SPYGATE; SMOKING GUN

[ken a.k.a OMK]

We will be heard at the ballot box and the GOP is worried because "anyone but Hillary" won't work this time.

[happyhoix]

Apr 16, 2018 10:56:15 GMT -5 ken a.k.a OMK said:

We will be heard at the ballot box and the GOP is worried because "anyone but Hillary" won't work this time.

That's why I don't understand this fixation on Hillary's emails.

Hillary lost. Hillary has said she'll never run for anything again.

If the GOP was smart, they would stop obsession over her emails and start looking at the races that are going to be a real challenge for them this year - and not a one of them has Hillary running in it.

[Tennesseer]

The Pulitzer Prize winners for 2018 were announced today.  Sadly, the Conservative Treehouse did not win for Investigative Reporting.  In fact, they didn't win anything nor were they nominated for anything.

[swamp]

Apr 16, 2018 15:14:39 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

The Pulitzer Prize winners for 2018 were announced today.  Sadly, the Conservative Treehouse did not win for Investigative Reporting.  In fact, they didn't win anything nor were they nominated for anything.

because it's the liberals who are part of the lame stream media protectors of the deep state and in hilary's pockets who do the nominating.  or something like that. 

[ken a.k.a OMK]

But wouldn't the rich Republicans who think they can buy anything and anyone buy the award? 

[tallguy]

Apr 16, 2018 15:14:39 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

The Pulitzer Prize winners for 2018 were announced today.  Sadly, the Conservative Treehouse did not win for Investigative Reporting.  In fact, they didn't win anything nor were they nominated for anything.

We could take that way too far if we wanted to.   

Instead of the Pulitzer, could it be the Pupu Prize, because they sure put out a platter of something?
Or the Pooh Pooh Prize, because they are so easy to dismiss?
Or the Poo Poo Prize, because, well, never mind.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Apr 16, 2018 6:52:07 GMT -5 happyhoix said:

Apr 14, 2018 19:36:17 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Serious couple of questions for you:

1. Why do you think Hillary Clinton destroyed more than 33,000 emails which were under subpoena? We know that she hired the firm to use "BleachBit" to wipe her server:



and she had staff destroy devices with hammers- watch as CNN fact checks this  on the fly-- priceless:



Do you have any thoughts on this interview of James Comey:

So she lost some emails - not uncommon for servers to do that.  Our servers at work are set to delete emails that are 3 months old, doesn't mean we're doing anything illegal or nefarious. 

Sorry, but this is incorrect. She deleted them knowing she was required to preserve them both by State Dept rules and other laws as well as the fact they were under subpoena, she then hired a firm to use BleachBit to scrub her servers, and she had staff smash devices with hammers to prevent recovery of data from devices which might have contained the emails and other information. 

However missing emails pale in comparison to collusion with the Russian government in order to throw an American election. We already know Trump Jr had a meeting with some Russians in order to obtain 'dirt' on Clinton, which, as Bannon said, is treasonous behavior, and now there is a rumor floating around that Mueller has proof that Cohen met with Russians in Prague, something he has adamantly denied, but if true, means he and Trump are well and truly fucked.

I have sources for the above information- do you have any sources? Because so far, the testimony from everyone involved is that there's no evidence of collusion (nevermind that collusion is not a crime): 

Go ahead and fixate on Clinton, her private server and her missing emails, if that's how you want to spend your time. Like the band playing on the deck of the sinking Titanic, however,  there are much more important things going on right now, things that will certainly end up taking some people down, but probably not the ones you hope.

Your answer that emails were or are "missing" is incorrect, and you have no answers to the other questions. You are exactly where all Trump opponents are right now- wandering around in the moral and intellectual wilderness. 

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Apr 14, 2018 9:26:26 GMT -5 tallguy said:

It serves no purpose to quote facts to those whose beliefs are built on denying them.


The rest of us appreciate it though.   

You have no facts. I have just illustrated that.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

And it's only ONE (1) question-- and no one can provide an answer to this single question.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Oh, and to clarify the question: it is not "did she delete emails, scrub servers, and destroy devices with hammers"-- that is establish fact. I'm not asking you to read her mind-- the question isn't "why did she?". The question is:

Why do YOU THINK Hillary Clinton destroyed more than 33,000 emails which were under subpoena?

[happyhoix]

Apr 17, 2018 7:49:55 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

And it's only ONE (1) question-- and no one can provide an answer to this single question.

Is it 'what is the meaning of life, the universe and everything?'

Because it's 42.

I can document that.

[thyme4change]

Apr 17, 2018 7:52:25 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Oh, and to clarify the question: it is not "did she delete emails, scrub servers, and destroy devices with hammers"-- that is establish fact. I'm not asking you to read her mind-- the question isn't "why did she?". The question is:

Why do YOU THINK Hillary Clinton destroyed more than 33,000 emails which were under subpoena?

