Deleted
Joined: May 6, 2024 17:57:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 17:34:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Feb 4, 2011 17:46:30 GMT -5
Correlation does not equal causation.
|
|
❤ mollymouser ❤
Senior Associate
Sarcasm is my Superpower
Crazy Cat Lady
Joined: Dec 18, 2010 16:09:58 GMT -5
Posts: 12,857
Today's Mood: Gen X ... so I'm sarcastic and annoyed
Location: Central California
Favorite Drink: Diet Mountain Dew
|
Post by ❤ mollymouser ❤ on Feb 4, 2011 17:53:53 GMT -5
I wonder if working moms are making EVERYONE fat? And maybe THEY are behind GLOBAL WARMING!?!?! And unrest in the Middle East!?!?
::: rolls eyes / insert sarcasm tag here :::
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 6, 2024 17:57:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 17:57:18 GMT -5
I wonder if working moms are making EVERYONE fat? And maybe THEY are behind GLOBAL WARMING!?!?! And unrest in the Middle East!?!? ::: rolls eyes / insert sarcasm tag here ::: This is the same way I felt. Are working moms behind all those grown man and woman that are over 300-400 lbs or so. Maybe the mothers of all the past participants of the biggest loser show should have stayed home with their child..
|
|
|
Post by debtheaven on Feb 4, 2011 18:05:25 GMT -5
What a bunch of CARP!!! The only one in our family of six who is somewhat overweight is me (size 12). All our four kids are stick insects.
It may have something to do with our living in Europe where eating habits are much healthier, despite all the delicious pastry and cheese. But I'm sure as heck that it has ZERO to do with my working!!!
Caveat: I'm working several evenings / nights now. So I do use more "ready meals" than I did before, when I wasn't working evenings or getting home so late. Yet six months later, my kids are STILL stick insects.
Carl, you're Haitian, you speak French. "C'est chercher midi à 14 heures." (Not sure you have that expression in Haiti, but it means looking for something where you are sure not to find it.)
This is utter and total CARP as far as I am concerned.
I am SICK TO DEATH of working moms getting such a bad rap.
|
|
|
Post by kristi28 on Feb 4, 2011 18:26:31 GMT -5
I'm sure that i will get flamed for this, but I really liked this article. The author of the study did a great job explaining what they did and did not learn from their results. She says "It's not causal, its an association". The article goes on to explain some possible explanations for the association and describe the challenges for working families.
Maybe they will end up deciding that after-school programs which are utilized primarily by working mothers are feeding the children too much junk food and not letting them run around. This study is not a condemnation of working, and I don't know why people want to see it that way.
|
|
jk70
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 3, 2011 16:39:57 GMT -5
Posts: 154
|
Post by jk70 on Feb 4, 2011 18:39:02 GMT -5
Not that I agree with any of the article but you can't take your situation and say, "aha, that didn't happen to us, therefore it's not true"
|
|
april47
Familiar Member
Joined: Jan 8, 2011 18:44:29 GMT -5
Posts: 512
|
Post by april47 on Feb 4, 2011 18:39:23 GMT -5
OK how does it explain the obesity of people of "a certain age"? My mom stayed home and cooked from scratch. There wasn't fast food at every corner. We didn't have money for junk food. I have faught obesity since forever! Stupid article.
|
|
busymom
Distinguished Associate
Why is the rum always gone? Oh...that's why.
Joined: Dec 25, 2010 21:09:36 GMT -5
Posts: 28,407
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"https://cdn.nickpic.host/images/IPauJ5.jpg","color":""}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 0D317F
Mini-Profile Text Color: 0D317F
|
Post by busymom on Feb 4, 2011 18:54:47 GMT -5
I've done both the stay-at-home Mom gig, and the working Mom gig. Have you noticed how EVERYTHING is always the Mom's fault (how about looking at the Dad's involvement?!)
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 6, 2024 17:57:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 18:57:31 GMT -5
Have you noticed how EVERYTHING is always the Mom's fault (how about looking at the Dad's involvement?!) LOL, so true! I guess fathers can never mess up their kids
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 6, 2024 17:57:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2011 19:04:10 GMT -5
Carl, you're Haitian, you speak French. "C'est chercher midi à 14 heures." (Not sure you have that expression in Haiti, but it means looking for something where you are sure not to find it.) Bien sur
|
|
|
Post by debtheaven on Feb 4, 2011 19:10:35 GMT -5
Not that I agree with any of the article but you can't take your situation and say, "aha, that didn't happen to us, therefore it's not true"
Fair enough! You are right.
Have you noticed how EVERYTHING is always the Mom's fault (how about looking at the Dad's involvement?!)
Yes I have indeed, and personally I am sick to death of it!
Carl I wasn't sure LOL. Wink back! (I'm on a Mac and the smilies I post don't show up for me.)
|
|
|
Post by debtheaven on Feb 4, 2011 19:21:08 GMT -5
Kristi I reread the article (it's really late here) and I can see your POV. There is certainly no one cause for this, and there is certainly no one solution either.
