|
Post by lakhota on Jan 27, 2011 19:42:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jan 27, 2011 19:43:37 GMT -5
Oh, Sarah, what a potty mouth you have for a so-called "Christian" lady!
I am sooo disappointed...
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Jan 27, 2011 19:51:58 GMT -5
I often say "WTF" when I'm trying to figure out what she's saying.
|
|
b2r
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:35:25 GMT -5
Posts: 7,257
|
Post by b2r on Jan 27, 2011 19:53:44 GMT -5
|
|
verrip1
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:41:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,992
|
Post by verrip1 on Jan 27, 2011 20:57:08 GMT -5
It's easy to understand, given these conflicting positions:
We need to reduce the deficit; and we need to 'invest' more spending in education, R&D, and infrastructure; and I'm not going to cut discretionary spending, I only want to freeze it, and only for a short time.
"What The Fuck?" is a completely appropriate response to hearing one fool say these conflicting things within a few minutes.
So, what's your problem? You deny Palin her free speech to call it like it is? Or to maybe use double entendres?
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jan 27, 2011 20:59:50 GMT -5
I just don't think I can vote for a woman who uses such language.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2011 21:00:36 GMT -5
So a better speech would have been we're going to reduce the deficit by gutting education, R&D and infrastructure, and getting rid of the minimal budget catagory which is discretionary spending (and which cuts all of your local community projects, like bridges and stuff...)...
That's a winning model... and then the opposition can rail about how he doesn't value education, R&D and infrastructure...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2011 21:05:20 GMT -5
In the video of Mrs Palin talking that I saw (which may not have been everything she said) I agreed with everything she said. I had no idea that she was as close politically to me as that (at least on those few topics).
|
|
|
Post by Thinking-long-term on Jan 27, 2011 21:14:58 GMT -5
She is right about the Government not being able to solve the unemployment crisis, only private enterprise can do that.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2011 21:18:04 GMT -5
So why didn't they do it the 8 years leading up to this crisis? ... all those tax breaks... and 0 net private sector jobs... and right now.. corporate profits totally recovered a year ago... but jobs are still not coming back... hmmm.... its a pickle...
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,508
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 27, 2011 21:21:00 GMT -5
billisonboard response Re: Sarah Palin SOTU Response:[glow=green,2,300]"DAITRNGAS" [/glow](does anyone in their right mind give a
|
|
verrip1
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:41:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,992
|
Post by verrip1 on Jan 27, 2011 21:31:57 GMT -5
I just don't think I can vote for a woman who uses such language. I just don't think I can vote for a dumbass who says such contradictory things.
|
|
verrip1
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:41:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,992
|
Post by verrip1 on Jan 27, 2011 21:32:55 GMT -5
billisonboard response Re: Sarah Palin SOTU Response:[glow=green,2,300]"DAITRNGAS" [/glow](does anyone in their right mind give a You replied to the thread. That means at least you do.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jan 27, 2011 21:37:00 GMT -5
She is right about the Government not being able to solve the unemployment crisis, only private enterprise can do that. According to the BLS website, there were 111,634,000 Americans employed in the private sector at the start of George W. Bush's first term, in January 2001. Eight years later, in January 2009, there were 110,961,000 Americans employed in the private sector. So the United States lost 673,000 private-sector jobs on Bush's watch.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/oct/25/nancy-pelosi/nancy-pelosi-says-more-private-sector-jobs-created/I repeat: The United States lost 673,000 private-sector jobs on Bush's watch.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2011 21:39:45 GMT -5
How is it contradictory... we need to reduce the deficit, but not by cutting education, R&D and infrastructure. And freezing discretionay spending actually makes sense. Because discretionary spending is only a very small, barely noticable part of the budget... it wouldn't make much of any difference to cut it, but we can stop it from growing and make sure we use it effectively, but if we are going to cut the deficit... we need to address the drains of long term mandatory spending...
I don't see the contradiction?
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,508
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 27, 2011 21:41:58 GMT -5
billisonboard response Re: Sarah Palin SOTU Response:[glow=green,2,300]"DAITRNGAS" [/glow](does anyone in their right mind give a You replied to the thread. That means at least you do. I responded to the posting of a thread on a message board about her responding. If I cared about what she said I would have click on the link in the OP. I didn't. I don't care what she said. Sorry.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jan 27, 2011 21:42:33 GMT -5
|
|
verrip1
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:41:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,992
|
Post by verrip1 on Jan 28, 2011 2:45:56 GMT -5
You replied to the thread. That means at least you do. I responded to the posting of a thread on a message board about her responding. If I cared about what she said I would have click on the link in the OP. I didn't. I don't care what she said. Sorry. Wait! Are you looking for an insult? Sorry, wrong office. This is arguments.
|
|
|
Post by magichat on Jan 28, 2011 9:03:14 GMT -5
' Thanks for helping prove that adding government jobs costs the private sector. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 9:30:59 GMT -5
Then i guess it also proves that significant tax breaks to the wealthy don't really create private sector jobs... either...
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Jan 28, 2011 10:55:15 GMT -5
Are you going to be commenting on the SOTU responses of all the pundits and entertainers on television, or are you just singling out Palin? How about Charlie Sheen's take on the whole thing? Or Snooki? LOL! You guys are so sad...
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Jan 28, 2011 11:04:17 GMT -5
Ed, when Charlie Sheen or Snook run for president, I'm sure the talking heads will be talking about them. Poor Sarah. She's SO picked on! LOL
|
|
ugonow
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:15:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,397
|
Post by ugonow on Jan 28, 2011 11:14:58 GMT -5
Are Sheens or Snookies SOTU response online?I would love to see them. I bet they are winners
|
|
swamp
Community Leader
Don't be a fool. Call me!
Joined: Dec 19, 2010 16:03:22 GMT -5
Posts: 45,344
|
Post by swamp on Jan 28, 2011 11:19:22 GMT -5
I often say "WTF" when I'm trying to figure out what she's saying. LOL. Karma for you.
|
|
|
Post by magichat on Jan 28, 2011 11:44:25 GMT -5
Then i guess it also proves that significant tax breaks to the wealthy don't really create private sector jobs... either... There you go again with the lies about tax cuts for the wealthy, how sad.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 12:46:07 GMT -5
I'm sorry... what was my lie?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:35 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 12:51:12 GMT -5
Sarah's WTF was her best moment yet!! I love Sarah. She is so real. No, I would not vote for her, not any time soon, but I like her a lot.
|
|
|
Post by magichat on Jan 28, 2011 13:14:59 GMT -5
I'm sorry... what was my lie? An omission is a lie as well.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 15, 2024 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 13:15:29 GMT -5
What did i omit?
|
|
|
Post by magichat on Jan 28, 2011 13:20:52 GMT -5
That the tax cuts affected all tax brackets.
|
|