Maybe they were like the 33,000 emails I destroyed which were just my boss replying all to every single email with "Thanks" and then thinking of something more clever to say, so he reply all again with another one sentence thought, and then he thinks of a question, so he does reply all again with the question, and then two people feel obligated to answer the question and copy everyone, and then he responds to both of those by reply all "Thanks" and then he thinks of something else and he sends that too and then thinks of something else to say, usually a totally useless thought.

[djAdvocate]

Apr 17, 2018 10:39:13 GMT -5 thyme4change said:

Apr 17, 2018 7:52:25 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Oh, and to clarify the question: it is not "did she delete emails, scrub servers, and destroy devices with hammers"-- that is establish fact. I'm not asking you to read her mind-- the question isn't "why did she?". The question is:

Why do YOU THINK Hillary Clinton destroyed more than 33,000 emails which were under subpoena?

Maybe they were like the 33,000 emails I destroyed which were just my boss replying all to every single email with "Thanks" and then thinking of something more clever to say, so he reply all again with another one sentence thought, and then he thinks of a question, so he does reply all again with the question, and then two people feel obligated to answer the question and copy everyone, and then he responds to both of those by reply all "Thanks" and then he thinks of something else and he sends that too and then thinks of something else to say, usually a totally useless thought.

i also destroyed 33000 emails recently.  they were spam items that had made it through my filter in the last (5) years.

[ken a.k.a OMK]

Hillary was asked to provide work emails. Her attorney's told her 33k were not work related and asked her what she wanted to do. She said she had no need for them anymore. I think later it was discovered some were work.  When SCP tells me how wrong I am we will get the real facts. 

[happyhoix]

Apr 17, 2018 10:46:07 GMT -5 ken a.k.a OMK said:

Hillary was asked to provide work emails. Her attorney's told her 33k were not work related and asked her what she wanted to do. She said she had no need for them anymore. I think later it was discovered some were work.  When SCP tells me how wrong I am we will get the real facts. 

Clearly, they were all emails placing hits on her enemies and arranging the transfer of children into the pizza prostitution ring, and she had to acid wash the entire inside of her computer to make sure no one found out.

If you start with the assumption the Clintons are subhuman, demonic hell beasts trying to destroy the country, it's easy to figure out what was in the emails - any red blooded apple pie eating American could do it.

[ken a.k.a OMK]

Apple pie.....  Now I want some. 

[travelingdeb]

Wow, I just now deleted about 500 emails off my government (federal) email, and I have thousands more to go, and I am a pretty low level employee. I could just imagine how much spam and junk emails that Hillary got.  I am supposed to clean it up every few months.  Makes sense to get rid of the junk just in case there is some kind of audit, will take much less time to dig through.  

Am I going to jail now

 

[thyme4change]

Apr 17, 2018 16:47:48 GMT -5 travelingdeb said:

Wow, I just now deleted about 500 emails off my government (federal) email, and I have thousands more to go, and I am a pretty low level employee. I could just imagine how much spam and junk emails that Hillary got.  I am supposed to clean it up every few months.  Makes sense to get rid of the junk just in case there is some kind of audit, will take much less time to dig through.  

Am I going to jail now

 

Clearly, you hate America.

[AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP]

Apr 17, 2018 10:39:13 GMT -5 thyme4change said:

Apr 17, 2018 7:52:25 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Oh, and to clarify the question: it is not "did she delete emails, scrub servers, and destroy devices with hammers"-- that is establish fact. I'm not asking you to read her mind-- the question isn't "why did she?". The question is:

Why do YOU THINK Hillary Clinton destroyed more than 33,000 emails which were under subpoena?

Maybe they were like the 33,000 emails I destroyed which were just my boss replying all to every single email with "Thanks" and then thinking of something more clever to say, so he reply all again with another one sentence thought, and then he thinks of a question, so he does reply all again with the question, and then two people feel obligated to answer the question and copy everyone, and then he responds to both of those by reply all "Thanks" and then he thinks of something else and he sends that too and then thinks of something else to say, usually a totally useless thought.

Were you required by law to keep them? Did you hire a company to use BleachBit and smash all of your devices to ensure that of those "thanks" emails from your boss could never be recovered? I mean, it's an answer- but it's not a reasonable answer in my opinion. All you'd have to do is imagine Trump did the same thing and then tell me honestly you'd give the same answer. Puh-Leeze.

[thyme4change]

Pssst. It was a joke - making fun of my boss.

[ken a.k.a OMK]

All you'd have to do is imagine Trump did the same thing and then tell me honestly you'd give the same answer. Puh-Leeze.

Trump doesn't email but his tweets, which are considered official by his administration, are here forever. All the lies and name calling. 

[dondub]

Will you people please feed my Hillary obsession by ignoring the true meaning of her email slight of hand? TYIA.

