billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,433
|
Post by billisonboard on Aug 21, 2020 12:46:04 GMT -5
It is simply a video of a human being displaying leadership. I guess i did "cherry pick" that YouTube clip as opposed to posting one showing a vacation encounter with a moose or something like that. I just thought it was a great example of leadership.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,040
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Aug 21, 2020 13:32:40 GMT -5
sorry, but everyone defending Trump ONLY points that ONE PART of what he said out. that is dishonest, and I got tired of it.
I see it here all the time. You are mistaken if you think I'm defending Trump. then you should do better than those that are.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 20, 2024 2:08:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2020 11:39:09 GMT -5
Are you saying that every nut bag conspiracy needs to be investigated by the president, when presented by the media in the form of a question ? (full circle) No. I am not saying investigated. There are many that a quick "That is just absurd. Next?" is all that would be necessary if he were asked. But when a claim is made in an opinion piece published by a major news magazine concerning the question of eligibility of a recently announced major party Vice-presidential candidate and he does not know if it is a valid claim, yes he should invest the time to be able to give a clear, definite answer to where he stands on the claim. Agree (bolded) But sometimes he rambles on for no good reason. He needs a teleprompter panel to quickly type in good answers for him. Wouldn't be the first president to do that.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,433
|
Post by billisonboard on Aug 24, 2020 11:58:15 GMT -5
No. I am not saying investigated. There are many that a quick "That is just absurd. Next?" is all that would be necessary if he were asked. But when a claim is made in an opinion piece published by a major news magazine concerning the question of eligibility of a recently announced major party Vice-presidential candidate and he does not know if it is a valid claim, yes he should invest the time to be able to give a clear, definite answer to where he stands on the claim. Agree (bolded) But sometimes he rambles on for no good reason. He needs a teleprompter panel to quickly type in good answers for him. Wouldn't be the first president to do that. Agree (bolded) However, within those ramblings he indicates ignorance of things that the President of the United States should not be ignorant of, an ignorance he should lose by learning.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 20, 2024 2:08:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2020 12:01:36 GMT -5
Agree (bolded) But sometimes he rambles on for no good reason. He needs a teleprompter panel to quickly type in good answers for him. Wouldn't be the first president to do that. Agree (bolded) However, within those ramblings he indicates ignorance of things that the President of the United States should not be ignorant of, an ignorance he should lose by learning.
A person is usually ignorant, when presented with a question of something he knows nothing about.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,433
|
Post by billisonboard on Aug 24, 2020 12:34:56 GMT -5
Agree (bolded) However, within those ramblings he indicates ignorance of things that the President of the United States should not be ignorant of, an ignorance he should lose by learning.
A person is usually ignorant, when presented with a question of something he knows nothing about. And it is certainly absurd to think that any human being should know everything. The issue here is should the President of the United States remain in a state of ignorance when it comes to whether Kamala Harris's unquestioned birth circumstance qualifies her to assume the office of President and/or not make a definitive statement one way or the other if he has learned more after showing that ignorance.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 20, 2024 2:08:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2020 10:36:56 GMT -5
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,433
|
Post by billisonboard on Aug 25, 2020 10:44:33 GMT -5
I understand you want to make that the issue. It isn't. It starts with the possible willful ignorance of the current President of the United States. Or his use of this situation to create uncertainty. The question becomes, "Is this the leadership the nation should accept from the person holding that high office?"
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 20, 2024 2:08:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2020 10:44:54 GMT -5
A person is usually ignorant, when presented with a question of something he knows nothing about. And it is certainly absurd to think that any human being should know everything. The issue here is should the President of the United States remain in a state of ignorance when it comes to whether Kamala Harris's unquestioned birth circumstance qualifies her to assume the office of President and/or not make a definitive statement one way or the other if he has learned more after showing that ignorance.We've already gone the full circle on this one. (bolded) With this question you never answered from Reply #63. Are you saying that every nut bag conspiracy needs to be investigated by the president, when presented by the media in the form of a question ?
|
|
Deleted
Joined: Apr 20, 2024 2:08:41 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2020 10:45:57 GMT -5
I understand you want to make that the issue... If I wanted to make an issue of it, I would of posted it. In this case you did.
|
|
billisonboard
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 22:45:44 GMT -5
Posts: 37,433
|
Post by billisonboard on Aug 25, 2020 10:48:19 GMT -5
Are you saying that every nut bag conspiracy needs to be investigated by the president, when presented by the media in the form of a question ? (full circle) No. I am not saying investigated. There are many that a quick "That is just absurd. Next?" is all that would be necessary if he were asked. But when a claim is made in an opinion piece published by a major news magazine concerning the question of eligibility of a recently announced major party Vice-presidential candidate and he does not know if it is a valid claim, yes he should invest the time to be able to give a clear, definite answer to where he stands on the claim.
|
|