But, working moms generally do get a very bad rap!
|
|
|
Post by kristi28 on Feb 4, 2011 21:22:03 GMT -5
Debt: Having been a working mom, a SAHM, and now working part time, I have come to the conclusion that no matter what I choose, someone will think that I am an awful parent. I have to be satisfied that I am doing what is best for me and mine, and not worry too much about it. That being said, I am also a statistician. I just love it when you actually read a study where the author realizes that the statistics can only tell you about correlation, not causation. This author did that and some people (especially the one cited in the article) are trying to turn her work into an indictment of working parents. I guess you get more attention if you try to make it controversial.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: May 6, 2024 17:57:12 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2011 2:06:59 GMT -5
I guess you get more attention if you try to make it controversial. No one would read it if it wasn't controversial.
|
|
DVM gone riding
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 23:04:13 GMT -5
Posts: 3,383
Favorite Drink: Coffee!!
|
Post by DVM gone riding on Feb 5, 2011 12:35:47 GMT -5
This is called "soft" science for a reason. They can't PROVE that it causes it, but they have statistically shown that they are linked-which depending on their statistical analysis is actually a big deal AND it makes a lot of sense, in that working mom's have less time and might cook/get less healthy meals together. They did also point out that eating together was a big part of it, so those working moms that take the time to make their families eat together don't need to feel guilty! But the working mom's that get dinner 3/5 times a week from McD's probably SHOULD feel guilty!
|
|
kindthatjingles
Familiar Member
Joined: Feb 5, 2011 19:06:06 GMT -5
Posts: 622
|
Post by kindthatjingles on Feb 5, 2011 19:12:30 GMT -5
First post ever.. Long time Lurker
I am a working Divorced Mom, and we have one drive thru night a week. Other than that, I cook and pack lunches. But one night a week the Mama needs a break!
|
|
|
Post by The Walk of the Penguin Mich on Feb 5, 2011 21:18:52 GMT -5
The author of the study did a great job explaining what they did and did not learn from their results. She says "It's not causal, its an association".
The problem with this is that even though the author made this distinction, people are not reading it this way. All that you have to do is look at the comments on this thread.
Correlation does not equal causation and the popular press interpretation of the article interprets the research exactly this way. Not only that, sheeple are just as willing to believe someone else's (incorrect) interpretation of the data.
|
|
cronewitch
Junior Associate
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 21:44:20 GMT -5
Posts: 5,974
|
Post by cronewitch on Feb 7, 2011 3:50:57 GMT -5
First post ever.. Long time Lurker I am a working Divorced Mom, and we have one drive thru night a week. Other than that, I cook and pack lunches. But one night a week the Mama needs a break! Welcome, you help make the point. When mother's don't work they don't eat out every week because they aren't needing a break. When I was a child eating out was a very rare treat maybe once a year. It is more common in most families because people are richer now and fast food is more available but I have known working moms that let the latchkey kids order pizza just because they were stuck home all summer alone and she didn't take the time to force them to eat healthy. Her kids were old enough legally to be alone like 13-14 and if she had to go home and make dinner they wouldn't eat until after 7. Kids like that might also make mac and cheese or something for lunch that could pack on pounds over the childhood. They didn't say the kids gained fast just a couple of pounds a year that only takes about 7,000 calories extra. If those same kids aren't allowed to run and play but made to stay home while she was working they might not burn so many calories.
|
|
telephus44
Well-Known Member
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 10:20:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,259
|
Post by telephus44 on Feb 7, 2011 11:30:49 GMT -5
I'm glad to see that in addition to all of the other horrible things I've bestowed upon my son, I am now also going to make him fat.
Woo-hoo!
Actually, this makes me want to check out that blog (Working Moms Against Guilt).
|
|
NomoreDramaQ1015
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:26:32 GMT -5
Posts: 47,271
|
Post by NomoreDramaQ1015 on Feb 7, 2011 11:35:09 GMT -5
Aww crap, I saw on GMA last week that according to a pediatrician my kid is going to be fat because I feed her rice cereal. I've also read taht what I ate while she was in utero will make her fat. I also work so that is going to make her fat! Ah well, at least at this rate she will get her own TLC speacil
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,414
|
Post by thyme4change on Feb 7, 2011 11:53:00 GMT -5
I'm glad this article is posted. I'm sick of everyone thinking I'm so perfect.
|
|
dividend
Established Member
It's 5:00 somewhere.
Joined: Dec 23, 2010 21:31:29 GMT -5
Posts: 387
|
Post by dividend on Feb 8, 2011 13:06:50 GMT -5
So one of my friends is the primary breadwinner in her marriage, with a 7 year old son. She posted on Facebook today that she felt attacked by all the recent press about working mothers, and a bunch of her other friends joined in, calling it, "oppression", "a consipiracy," and "an attempt to keep working mothers down," and citing the women's rights movement. I tried to point out that it's a good thing to examine both sides of an issue, and that that kind of thinking stifles intelligent discourse about both sides of an issue, but I got jumped all over. I guess as the only non-mother in the discussion, my opinions have no value. Am I wrong though? Are there issues which shouldn't be critically examined? Are the choices of mothers some kind of sacred cow? Do I just not get it because I don't have children?