[travelingdeb]

Apr 17, 2018 16:59:51 GMT -5 thyme4change said:

Apr 17, 2018 16:47:48 GMT -5 travelingdeb said:

Wow, I just now deleted about 500 emails off my government (federal) email, and I have thousands more to go, and I am a pretty low level employee. I could just imagine how much spam and junk emails that Hillary got.  I am supposed to clean it up every few months.  Makes sense to get rid of the junk just in case there is some kind of audit, will take much less time to dig through.  

Am I going to jail now

 

Clearly, you hate America.

Of course....

[travelingdeb]

Apr 17, 2018 17:08:54 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Apr 17, 2018 10:39:13 GMT -5 thyme4change said:

Maybe they were like the 33,000 emails I destroyed which were just my boss replying all to every single email with "Thanks" and then thinking of something more clever to say, so he reply all again with another one sentence thought, and then he thinks of a question, so he does reply all again with the question, and then two people feel obligated to answer the question and copy everyone, and then he responds to both of those by reply all "Thanks" and then he thinks of something else and he sends that too and then thinks of something else to say, usually a totally useless thought.

Were you required by law to keep them? Did you hire a company to use BleachBit and smash all of your devices to ensure that of those "thanks" emails from your boss could never be recovered? I mean, it's an answer- but it's not a reasonable answer in my opinion. All you'd have to do is imagine Trump did the same thing and then tell me honestly you'd give the same answer. Puh-Leeze.

A lot of emails I am not required to keep.  A lot of her emails could have been the same, or not.  We would never really know.  But obviously you are on the side that they were required, and I (from personal experience) am on the side that they were not required. 

I would most definitely use a program if I was allowed to delete mass emails, why not?  Would save a ton of time....  I would love to be able to screen shot my day to day emails that I get, it's crazy!  And I am not that high on the hierarchy. 

[djAdvocate]

as another poster correctly stated, this boils down to whether you think Hillary is careless or evil. 

if you think she is evil, then the email content is what dondub said.  if you think she is careless, it is what i said.

[happyhoix]

Apr 17, 2018 17:08:54 GMT -5 AgeOfEnlightenmentSCP said:

Apr 17, 2018 10:39:13 GMT -5 thyme4change said:

Maybe they were like the 33,000 emails I destroyed which were just my boss replying all to every single email with "Thanks" and then thinking of something more clever to say, so he reply all again with another one sentence thought, and then he thinks of a question, so he does reply all again with the question, and then two people feel obligated to answer the question and copy everyone, and then he responds to both of those by reply all "Thanks" and then he thinks of something else and he sends that too and then thinks of something else to say, usually a totally useless thought.

Were you required by law to keep them? Did you hire a company to use BleachBit and smash all of your devices to ensure that of those "thanks" emails from your boss could never be recovered? I mean, it's an answer- but it's not a reasonable answer in my opinion. All you'd have to do is imagine Trump did the same thing and then tell me honestly you'd give the same answer. Puh-Leeze.

I would be happy as a pig in shit if the worst thing Trump did this month was delete some government emails.

Even if it was the worst thing this week - if he could just go one damn week where the worst thing he did was delete some government emails, and I didn't have to hear about any porn stars, or who he fired now, or which of his advisors he threw under the bus today, or who he insulted in his daily tweetstorm, or what ally he's offended  - that would be such a fucking relief.

[dezii]

Apr 16, 2018 15:23:09 GMT -5 swamp said:

Apr 16, 2018 15:14:39 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

The Pulitzer Prize winners for 2018 were announced today.  Sadly, the Conservative Treehouse did not win for Investigative Reporting.  In fact, they didn't win anything nor were they nominated for anything.

because it's the liberals who are part of the lame stream media protectors of the deep state and in hilary's pockets who do the nominating.  or something like that. 

really?....got a link or two?

[swamp]

Apr 18, 2018 8:14:35 GMT -5 dezii said:

Apr 16, 2018 15:23:09 GMT -5 swamp said:

because it's the liberals who are part of the lame stream media protectors of the deep state and in hilary's pockets who do the nominating.  or something like that. 

really?....got a link or two?

  It's sarcasm. 

[OldCoyote]

Apr 15, 2018 23:33:29 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

Apr 15, 2018 23:28:27 GMT -5 dondub said:

Only the strangely obsessive aren't over Hillary yet. Geez I was in 2003 and I mostly vote demo. Current POTUS crimes are much more interesting and relevant.

Funny you should mention Hillary. I saw this on a Facebook poster's page posted just six hours ago. The poster is obsessed with Hillary.

She does look sick!! she need to have that looked at.

[Tennesseer]

Apr 18, 2018 8:22:43 GMT -5 OldCoyote said:

Apr 15, 2018 23:33:29 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

Funny you should mention Hillary. I saw this on a Facebook poster's page posted just six hours ago. The poster is obsessed with Hillary.

She does look sick!! she need to have that looked at.

According to one poster, she was to die in September, 2016. The poster said in August of that year she was dying from late stage Parkinson's disease and only had two weeks to live.

Nothing to treat or have looked at. The dead can't get sick.