Peace77
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 1:42:40 GMT -5
Posts: 3,923
|
Post by Peace77 on Jul 10, 2019 8:04:03 GMT -5
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,367
|
Post by Tiny on Jul 10, 2019 10:45:38 GMT -5
That is interesting! Is it considered taxable income for the employee (ie part of their salary?). Does the employer make an actual payment to the loan - or is it on the employee to get the $$ to the loan? Does the employer get some tax benefit from it?
|
|
adela76
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 29, 2011 19:15:12 GMT -5
Posts: 125
|
Post by adela76 on Jul 10, 2019 17:29:41 GMT -5
This kind of bugs me . . . Instead of a complicated program administered by a third party to pay $100 a month toward individual student loans (which is not a lot), just pay your employees more! According to a google search, the payment is taxable income to the employee. It sounds like mainly a recruitment/retention tool for the employer. There are efforts to make the payments tax-free: www.plansponsor.com/lawmakers-introduce-bill-help-employers-offer-student-loan-repayment-benefit/
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,367
|
Post by Tiny on Jul 10, 2019 22:18:02 GMT -5
This kind of bugs me . . . Instead of a complicated program administered by a third party to pay $100 a month toward individual student loans (which is not a lot), just pay your employees more! According to a google search, the payment is taxable income to the employee. It sounds like mainly a recruitment/retention tool for the employer. There are efforts to make the payments tax-free: www.plansponsor.com/lawmakers-introduce-bill-help-employers-offer-student-loan-repayment-benefit/ This "benefit" IS paying an employee more-- from the article between 1200 to 2K per year more. If you had student loans and your employer offered you this - it wouldn't make much sense to NOT take it. I do agree that it's a recruitment/retention tool for an employer. I suspect it's a way for an employer to offer more "money" to an employee without actually raising wages. I doubt an employer would replace wages with this benefit.
|
|
1Day@aTime
New Member
Joined: Mar 15, 2011 15:44:39 GMT -5
Posts: 49
|
Post by 1Day@aTime on Jul 11, 2019 5:21:15 GMT -5
I had the last $7500 of my SL paid as long as I stayed on for at least 3 years (or I would have had to pay it back). They just paid the SL directly and it was taxable. Fine by me, it was 7500 off my back and I had no plans to leave. This was ages ago and I'm still here.
|
|
geenamercile
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 17, 2010 16:40:28 GMT -5
Posts: 2,488
|
Post by geenamercile on Jul 11, 2019 7:43:45 GMT -5
I see it more of just post paying for courses vs pre-paying like many companies already do with paying for their employees to take courses.
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,367
|
Post by Tiny on Jul 11, 2019 12:45:21 GMT -5
I see it more of just post paying for courses vs pre-paying like many companies already do with paying for their employees to take courses. Yes, it's kind of like "tuition re-imbursement" for courses you maybe took a few years ago.
|
|