Suspected Terrorist Held In Spokane

[ugonow]

seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014443763_spokanebomb10m.html

[mmhmm]

But ... but ... but ... he's not a Muslim!

[Tennesseer]

This surely is awkward.

[mmhmm]

Perhaps the Muslim community in Spokane don't know this guy is there! Surely, they would have converted his butt by now if they'd only known! Gee! I hope he's not a *gulp* Christian, or Jewish, or a Buddhist, or Hindu, or ... I'm getting a bit faint. Anyone know where we left the fainting couch?

[steff]

But according to posters here, all terrorists are Muslims.... the police must have made a mistake and arrested some innocent neo-nazi who just wanted to watch the parade.

[Deleted]

Mar 10, 2011 14:01:23 GMT -5 steff said:

But according to posters here, all terrorists are Muslims....

Can you show us where some posters have said "ALL" terrorists are Muslim? Don't come back with the "most Terrorists" line since you put it out there that some have said "ALL".

[Tennesseer]

Mar 10, 2011 14:08:27 GMT -5 @financialtexan said:

Mar 10, 2011 14:01:23 GMT -5 steff said:

But according to posters here, all terrorists are Muslims....

Can you show us where some posters have said "ALL" terrorists are Muslim? Don't come back with the "most Terrorists" line since you put it out there that some have said "ALL".

This would be a start-why not focus on all home-grown terrorists. It's not just Muslims and never has been.

Muslim congressman weeps at terror hearing
Controversial hearing reignites debate over how to combat homegrown Islamic terrorism
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42005790/ns/politics/

[Deleted]

And yet you still haven't shown any examples of a poster on this board stating that "ALL" terrorists are Muslim. I'm totally shocked!

steff didn't say anything about some hearing.....she threw down the gauntlet stating that there are posters here that have said all terrorists are Muslim. Why is no proof needed in those accusations? All she has to do is come back with (1) single instance of that being said seriously by a poster here.

[burnsattornincan]

It's not just Muslims and never has been.

A nice little mini McVeigh for all the Muslim loving liberals, I'm sure we'll be hearing this one about a billion times over. The fact of the matter is that the vast majority are Muslim therefore the vast majority of our efforts to combat terrorism should be directed toward them. I do not understand how this could not make perfect sense to anyone.

[Tennesseer]

financialtexan-the Search function will not accept words less than 4 letters. Therefore the term "all terrorists are Muslim" is not a searchable term at this time.

But I can assure you on more than one occasion a poster has said "While not all Muslims are terrorists, all terrorists are Muslim."

[Deleted]

Mar 10, 2011 14:38:47 GMT -5 burnsattornincan said:

It's not just Muslims and never has been.

A nice little mini McVeigh for all the Muslim loving liberals, I'm sure we'll be hearing this one about a billion times over. The fact of the matter is that the vast majority are Muslim therefore the vast majority of our efforts to combat terrorism should be directed toward them. I do not understand how this could not make perfect sense to anyone.

I agree. That's not to say that we should ONLY focus on terrorism by Muslims. All terrorism, regardless of origination should be scrutinized and dealt with accordingly.

[jkapp]

I think the left is confused: All terrorists are not Muslim...but all Muslims are terrorists

[Deleted]

Mar 10, 2011 14:40:48 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

financialtexan-the Search function will not accept words less than 4 letters. Therefore the term "all terrorists are Muslim" is not a searchable term at this time.

But I can assure you on more than one occasion a poster has said "While not all Muslims are terrorists, all terrorists are Muslim."

Obviously you know someone who has said this.....So.....why not just click on their name, find the post in question and reprint it? You would prove me wrong in a couple of clicks.

[ed1066]

This would be a start-why not focus on all home-grown terrorists. It's not just Muslims and never has been.

Muslim congressman weeps at terror hearing
Controversial hearing reignites debate over how to combat homegrown Islamic terrorism
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42005790/ns/politics/

"Mohammed Salman Hamdani was a fellow American who gave his life for other Americans," Ellison said, his voice trembling. "His life should not be defined as a member of an ethnic group or a member of a religion, but as an American who gave everything for his fellow citizens."

That's the most self-serving and hypocritical thing I have heard in a long time! If he should not be defined by his ethnicity or religion, why mention him specifically, and not the hundreds of other first responders who died on 9/11? What a crock of shit...do liberals actually fall for this garbage?

