kent
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 16:13:46 GMT -5
Posts: 3,594
|
Post by kent on May 23, 2014 20:08:24 GMT -5
|
|
Tennesseer
Member Emeritus
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:58:42 GMT -5
Posts: 64,924
|
Post by Tennesseer on May 23, 2014 20:16:28 GMT -5
This may be from your link (it's not working, at least for me). The below makes sense to me. "In Sanders’ defense, there may be a number of good reasons not to give the VA Secretary expansive power to fire executives. The civil service system has a number of checks and balances to protect government employees. Many people view them as excessively biased in favor of government workers, and the result of unionization. In fact, though, they are designed to prevent a de facto return to the spoils system, in which an incoming president’s administration would purge senior officials from the opposite party and install members of their own party. Making it easy to fire senior federal executives, who are expected to be non-partisan in their work, would make it possible for future VA heads to remake the agency in their own ideological mode." See more at: www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/05/22/Senate-Dems-Block-Bill-Make-Firing-VA-Execs-Easier#sthash.aHIrPhaT.dpuf
|
|
djAdvocate
Member Emeritus
only posting when the mood strikes me.
Joined: Jun 21, 2011 12:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 76,714
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000307"}
|
Post by djAdvocate on May 23, 2014 20:32:10 GMT -5
i am not sure they should fire him.
my reasoning is twofold:
1) he didn't actually do anything wrong. 2) firing him won't fix the problem.
you want to fire him? go ahead. but you had better come up with a REAL solution BEFORE you do.
|
|