|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Dec 26, 2020 20:23:11 GMT -5
The bill he doesn’t want to sign gives $600 per person for Covid, he wants $2000 per person snd to eliminate much of the handouts to other countries, 2 new museums etc Unfortunately he should have insisted on these when Mnuchin was negotiating with Pelosi It’s all part of the same thing.
|
|
NastyWoman
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 20:50:37 GMT -5
Posts: 15,002
|
Post by NastyWoman on Dec 27, 2020 2:40:46 GMT -5
The bill he doesn’t want to sign gives $600 per person for Covid, he wants $2000 per person snd to eliminate much of the handouts to other countries, 2 new museums etc Unfortunately he should have insisted on these when Mnuchin was negotiating with Pelosi That wouldn't have taken much as the bill the Dems put forward contained the $2'000 the Loser claims to want. He should have talked to the Repubs to get that. Rule π1 when negotiating: make sure you are talking to the relevant party
|
|
|
Post by minnesotapaintlady on Dec 27, 2020 12:54:23 GMT -5
The bill he doesn’t want to sign gives $600 per person for Covid, he wants $2000 per person snd to eliminate much of the handouts to other countries, 2 new museums etc Unfortunately he should have insisted on these when Mnuchin was negotiating with Pelosi That wouldn't have taken much as the bill the Dems put forward contained the $2'000 the Loser claims to want. He should have talkod to the Repubs to get that. Rule π1 when negotiating: make sure you are talking to the relevant party But he wouldn't get any credit going that route, this way he gets to be the hero! Trump standing up to that nasty congress to get the people more money. He's also not stating which particular bloat provisions should be cut either. Let congress be the bad guys there. The whole thing is ridiculous. This shouldn't take this long. Dems and president want 2K each? Fine. Then go in and cut something that is costing about the same. I can't believe we have enough congressmen that committed to crap like tax cuts for racehorse owners that it can't be voted out.
|
|
jerseygirl
Junior Associate
Joined: May 13, 2018 7:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 5,368
|
Post by jerseygirl on Dec 27, 2020 14:01:26 GMT -5
Congress is made of incompetent do nothing fools I’m always surprised that they can get around to collecting campaign funds Guess we’re also fools for voting for them
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 7,998
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Dec 27, 2020 15:04:41 GMT -5
You get the representation you deserve
|
|
|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Dec 27, 2020 15:15:54 GMT -5
Congress is made of incompetent do nothing fools I’m always surprised that they can get around to collecting campaign funds Guess we’re also fools for voting for them How many bills passed by the House are still on McConnell’s desk now? Last I heard, it was over 200. This would suggest someone is doing something.
|
|
TheOtherMe
Distinguished Associate
Joined: Dec 24, 2010 14:40:52 GMT -5
Posts: 28,334
Mini-Profile Name Color: e619e6
|
Post by TheOtherMe on Dec 27, 2020 17:02:30 GMT -5
Congress is made of incompetent do nothing fools I’m always surprised that they can get around to collecting campaign funds Guess we’re also fools for voting for them How many bills passed by the House are still on McConnell’s desk now? Last I heard, it was over 200. This would suggest someone is doing something. Also suggests McConnell has been too busy voting on judges to do his job.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,858
|
Post by thyme4change on Dec 27, 2020 21:19:16 GMT -5
The bill he doesn’t want to sign gives $600 per person for Covid, he wants $2000 per person snd to eliminate much of the handouts to other countries, 2 new museums etc Unfortunately he should have insisted on these when Mnuchin was negotiating with Pelosi Those are two separate bills, traveling together, and the foreign aid amounts are routine AND exactly what Trump requested. That said - he signed them both because he knew he was looking like an infected foreskin.
|
|
Ryan
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 16, 2014 13:40:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,233
|
Post by Ryan on Dec 28, 2020 12:17:55 GMT -5
I don't see a lot of people retiring early. Seems like people are actually working longer because of COVID. If you had tech skills to do the job in the office, then you can do it from home as well so we don't really have employees that are feeling overwhelmed from a tech standpoint. If anything, I think COVID is delaying retirement for people since 1) If you're near retirement, you're probably somewhat cautious so you're not going to retire and start traveling. 2) You're working from home, so it's much easier.
|
|
Lizard Queen
Senior Associate
103/2024
Joined: Jan 17, 2011 22:19:13 GMT -5
Posts: 14,659
|
Post by Lizard Queen on Dec 29, 2020 19:09:37 GMT -5
In a department meeting this morning, a person in another department was mentioned in regards to retirement. He's now eligible, per his pension. He refuses to disclose, which is his right. He's in my group thats sits together at lunch (pre-pandemic), and he mentioned as such. Since he's a line worker, he's in one of the most important, highest paid areas in our utility. So, for us bean counters, the story was a budget for a new apprentice for whenever he decides to quit. I'm guessing with the pandemic, there's not much to do besides work, so why not build up the pension a little more? After all those years, he gets beaucoup PTO anyway.
