Politically_Incorrect12
Senior Member
With a little faith, we can move a mountain; with a little help, we can change the world.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 20:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 3,763
|
Post by Politically_Incorrect12 on Jul 21, 2011 10:18:21 GMT -5
|
|
Politically_Incorrect12
Senior Member
With a little faith, we can move a mountain; with a little help, we can change the world.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 20:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 3,763
|
Post by Politically_Incorrect12 on Jul 21, 2011 10:47:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jul 21, 2011 13:03:44 GMT -5
Marine to receive Medal of Honor for Afghan valor
I am not an expert for the awarding of the MOH but did know of one guy who received it for throwing himself on a grenade in the Nam and he was a combat photographer... He died from his wounds and most who did receive the highest award our country can bestow for bravery in combat are usually to those who have risked their lives to save their fellow comrades...a large percentage of the awardees for the MOH are for the most part posthumously from what I recall ..
Recommendations for the Navy Cross, Silver Star, or Bronze Star are all awarded for act of conspicuous gallantry and bravery in combat.. Often those who are awarded these medals performed above and beyond during combat. But usually it is a medal review committee who makes the call as to which medal is appropriate for the individual acts of bravery in combat based on the recommendations of an officer or staff NCO who witnessed the act, and then he submitted his recommendation to the medal review board after getting his COs approval.. The review board will often ask others to submit their recollections of the event or act that is under review..
I am not sure if this answers your question or not but might give you a basic idea about awarding medals in the military... Often it is a judgement call by an individual who witnessed a brave act under fire who then begins the process for awarding a medal for that particular act of bravery.. And of course many acts of bravery are never recorded or recommended for a medal..
|
|
Politically_Incorrect12
Senior Member
With a little faith, we can move a mountain; with a little help, we can change the world.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 20:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 3,763
|
Post by Politically_Incorrect12 on Jul 21, 2011 20:39:12 GMT -5
When I was in the military, medals seemed to arbitrary to me. What one person does gets them a Bronze Star or higher, while another person doing the exact same thing gets no recognition, and ArCom or something along those lines. The same seems to go for the Silver Star and the MOH as well.
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jul 22, 2011 10:19:20 GMT -5
When I was in the military, medals seemed to arbitrary to me. What one person does gets them a Bronze Star or higher, while another person doing the exact same thing gets no recognition, and ArCom or something along those lines. The same seems to go for the Silver Star and the MOH as well. Yea but I don't think what you claim is such a big thing in our mlitary..overall the awarding of medals is done very well in most cases. I really cannot recall a single instance of anyone complaining about medals but there were a few cases that I recall for a few guys who were awarded Letters of Commendation who probably deserved a Bronze Star or Silver Star but I think that is the exception rather than the rule..
|
|