|
Post by traelin0 on Feb 3, 2011 19:34:37 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Dec 4, 2024 12:52:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2011 19:41:44 GMT -5
Over my head, but I will bump it to see what others say.
|
|
midwesterner (banned)
Familiar Member
banned
New Boss is same as the old Boss
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:00:47 GMT -5
Posts: 942
|
Post by midwesterner (banned) on Feb 22, 2011 18:17:41 GMT -5
Trae, I posted something about this in MT, reguarding silver, nickel and copper in our currencies which has been replaced with cheaper material like zinc. What is your thoughts of collecting pre 1982 pennies for copper, and nickels for the 25% nickel/75% copper value in them? Do you see good money replacing bad in this case of the lower demoninations of coinage?
|
|
midwesterner (banned)
Familiar Member
banned
New Boss is same as the old Boss
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:00:47 GMT -5
Posts: 942
|
Post by midwesterner (banned) on Feb 22, 2011 18:33:35 GMT -5
Here's a good one Trae, bad quality, but good point.
|
|
safeharbor37
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 23:18:19 GMT -5
Posts: 1,290
|
Post by safeharbor37 on Jul 8, 2011 13:06:46 GMT -5
It isn't reasonable to expect the government to mint coins which are worth more as raw material than their face value. I don't keep up with commodities but the value of copper has increased recently faster than nickel ~ I think, so it could come to pass that a nickle be worth more melted down. Of course, if that should happen, the collector value of those coins would go up. I remember when the government ceased minting silver quarters, the local pharmacist allowed a friend to go through his coins every afternoon to glean the silver quarters. I've frequently wondered how the guy made out. If he's like most he sold out too early. If he still has them in a box, he's probably wealthy just from the coins.
|
|