27 GMT -5
Hey-if Obama is going to be impeached, he might as well go out with a BANG! Obama is not going to be impeached. And he is mulling nothing. Fine with me!
|
|
chiver78
Administrator
Current Events Admin
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:04:45 GMT -5
Posts: 39,746
|
Post by chiver78 on Jul 30, 2014 8:27:08 GMT -5
how do your tax dollars support them?In my public schools where we pay for extra classes for kids who don't speak English, because their parents came here illegally. And can't be bothered to try to assimilate, even if it would be good for their kids. When my kid who has drug allergies is exposed to documented cases of diseases to which she should enjoy herd immunity, yet she doesn't. There are documented outbreaks of measles, mumps and outbreaks of tuberculosis. When my kid breaks a bone and knows it's broken and yet begs me not to take him to the ER because "It's Friday night and I don't want to wait for an X-ray"...behind all the illegals who know they can't be turned away. When my kid gets "free lunch" and I'm like WTF? I didn't ask for this, nor did we need it and I'm told "Don't worry, be happy, the taxpayers will cover it." It was to garner more services for the school/poor/illegals. Am I the only one who said " I am the taxpayer."
you're aware, of course, that most of them are taxpayers too, right? not around here....let me try to explain. for starters, the town I work in now is an unofficial "sister city" to Governador Valadares, in the Minas Gerais region in Brazil. most of the illegals here come from there, and they know exactly what they need to do in order to work around the system b/c those illegals that have gone home after coming here and banking tons of cash have told them how it all works here, before they ever leave Brazil. my mom was the accountant for a string of gas stations owned by one guy in the town I work in. most of those gas stations had little kiosk coffee shops of a local chain (like a Dunkin) that were owned by another guy. my mom got friendly with a couple of the Brazilian girls (early 20s?) that worked the kiosk during a stretch where she was working the gas station register on Sunday nights when the owner had a hard time finding someone for that shift. she learned from the Brazilian girls that they spend no more than one year at any job, using a BS SS#, claiming the max dependents on their W4, and never filing taxes. they cram more people into apartments and houses than a college dorm, in order to save more money. they will work 80h a week if you let them, and they go back to Brazil in a few years and live the good life with everything they banked while they were here. there are definitely those that stay longer, that have American citizen children that allow them to stay, but ^that is the MO of most of the illegals I've come across. because of the nature of the jobs they take, they are able to stay under the radar as long as they stay out of criminal trouble. I'm all for requiring business owners to actually check the validity of the paperwork anyone presents at the start of a job, and fining those that hire illegals. I don't know why that's not already a requirement. that's just common sense IMHO.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,712
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jul 30, 2014 9:29:26 GMT -5
you're aware, of course, that most of them are taxpayers too, right? not around here....let me try to explain. for starters, the town I work in now is an unofficial "sister city" to Governador Valadares, in the Minas Gerais region in Brazil. most of the illegals here come from there, and they know exactly what they need to do in order to work around the system b/c those illegals that have gone home after coming here and banking tons of cash have told them how it all works here, before they ever leave Brazil. my mom was the accountant for a string of gas stations owned by one guy in the town I work in. most of those gas stations had little kiosk coffee shops of a local chain (like a Dunkin) that were owned by another guy. my mom got friendly with a couple of the Brazilian girls (early 20s?) that worked the kiosk during a stretch where she was working the gas station register on Sunday nights when the owner had a hard time finding someone for that shift. she learned from the Brazilian girls that they spend no more than one year at any job, using a BS SS#, claiming the max dependents on their W4, and never filing taxes. they cram more people into apartments and houses than a college dorm, in order to save more money. they will work 80h a week if you let them, and they go back to Brazil in a few years and live the good life with everything they banked while they were here. there are definitely those that stay longer, that have American citizen children that allow them to stay, but ^that is the MO of most of the illegals I've come across. because of the nature of the jobs they take, they are able to stay under the radar as long as they stay out of criminal trouble. i submit that if they were worried about legal trouble, they would stay in Guatemala, or wherever else. no, they are more worried about starving or getting shot in their home country. our legal system doesn't worry them a bit.I'm all for requiring business owners to actually check the validity of the paperwork anyone presents at the start of a job, and fining those that hire illegals. I don't know why that's not already a requirement. that's just common sense IMHO. it IS a requirement. but without a well funded and staffed INS, these laws are UNENFORCEABLE.interesting. most here are employed by large agricultural concerns, hotels and food franchises. they have automatic payroll systems. that means that these folks pay payroll taxes, and SOME (admittedly not much) income tax, as well as worker's comp and a host of other taxes. several organizations have estimated the revenues received by undocumented aliens, and compared it to services rendered. even the most staunchly anti-immigrant ones say that over half the costs are covered. some of the pro-immigrant ones claim that it is over 100% covered. my own personal estimate is that it is somewhere around 80% so, although it is true that they take more in services than they pay in taxes (as is the case with most CITIZENS in similar economic standing), it is NOT true that they are huge sucking siphons of public funds, as popular as it may be to say so.
|
|
The Captain
Junior Associate
Hugs are good...
Joined: Jan 4, 2011 16:21:23 GMT -5
Posts: 8,717
Location: State of confusion
Favorite Drink: Whinnnne
|
Post by The Captain on Jul 30, 2014 12:03:00 GMT -5
|
|