|
Post by privateinvestor on Jun 11, 2011 21:28:52 GMT -5
Hey I like Hillary but then again I like everyone as you all know.. I specialize in liking women 50+ who are attractive and highly intelligent in case anyone is wondering??
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 11, 2011 21:29:06 GMT -5
Seriously, what do you think about a couple that was poor while he served as governor of a poor state, envious of their pals who had some money, desperate enough to get into a real estate scheme, hangers on with the Arkansas "jet setters." Who go to Washington and bring in all their pals. Who scramble and accept charity from their friends to live up to their station.
Who then manage to sell books and get selected to the NY senate, get top dollar for speeches and all of a sudden they are worth $80 million dollars.
IN PUBLIC SERVICE.
Nice gig.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 11, 2011 21:31:38 GMT -5
Oh, that Clinton envy...
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 11, 2011 21:32:30 GMT -5
Seriously, what do you think about a couple that was poor while he served as governor of a poor state, envious of their pals who had some money, desperate enough to get into a real estate scheme, hangers on with the Arkansas "jet setters." Who go to Washington and bring in all their pals. Who scramble and accept charity from their friends to live up to their station. Who then manage to sell books and get selected to the NY senate, get top dollar for speeches and all of a sudden they are worth $80 million dollars. IN PUBLIC SERVICE. Nice gig. I fully agree. They started poor and should have ended poor. The whole BS of the poor making it rich in the USA based on merit is really offensive to me. So what they were both incredibly well educated, smart, personable, and ambitious? They SHOULD have stayed poor. I am OK with hereditary wealth like the Bush family, but the whole climbing the social and financial ladder based on education like the Clinton's makes me puke. What has America come to?
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jun 11, 2011 21:34:24 GMT -5
Here's a scenario for Hillary .....in a few weeks she will resign as Sec of State and move to the World Bank President and then after about a year at the World Bank; the DNC will ask her to run against Obama and she will accept only if she can find a spot for Old Bill in her adminstration.....so I am monitoring this scenario to see if it plays out and will keep you all updated..
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 11, 2011 21:35:10 GMT -5
Yeah, I'd love to be a shyster disbarred lawyer who rubs elbows with the biggest thieves and liars on the planet. I'd sleep so well at night knowing that like my hero Walter Cronkite I was glad to be aligned with Satan. One worlders, oh if only I were one of them. . . on my way to hell with lots of worldly treasure. Who wouldn't?
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 11, 2011 21:38:16 GMT -5
Let's see now. . . will anyone mount a defense of the Clintons?? Please explain your admiration and respect. Pretty please.
As some may remember, I would have voted for Hillary over John McCain, because despite his hero status she still has more balls.
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jun 11, 2011 21:43:15 GMT -5
As some may remember, I would have voted for Hillary over John McCain, because despite his hero status she still has more balls
I have admired Hillary since the Democratic Presidential Debates and she held her own against Edwards and Obama...
I voted for McCain/Palin but had Hillary beat Obama I would have voted for Hillary and made tons of points with all the ladies in my family who think Hillary is awesome and doing some good things at state.. and I agree with them.. but I have to I think?? I am out numbered by women in case you are wondering and believe me you cannot win an agrument with a bunch of women, they may let you think you won but in reality you didn't...so I don't even bother
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 11, 2011 21:43:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 11, 2011 21:45:35 GMT -5
Yeah, I'd love to be a shyster disbarred lawyer who rubs elbows with the biggest thieves and liars on the planet. I'd sleep so well at night knowing that like my hero Walter Cronkite I was glad to be aligned with Satan. One worlders, oh if only I were one of them. . . on my way to hell with lots of worldly treasure. Who wouldn't? Yes, sadly that appears to be your problem. Thanks for being honest.
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jun 11, 2011 21:47:20 GMT -5
Ok do you think Hillary would have been a better president than Obama if she was elected on 15 January 2009 and not him??
I think that is a no brainer because Hillary has more experience than Obama as a senator and she had a better track record than he has...I also think Hillary who as Sec of State is one of the best we have had in that slot in recent times..
I think she is also a harder worker than Obama and a better diplomat..and her judgement is better than his, she has more maturity and knowledge on most economic policy issues.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 11, 2011 21:48:46 GMT -5
|
|
NoMoreLunacy
Well-Known Member
Joined: Jun 8, 2011 23:21:57 GMT -5
Posts: 1,293
|
Post by NoMoreLunacy on Jun 11, 2011 21:48:46 GMT -5
Ok do you think Hillary would have been a better president than Obama if she was elected on 15 January 2009 and not him?? I would have voted for Edwards. He had the best policy of the 3. I did vote for Hillary in the primaries.
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 11, 2011 21:52:38 GMT -5
Yeah, I'd love to be a shyster disbarred lawyer who rubs elbows with the biggest thieves and liars on the planet. I'd sleep so well at night knowing that like my hero Walter Cronkite I was glad to be aligned with Satan. One worlders, oh if only I were one of them. . . on my way to hell with lots of worldly treasure. Who wouldn't? Yes, sadly that appears to be your problem. Thanks for being honest. No defense of admired couple then, just attacking fellow member of forum. Same old . . . See ya.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 11, 2011 21:55:58 GMT -5
Marshabar, I would gladly vote for either Bill or Hillary to be president.
