thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,327
|
Post by thyme4change on Feb 24, 2023 17:49:14 GMT -5
I'm having trouble with the rationale. They are trying to threaten opponents into silence (with uneven lawsuit rules) by essentially admitting that they are worthy of defamation by their own views/words - but because those views/words are part of their "religious" beliefs they shouldn't be held up to public scrutiny? And should instead get to take their revenge on others who don't share their views or "religious" beliefs? How broad/narrow is this proposed law? Because I can think of lots of ways this could backfire on them if it is equally applicable to people of other beliefs. Big can of worms they want to open, here. This tactic of opening lawsuits up to everyone (similar to the abortion reporting ones in some states) feels like they are setting up and encouraging a DDOS type of attack, via endless lawsuits by groups of followers, for perceived enemies. they are trying to legally restore white male privilege. this is a trial balloon. Sad, but true 😩
|
|