decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 18, 2011 10:01:01 GMT -5
Just keep adding up the - not the + and there you will find the state of things,being,sorry paper pushers,but your SHAM is being ripped apart.
|
|
Small Biz Owner
Familiar Member
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 8:43:06 GMT -5
Posts: 607
|
Post by Small Biz Owner on Aug 18, 2011 10:05:01 GMT -5
I noticed that from your birth/death business jobs model link from the BLS. Thanks for the info Mr Decoy.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 18, 2011 10:15:15 GMT -5
Small Biz Owner, your welcome. So many were covered in crap that one could not help but to show some light. For those that think tracking is simple,well it's not. However to be a good collector/tracker,you go against the flow more often than not. Anyone professing such things as waiting jobs since 2009 of 3 mil. for instance,get a grip as those things do not fit into meaningful honest equations when 3 years have passed and still barking 3 mil. Small Biz Owner, remember the days of on the job training.
|
|
Virgil Showlion
Distinguished Associate
Moderator
[b]leones potest resistere[/b]
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 15:19:33 GMT -5
Posts: 27,448
|
Post by Virgil Showlion on Aug 18, 2011 10:42:23 GMT -5
Wall Street economists are again proving their incredible worth with the Philly Fed forecast: An 8-sigma event.
|
|
Small Biz Owner
Familiar Member
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 8:43:06 GMT -5
Posts: 607
|
Post by Small Biz Owner on Aug 18, 2011 11:07:59 GMT -5
Economists, I never knew you could keep your job, while still being so wrong. Wonder how many hundreds of thousands they take in each year in salary plus bonus? $200k? $300k? Good work if you can get it.
|
|
Virgil Showlion
Distinguished Associate
Moderator
[b]leones potest resistere[/b]
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 15:19:33 GMT -5
Posts: 27,448
|
Post by Virgil Showlion on Aug 18, 2011 11:09:33 GMT -5
Let's say somewhere between $10 and $10,000,000, and by economist standards that will be close enough.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 18, 2011 11:29:15 GMT -5
I like the 'PAID' economists as they give me some great insight away from the bunch.
|
|
usaone
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 9:10:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,429
|
Post by usaone on Aug 18, 2011 12:07:05 GMT -5
The philly fed always tanks in august. Everyone around here is on vacation. Ask TM we are all down the shore.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 18, 2011 12:27:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by inhouston on Aug 18, 2011 13:30:31 GMT -5
Afternoon Decoy - Great fuzzy math trick - from the master magicians - The Federal Government: (As ascertained by some people who actually looked at - and computed - the data)
"Nearly 14 million workers are still unemployed. The figure keeps creeping lower, but it is due to government math. If you are out of the workforce for too long, you no longer count as an unemployed person. Nice math."
"Somehow the workforce with the unemployed percentages is much lower. How we went from 9.8% to 9.4% was fuzzy math. Now we magically went down to 9.0% despite only a few thousand jobs being created. Make no mistake about government math. You are being lied to by the Labor Department, my friend."
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 18, 2011 14:27:44 GMT -5
In Houston, why how the heck have you been and nice to see you here! As it all catches up to itself hey. Well we have a lot to go and the old water facet has been turned up a bit further. Good thing for controlled demolitions in financial markets. But they have had a lot of practice and I am sure a lot of fun along the way. I am just wondering how they are going to control the cutbacks along with hungry people out of work along with the family and house payment and perhaps the wife working. Savers vs Spenders. That's a good one all in it's own withj the dried up accts. not producing crap for return in regards to interest. This was a magic trick of magic tricks! Fun to SEE how the illusion works all the same.
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 18, 2011 15:47:53 GMT -5
"Say Wally" "What's that Beaver?" "Mrs. Landers says we have to learn some new math tomarrow" "Yeah beaver,I remember that" "Is it hard to do Wally?" "Not really Beaver. You like magic don't you?" "Why,I guess Wally" "Then your going to have some real fun Beaver! Say Beav" "What's that Wally?" "Go ask Dad to show ya some stuff now!" "How's that Wally" "He will teach you how the $5 dollar bill goes around and what happens when someday it can not go around any longer "
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 22, 2011 8:47:31 GMT -5
|
|
decoy409
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 27, 2010 11:17:19 GMT -5
Posts: 7,582
|
Post by decoy409 on Aug 25, 2011 9:25:46 GMT -5
Shape by design. Say Ted,great stuff you came up with to share! By the way Ted Aug. 25,2011 - Kevin Slavin: How Algorithms Shape Our World Kevin Slavin argues that we’re living in a world designed for — and increasingly controlled by — algorithms. In this riveting talk from TEDGlobal, he shows how these complex computer programs determine: espionage tactics, stock prices, movie scripts, and architecture. And he warns that we are writing code we can’t understand, with implications we can’t control. cryptogon.com/?p=24466Why Ray Theory should have been brought into the equation. Done in short bursts to see reaction,then you simply follow up from there. So in escense,as long as the projection holds with short bursts from various rays in the same direction applied in short bursts,then further can be added. However if they are over applied without conformation of a positive effect,then we have a collapse of the theory providing the rays were not correctly supervised by honesty. Done correctly why it's a positive magnet sucking in all around it,as the projection of the path seems clear. However without applied projection (not natural release),sooner or later disater strikes and the theory is no longer valid as one of natural truth representation but that of fallacy.
|
|