Deleted
Joined: Apr 19, 2024 3:30:37 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2022 15:42:56 GMT -5
I guess women should just not have sex then. Sex is not for women’s pleasure anyway, it’s just for men’s pleasure. Women just need to only have sex for the purposes of procreating with her husband, and it is her duty to make herself available to him at all times, and make sure the act is pleasurable for him. If she doesn’t want to have sex at any given moment, for whatever reason, too bad. If she doesn’t want to have babies and raise children at that point in her life or ever, for what ever reason, too bad. And if a man violates her and gets her pregnant, that’s too bad too, because some kind of way, it was her fault she was violated anyway. Of course, I don’t believe any of the shitty things I just wrote. I felt like a terrible person, just typing that bullshit. But it’s looking like there are an unfortunate number of people whose dicks get hard at the thought of that becoming our reality. Again.I would bet that an overwhelming majority of those men could not get an intelligent, independent woman in the first place, and would have no idea of what to do to keep her if they did.  I think a lot of them already have a woman or a wife or women or a wife and other women. Some of those women are probably reasonably intelligent. But I think that is kind of a whole ‘nother subject about how women are raised, and how a lot of women feel about themselves and their worth. Sadly, a lot of women, even in 2022, feel like they are nothing, inadequate or incomplete without a man, even a boorish/whorish/misogynistic/abusive/Mommy issues having man is better than no man. I guess I’m saying that “independent” is more important than “intelligent” in your sentence. Just my opinion though. |
|
tallguy
Senior Associate
Joined: Apr 2, 2011 19:21:59 GMT -5
Posts: 14,134
|
Post by tallguy on May 25, 2022 15:48:56 GMT -5
I would bet that an overwhelming majority of those men could not get an intelligent, independent woman in the first place, and would have no idea of what to do to keep her if they did. I think a lot of them already have a woman or a wife or women or a wife and other women. Some of those women are probably reasonably intelligent. But I think that is kind of a whole ‘nother subject about how women are raised, and how a lot of women feel about themselves and their worth. Sadly, a lot of women, even in 2022, feel like they are nothing, inadequate or incomplete without a man, even a boorish/whorish/misogynistic/abusive/Mommy issues having man is better than no man. I guess I’m saying that “independent” is more important than “intelligent” in your sentence. Just my opinion though. I did include both.  |
|
seriousthistime
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 20:27:07 GMT -5
Posts: 4,695
|
Post by seriousthistime on May 25, 2022 15:54:31 GMT -5
The dating apps added an option to say whether you are vaccinated or not. I'm hoping one has the balls to add the option to day if you're pro choice or anti abortion. Make my dating life easier. It used to be that a difference in political views was a difference of opinion. Your disagreement might be more or less pronounced but it was just a difference, like I don't eat fish or seafood but my potential soulmate might eat one or both. Do the dating apps ask your political views in general, and how strongly they are held? I don't see how I could find a potential soulmate who followed Q, for example. |
|
hurley1980
Well-Known Member
I am all that is wrong with the world....don't get too close, I'm contagious.
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 17:35:06 GMT -5
Posts: 1,942
|
Post by hurley1980 on May 25, 2022 18:22:20 GMT -5
The dating apps added an option to say whether you are vaccinated or not. I'm hoping one has the balls to add the option to day if you're pro choice or anti abortion. Make my dating life easier. It used to be that a difference in political views was a difference of opinion. Your disagreement might be more or less pronounced but it was just a difference, like I don't eat fish or seafood but my potential soulmate might eat one or both. Do the dating apps ask your political views in general, and how strongly they are held? I don't see how I could find a potential soulmate who followed Q, for example. When I was on dating apps years ago (pre-covid), I had specifically said in my bio that I would reject all Trumpers. I got a lot of hate messages from incel guys, but it did keep them from trying to meet up. I'm no longer looking to date even though I am only 42, because I just prefer to be single at this point, but if I was, I would also put on my bio, that I would reject all "pro-lifers." Many of my single friends do the same. |
|
justme
Senior Associate
Joined: Feb 10, 2012 13:12:47 GMT -5
Posts: 14,618
|
Post by justme on May 25, 2022 18:43:51 GMT -5
The dating apps added an option to say whether you are vaccinated or not. I'm hoping one has the balls to add the option to day if you're pro choice or anti abortion. Make my dating life easier. It used to be that a difference in political views was a difference of opinion. Your disagreement might be more or less pronounced but it was just a difference, like I don't eat fish or seafood but my potential soulmate might eat one or both. Do the dating apps ask your political views in general, and how strongly they are held? I don't see how I could find a potential soulmate who followed Q, for example. They do but just general - conservative, moderate, liberal. Maybe one other? |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,035 
