Possible now not the time for discussions

[deziloooooo]

between the Palastinian , {PA} Fatah and the Israeli's, possible best for all parties to just cool it as the fall out , with concessions having to be made might bring out the crazies . This is the focus on thei article from Debka, their file analist, interesting view on the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
www.debka.com/article/20739/
-----------------------------------------------------
An Israel diplomatic initiative now would draw an Arab revolt backlash

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis March 7, 2011, 7:50 PM (GMT+02:00)
Tags: Abbas Israel Netanyahu Palestinians Netanyahu: They don't want to talkDefense Minister Ehud Barak has joined the chorus of foreign and Israeli politicians and media pushing Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to launch a fresh initiative to end the stalemate in the peace process with the Palestinians. Monday, March 7, Barak told a radio interviewer that in his view Palestinian independence and a peace accord would not run counter to Israel's primary security interests and urged him to publish a new peace plan right now.

Barak was responding to a rare policy statement from the prime minister Sunday, March 6, at a joint news conference with visiting Chilean President Sebastian Pinera, whose government recognized a Palestinian state.

"We are willing to sit down and negotiate peace," said Netanyahu, "but the Palestinians have found a variety of excuses not to do so." He accused them of avoiding talks in the hope of persuading the international community to impose a solution on Israel. "Basically, they say, we don't have to negotiate, we can sit back, we can teach our children to idolize mass killers – they named a public square in Ramallah for a terrorist who murdered 400 innocent Israelis; they can do that and get away with it."

Netanyahu went on to list five gestures had made in the last year for advancing the peace process, including a 10-month freeze of settlement construction and the removal of numerous checkpoints.

Barak urged the prime minister not to wait to unveil his new peace program until late May when he has been invited to address both US Houses of Congress, but to go public now.

At the same time, debkafile's analysts offer four reasons why it is a bad idea to publish any peace plan at this time:
-----------------------------------------------------
{To read the article, including the four reasons why debka analist suggest such talks now are not in either israeli or the PA[Fatah} interests , click on link to go to the article}

[ed1066]

between the Palastinian , {PA} Fatah and the Israeli's

Fatah has no legal treaty authority, they are just a political party in the PA. The legal government of the PA is Hamas, and they need to be dealt with in the way Israel deals with terrorists...

A "deal" with Fatah is the equivalent of a foreign country making a deal with only the Republican Party in the US. They have some influence in certain areas perhaps, but they are not in charge...

[deziloooooo]

Mar 10, 2011 17:04:14 GMT -5 @ed1066 said:

between the Palastinian , {PA} Fatah and the Israeli's

Fatah has no legal treaty authority, they are just a political party in the PA. The legal government of the PA is Hamas, and they need to be dealt with in the way Israel deals with terrorists...

A "deal" with Fatah is the equivalent of a foreign country making a deal with only the Republican Party in the US. They have some influence in certain areas perhaps, but they are not in charge...

As usual , for you ed you didn't read the article, don't say you did, you didn't, you just saw the word "Hamas", {PA}, and you again went off on your same old, same old, all over again, having nothing to do with the suggestion of the analist of "debka" thoughts. You left out your accusation of me being in love/supporter of "Hamas and wanting the destruction of Israel by the way, tsk, tsk, can't forget that, just by mentioning the subject. Oh well.