Cheesy FL-Vol
Junior Associate
"Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing." -- Helen Keller
Joined: Dec 17, 2010 16:13:50 GMT -5
Posts: 6,691
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":""}
|
Post by Cheesy FL-Vol on Apr 5, 2020 8:12:37 GMT -5
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 7,366
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Apr 5, 2020 8:51:51 GMT -5
Problem is making adequate amounts of it. A limited number of patients will benefit. If 100,000 people need to be hospitalized, it’s difficult to imagine having nearly enough to treat everyone
|
|
oped
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,676
|
Post by oped on Apr 5, 2020 8:54:05 GMT -5
Is it possible that we can give it to first line doctors and nurses? I would be all for that if it turns out to be effective and limited in supply.
|
|
Gardening Grandma
Senior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 13:39:46 GMT -5
Posts: 17,962
|
Post by Gardening Grandma on Apr 5, 2020 9:22:06 GMT -5
Is it possible that we can give it to first line doctors and nurses? I would be all for that if it turns out to be effective and limited in supply. That would be the most sensible thing to do if it does turn out to be effective
|
|
lynnerself
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 3, 2011 11:42:29 GMT -5
Posts: 4,166
|
Post by lynnerself on Apr 5, 2020 9:56:20 GMT -5
Right now it's hard to be a donor. You need to be symptom free for 14 days and have a negative test. But the Red Cross in accepting applications from interested people.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 7,366
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Apr 5, 2020 10:06:24 GMT -5
Is it possible that we can give it to first line doctors and nurses? I would be all for that if it turns out to be effective and limited in supply. That would be the most sensible thing to do if it does turn out to be effective It’s used to work rest those infected already. Not meant to prevent infection
|
|
Cheesy FL-Vol
Junior Associate
"Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing." -- Helen Keller
Joined: Dec 17, 2010 16:13:50 GMT -5
Posts: 6,691
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":""}
|
Post by Cheesy FL-Vol on Apr 5, 2020 10:23:10 GMT -5
That would be the most sensible thing to do if it does turn out to be effective It’s used to work rest those infected already. Not meant to prevent infection That is how I interpreted the article. It would be used to help those who are seriously ill to recover. I realize the research is in early stages and other countries are researching the same thing. It was suggested in the article that plasma from one person with the antibodies could treat two or three people.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 7,366
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Apr 5, 2020 10:33:03 GMT -5
It’s used to work rest those infected already. Not meant to prevent infection That is how I interpreted the article. It would be used to help those who are seriously ill to recover. I realize the research is in early stages and other countries are researching the same thing. It was suggested in the article that plasma from one person with the antibodies could treat two or three people. Sounds about right, problem is this is very labor intensive, and requires varying amounts of time for those who have recovered to donate plasma. Can take a fair amount of time to collect enough antibodies. If this works however, it would suggest that those antibodies would lead to immunity from the virus for those already infected. Answers one burning question
|
|
oped
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 20, 2018 20:49:12 GMT -5
Posts: 4,676
|
Post by oped on Apr 5, 2020 10:40:46 GMT -5
That would be the most sensible thing to do if it does turn out to be effective It’s used to work rest those infected already. Not meant to prevent infection Yes... but that doesn't negate the fact that if it works and is a limited resource I vote for it to be given to doctors and nurses who are ill first and foremost... I actually read 'newly infected' not necessarily 'most sick'... in the article.
|
|
pulmonarymd
Junior Associate
Joined: Feb 12, 2020 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 7,366
Member is Online
|
Post by pulmonarymd on Apr 5, 2020 10:47:24 GMT -5
It’s used to work rest those infected already. Not meant to prevent infection Yes... but that doesn't negate the fact that if it works and is a limited resource I vote for it to be given to doctors and nurses who are ill first and foremost... I actually read 'newly infected' not necessarily 'most sick'... in the article. Yes it is not clear when it would be most effective, but it would make most sense to use it early in the illness. Later on, it would hopefully prevent the more serious complications. If used later when people are already severely ill, it may not have as great a benefit. This is why all the fanfare given to these therapies needs to be tamped done. lots of unknowns that need to be sorted through to see what works, how effective they are, and when and to which patient they should be given. Not a quick process.
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 75,069
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on Apr 5, 2020 13:07:40 GMT -5
Problem is making adequate amounts of it. A limited number of patients will benefit. If 100,000 people need to be hospitalized, it’s difficult to imagine having nearly enough to treat everyone this/\
we could have used Chinese plasma if we got on this in Jan. now?
we have 300k+ diagnosed with the disease and only 10k recovered patients. it's way too late.
|
|