NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 12, 2011 17:44:57 GMT -5
I speak what Republicans are afraid to say out of fear of losing elections.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 0:25:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 17:47:19 GMT -5
BLEEP!! WRONG!!! We know what you are doing, guy. I don't know any conservatives that are as heartless and coldblooded as you, and I know lots of conservatives.
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 12, 2011 17:48:50 GMT -5
BLEEP!! WRONG!!! We know what you are doing, guy. I don't know any conservatives that are as heartless and coldblooded as you, and I know lots of conservatives. They are just afraid to speak their mind. I am not.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 12, 2011 19:51:18 GMT -5
Palin: "No Scientific Evidence" Polar Bears Are EndangeredGovernor's notes in email with embedded letter from environmental group leader were redacted. Sarah Palin has never pressed environmental issues as priorities in her political campaigns, and an email exchange in January 2007 shows just how little she cares (or knows) about the effects of global warming. Palin sent an email to her aides with an embedded letter from Mary Walker, the head of an Anchorage environmental group, which rebukes the governor for requesting that the federal government not include the polar bear on its list of endangered species. The environmentalist wrote in her letter that Palin's written request to the government "had several clear factual errors such as the statement: there is no scientific evidence.... that these polar bear populations are declining." Walker then provided the scientific evidence to counter Palin's claim, and wrote that Palin's claim that there was "no discrete human activities that can be regulated" when it came to the effects of global warming on polar bears' habitat. The part of the email that followed Walker's embedded letter was removed and replaced with the note: "Privileged or Personal Material Redacted." We can only see that she addressed aide Mike Tibbles in the email, whose response was also redacted. www.thedailybeast.com/interactive/palin-emails/2011/6/12/palin-no-scientific-evidence-polar-bears-are-endanmotherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/sarah-palin-emails-revealed-live-updates#bears
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 12, 2011 22:35:51 GMT -5
Palin: "No Scientific Evidence" Polar Bears Are EndangeredGovernor's notes in email with embedded letter from environmental group leader were redacted. Sarah Palin has never pressed environmental issues as priorities in her political campaigns, and an email exchange in January 2007 shows just how little she cares (or knows) about the effects of global warming. Palin sent an email to her aides with an embedded letter from Mary Walker, the head of an Anchorage environmental group, which rebukes the governor for requesting that the federal government not include the polar bear on its list of endangered species. The environmentalist wrote in her letter that Palin's written request to the government "had several clear factual errors such as the statement: there is no scientific evidence.... that these polar bear populations are declining." Walker then provided the scientific evidence to counter Palin's claim, and wrote that Palin's claim that there was "no discrete human activities that can be regulated" when it came to the effects of global warming on polar bears' habitat. The part of the email that followed Walker's embedded letter was removed and replaced with the note: "Privileged or Personal Material Redacted." We can only see that she addressed aide Mike Tibbles in the email, whose response was also redacted. www.thedailybeast.com/interactive/palin-emails/2011/6/12/palin-no-scientific-evidence-polar-bears-are-endanmotherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/sarah-palin-emails-revealed-live-updates#bears Didn't Palin use to shoot polar bears from helicopters using machine guns?
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Jun 13, 2011 0:29:09 GMT -5
Palin: "No Scientific Evidence" Polar Bears Are EndangeredGovernor's notes in email with embedded letter from environmental group leader were redacted. Sarah Palin has never pressed environmental issues as priorities in her political campaigns, and an email exchange in January 2007 shows just how little she cares (or knows) about the effects of global warming. Palin sent an email to her aides with an embedded letter from Mary Walker, the head of an Anchorage environmental group, which rebukes the governor for requesting that the federal government not include the polar bear on its list of endangered species. The environmentalist wrote in her letter that Palin's written request to the government "had several clear factual errors such as the statement: there is no scientific evidence.... that these polar bear populations are declining." Walker then provided the scientific evidence to counter Palin's claim, and wrote that Palin's claim that there was "no discrete human activities that can be regulated" when it came to the effects of global warming on polar bears' habitat. The part of the email that followed Walker's embedded letter was removed and replaced with the note: "Privileged or Personal Material Redacted." We can only see that she addressed aide Mike Tibbles in the email, whose response was also redacted. www.thedailybeast.com/interactive/palin-emails/2011/6/12/palin-no-scientific-evidence-polar-bears-are-endanmotherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/sarah-palin-emails-revealed-live-updates#bears Didn't Palin use to shoot polar bears from helicopters using machine guns? Only in your creepy wet dreams...