|
|
Tiny
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 29, 2010 21:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 13,508
|
Post by Tiny on Dec 30, 2020 13:11:02 GMT -5
The bill he doesn’t want to sign gives $600 per person for Covid, he wants $2000 per person snd to eliminate much of the handouts to other countries, 2 new museums etc Unfortunately he should have insisted on these when Mnuchin was negotiating with Pelosi Those are two separate bills, traveling together, and the foreign aid amounts are routine AND exactly what Trump requested. That said - he signed them both because he knew he was looking like an infected foreskin. I think there was more jockeying for position... When the Democrats OK'd the 2000 per person (something I'm guessing the Republicans DON"T want) the Republicans threw in some conditions like looking into Voter Fraud and something else that trump wanted. What better way to add to the legitimacy of the widespread Voter Fraud than to have another official something looking in to it?? Now it's back on the Democrats - if they reject the bill - THEY are rejecting the 2000 that trump dearly wanted to give the poor suffering Americans. I also saw that the incumbent Georgia senators jumped on the "Yes! Yes! Give people 2000!!! We must help struggling Americans" - I'm wondering how much of this is to prolong the process in order to help the incumbent Georgia senators win their election. I probably won't get any of this money (I didn't get any of the first one)... but even so, I find using Americans (and businesses) that need this money as a Pawn to further one's political positioning to be rather ugly. I would hope Republican voters see how they are being played/used.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,858
|
Post by thyme4change on Dec 30, 2020 13:26:49 GMT -5
|
|
teen persuasion
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by teen persuasion on Dec 31, 2020 13:09:08 GMT -5
DH just last night mentioned someone at his agency was leaving unexpectedly (didn't use the word retirement). It wasn't a teacher, maybe in administration. DH has been ready mentally to retire for a while, and the itch got stronger this spring/summer teaching remotely. I've been crunching the numbers, and tentatively thinking next year (finish out the school year). Not sure if I want to quit, too, or keep going a bit longer; generally I like my part-time job, but having no vacation time is a deterrent to traveling to see our grandson, but Covid is a deterrent, too, right now. This spring/summer, when things were shut down and we were both working half-assed from home, was a great trial run for retirement. It's not the job we dislike, it's the forced schedule we hate. Get up in the dark, go somewhere when we don't want to, working late messes up dinner, etc. My coworker's DH is a teacher, too, and he's hanging on to eek out a bit more pension before retiring (started teaching later), so she's kind-of in the same position, crunching numbers and ready to bolt soon, too. Which means the director/board will need to hire new staff eventually to replace us. It's tricky - add staff now to train them before we take our knowledge away with us, but that strains a tight budget and someone/everyone loses hours/pay. We'd both love to ditch our evening hours, but a new hire couldn't realistically work alone at night until they get more experience. Complicating all this is college plans - next year should be the first year included on DS5's FAFSAs. We'd want to target AGI < $27k. It's easy if we are both not working (Roth conversion ladder). It's trickier but probably ok if DH works a half year and most of my income goes to my SIMPLE IRA. If only I am working, I reduce/stop retirement savings, and we mostly spend my income, bit of Roth conversions. If DH doesn't quit and we continue working (ACA goes away, need health insurance), it's a much finer needle to thread - we have to max everything tax deferred from 1/1/21 to stay under the cliff. So we can't just wing it - need to decide on max retirement, or maintain status quo. And open enrollment is fast approaching. DH has pretty much decided to finish out the school year, and quit (so end of June). The new Stimulus bill included FAFSA changes/simplification that would take effect 23/24 school year, DS5's first year of college. I've been parsing the sections regarding FAFSA changes. Going from 108 questions to 36 (but I see only 20/XX listed in the text). Dropping the state tax proxy altogether (that helped us). Increased Income Protection amounts but dropped the division of EFC between multiple students (shouldn't affect us with one student, but hurts others). Biggest change seems to revolve around auto EFC = zero and SNT (actually, both get new names: Student Aid Index and ?? something I don't remember ATM). Auto SAI = 0 if you qualify for max PELL, based on AGI < 175% federal poverty level for married parents (225% for single parents). SNT AGI threshold raised to $60k, other changes in secondary eligibility criteria (left out free/reduced lunch, added others). So now I'm completely rethinking our target AGI, might want to do more Roth conversions while we still have a bunch of nonrefundable credits (dependent reliant) to cover the federal tax cost (normally they go to waste). But we'd lose a lot of EITC and state EITC, and owe more state tax on the conversions, in effect a shadow marginal tax rate of 21% + 6.3% + 5ish % = 33ish % rate. Or we stay slow on conversions and hope to get enough done over 15 or so years. But rates and brackets revert in a few years. Flip-flop-flip-flop...
|
|