[Tennesseer]

financialtexan-to find such a quote would require searching the specific wording of the quote and I already stated the search function would not search for the exact words if the search word was less than 4 letters. And I am not going to search almost 30,000 posts in P&M for for specific words.

But I did find this one. If Mr. Burrns had not posted, I would not have thought of him. Now if ony Mr. Burns had added just one more .001 we would have had a winner:

Topic: Patriot Act (Read 569 times) burnsattornincan
Junior Contributor

Joined: Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 737
Karma: 256
[ Exalt ] Re: Patriot Act
« Result #257 on Feb 9, 2011, 13:27 »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't know the Tea Party was against this. So far there is nothing that I disagree with about their policies. Maybe they have in mind to go all the way with this fiasco of "homeland security" and the billions of dollars wasted since 911. Eliminate everything created since then and do it the old fashioned way by cutting out all the bs and simply applying racial profiling since 99.999 of terrorists are Muslim. Go ahead liberals, McVeigh yourselves away, you don't have much else.


Read more: notmsnmoney.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=burnsattornincan#ixzz1GEBMggIF

[Deleted]

Mar 10, 2011 14:50:03 GMT -5 @ed1066 said:

What a crock of shit...do liberals actually fall for this garbage?

It's not just liberals, but the answer is YES.....many people fall for crap like that.

[Deleted]

Mar 10, 2011 14:53:17 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

financialtexan-to find such a quote would require searching the specific wording of the quote and I already stated the search function would not search for the exact words if the search word was less than 4 letters. And I am not going to search almost 30,000 posts in P&M for for specific words.

But I did find this one. If Mr. Burrns had not posted, I would not have thought of him. Now if ony Mr. Burns had added just one more .001 we would have had a winner:

Topic: Patriot Act (Read 569 times) burnsattornincan
Junior Contributor

Joined: Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 737
Karma: 256
[ Exalt ] Re: Patriot Act
« Result #257 on Feb 9, 2011, 13:27 »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't know the Tea Party was against this. So far there is nothing that I disagree with about their policies. Maybe they have in mind to go all the way with this fiasco of "homeland security" and the billions of dollars wasted since 911. Eliminate everything created since then and do it the old fashioned way by cutting out all the bs and simply applying racial profiling since 99.999 of terrorists are Muslim. Go ahead liberals, McVeigh yourselves away, you don't have much else.


Read more: notmsnmoney.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=burnsattornincan#ixzz1GEBMggIF

I would have accepted that had Michael Jordan not said there was a 99.999% chance of him staying retired the 2nd time. Although I'm sure he himself would like to forget his Wizards days.

[mmhmm]

Mar 10, 2011 14:25:13 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

Mar 10, 2011 14:08:27 GMT -5 @financialtexan said:

Can you show us where some posters have said "ALL" terrorists are Muslim? Don't come back with the "most Terrorists" line since you put it out there that some have said "ALL".

This would be a start-why not focus on all home-grown terrorists. It's not just Muslims and never has been.

Muslim congressman weeps at terror hearing
Controversial hearing reignites debate over how to combat homegrown Islamic terrorism
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42005790/ns/politics/

I think that's been the point for many of us, Tennesseer. We don't need to be concentrating on only Islamic terrorists. These guys are out there, too, and if we're going to talk about terrorism, we need to talk about terrorism from all its nefarious sources.

[mmhmm]

Hee! I don't read burns, Tennesseer, but I see you can still count on him if you're looking for a patently ridiculous statement! ;D

[burnsattornincan]

Ha ha!!! Thanks Tenn!

So today I said only 99% of terrorists are Muslim. You liberals must be slowly brainwashing me!!!

[mmhmm]

Mar 10, 2011 14:46:22 GMT -5 @financialtexan said:

Mar 10, 2011 14:40:48 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

financialtexan-the Search function will not accept words less than 4 letters. Therefore the term "all terrorists are Muslim" is not a searchable term at this time.

But I can assure you on more than one occasion a poster has said "While not all Muslims are terrorists, all terrorists are Muslim."

Obviously you know someone who has said this.....So.....why not just click on their name, find the post in question and reprint it? You would prove me wrong in a couple of clicks.

He did. I'd say 99.999% is close enough to 100% to avoid quibbling, wouldn't you?

