decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Jan 29, 2011 11:24:29 GMT -5
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Jan 29, 2011 11:41:58 GMT -5
Why don't you ask your Goverment that question. And if you can write your sentences so they are understandable, that would be a good thing (no foul). Even I have my moments. Point here is that these people are taking care of us as you are suppose to believe, are you not? And so regardless unless you want to put on the gear and hit the zone, RESPECT in however needed should be given.
|
|
silverguy25
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 19:11:30 GMT -5
Posts: 165
|
Post by silverguy25 on Jan 29, 2011 11:46:52 GMT -5
Did his wife to work when she realized they had reduced income? And, at what point is are you no longer responsible for the debts you incur? It is a reasonable question. Did you read the article? Even though some of the nation's military families have been sending their breadwinners into war zones for almost a decade, some of the nation's biggest lenders are still fumbling one the basic elements of this law -- its foreclosure protections.
Under the law, only a judge can authorize a foreclosure on a protected service member's home, even in states where court orders are not required for civilian foreclosures, and the judge can act only after a hearing where the military homeowner is represented. The law also caps a protected service member's mortgage rate at 6 percent.
1.) Deployed service members have foreclosure protection against a bank diving in and taking a home while they are fighting to protect our country. 2) A judge must sign off on the foreclosure of a deployed service member. Both of these laws were bypassed, and its downright dispicable.
|
|
silverguy25
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 19:11:30 GMT -5
Posts: 165
|
Post by silverguy25 on Jan 29, 2011 11:50:51 GMT -5
I agree, so stop rambling on about entitlements when its clear that is not the case here.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Jan 29, 2011 11:51:47 GMT -5
You are certainly right there as REGARDLESS this should have never happened to begin with, Quote (from article): Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) Formerly Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (SSCRA) usmilitary.about.com/od/sscra/l/blscramenu.htmWhile the troops are out of town and DEFENDING both you and I and everybody else here at home, they should as writ into law, have no worries as to there home, back home. This same crap goes on right now but it's even worse as many have the old Robo Signed paper.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Jan 29, 2011 12:35:56 GMT -5
silverguy25 handed it to you. What are you not understanding? Quote: Today at 11:31am, Snerdley Snicklefritz wrote: Did his wife to work when she realized they had reduced income? And, at what point is are you no longer responsible for the debts you incur? It is a reasonable question. Did you read the article? Even though some of the nation's military families have been sending their breadwinners into war zones for almost a decade, some of the nation's biggest lenders are still fumbling one the basic elements of this law -- its foreclosure protections. Under the law, only a judge can authorize a foreclosure on a protected service member's home, even in states where court orders are not required for civilian foreclosures, and the judge can act only after a hearing where the military homeowner is represented. The law also caps a protected service member's mortgage rate at 6 percent. 1.) Deployed service members have foreclosure protection against a bank diving in and taking a home while they are fighting to protect our country. 2) A judge must sign off on the foreclosure of a deployed service member. Both of these laws were bypassed, and its downright dispicable. Read more: notmsnmoney.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=moneytalk&action=display&thread=2561#ixzz1CRlLA8M5
|
|
midwesterner (banned)
Familiar Member
banned
New Boss is same as the old Boss
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:00:47 GMT -5
Posts: 942
|
Post by midwesterner (banned) on Jan 29, 2011 13:26:51 GMT -5
I love how many here put burden of all responisblity on the little guy. Sure personal responsiblity is in order, but my gosh many put no blame on the banks responsible for this crisis, and the corporation that shipped our good paying jobs overseas. I was never asked if I thought it was ok to globalize our nations corporations, and jobs. Outsourcing has been a factor and lowering standard of living for many. Poor bankers.
|
|
|
Post by vl on Jan 29, 2011 13:46:58 GMT -5
Have you ever worked for a bank? The ranks of personnel are comprised substantially of people who would sell their soul for a wealth-associated LABEL. That's where we get stuff like: Senior Executive Director of Water Cooler Jugs. Actual talent is wasted in banking.
Soldiers and families HAVE ALREADY BEEN evicted. The first one should have evoked the need to CLOSE THE BANKS, reconcile and re-open with heavy oversight and regulatory control.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Jan 30, 2011 8:10:43 GMT -5
V_L, Thumbs up with that!
|
|