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on May 25, 2022 19:16:40 GMT -5
It used to be that a difference in political views was a difference of opinion. Your disagreement might be more or less pronounced but it was just a difference, like I don't eat fish or seafood but my potential soulmate might eat one or both. Do the dating apps ask your political views in general, and how strongly they are held? I don't see how I could find a potential soulmate who followed Q, for example. When I was on dating apps years ago (pre-covid), I had specifically said in my bio that I would reject all Trumpers. I got a lot of hate messages from incel guys, but it did keep them from trying to meet up. I'm no longer looking to date even though I am only 42, because I just prefer to be single at this point, but if I was, I would also put on my bio, that I would reject all "pro-lifers." Many of my single friends do the same. |
|
countrygirl2
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 7, 2016 15:45:05 GMT -5
Posts: 16,830
|
Post by countrygirl2 on May 25, 2022 22:37:13 GMT -5
I'm betting all the rich congressmen still have only 1 or 2 kids. Somehow, yeah right, their wives won't have a house full of kids. Pity the poor woman that had a drunk husband or whatever and is going to force her whenever. Or is just mean and attacks his wife, she will have no way to do anything to stop it. More unwanted kids, horrible situation.
This is medieval and horrible, the repubs are going to grind women down just like the middle eastern countries have done to women there. It totally sickens me.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,371
|
Post by thyme4change on May 26, 2022 8:56:44 GMT -5
a) What are they sneaking inside that horse?b) Enter Trojan condem joke here. 😃 Christian Nationalism, authoritarianism, regression to a time when white men controlled everything including women's bodies. i am sure i am missing something. I think of a trojan horse as a clever disguise that hides a big secret. I don’t think the goals of Christian Nationalism and white male supremacy are hidden at all. |
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,431
|
Post by billisonboard on May 26, 2022 9:02:38 GMT -5
Christian Nationalism, authoritarianism, regression to a time when white men controlled everything including women's bodies. i am sure i am missing something. I think of a trojan horse as a clever disguise that hides a big secret. I don’t think the goals of Christian Nationalism and white male supremacy are hidden at all.  "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts" is something I learned way back in regards to the Trojan Horse story. I see no "gift". |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,035
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on May 26, 2022 12:56:06 GMT -5
I think of a trojan horse as a clever disguise that hides a big secret. I don’t think the goals of Christian Nationalism and white male supremacy are hidden at all. "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts" is something I learned way back in regards to the Trojan Horse story. I see no "gift". i think of the Trojan Horse story as having a broader meaning. to me it means that something which appears to be something relatively benign is hiding something that is utterly destructive. i get why you don't like the analogy. we all do, bills. you have repeated it half a dozen times. |
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,431
|
Post by billisonboard on May 26, 2022 13:12:51 GMT -5
"Beware of Greeks bearing gifts" is something I learned way back in regards to the Trojan Horse story. I see no "gift". i think of the Trojan Horse story as having a broader meaning. to me it means that something which appears to be something relatively benign is hiding something that is utterly destructive. i get why you don't like the analogy. we all do, bills. you have repeated it half a dozen times. And I understand why the meaning that you assign to this age old story would make you like it in this situation. |
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,035
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on May 26, 2022 13:26:28 GMT -5
i think of the Trojan Horse story as having a broader meaning. to me it means that something which appears to be something relatively benign is hiding something that is utterly destructive. i get why you don't like the analogy. we all do, bills. you have repeated it half a dozen times. And I understand why the meaning that you assign to this age old story would make you like it in this situation. stop making this personal. as i said before, i didn't come up with this. i don't "like" it. i just agree with it. Ilyse Hogue came up with the analogy. and she has been thinking about it for decades i would suggest that you wallpaper HER rather than ME, bills. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/-a-trojan-horse-abortion-issue-seen-as-a-means-religious-right-to-assert-more-power-139323461787Ilyse Hogue, former president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, and the author of "The Lie That Binds," talks about how abortion became a convenient political vehicle for the religious right, and what else religious conservatives are likely to pursue with the power obtained through their anti-abortion advocacy. i think she makes a very good point, and makes it well. the abortion issue is the political vehicle carrying the religious right into politics. i get that you don't like the analogy, and i get WHY you don't like it, ok? i heard you, bills. |
|
