|
Post by sanityjones on Jan 31, 2011 21:34:00 GMT -5
I recently settled a debt which had gone to collections. I ended up paying about 60% of the original debt. The other day I received in the mail a 1099 for the difference between the original debt and the settlement of the debt (40%). Is this a common practice?
|
|
bookcrazychick
Initiate Member
Joined: Jan 7, 2011 22:48:42 GMT -5
Posts: 77
|
Post by bookcrazychick on Feb 1, 2011 11:05:51 GMT -5
Yes, the forgiven part may also be taxable to you.
|
|
|
Post by sanityjones on Feb 1, 2011 16:57:12 GMT -5
Does this mean that the company did not write off this amount as a loss, (thus creating a deduction for them), or that their deduction is now my income and my tax burden in order to balance the books in the larger sense? Also, a portion of that 40% would have been interest payments and technically been a write off form me..........................
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Nov 24, 2024 14:25:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2011 17:00:16 GMT -5
Does this mean that the company did not write off this amount as a loss, (thus creating a deduction for them), or that their deduction is now my income and my tax burden in order to balance the books in the larger sense? Also, a portion of that 40% would have been interest payments and technically been a write off form me.......................... The company did write off the amount and it would be an expense, or deduction, to the business.
|
|
|
Post by nancy65 on Feb 1, 2011 17:12:01 GMT -5
Does this mean that the company did not write off this amount as a loss, (thus creating a deduction for them), or that their deduction is now my income and my tax burden in order to balance the books in the larger sense? Also, a portion of that 40% would have been interest payments and technically been a write off form me.......................... Was this home mortgage debt? Or business debt? Or personal debt such as credit cards? Different rules apply in different situations.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,351
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Feb 1, 2011 17:20:24 GMT -5
Yes, the forgiven part may also be taxable to you. What she said. I believe if the 1099 amount is less than $600 you do not have to report as income but if it is $600 or greater you do. Just one of the many ways the IRS brings in money.
|
|
MN-Investor
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:22:44 GMT -5
Posts: 1,978
|
Post by MN-Investor on Feb 1, 2011 17:36:47 GMT -5
"I believe if the 1099 amount is less than $600 you do not have to report as income but if it is $600 or greater you do." The $600 threshold relates to whether or not a 1099 is required. The amount is taxable whether or not a 1099 is required.
|
|
|
Post by commentator on Feb 1, 2011 17:45:07 GMT -5
I believe if the 1099 amount is less than $600 you do not have to report as income but if it is $600 or greater you do. Just one of the many ways the IRS brings in money. That is absolutely wrong. ALL taxable income must be reported no matter how small the amount and no matter whether a 1099 was received or not.
|
|
mwcpa
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 7, 2011 6:35:43 GMT -5
Posts: 2,425
|
Post by mwcpa on Feb 1, 2011 17:50:53 GMT -5
optimist... check out the following
"§ 61 Gross income defined (a) General definition. Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived"
The law does not say if the collecting is under 600.00 it is not taxed... it says, all income is taxable unless specifically excluded....reporting to the IRS by a payer is not the same as reporting to the IRS for the recipient.
Sanity.... the section noted above continues to state
"including (but not limited to) the following items:.... (12) Income from discharge of indebtedness;"
Also, see § 108 Income from discharge of indebtedness.
as Nancy noted, there are some rules that exclude debt discharge from being taxable (there are costs though.... you should see a local qualified tax professional about this)
|
|
|
Post by sanityjones on Feb 1, 2011 20:31:23 GMT -5
Thanks for the input. I have never had this experience before, and the strange thing is it is only one creditor which has done this. It was a couple of personal debts which I intentionally defaulted on due to creditor snottiness. Everyone else got paid in full.
|
|
mwcpa
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 7, 2011 6:35:43 GMT -5
Posts: 2,425
|
Post by mwcpa on Feb 2, 2011 8:35:20 GMT -5
sanity, think of it this way... assuming a 30% effective tax rate.... You borrowed 1,000, paid back zero to the credit card company and now have to pay tax of 300.... you are still ahead of the game by 700 and you have the 1,000 of stuff you bought....I would gladly pay 300 to get something I wanted or needed that was worth 1,000.
|
|
|
Post by nancy65 on Feb 2, 2011 18:15:27 GMT -5
I recently settled a debt which had gone to collections. I ended up paying about 60% of the original debt. The other day I received in the mail a 1099 for the difference between the original debt and the settlement of the debt (40%). Is this a common practice? After your clarification of the type of debt-- Yes, this is common practice, and you do have taxable income in that amount. It goes on line 21 of your 1040.
|
|
Opti
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 10:45:38 GMT -5
Posts: 42,351
Location: New Jersey
Mini-Profile Name Color: c28523
Mini-Profile Text Color: 990033
Member is Online
|
Post by Opti on Feb 2, 2011 18:44:08 GMT -5
I sit corrected everyone. Sorry.
|
|
ihearyou2
Well-Known Member
I smell better then I look
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:05:34 GMT -5
Posts: 1,857
|
Post by ihearyou2 on Feb 2, 2011 19:21:19 GMT -5
Or think of it this way, an expense to one party is income to the other and hence taxable.
1099s are simply the way for the government to check up on people's reporting and the 600 is a random number that the government is willing to spend the time sifting through. For dollars less then that they don't want the reporting but 1 dollar of income is supposed to be reported by the taxpayer regardless.
|
|