muttleynfelix
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 15:32:52 GMT -5
Posts: 9,406
|
Post by muttleynfelix on Oct 15, 2013 9:53:58 GMT -5
So, if we aren't supposed to try to understand and speculate, then what is the purpose of the thread? To just simply come on and express sympathy? If that is what it is fine. But, i presume we are going to have a discussion? Obviously, I wasn't on this thread this weekend. The whole point was that the story saddened me. It saddened me a lot and I was listening to sports radio Friday afternoon and that was the big story. The other point was about the thread we had a few days prior that essentially some people posted that abuse doesn't happen because of economics. That is where my "offensive" title came from.
|
|
muttleynfelix
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 15:32:52 GMT -5
Posts: 9,406
|
Post by muttleynfelix on Oct 15, 2013 10:01:01 GMT -5
Anyway, I posted this when the story first broke, before the kid even died. So, when I first posted I assumed that Peterson had a relationship with the child. That said, it is still a sad story. No, it wouldn't have been national news without the Peterson angle.
|
|