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 13, 2011 8:29:40 GMT -5
BLEEP!! WRONG!!! We know what you are doing, guy. I don't know any conservatives that are as heartless and coldblooded as you, and I know lots of conservatives. They are just afraid to speak their mind. I am not. They are just afraid to speak out of their mind. I am not. ;D Yowza!! Name sez it all. Like the effort. Refine it and get a radio show.
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 13, 2011 11:54:52 GMT -5
In the annals of American politics, I don’t believe that any congressman, governor, or president has been the subject of such relentless liberal or media hatred or criticism as Sarah Palin, former Governor of Alaska. It is a phenomenon that defies simple understanding or explanation. It can only mean that the left is so frightened of a Palin candidacy for president, that they will do and say anything that will turn the American people against her. And now, with the release of 24,000 pages of her emails, written and sent during her tenure as governor, we have another mind-boggling attempt on the part of the media to find something that would embarrass the ex-governor. And I’m sure they’ll find some trivial gaffe or mistake Palin made in those 24,000 pages. But it is hardly likely that whatever they find will turn her fans away from her, or that the hatred the left already has for her will get any hotter. Indeed, how much more can they hate her? I love Sarah Palin. To me she personifies the American spirit at its best. She is patriotic, proud of America and its accomplishments, independent minded, not afraid of her enemies, an admirer of capitalism, an individualist, a lover of the American heritage, and a strong desire to prevent America from going down the ruinous path to socialism. She is also a devoted mother and wife who believes in the centrality of the family in our social fabric. She stands for everything that is good and wholesome about America, and projects a strong, benevolent attitude toward her fellow citizens. If you’re a conservative, what’s there not to like about Sarah Palin? One thing the left has done for Palin is made her a household name. She is recognized by every man, woman, and child in America as a controversial political figure. She is the best known Republican in America, and even the morons that Jay Leno interviews on the streets of Los Angeles know who she is. Establishment Republicans are not too happy with Sarah. These are the same Republicans who, when in power, never repealed a liberal Democrat program and usually made them more efficient. Remember in one of his first acts as President, George W. Bush joined with Ted Kennedy to enact “No Child Left Behind,” giving Lyndon Johnson’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act a new lease on life? Instead of trying to repeal that useless act, he simply pumped more blood into it. And what was one of Bush’s last acts as President? He named the Education Department building after Lyndon Baines Johnson. So when Karl Rove acts a little cool toward Sarah, he ought to be asked, “Why didn’t you stop Bush from spending a trillion dollars more than was wise? Why did you give the Democrats the best chance for defeating Republicans in 2008?” The left’s efforts to demonize Palin are more aimed at getting Republicans to reject her than at getting liberals to hate her more than they already do. That is why they will keep up their feverish, over-the-top criticism of Palin, so that Republicans will believe that she is unelectable. Yes, 45 percent of the electorate will not vote for her. And 45 percent will vote for her. It is that ten percent of independent voters that the left is trying to persuade that Palin is a right-wing extremist who will destroy all of those great entitlement programs created by the left. But because Palin has access to the media like no other candidate in history, she is quite capable of appealing to that ten percent that can put her over the top. And I would bet that she can do it. That ten percent that voted for Obama are now so thoroughly disillusioned by that crafty charismatic socialist, that they will not vote for him again, under any circumstances. They know he is ruining America.
So the battle is joined. Sarah’s bus tour has given her an opportunity to meet the local people and spread the message of Americanism. Yes, the media made a big deal over what she said about Paul Revere. But since most Americans don’t know who he is, it is unlikely that it will affect whether or not they will vote for her.