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,414
|
Post by thyme4change on Feb 8, 2011 13:14:02 GMT -5
One thing that we don't want to get near is creating an atmosphere where you have to choose between the academically studied and scientifically approved best way to raise children and the way women want to live. So many women have already chosen to be child-free because they don't want to deal with it. We are already at a zero-population growth, with our next generation being populated by immigrants. If you look at countries before us that have reduced their birth rates over time, there are economic consequences.
If half of the 71% of those mothers chose not to have kids, our country would be really boned in 20 years. So, we can examine anything you want - but we need to tread carefully because we could have some really unintended consequences. The best thing to do is examine the actual problems and try to fix those, rather than just say "Working moms statistically don't provide healthy living conditions." Why don't we really focus on what is wrong with health of all the children - something any mom could benefit from.
|
|
NomoreDramaQ1015
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:26:32 GMT -5
Posts: 47,271
|
Post by NomoreDramaQ1015 on Feb 8, 2011 13:50:33 GMT -5
There is examining and then there is what the media does. Like Mich1 said correlation does not equal causation and the author is very careful to point that out when talking to the press.
HOWEVER, that is not going to sell news or boost ratings like "Working mothers make their children fat!". That's going to get a lot more people to tune in and listen to you than discussing the actual study and actual paper.
I am all for discussion, but it should be on the evidence that actually exists, not the hyped up media version of the information.
But most people will not do a literature dig to find the actual paper and make a decision based on that. They are going to listen to CNN and jump on the bandwagon because that makes them feel better about the choices they made.
Like GMA with the pediatrician that says rice cereal makes kids fat.
Not really what he was talking about, he was discussing more feeding children heavily processed foods and getting back to whole foods.
But that is boring and GMA doesn't want you to turn the channel to the Today Show so before going to commerical saying "Up next, Rice Cereal makes your child fat!" is going to keep you tuned in to see what they are talking about.
|
|
|
Post by kristi28 on Feb 8, 2011 13:58:04 GMT -5
Studies like this are exactly how researchers go about finding the real underlying causes, though. Now that they have learned that there is a difference between the averages for working and nonworking mothers, they can go and look for other things that differ between the two groups.
Suppose that the working mothers buy an average of three fast food meals per week for their families and the nonworking mothers buy only one. Then, fast food is causing weight gain, which makes it appear that working mothers have higher BMI children. However, both types of mothers who don't buy too much fast food are better off than either kind of mother who does.
|
|
NomoreDramaQ1015
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 20, 2010 14:26:32 GMT -5
Posts: 47,271
|
Post by NomoreDramaQ1015 on Feb 8, 2011 14:01:22 GMT -5
Studies like this are exactly how researchers go about finding the real underlying causes
In general lay people do not know this. They do not know nor care how scientific studies work. They rely on the media to give them this information.
It's not the study that is the problem, it is how the media presents the story.
Most people will change the channel if you start to go into what an actual scientific study is and how correlation does not equal causation blah blah.
Most people are going to stop here:
The length of a mother's employment is associated with an increase in her child's body mass index, according to a study in the journal Child Development
They are not going to go here:
Wen-Jui Han, an associate professor at Columbia University School of Social Work, who read the study, said the results do not imply that a working mom's children are doomed to obesity or here:
It's not causal, it's an association," said lead author Taryn Morrissey about the trends. "Nobody found a single smoking gun as a cause of childhood obesity. We found quite a small, but (statistically) significant increase in the body mass index of children. This increase is associated with maternal employment."
The problem isn't studies it is the media sensationalizing to get ratings rather than being responsible and reporting studies as they are written.
|
|
thyme4change
Community Leader
Joined: Dec 26, 2010 13:54:08 GMT -5
Posts: 40,414
|
Post by thyme4change on Feb 8, 2011 14:01:50 GMT -5
Don't we already know what makes kids fat?
|
|
Clifford
Established Member
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 15:19:53 GMT -5
Posts: 422
|
Post by Clifford on Feb 8, 2011 14:22:40 GMT -5
I love how researchers choose to examine one variable - in this case mothers' working hours - when the topic clearly calls for a multi-variate analysis to see which of many factors is significant. I could come up with over 100 potential reasons for kids' obesity. Who's to say that some or all don't contribute as much or more than whether or not the mom is at work? They just picked this one so they could get published, because no one is interested in reading that if the two parents were kind of heavy, and the grandparents were kind of heavy, then the kids might just turn out kind of heavy. Having said all that, since my wife stays at home, I will support their conclusions.
|
|
|
Post by justwhoever on Feb 8, 2011 14:27:38 GMT -5
I heard on the radio just the other day that a new study(didn't say where or who) found that babies who are given solids before 1 yr are going to be overweight by 3 yrs old. And also if the parents didn't go to college then they will also be overweight.
I laughed. I did not go to college and none of my kids are overweight. And all of them had solids before a yr old.
|
|