|
Post by traelin0 on Jan 24, 2011 21:24:21 GMT -5
For those without the problem of normalcy bias, you may find interesting both the numbers being spent and the speculation as to why it's being spent in the first place. For those with the problem of normalcy bias, nothing to see here, move along. Read more here.
|
|
fairlycrazy23
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 23:55:19 GMT -5
Posts: 3,306
|
Post by fairlycrazy23 on Jan 24, 2011 21:33:11 GMT -5
This is probably nothing more than the government over compensating. One of the best things they can probably do is remove anti-gouging laws.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,476
|
Post by billisonboard on Jan 24, 2011 21:34:10 GMT -5
It is a request for information. Should they wait until there is an earthquake and then send at a request for information on who is in a position to provide meals for people?
|
|
Mad Dawg Wiccan
Administrator
Rest in Peace
Only Bites Whiners
Joined: Jan 12, 2011 20:40:24 GMT -5
Posts: 9,693
|
Post by Mad Dawg Wiccan on Jan 24, 2011 21:38:42 GMT -5
The assumption that is made in the case of the normalcy bias is that since a disaster never has occurred that it never will occur.
I don't see any case for normalcy bias here. The New Madrid Fault Line spawned one of the worst earthquakes in US history back in the early 1800s, and is ripe to do so again.
|
|
|
Post by traelin0 on Jan 24, 2011 21:42:56 GMT -5
maddawg, hang around for awhile. You'll see what I mean by normalcy bias in a short period of time. P&M in particular excels in optimism opium and the philosophy that economic law stops at the shores of Amerika.
(As for New Madrid, it was a biggin, but it was in DEC 1811 - FEB 1812 if memory serves me, with thousands of aftershocks. It was in sparsely populated frontier land and if there were no normalcy bias in humans, they wouldn't have built Memphis.)
|
|
|
Post by traelin0 on Jan 24, 2011 21:44:54 GMT -5
It is a request for information. Should they wait until there is an earthquake and then send at a request for information on who is in a position to provide meals for people? LOL, bills. They are planning to spend half a billion dollars (est.) to support "disaster relief efforts...for a survivor population of 7M." That is not a run-of-the-mill RFI, and I've seen my fair share of procurements. You should see some of the interesting exercises and simulations they've done on 7.7M and 7.0M earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Pretty in-depth. www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/8971
|
|
|
Post by traelin0 on Jan 25, 2011 13:30:23 GMT -5
|
|
safeharbor37
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 23:18:19 GMT -5
Posts: 1,290
|
Post by safeharbor37 on Jan 25, 2011 17:52:27 GMT -5
"Normalcy bias" offsets the "Chicken Little effect." It's the reason I go out my front door without checking through the window, peep hole or security camera ~ even though I'm aware that there might be an evil person waiting to rob and abuse me ~ and I feel this way simply because, no matter how hard I looked, I've never found any insurmountable dangers waiting for me there and therefore assume that there won't be the next time I leave the house. When the bad guys [things] get me, you can say, "I told you so!" Chill. Like Hank Williams said so artfully, "I'll never get out of this world alive."
|
|