deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Jun 10, 2015 11:55:07 GMT -5
|
|
mroped
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 17:36:56 GMT -5
Posts: 3,453
|
Post by mroped on Jun 10, 2015 12:33:26 GMT -5
They finaly woke up! This is modern warfare. No mass invasions but guerrilla type war more or less. You have an enemy that you can't find, you sit and wait for him to make a mistake. Much more efficient, far less expensive.
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Jun 10, 2015 16:05:29 GMT -5
I can finally see why my parents thought we'd be in Vietnam forever. There is another article I may post on a new thread...it 's premise is the definitely possibility of a Mid East war..not Arab States ./ Israel but between Suni and Shia...Iran / Saudi..both sides thinking that it's a defensive war...and then all the Suni and Shia taking sides in the area.. If it happens then where does that leave ourselves and the Europeon States..if you support one side..say Iraq central government as a example then it means your old Bathest party..against the Sunni..at least as it is today..and if you support the central government , indirectly your supporting Iran today which means the Saudis..our very long term allie is upset or worse and here we are looking like we are supporting our 50 year old enemy government..{not so much the people} Iran... [and people actually run like heck to become POTUS to deal with this type of stuff...? and it's the human race that supposedly is the superior species here.. You have to be crazy...]
|
|
mroped
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 17:36:56 GMT -5
Posts: 3,453
|
Post by mroped on Jun 10, 2015 16:40:46 GMT -5
That would be a religious war and regardless what side any country out of the area would take, it will be in the wrong. So best...stay out of it!
But, but, but there is so much money to be made!
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jun 10, 2015 17:36:37 GMT -5
We learned on September 11, 2001 that we cannot afford to allow radical islamists sanctuary anywhere on the planet.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,116
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
Member is Online
|
Post by djAdvocate on Jun 10, 2015 18:09:42 GMT -5
We learned on September 11, 2001 that we cannot afford to allow radical islamists sanctuary anywhere on the planet. excepting here:
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Jun 10, 2015 18:14:36 GMT -5
We learned on September 11, 2001 that we cannot afford to allow radical islamists sanctuary anywhere on the planet. excepting here: Sorry missing it...what am I looking at..?
|
|
deziloooooo
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:22:04 GMT -5
Posts: 10,723
|
Post by deziloooooo on Jun 10, 2015 18:15:50 GMT -5
|
|
mroped
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 17:36:56 GMT -5
Posts: 3,453
|
Post by mroped on Jun 10, 2015 18:26:48 GMT -5
We learned on September 11, 2001 that we cannot afford to allow radical islamists sanctuary anywhere on the planet. After an almost 200,000 troops from which over 5000 paid full measure and God knows how many crippled or scared for life, 13 years and $10 trillion dollars(?) do we still hang onto that? Using that logic we should also go after the radical Christians or any other group that becomes radical or is radical. Do I think that we should hunt them and take them one by one on site? Hell, yes! But we have to get smart about it and their present move seems to show a bit of that. Thats how it should've been approached from the get go.
|
|
AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 21, 2010 11:59:07 GMT -5
Posts: 31,709
Favorite Drink: Sweetwater 420
|
Post by AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP on Jun 10, 2015 20:34:45 GMT -5
We learned on September 11, 2001 that we cannot afford to allow radical islamists sanctuary anywhere on the planet. After an almost 200,000 troops from which over 5000 paid full measure and God knows how many crippled or scared for life, 13 years and $10 trillion dollars(?) do we still hang onto that? Using that logic we should also go after the radical Christians or any other group that becomes radical or is radical. Do I think that we should hunt them and take them one by one on site? Hell, yes! But we have to get smart about it and their present move seems to show a bit of that. Thats how it should've been approached from the get go. Radical Christians do not pose an existential threat to the national security of the United States of America, or our citizens. Radical muslims, do. They have billions of dollars, numerous state sponsors, and would nuke us a second after getting a bomb. I'm not a fan of nation-building, but the idea that we don't need a comprehensive, no bullshit, we win - they lose strategy for dealing with the threat from radical muslims and their war-mongering state sponsors is naive.
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 63,464
|
Post by Tennesseer on Jun 10, 2015 20:42:30 GMT -5
After an almost 200,000 troops from which over 5000 paid full measure and God knows how many crippled or scared for life, 13 years and $10 trillion dollars(?) do we still hang onto that? Using that logic we should also go after the radical Christians or any other group that becomes radical or is radical. Do I think that we should hunt them and take them one by one on site? Hell, yes! But we have to get smart about it and their present move seems to show a bit of that. Thats how it should've been approached from the get go. Radical Christians do not pose an existential threat to the national security of the United States of America, or our citizens. Radical muslims, do. They have billions of dollars, numerous state sponsors, and would nuke us a second after getting a bomb. I'm not a fan of nation-building, but the idea that we don't need a comprehensive, no bullshit, we win - they lose strategy for dealing with the threat from radical muslims and their war-mongering state sponsors is naive. Really? But let's not forget Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph, Shelley Shannon, Scott Roeder and others.
|
|
mroped
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 17:36:56 GMT -5
Posts: 3,453
|
Post by mroped on Jun 10, 2015 20:57:38 GMT -5
Those don't count! They are Christian so is a different...ummm, whatever is that fits!
|
|
mroped
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 17, 2014 17:36:56 GMT -5
Posts: 3,453
|
Post by mroped on Jun 10, 2015 21:12:59 GMT -5
And since we are talking about radical groups how about those that want secession or declare "independence" or sovereignty! Ah, wait! They have the right to do that under the Constitution or something like that.
News flash: so are the other people of the world and we, The US have no right whatsoever to tell them how to live their lives. When you go hunting for bear, you don't burn the woods. You go to his den and wait quietly!
|
|