Read this one with a open mind..it's from a senior corespondent of AlJazeer, they do have their own agenda, not saying it's true, not saying it's false, probably a bit of both but also heavier on the possibility of being more right then wrong in many cases.
The important thing is to me, unless there is a government in Kabul that can get the trust of the Afghan people, semi honest, and can provides basic services beyond the confines of the Capital, i doubt we can succeed here and it seems there is no one ready to come forward to take karzi and his peoples place , IMHO.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/20113718714585594.html#----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinion
Failing in Afghanistan successfully
Despite hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of troops, the US is unable to conclude its longest war.
Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera Senior Political Analyst Last Modified: 07 Mar 2011 19:06 GMT
" The recent killing of nine Afghan children has put the spotlight on the US military's new aggressive methods [AFP]
While we have been fixated on successive Arab breakthroughs and victories against tyranny and extremism, Washington is failing miserably but discreetly in Afghanistan.
The American media's one-obsession-at-a-time coverage of global affairs might have put the spotlight on President Obama's slow and poor reaction to the breathtaking developments starting in Tunisia and Egypt. But they spared him embarrassing questions about continued escalation and deaths in Afghanistan.
In spite of its international coalition, multiple strategies, hundreds of billions of dollars, and a surge of tens of thousands of troops, the US is unable to conclude its longest war yet or at least reverse its trend.
Recent "reports" from the war front have been of two kinds. Some official or analytical in nature and heavily circulated in Washington portray a war going terribly well. On the other hand, hard news from the ground tell a story of US fatigue, backtracking and tactical withdrawals or redeployments which do not bode well for defeating the Taliban or forcing them to the negotiations' table.
For example, while the US military's decision to withdraw from the Pech valley was justified on tactical need to redeploy troops for the task of "protecting the population", keen observers saw it as a humiliating retreat from what the Pentagon previously called a very strategic position and sacrificed some hundred soldiers defending it.
Likewise, strategic analysts close to the administration speak triumphantly of US surge and hi-tech firepower inflicting terrible cost on the Taliban, killing many insurgents and driving many more from their sanctuaries.
But news from the war front show the Taliban unrelenting, mounting counterattacks and escalating the war especially in areas where the US has "surged" its troops. And while the majority of the 400 Afghan districts are "calmer", they remain mostly out of Kabul's control"
--------------------------------------------------------------
{click on links to read article}