[Tennesseer]

Now in this country, we had the Oklahoma City bombing (non-Muslim terrorist), 9/11 (Muslim terrorists), Atlanta Olympics bombing (non-Muslim terrorist), Unabomber (non-Muslim) shoe bomber (Muslim terrorist) underwear bomber (Muslim terrorist) NYC SUV bomber( Muslim terrorist) and now the Spokane MLK parade bomber (non-Muslim bomber), four men around the Syracuse NY area lanning an attack (Muslims).

So at least in the United States, 99.999% of recent potential and actual terrorist acts were not committed by Muslims. If I missed another attack I apologize. Those are just the ones I remember.

[burnsattornincan]

Hee! I don't read burns

Thanks ok darlin, I've got enough points to last me a lifetime.

[Deleted]

Mar 10, 2011 14:59:30 GMT -5 mmhmm said:

Mar 10, 2011 14:25:13 GMT -5 Tennesseer said:

This would be a start-why not focus on all home-grown terrorists. It's not just Muslims and never has been.

Muslim congressman weeps at terror hearing
Controversial hearing reignites debate over how to combat homegrown Islamic terrorism
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42005790/ns/politics/

I think that's been the point for many of us, Tennesseer. We don't need to be concentrating on only Islamic terrorists. These guys are out there, too, and if we're going to talk about terrorism, we need to talk about terrorism from all its nefarious sources.

I won't dispute the fact that all terrorism should be looked into, regardless of its source. I've said as much in this very thread. While I may agree or disagree with the hearing being held by Rep. King, I will say that if 7 to 9 times out of 10 it's an act of terrorism by Muslims then that should get a larger microscope aimed towards it. As someone else said......body count is overwhelmingly in favor of Muslim terrorists.

[jarhead1976]

Islams humanity around the world.. ........................................Islam's Latest Contributions to Peace
"Mohammed is God's apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless
to the unbelievers but merciful to one another" Quran 48:29

2011.03.09 (Cairo, Egypt) - Nine Copts, including a child, are killed and over a hundred more injured when a Muslim mob hurls firebombs and shoots into a group protesting a church burning.
2011.03.09 (Adezai, Pakistan) - A Shahid suicide bomber detonates at the funeral of the wife of a peace committee member, sending over 40 souls to Allah.
2011.03.08 (Djelfa, Algeria) - Fundamentalist bombers attack a group of bird hunters, killing five.
2011.03.08 (Abu Ghraib, Iraq) - A government employee is dragged out of his home and stabbed to death in front of his family.
2011.03.08 (Faisalabad, Pakistan) - Islamists detonate a massive bomb at a gas station, incinerating over thirty innocents.
2011.03.08 (Asendabo, Ethiopia) - Two Christians are killed when angry Muslims rampage through their community, burning churches and homes.

[burnsattornincan]

If I missed another attack I apologize.

It isn't just the carried out attacks you missed, it is the abundance of thwarted attacks.

[Tennesseer]

Mar 10, 2011 15:01:51 GMT -5 burnsattornincan said:

Ha ha!!! Thanks Tenn!

So today I said only 99% of terrorists are Muslim. You liberals must be slowly brainwashing me!!!

Mr. Burns- I did not mean to single you out. If you had not posted, your literary body of work would not have come to my mind.

Others have said it besides you.

[Tennesseer]

Mar 10, 2011 15:06:56 GMT -5 burnsattornincan said:

If I missed another attack I apologize.

It isn't just the carried out attacks you missed, it is the abundance of thwarted attacks.

Other than 9/11, Oklahoma City, Atlanta and the Unabomber, all the others listed were unsuccessful. Even the Unabomber was eventually thwarted by his brother.

[ed1066]

I will say that if 7 to 9 times out of 10 it's an act of terrorism by Muslims then that should get a larger microscope aimed towards it. As someone else said......body count is overwhelmingly in favor of Muslim terrorists.

Exactly. It's just common sense. If someone has cancer and a hangnail, which one would you treat first and more aggressively? Based on the liberal logic, they are suggesting both be given equal priority. Does that make sense?

[burnsattornincan]

Mr. Burns- I did not mean to single you out.

Don't be shy Mr. Tennesseer, single me out anytime you wish. Just be sure you are stating facts, which this time you only missed by 1/1000 of a percent. Close, but not quite!