It will be interesting to see what they can find in the 24,000 pages of emails to smear her. And they would not be going to all that trouble of finding a needle in a haystack if they did not believe that Palin has a great chance of being nominated for President at the Republican National Convention.
If anything, the release of these 24,000 pages has simply made many Americans aware of how worried the Democrats are over the possibility of a Palin candidacy. That can only make conservatives sense that Palin is indeed the one who should be nominated. If she is, she will win.www.thenewamerican.com/opinion/sam-blumenfeld/7837-sarah-palins-emails
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 13, 2011 12:08:14 GMT -5
It'd be a hot four years that's for sure.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 0:25:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 13, 2011 12:53:52 GMT -5
All I know is she couldn't do worse than Obama, and I would believe everything she does is in the best interest of the USA. I don't believe that about Obama. He seems more interested in other countries than our country. I know a huge country like the USA is tied to global things, but you don't overlook your own needs and see to others first. It is pretty basic knowledge that if you don't take care of yourself you are worthless to anyone else. We are at this point spending a lot of money in countries that do not affect our security, and have no allegiance to us. In this economy that is irresponsible. I think Sarah wants this country to thrive and succeed. She honestly believes in America and Americans. I don't think Obama does. Although it is true that I would vote for anybody but Obama, Sarah Palin is not my last choice. Plus, at this point, she is not even running, just going around stirring things up, which I see as a good thing. People are disheartened. They need to be stirred up.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 13, 2011 15:15:11 GMT -5
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Jun 13, 2011 15:20:27 GMT -5
Sarah Palin's Emails Written At 8th Grade Level -- Better Than Some CEOs Has Palin suddenly lost her luster since the best the libs can dig up is her 8th grade level" writing?
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 13, 2011 15:30:02 GMT -5
Sarah Palin's Emails Written At 8th Grade Level -- Better Than Some CEOs Has Palin suddenly lost her luster since the best the libs can dig up is her 8th grade level" writing? They'll never be through with Palin. She is a scary goddess they love to hate. I think they're getting more emotional catharsis from hating her than from loving Gaia.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 13, 2011 21:35:23 GMT -5
|
|
formerexpat
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 12:09:05 GMT -5
Posts: 4,079
|
Post by formerexpat on Jun 13, 2011 21:54:16 GMT -5
|
|
formerexpat
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 12:09:05 GMT -5
Posts: 4,079
|
Post by formerexpat on Jun 13, 2011 22:06:33 GMT -5
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 13, 2011 22:30:31 GMT -5
It seems to me that many people feel that it is patently offensive to admit that global warming is real. Why is that? It's not like American jobs are dependent on guzzling gas. Manufacturing is pretty much gone already.
|
|
OldCoyote
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 10:34:48 GMT -5
Posts: 13,449
|
Post by OldCoyote on Jun 14, 2011 6:35:21 GMT -5
As I sit here typing away , ready to demand the release of other political leaders emails, I realize that it is not going to happen. (You know, it takes a while for the thought to penetrate the thick skull, but thin skin) Why? No one in higher politics are as squeaky clean as Palin. Lakhota, I wasted my time looking at the fourteen juicy emails, praising Obama for his speech??? That just took her down a couple of notches on my list.
|
|
floridayankee
Junior Associate
If You Don't Stand Behind Our Troops, Feel Free to Stand in Front of Them.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:56:05 GMT -5
Posts: 7,461
|
Post by floridayankee on Jun 14, 2011 7:43:26 GMT -5
It seems to me that many people feel that it is patently offensive to admit that global warming is real. The globe has been warming and cooling all by itself for several billion years all without the aid of mankind. Why would one have a problem admitting global warming is real?
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 14, 2011 15:11:27 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 0:25:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2011 15:37:41 GMT -5
Love the Daily thing. Funny!!
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 14, 2011 16:34:11 GMT -5
Can't get over how cute your avatar is. Delightful. Love Barker's art. What a vision. I've started dvr'ing Stewart. He just cracks me up. I have a crush on him.
|
|