imawino
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 17, 2010 22:58:16 GMT -5
Posts: 5,359
|
Post by imawino on Mar 4, 2021 21:47:08 GMT -5
Just like people should argued about the health effects of smoking. No amount of data was adequate for them either. And you are about as tight as they are. I’m done, I should have known better than to engage with you againI see you are showing your 'bedside manners' again. Anyone with an opinion different from yours you immediately go into attack mode. But what do I know, I'm just a stupid factory worker. BTW, what does smoking have to do with the main topic of flood insurance? He's "a" doctor, not "your" doctor. You don't know squat about his bedside manner. |
|
dondub
Senior Associate
The meek shall indeed inherit the earth but only after the Visigoths are done with it.
Joined: Jan 16, 2014 19:31:06 GMT -5
Posts: 12,110 
Location: Seattle
Favorite Drink: Laphroig
|
Post by dondub on Mar 4, 2021 23:18:25 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 18, 2024 17:19:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2021 8:18:14 GMT -5
I wish that had data past 1950, because we have had a steep increase since then. Lemme show you a graph that doesn't have the last 70 years on it to prove the last 70 years are just like all the rest. All you need to do is compare the temps on all graphs. Might be too difficult ? Or is it easier to take the nonsense route of projecting what I 'might' be doing, lol. Those short weather charts read out in tenths of a degree, look at that spike, lol. Compare to sudden rises going much farther back, than a cherry picked time frame that begins with the last ice age. Either/or my point was the climate always changes, and I laugh everytime the ridiculousness of that term comes up. We have climate change, mix in a little nonsense of all inclement weather is caused by it and voila, we gotta do something that involves bigger government and regulation. We're saving the planet don't cha know. Post hoc ergo propter hoc |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 18, 2024 17:19:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2021 8:24:35 GMT -5
Just like people should argued about the health effects of smoking. No amount of data was adequate for them either. And you are about as tight as they are. I’m done, I should have known better than to engage with you againI see you are showing your 'bedside manners' again. Anyone with an opinion different from yours you immediately go into attack mode. But what do I know, I'm just a stupid factory worker. BTW, what does smoking have to do with the main topic of flood insurance? He's "a" doctor, not "your" doctor. You don't know squat about his bedside manner. She seems to be correlating to his online bullying. Like most bullies, that are weak minded rookies online. But a bully none the less. |
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,371
|
Post by thyme4change on Mar 5, 2021 13:48:25 GMT -5
Your graphs and my graphs don't seem to be using the same y-axis? I am not sure how to translate temp changed compared to present to temp anomoly?
I am no Rhodes Scholar, and so many experts agree this is a problem. I won't be so bold to assume that because I looked at one or two graphs I know better than they do. Sorry, your slam dunk of combining two charts to prove the entire scientific community wrong doesn't sway me much.
|
|
imawino
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 17, 2010 22:58:16 GMT -5
Posts: 5,359
|
Post by imawino on Mar 5, 2021 14:00:33 GMT -5
He's "a" doctor, not "your" doctor. You don't know squat about his bedside manner. She seems to be correlating to his online bullying. Like most bullies, that are weak minded rookies online. But a bully none the less. As usual, literally zero to do with what I said. I correlate that you are nonsensical in real life, since your replies to me are always just that. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 18, 2024 17:19:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2021 17:20:07 GMT -5
She seems to be correlating to his online bullying. Like most bullies, that are weak minded rookies online. But a bully none the less. As usual, literally zero to do with what I said. I correlate that you are nonsensical in real life, since your replies to me are always just that. As your post disregarding the explanation of what she was correlating was in the first line of my post you quoted Your replies can't follow the simplest context, your life in context, is probably the same. |
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 18, 2024 17:19:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 5, 2021 17:24:32 GMT -5
Your graphs and my graphs don't seem to be using the same y-axis? I am not sure how to translate temp changed compared to present to temp anomoly? I am no Rhodes Scholar, and so many experts agree this is a problem. I won't be so bold to assume that because I looked at one or two graphs I know better than they do. Sorry, your slam dunk of combining two charts to prove the entire scientific community wrong doesn't sway me much. That's why I didn't post charts in the first place. Now I don't know why you did it first.  Seemingly there's a slew of experts for every point of view in the universe, I don't use that argument. |
|