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jun 11, 2011 21:56:22 GMT -5
]
I would have voted for Edwards. He had the best policy of the 3. I did vote for Hillary in the primaries.[/quote][/color]
I voted for Edwards in the Presidential Democratic Primary and am still trying to live that one down....not easy after three years
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Jun 11, 2011 23:06:15 GMT -5
The libs cannot get enough of Palin! The liberal Palin-lust knows no bounds...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 0:25:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2011 23:25:04 GMT -5
Hil will go to World Bank, all her hanger-ons, like Huma, Weinerman, and the baby, of course.. will all be appointed to something, and everybody will live happily ever after..IF the Bilderbergs give approval..
God BLESS America
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 12, 2011 0:32:46 GMT -5
Seriously, what do you think about a couple that was poor while he served as governor of a poor state, envious of their pals who had some money, desperate enough to get into a real estate scheme, hangers on with the Arkansas "jet setters." Who go to Washington and bring in all their pals. Who scramble and accept charity from their friends to live up to their station. Who then manage to sell books and get selected to the NY senate, get top dollar for speeches and all of a sudden they are worth $80 million dollars. IN PUBLIC SERVICE. Nice gig. I fully agree. They started poor and should have ended poor. The whole BS of the poor making it rich in the USA based on merit is really offensive to me. So what they were both incredibly well educated, smart, personable, and ambitious? They SHOULD have stayed poor. I am OK with hereditary wealth like the Bush family, but the whole climbing the social and financial ladder based on education like the Clinton's makes me puke. What has America come to? Oh my...that's friggin funny!
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 12, 2011 0:38:11 GMT -5
"I'd sleep so well at night knowing that like my hero Walter Cronkite I was glad to be aligned with Satan. "
Any evidence whatsoever that Walter Cronkite was aligned with "Satan" or anyone resembling "Satan"?
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 12, 2011 0:38:18 GMT -5
ravinglunatic is obviously a DNC operative.
|
|
|
Post by lakhota on Jun 12, 2011 0:55:36 GMT -5
Cronkite contrasted his support for accountable global government with the opposition to it by politically active Christian fundamentalists in the United States: "Even as with the American rejection of the League of Nations, our failure to live up to our obligations to the United Nations is led by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our nation’s conscience.They pander to and are supported by the Christian Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing. Their leader, Pat Robertson, has written that we should have a world government but only when the messiah arrives. Any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the Devil! Well join me… I'm glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_CronkiteAmen and praise Gawd. I never thought I'd live to see the day when "anyone" would bash Walter Cronkite. I knew he was a great man; now I know he was even greater than I thought. RIP, Sir.
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 12, 2011 4:24:51 GMT -5
Yes, they are scared. She really IS the girl next door, and through some insane thing no one can understand, she has grown in wealth and fame to a point people could actually elect her. After the nobody Senator from Illinois that became POTUS this is the biggest thing we have seen for awhile...... that's what hating Sarah from the minute we all met her has brought-- fame, fortune, and power. Mainly it is liberals responsible for this. Libs rule the media, libs made Sarah famous.... the lib media has pizzed a lot of people off to the point that we would vote for Sarah over Obama.. they did it, not conservatives.[/quote Why exactly do you believe anyone is scared of Sara Palin? She isn't electable. She doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell of winning in 2012. The only power she has is to turn heads like a car wreck. People just wait for the next dumb ass statement to come out of her pie hole. So she is attractive. So what. Lots of attractive women out there, they won't get elected either. As far as the "liberal media", that is a crock. But please, don't let me stop the conspiracy contingent, I have stock in the company that makes tin foil.
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 12, 2011 5:56:34 GMT -5
Yes, Palin is such a non-force and a nobody that the media wants to read thousands upon thousands of pages of old emails to find something to try to discredit this person that they are not afraid of and poses no threat of a real victory. Uh, huh. Nice try, but I never said she was a" nobody". The media is also fascinated with the likes of Kim Kardashian and Justin Bieber. Neither one of them have a snowballs chance in hell if they ran for the office either. I put Palin in their league. She is entertainment. No substance. As far as trying to find something to discredit her, well she did a fine job of that all by herself.
|
|
cereb
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 23, 2011 0:33:47 GMT -5
Posts: 3,904
|
Post by cereb on Jun 12, 2011 5:58:13 GMT -5
Palin is electable. Nobody knows who is electable until they toss their hat in the ring and go for it. She has a chance just like anyone else. If she doesn't run, she has no chance. But, you really never know. Things happen in the world and the mood of the people shift. You cannot say she "can't win". She CAN win if she makes her case to the people. I have far more faith in the average American voter.
|
|
|
Post by privateinvestor on Jun 12, 2011 7:16:05 GMT -5
Sarah will NOT run for president ..she is just playing the American voters like a violin much the same way as she played the voters of Alaka...she is too greedy for the megabucks to take a pay cut and become our next President. Although she might give Barrack a good run for his money, excuse the puns but couldn't resist.
Read some of the lady's emails and then decide if you think she is Presidential material or not. I say no way, no how...IMHO
|
|
tyfighter3
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:01:17 GMT -5
Posts: 1,806
|
Post by tyfighter3 on Jun 12, 2011 11:37:09 GMT -5
I bet they would be fun to read threw.
|
|
|
Post by ed1066 on Jun 12, 2011 11:42:08 GMT -5
ravinglunatic is obviously a DNC operative. Agree. He sucks at pretending to be conservative, a la Stephen Colbert. The other guy here who did that was better at it...
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 19, 2024 0:25:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2011 11:50:11 GMT -5
He's some kind of satire on conservatism.. like the Onion stories. I'm just glad his name is right, so I can call him lunatic whenever I want!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by marshabar1 on Jun 12, 2011 16:07:35 GMT -5
I'm just glad his name is right, so I can call him lunatic whenever I want!! ;D
I like the satire. ;D LOL, krickitt..
|
|