djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,233 
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Aug 11, 2016 20:53:34 GMT -5
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,233
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Aug 12, 2016 2:32:04 GMT -5
|
|
happyhoix
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Oct 7, 2011 7:22:42 GMT -5
Posts: 20,931
|
Post by happyhoix on Aug 12, 2016 9:00:50 GMT -5
I've been reading an article about Johnson in the New Yorker. Interesting. I could vote for him.
|
|
Politically_Incorrect12
Senior Member
With a little faith, we can move a mountain; with a little help, we can change the world.
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 20:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 3,763
|
Post by Politically_Incorrect12 on Aug 13, 2016 14:03:55 GMT -5
It'd be interesting if he was actually able to make the debates. I wouldn't mind seeing the debate format expand to include the top 3-4 potential candidate instead of what we have now. Honestly, how likely is it that people will get a legitimate amount of information about other potential candidates (outside the main two options) if we do everything we can to limit their exposure? I realize that is the point, but it's not a good one. The reason Johnson is polling as well as he is probably happened in large part because people are so disenfranchised with the two main candidates that they are actually searching for other options. We have to stop this, there are only two options and therefore there will only be two candidates that are represented by the two major parties that have a vested interest to make sure nobody else gets any spotlight. |
|
