dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Feb 2, 2023 16:38:51 GMT -5
My tax accountant says yes but I’m seeing different opinions on line.
A tenant methed their unit. Abatement and rehab and lost rent total $75,000. I know the lost rent payment will be taxable income, but what about the rest after our deductible? Can the damage, about $68,000, be written off or does the settlement make it a wash.
Thanks.
|
|
jerseygirl
Senior Member
Joined: May 13, 2018 7:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 4,772
|
Post by jerseygirl on Feb 2, 2023 16:49:12 GMT -5
Wow that’s terrible damage I’d sell the rental and never want to go through this again Probably not able to sue the tenant cause probably they have no money
DD found charging higher rents brought tenants with more income and more responsible (needed to get more income)
|
|
haapai
Junior Associate
Character
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 20:40:06 GMT -5
Posts: 5,885
|
Post by haapai on Feb 2, 2023 17:23:30 GMT -5
The best advice that I can offer is to go back to your tax accountant and listen more carefully. The lost rent payments portion of the settlement should almost certainly be taxable. I have absolutely no quibble with that. Whether the remaining $68K is taxable or not may hinge on whether it has already been declared as a loss.
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Feb 2, 2023 17:27:54 GMT -5
Wow that’s terrible damage I’d sell the rental and never want to go through this again Probably not able to sue the tenant cause probably they have no money DD found charging higher rents brought tenants with more income and more responsible (needed to get more income) It’s a 26 unit. Won’t be selling. The tenant was completely vetted by the PM. He has been sent to collection, of course.
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Feb 2, 2023 17:30:45 GMT -5
The best advice that I can offer is to go back to your tax accountant and listen more carefully. The lost rent payments portion of the settlement should almost certainly be taxable. I have absolutely no quibble with that. Whether the remaining $68K is taxable or not may hinge on whether it has already been declared as a loss. I listened. She said if I deduct the damage expense I have to declare the settlement. No double dipping. But half the damage was paid by Dec. 31, 2022. Have not received a check yet from the insurer, although some is on the way now.
|
|
TheOtherMe
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 14:40:52 GMT -5
Posts: 27,171
Mini-Profile Name Color: e619e6
|
Post by TheOtherMe on Feb 2, 2023 19:49:10 GMT -5
I agree that if the expenses have been deducted, the settlement will need to be treated as income. That would be double dipping. Any expenses in excess of the settlement should be deductible.
|
|
|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Feb 2, 2023 20:03:04 GMT -5
I was under the impression that insurance payments were supposed to make you whole. If someone totaled your car, you wouldn’t have to pay taxes on the repairs or cost to replace it, so why would you have to pay taxes on the insurance payments to make it habitable again? Am I missing something?
Agree about the rental portion being taxable though.
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Feb 2, 2023 20:24:17 GMT -5
I was under the impression that insurance payments were supposed to make you whole. If someone totaled your car, you wouldn’t have to pay taxes on the repairs or cost to replace it, so why would you have to pay taxes on the insurance payments to make it habitable again? Am I missing something? Agree about the rental portion being taxable though. Yes, the lost rents are taxable. And that’s the same opinion I found on line mich. but when the car gets fixed it’s by the insurance proceeds and not out of pocket.
|
|
azucena
Junior Associate
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 13:23:14 GMT -5
Posts: 5,202
|
Post by azucena on Feb 2, 2023 20:29:06 GMT -5
If you're not sure you're getting the right advice from your tax person, is he/she part of larger firm that you could ask for supervisor to respond on this case?
|
|
|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Feb 2, 2023 20:32:15 GMT -5
I was under the impression that insurance payments were supposed to make you whole. If someone totaled your car, you wouldn’t have to pay taxes on the repairs or cost to replace it, so why would you have to pay taxes on the insurance payments to make it habitable again? Am I missing something? Agree about the rental portion being taxable though. Yes, the lost rents are taxable. And that’s the same opinion I found on line mich. but when the car gets fixed it’s by the insurance proceeds and not out of pocket. I guess that’s my point. If you abate the apartment and pay OOP, then you can deduct the abatement from your taxes. Then I guess you’d have to pay taxes on what the insurance reimburses you, right? Is it just the one apartment in the multi unit building, or are others affected?
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Feb 2, 2023 20:54:45 GMT -5
Yes, the lost rents are taxable. And that’s the same opinion I found on line mich. but when the car gets fixed it’s by the insurance proceeds and not out of pocket. I guess that’s my point. If you abate the apartment and pay OOP, then you can deduct the abatement from your taxes. Then I guess you’d have to pay taxes on what the insurance reimburses you, right? Is it just the one apartment in the multi unit building, or are others affected? That what I am trying to determine. My accountant says “taxable”. And not just the 1 unit. He also contaminated 5000sq’ of attic crawl and insulation.🤬
|
|
TheOtherMe
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 14:40:52 GMT -5
Posts: 27,171
Mini-Profile Name Color: e619e6
|
Post by TheOtherMe on Feb 2, 2023 20:59:21 GMT -5
The car would depend on whether it's use was personal or business. If personal, nothing has been deducted on the tax return. If deductible, it has and the insurance is reimbursing you.
|
|
|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Feb 2, 2023 22:40:44 GMT -5
I guess that’s my point. If you abate the apartment and pay OOP, then you can deduct the abatement from your taxes. Then I guess you’d have to pay taxes on what the insurance reimburses you, right? Is it just the one apartment in the multi unit building, or are others affected? That what I am trying to determine. My accountant says “taxable”. And not just the 1 unit. He also contaminated 5000sq’ of attic crawl and insulation.🤬 Oh, sheesh! What a mess!
|
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Feb 2, 2023 23:34:27 GMT -5
That what I am trying to determine. My accountant says “taxable”. And not just the 1 unit. He also contaminated 5000sq’ of attic crawl and insulation.🤬 Oh, sheesh! What a mess! 6 months worth and then I figured out St. Farm was going to deny the claim. The letter was prepared but my agent stepped in, talked to a manager and they put a hold on it all through Christmas and New Year. When I figured out they were in denial mode he admitted it and took that action. Then I emailed 4 links I found about not letting your insurance company get away with it. A link inside a link had a St. Farm case where THEY lost at the state Supreme Court level somewhere. Also a WaSt case where insurance paid. St. Farm corporate legal was willing to break the law, according to a lawyer friend that had done insurance work. So those links were a shot across the bow. When they decided to cover the claim, my agent said those links were a deciding factor. Can you say treble damages. Checks are on the way.😎
|
|